Xiaomi Mi Gamme
Processeur: unknown, Intel Atom x5 Z8500, Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956, Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855Carte graphique: unknown, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Qualcomm Adreno 330, Qualcomm Adreno 405, Qualcomm Adreno 418, Qualcomm Adreno 430, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 509, Qualcomm Adreno 510, Qualcomm Adreno 530, Qualcomm Adreno 540, Qualcomm Adreno 630, Qualcomm Adreno 640
Écran: 0.50 pouces, 5.00 pouces, 5.15 pouces, 5.20 pouces, 5.50 pouces, 5.70 pouces, 5.84 pouces, 5.99 pouces, 6.00 pouces, 6.39 pouces, 6.40 pouces, 6.44 pouces, 6.90 pouces, 7.90 pouces
Poids: 0.129kg, 0.13kg, 0.132kg, 0.133kg, 0.135kg, 0.145kg, 0.149kg, 0.15kg, 0.161kg, 0.163kg, 0.165kg, 0.166kg, 0.168kg, 0.185kg, 0.187kg, 0.189kg, 0.203kg, 0.209kg, 0.211kg, 0.218kg, 0.221kg, 0.255kg, 0.332kg
Prix: 0, 200, 210, 250, 300, 350, 400, 470, 500, 600, 799 euros
Moyenne de 600 notes (à partir de 1229 critiques)
Xiaomi Mi 4i
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 4iProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Écran: 5.00 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.13kg
Prix: 300 euros
Liens: Mi 4i (Modèle)
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it, for this closer look at the Xiaomi Mi 4i! There’s no denying that this is a really good phone that features an unbeatable price tag, but Xiaomi’s marketing of the Mi 4i being an “affordable flagship” is quite misleading. Affordable, definitely, but flagship, not quite. While you do get excellent design and build quality, great display, impressive battery life, and a good software experience, its processing package, and the availability of just 16 GB of non-expandable storage puts this device in the mid-range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/29/2015
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4i bridges the gap between the flagship Mi series and the Redmi lot, a likable gadget but not in the sense of a pet - it may be an affordable phone but not underpowered and full of compromise. No, on paper everything seems near perfect for the Mi 4i. And for the most part, the Xiaomi Mi 4i lives up to its promise. Its 5" 1080p screen is great and the imaging department is quite capable as well. Both the 13MP primary unit and the 5MP selfie cam produce good images with great detail and subtle processing. The thoughtful design results in a great handling experience, the connectivity options are above average, and the battery backup is solid.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/10/2015
Xiaomi Mi Note Pro
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Note ProProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 430
Écran: 5.70 pouces, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Poids: 0.161kg
Prix: 500 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
My only other niggles with the Pro are a keyboard backlight that's either on or off with no adjustment for duration or brightness, a rather mundane one-megapixel webcam, and cooling fans that when working full-tilt can be a little intrusive.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
As our first Xiaomi phone ever to be reviewed, there are a lot of thoughts to be had on this phone, more than a usual review. However, in order to discuss them we need to start by talking about what we’ve learned throughout the testing process. Probably the best place to start is design. Xiaomi is clearly capable of creating a phone that is well designed, and it shows with the Mi Note line.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/11/2015
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The specs are mighty fine with this, we’re not denying that, but it still performs slightly behind the Note5 in many areas. Furthermore, it doesn’t have the nearly the same amount of diversified features that cater to power users, so its particular user experience might be thought of as limiting to some folks. The low cost and drool worthy specs sheet give the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro a lot of credibility in generating attention, however, it still lacks the solid performance and meaningful experiences to really give the Note5, as well as some other noteworthy phones in the same caliber, any sort of threat.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/11/2015
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
At the end of the day, I can’t see many AndroidBeat readers opting to import one of these, though. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong with the Mi Note Pro, in some ways it’s an Android powerhouse. But at the same time, you can get more functions, more flexibility, more familiarity, and more manufacturer and retailer support from a vanilla Galaxy Note 4 for roughly the same outlay, now at summer 2015 pricing in most of the world.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2015
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it for this in-depth look at the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro! Xiaomi claims that the Mi Note Pro is the best smartphone in the world, and while that statement is certainly subjective, the device does manage to impress in key aspects, with regards to build quality, performance, the camera, software, and the overall user experience. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is definitely a worthy competitor to the current crop of Android flagships, and it is actually quite a shame that, at least for now, more people won’t be able to get their hands on it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/09/2015
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/05/2017
Xiaomi Mi 4c
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 4cProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 418
Écran: 5.00 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.132kg
Prix: 300 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Based on the specs, build quality and software alone, the answer is a resounding yes. The Mi4C is well made, has a fantastic 1080p screen, sports a wonderful camera and is compact and comfortable to use. It also has one of the best Android UI skins on the block in the shape of MIUI 7 – even if it does copy Apple's iOS to an almost shameless degree.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/18/2015
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
On paper the Xiaomi Mi 4C is an excellent mid-range Android phone, with a fantastic spec for the money - it's half the price of the Nexus 5X and can be just as fast. There's a generous battery, a fairly good camera and some interesting new features such as USB-C. However, our benchmarking showed overheating to be a problem, and the issues we experienced with software out of the box make it difficult to recommend to less techie users.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/12/2015
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 80% performances: 60% équipement: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The bottom line is this: If you are on a budget, want the best bang-for-buck, and don't mind to manually pamper the phone on a regular basis, the Mi 4c is certainly a hard choice to overlook.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/02/2015
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We aren't sure if the Xiaomi Mi 4c was a necessary upgrade over the Mi 4i, but we are still glad for its existence. The Mi 4c has a lot going on for it - it is beautiful and comfy, it punches above its class when it comes to performance, it has an amazing still camera and great MIUI 7 interface.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/21/2015
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
All in all, the Xiaomi Mi4c is a jack of all trades, an excellent all-round 5-inch smartphone. It’s compact, light, well designed and well built. The screen is top notch, and so is the camera. It packs a processor that wouldn’t be out of place in a $500 phone. The storage is fast, although 16GB feels cramped in this day and age. Sure, you can go for the 3GB/32GB version, but at $275 it almost as much as the proper Mi4, or the Meizu MX5. Too bad there is no 2GB/32GB model under the $250 mark. For the time being, only the 2GB/16GB model is available, in black and white. If you want a pink, yellow or cyan Mi4c, or if you want the 3GB/32GB version, you’ll have to wait.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/15/2015
Xiaomi Mi4
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi4Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 330
Écran: 0.50 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.149kg
Prix: 300 euros
Liens: Mi4 (Modèle)
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi4 Overseas Edition is a strange phone. It’s a 3G flagship in an era of 4G mainstream phones, so it’s clearly not a good choice for people who want to use the fastest possible mobile data standard. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, because 4G is simply not available in a lot of markets, and coverage is spotty even in countries that already have a 4G infrastructure. If you live in a country with no 4G, or in a remote location where you can only use 3G, the watered down Mi4 starts to make perfect sense. The Mi4 Overseas Edition sells for $227 via GearBest, but if you pounce over the next few weeks, you can use coupon GBMI4 to get it down to $205 (valid till January 15). Basically the Mi4W costs as much as a mid-range phone. It’s actually slightly cheaper than the Mi4c we had a chance to review a couple of months ago.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/10/2015
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi MiPad 2Processeur: Intel Atom x5 Z8500
Carte graphique: Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Écran: 7.90 pouces, 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixels
Poids: 0.332kg
Prix: 200 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Clone de l’Ipad Mini. Le constructeur chinois Xiaomi lance sur le marché une tablette de 7,9 pouces nommée MiPad 2, qui est un clone de l’Ipad Mini d’Apple. Contrairement à la tablette d’Apple, la MiPad 2 qui est animée par l’OS Android de Google est un produit relativement abordable. Elle a beaucoup à offrir pour son prix…
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Entre son écran qui est un peu décevant, notamment en raison des fuites de lumière, ses performances très en retraits, même par rapport à la première génération de Mi Pad, et sa partie logicielle encore indisponible en français à l'heure de la rédaction de ces lignes, la Mi Pad 2 déçoit. Difficile en l'état de la conseiller donc, d'autant qu'elle entre en concurrence directe avec de très bons produits comme la très bonne Shield Tablet de Nvidia, vendue au même prix, ou encore l'excellent iPad mini 2, encore en vente pour 100 euros de plus environ.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Entre son écran qui est un peu décevant, notamment en raison des fuites de lumière, ses performances très en retraits, même par rapport à la première génération de Mi Pad, et sa partie logicielle encore indisponible en français à l'heure de la rédaction de ces lignes, la Mi Pad 2 déçoit. Difficile en l'état de la conseiller donc, d'autant qu'elle entre en concurrence directe avec de très bons produits comme la très bonne Shield Tablet de Nvidia, vendue au même prix, ou encore l'excellent iPad mini 2, encore en vente pour 100 euros de plus environ.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Once you dive into the world of Mi, it is important to mention that you are joining a large and friendly community of technology enthusiasts. This does not have to matter to you, but the culture around the brand is light-hearted and filled with fun mascots and accessories. Xiaomi pays close attention to its users, if ever you wanted to help influence what the next manufacturer built device or software will include, this is the ecosystem that you want to get involved with.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Once you dive into the world of Mi, it is important to mention that you are joining a large and friendly community of technology enthusiasts. This does not have to matter to you, but the culture around the brand is light-hearted and filled with fun mascots and accessories. Xiaomi pays close attention to its users, if ever you wanted to help influence what the next manufacturer built device or software will include, this is the ecosystem that you want to get involved with.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
If money is no object then the iPad mini 4 is the superior tablet here with all-round quality on offer. That's not to say the Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is bad, though. We're really impressed with it and you can save a lot of cash this way. However, prepare yourself for a slightly odd Android experience which requires some tweaking due to its Chinese roots.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
If money is no object then the iPad mini 4 is the superior tablet here with all-round quality on offer. That's not to say the Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is bad, though. We're really impressed with it and you can save a lot of cash this way. However, prepare yourself for a slightly odd Android experience which requires some tweaking due to its Chinese roots.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Whether Xiaomi intended to or not, the Mi Pad 2 is an Android tablet disguised as an iPad mini. This may disgust you or be exactly what you're looking for. Either way, we can't deny that this is a well-made, stylish tablet with decent specs for the price. You're best off getting the 64GB model and if the iOS style user interface is a turn-off, remember that Android is highly customisable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Whether Xiaomi intended to or not, the Mi Pad 2 is an Android tablet disguised as an iPad mini. This may disgust you or be exactly what you're looking for. Either way, we can't deny that this is a well-made, stylish tablet with decent specs for the price. You're best off getting the 64GB model and if the iOS style user interface is a turn-off, remember that Android is highly customisable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Putoinformatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Putoinformatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Saggiamente IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Saggiamente IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tablety PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Tablety PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Xiaomi Mi 4s
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 4sProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 418
Écran: 5.00 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.133kg
Prix: 350 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Haut de gamme pour un prix abordable. Le Mi 4s est choix pertinent de smartphone à 300$ au lieu de dépenser 600 ou 700 $ pour un modèle haut de gamme. Découvrons quel est son potentiel face aux concurrents de milieu et haut de gamme.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
There is no doubt that the Xiaomi Mi 4S is a great smartphone, especially for the price. Despite its flaws of a lack of global availability, disappointing low-light camera performance, and an outdated version of Android, there are several reasons why the Mi 4S may be appealing. Its very nice display, impressive performance for the price, excellent battery life, and great daylight camera performance may be enough to win over many who would have instead purchased the Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 86% écran: 86% mobilité: 86% finition: 84%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
There is no doubt that the Xiaomi Mi 4S is a great smartphone, especially for the price. Despite its flaws of a lack of global availability, disappointing low-light camera performance, and an outdated version of Android, there are several reasons why the Mi 4S may be appealing. Its very nice display, impressive performance for the price, excellent battery life, and great daylight camera performance may be enough to win over many who would have instead purchased the Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 86% écran: 86% mobilité: 86% finition: 84%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4s goes right by the book and pays due respect to its predecessors while genuinely trying to stand out and increase its chances of getting noticed. The Mi 4s improves on both the original Xiaomi Mi 4 and the Mi 4c version with more - and expandable - storage, a beefier battery and a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 4s goes right by the book and pays due respect to its predecessors while genuinely trying to stand out and increase its chances of getting noticed. The Mi 4s improves on both the original Xiaomi Mi 4 and the Mi 4c version with more - and expandable - storage, a beefier battery and a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 82% écran: 90% mobilité: 82%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 82% écran: 90% mobilité: 82%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 5 ProProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 5.20 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.13kg
Prix: 600 euros
Liens: Mi 5 Pro (Modèle)
Price comparison
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 Pro feels like a handset to match many of the other devices we've seen launch recently. With a release date planned for 1 March for the Chinese market, it will then be launching in India with more territories planned for the future. We're yet to see exactly what that means, or exactly how much it might cost, but we're looking at around £300 for a flagship spec handset, half the price of mainstream rivals.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/24/2016
Xiaomi Mi 5
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 5Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 5.15 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.129kg
Prix: 300 euros
Liens: Mi 5 (Modèle)
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Du poids lourd à un prix allégé. Le modèle phare le plus récent du fabricant chinois Xiaomi prouve qu'il est entré dans la cour des Smartphones haut de gamme. Des spécifications résolument premium, une configuration généreuse, un poids de seulement 129 grammes et un boîtier en verre de haute qualité. Cette fiche technique remet clairement en question grandes marques établies, puisque Xiaomi ne demande que 300 euros.
Source: Meilleurmobile Archive.org version
Vous souhaitez vous procurer un smartphone de dernière génération avec des caractéristiques techniques digne d’un mobile haut de gamme ? Aujourd’hui, nous vous proposons de découvrir le Xiaomi Mi 5, le smartphone de la marque chinoise du même nom.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Meilleurmobile Archive.org version
Vous souhaitez vous procurer un smartphone de dernière génération avec des caractéristiques techniques digne d’un mobile haut de gamme ? Aujourd’hui, nous vous proposons de découvrir le Xiaomi Mi 5, le smartphone de la marque chinoise du même nom.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi's best handset yet should worry the established names in the Android sector - it offers the same performance for half the price. A remarkable mobile in almost every regard.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi's best handset yet should worry the established names in the Android sector - it offers the same performance for half the price. A remarkable mobile in almost every regard.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: University Herald EN→FR Archive.org version
With this next generation technology in the Mi 5S, the phone will enable sensors on its panels and frames without any dedicated spot. Other leaked specs include the 5.15 inch screen and 6 GB of RAM paired with 256 GB of internal storage. The handset will sport 16 MP rear camera and pack 3,490 mAh battery. It will be powered by Snapdragon 821.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: University Herald EN→FR Archive.org version
With this next generation technology in the Mi 5S, the phone will enable sensors on its panels and frames without any dedicated spot. Other leaked specs include the 5.15 inch screen and 6 GB of RAM paired with 256 GB of internal storage. The handset will sport 16 MP rear camera and pack 3,490 mAh battery. It will be powered by Snapdragon 821.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: Soycincau EN→FR Archive.org version
So, is the Mi 5 for you? Well, if you want a well-built, light, ergonomically-sound “flagship” smartphone and only have RM1,549 to spend then probably yes. In fact, you could probably get it for less than the RRP if you pick it up with promo codes or through cashback services.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: Soycincau EN→FR Archive.org version
So, is the Mi 5 for you? Well, if you want a well-built, light, ergonomically-sound “flagship” smartphone and only have RM1,549 to spend then probably yes. In fact, you could probably get it for less than the RRP if you pick it up with promo codes or through cashback services.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum up: With the Mi5, Xiaomi is back in the flagship space, after skipping one product cycle. It’s a great comeback, and since Xiaomi prices tend to tumble a few months after launch, chances are the Mi5 will become even more attractive from a price/performance perspective in the near future. None of this would have been possible without Qualcomm’s stellar Snapdragon 820 and its custom Kryo CPU cores. Kudos to the gifted engineers in both outfits, they’ve done an impressive job.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/09/2016
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum up: With the Mi5, Xiaomi is back in the flagship space, after skipping one product cycle. It’s a great comeback, and since Xiaomi prices tend to tumble a few months after launch, chances are the Mi5 will become even more attractive from a price/performance perspective in the near future. None of this would have been possible without Qualcomm’s stellar Snapdragon 820 and its custom Kryo CPU cores. Kudos to the gifted engineers in both outfits, they’ve done an impressive job.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/09/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
But on comparing the camera features, OnePlus 3 lags behind somewhat as Mi 5 offers more camera enhancements than OnePlus 3 camera. The camera on OnePlus 3 uses a stock interface that has nothing much to offer but it can be replaced with a nice third party camera app to avail the features. The camera on Mi 5 supports HDR, Panorama, Timer, Audio, Manual, Straighten, Beautify, HHT, Tilt-shift, Fish eye, Slow motion, Burst shot while OnePlus 3 stock camera offers HDR, HD, Manual, RAW, Panorama, Beauty, Time-lapse, Slow motion, Burst shot.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/29/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
But on comparing the camera features, OnePlus 3 lags behind somewhat as Mi 5 offers more camera enhancements than OnePlus 3 camera. The camera on OnePlus 3 uses a stock interface that has nothing much to offer but it can be replaced with a nice third party camera app to avail the features. The camera on Mi 5 supports HDR, Panorama, Timer, Audio, Manual, Straighten, Beautify, HHT, Tilt-shift, Fish eye, Slow motion, Burst shot while OnePlus 3 stock camera offers HDR, HD, Manual, RAW, Panorama, Beauty, Time-lapse, Slow motion, Burst shot.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/29/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Finally, we’d like to re-emphasize our point from the beginning of this comparison: the Xiaomi Mi 5 might have prices starting from $300 ($340 for the mid-tier 64 gig model and $400 for the 128GB one) in China, but if you import it from your average eBay re-seller you’d have to put a $100 on top of each of those prices. And all you get usually is a shabby 30-day warranty with no manufacturer service or warranty. No surprise: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is NOT meant to be sold outside of China (and maybe India and the adjacent markets). And that’s a risk that you have to know about.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We end with reminding you: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is not a phone meant to be sold in the U.S. or Europe. It’s only available via unofficial channels (you can find it on eBay in the United States and shop from resellers with European warehouse like GizChina’s shop in the EU), but dealing with warranties and repairs would be a huge pain. That’s probably the biggest downside to owning a Xiaomi phone right now. Then, there is the price: the phone is sold for a full retail price of $300 to $400 in China, while third-party resellers add a $100 premium on top of that.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Finally, we’d like to re-emphasize our point from the beginning of this comparison: the Xiaomi Mi 5 might have prices starting from $300 ($340 for the mid-tier 64 gig model and $400 for the 128GB one) in China, but if you import it from your average eBay re-seller you’d have to put a $100 on top of each of those prices. And all you get usually is a shabby 30-day warranty with no manufacturer service or warranty. No surprise: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is NOT meant to be sold outside of China (and maybe India and the adjacent markets). And that’s a risk that you have to know about.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We end with reminding you: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is not a phone meant to be sold in the U.S. or Europe. It’s only available via unofficial channels (you can find it on eBay in the United States and shop from resellers with European warehouse like GizChina’s shop in the EU), but dealing with warranties and repairs would be a huge pain. That’s probably the biggest downside to owning a Xiaomi phone right now. Then, there is the price: the phone is sold for a full retail price of $300 to $400 in China, while third-party resellers add a $100 premium on top of that.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The one-word review for this phone is "impressive". That's the word I keep coming back to. The Xiaomi Mi5 is impressively designed, impressive in its battery life, and genuinely impressive in terms of power and performance. It's reasonably easy to build a cheap phone these days, and it's reasonably easy to build a powerful phone – but you usually can't do both. For the £300 (US$450) or so that the Mi5 is available for you would expect a fair few compromises to have been made, but there are almost none.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Wired Magazine EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s an excellent phone that, while lacking visual flair, makes up for it with great hardware and an innovative customized Android experience. One last note about that software. The Mi 5 comes in two different versions: one for the Chinese market with Xiaomi’s Mi Store on board, and one for international markets with the Google Play Store and Google’s services. If you’re going to buy it somewhere online and you don’t live in China, be sure to get the international version.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The one-word review for this phone is "impressive". That's the word I keep coming back to. The Xiaomi Mi5 is impressively designed, impressive in its battery life, and genuinely impressive in terms of power and performance. It's reasonably easy to build a cheap phone these days, and it's reasonably easy to build a powerful phone – but you usually can't do both. For the £300 (US$450) or so that the Mi5 is available for you would expect a fair few compromises to have been made, but there are almost none.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Wired Magazine EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s an excellent phone that, while lacking visual flair, makes up for it with great hardware and an innovative customized Android experience. One last note about that software. The Mi 5 comes in two different versions: one for the Chinese market with Xiaomi’s Mi Store on board, and one for international markets with the Google Play Store and Google’s services. If you’re going to buy it somewhere online and you don’t live in China, be sure to get the international version.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Xiaomi Mi 5 is a great all-around smartphone, only customers in China and India will be able to score it at bargain prices, starting at the equivalent of around $300 for the 32GB model. Shoppers from the rest of the world can buy the Mi 5 from eBay and other web stores, but chances are they'll end up paying a higher price. Most online retailers who sell Xiaomi products charge a price premium and ship their stock from China, which means you'll have to handle any import and sales taxes imposed by your state or country. Depending on where you are, these can be costly!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Xiaomi Mi 5 is a great all-around smartphone, only customers in China and India will be able to score it at bargain prices, starting at the equivalent of around $300 for the 32GB model. Shoppers from the rest of the world can buy the Mi 5 from eBay and other web stores, but chances are they'll end up paying a higher price. Most online retailers who sell Xiaomi products charge a price premium and ship their stock from China, which means you'll have to handle any import and sales taxes imposed by your state or country. Depending on where you are, these can be costly!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
With its fantastic array of high-end parts, the Mi 5 is a superb option. The package is only made sweeter by the its low price. The Xiaomi Mi 5 is around £300 cheaper than rival devices – such as the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 – that run on similar hardware . Yet, it doesn’t feel like it. While it may not be quite as sturdy as those higher priced phones, it performs just as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
With its fantastic array of high-end parts, the Mi 5 is a superb option. The package is only made sweeter by the its low price. The Xiaomi Mi 5 is around £300 cheaper than rival devices – such as the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 – that run on similar hardware . Yet, it doesn’t feel like it. While it may not be quite as sturdy as those higher priced phones, it performs just as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
Should you buy the Xiaomi Mi 5? If you don’t mind MIUI and the average camera, then yes. However, money is not the only thing you will need to buy the handset. You will also need patience and an hour in hand. Due to demand exceeding supply, Xiaomi currently only sells the Mi 5 in India on Wednesday at 2PM through its official website, where it usually goes out of stock within a minute or two. Worse, Xiaomi only sells the white variant of the Mi 5 in India right now with 32GB of storage space. Since the phone lacks a microSD card slot, the lack of a higher 64GB offering from Xiaomi can be a deal breaker for many. If you are ready to live with these compromises, the Mi 5 is almost a no-brainer, as it offers the best value for money in its range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/30/2016
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
Should you buy the Xiaomi Mi 5? If you don’t mind MIUI and the average camera, then yes. However, money is not the only thing you will need to buy the handset. You will also need patience and an hour in hand. Due to demand exceeding supply, Xiaomi currently only sells the Mi 5 in India on Wednesday at 2PM through its official website, where it usually goes out of stock within a minute or two. Worse, Xiaomi only sells the white variant of the Mi 5 in India right now with 32GB of storage space. Since the phone lacks a microSD card slot, the lack of a higher 64GB offering from Xiaomi can be a deal breaker for many. If you are ready to live with these compromises, the Mi 5 is almost a no-brainer, as it offers the best value for money in its range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/30/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
A fantastic Android flagship that comes in at an outrageously low price, the Xiaomi Mi 5 has the braun and the beauty to match the greats. Perhaps not a wise choice for first time Android users, but those comfortable in customising the setup will love the excellent-value, gorgeously designed Xiaomi Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
A fantastic Android flagship that comes in at an outrageously low price, the Xiaomi Mi 5 has the braun and the beauty to match the greats. Perhaps not a wise choice for first time Android users, but those comfortable in customising the setup will love the excellent-value, gorgeously designed Xiaomi Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90% équipement: 90%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Should Mi 4 users upgrade to the Mi 5? That depends on 3 factors – 4G connectivity, slim form factor, a faster phone. On the software front, there isn’t much that will be different. If you have a higher budget, you can certainly go for the Samsung Galaxy S6. The only real issue with any Xiaomi phones is the flash sale model, where a lot of potential buyers just do not manage to get through on the day of the sale and are frustrated at not being able to buy the phone. So, if you’re willing to be patient with the Mi 5 flash sales, this phone certainly offers a good value proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, there’s no denying that Xiaomi has made yet another excellent smartphone. The Mi 5 undercuts the best smartphones on the market in price but not nearly as much in features as in previous years. Although its lack of U.S. availability and 4G LTE support are a major hurdle, its low-light camera may be somewhat disappointing, and MIUI could use a few updates, there’s certainly a lot to love about the Xiaomi Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 89% écran: 87% mobilité: 91% finition: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, there’s no denying that Xiaomi has made yet another excellent smartphone. The Mi 5 undercuts the best smartphones on the market in price but not nearly as much in features as in previous years. Although its lack of U.S. availability and 4G LTE support are a major hurdle, its low-light camera may be somewhat disappointing, and MIUI could use a few updates, there’s certainly a lot to love about the Xiaomi Mi 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 89% écran: 87% mobilité: 91% finition: 90%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 without a doubt pushes the boundaries of what has been achievable in an affordably priced handset. The phone brings top of the line performance, amazing battery life and stunning design for a price point of Rs. 24,999 which is unprecedented. Sure, the camera could be a bit better and we do lament the absence of a higher capacity variant in India but we can’t help but recommend the Xiaomi Mi 5 as a device that lines up right alongside the current generation flagships and handily wins from a price to performance ratio.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/13/2016
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 without a doubt pushes the boundaries of what has been achievable in an affordably priced handset. The phone brings top of the line performance, amazing battery life and stunning design for a price point of Rs. 24,999 which is unprecedented. Sure, the camera could be a bit better and we do lament the absence of a higher capacity variant in India but we can’t help but recommend the Xiaomi Mi 5 as a device that lines up right alongside the current generation flagships and handily wins from a price to performance ratio.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/13/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi may be better known for its budget smartphones, but with the Mi 5 it has shown that it is more than capable of building a competent premium device as well. Although a lot of people will have problems with the price and the general idea that Xiaomi is even trying to build something premium, we feel that it's time to move on and give the company the respect it deserves. The Mi 5 is a solid effort that succeeds in giving you a flagship smartphone experience at a price that we consider excellent for a phone of this quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi may be better known for its budget smartphones, but with the Mi 5 it has shown that it is more than capable of building a competent premium device as well. Although a lot of people will have problems with the price and the general idea that Xiaomi is even trying to build something premium, we feel that it's time to move on and give the company the respect it deserves. The Mi 5 is a solid effort that succeeds in giving you a flagship smartphone experience at a price that we consider excellent for a phone of this quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 70% degré de nuisance: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a flagship class smartphone, at a mid-ranged price. The Snapdragon 820 makes it one of the most powerful smartphones in India at the moment, and even after being downclocked, it can go toe-to-toe with a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. The camera is disappointing, but at Rs. 24,999, there's no denying the value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 70% degré de nuisance: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a flagship class smartphone, at a mid-ranged price. The Snapdragon 820 makes it one of the most powerful smartphones in India at the moment, and even after being downclocked, it can go toe-to-toe with a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. The camera is disappointing, but at Rs. 24,999, there's no denying the value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away. Xiaomi is not ready to offer waterproofing just yet, but we can forgive its omission by being dazzled by the looks and thin profile. The lightweight glass body and sturdy metal frame, both thoughtfully crafted, may have had suffered from water-proofing anyway.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/16/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi made it easy for us. The Mi 5 is one of the most beautiful, most powerful, and most capable smartphones to date and there is little to dwell on it. If the Mi 5 is available in your geographic region, our recommendation is to grab one right away. Xiaomi is not ready to offer waterproofing just yet, but we can forgive its omission by being dazzled by the looks and thin profile. The lightweight glass body and sturdy metal frame, both thoughtfully crafted, may have had suffered from water-proofing anyway.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/16/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 features a new 5.15" IPS display of 1080p resolution. Even though most of the rumors suggested an upgrade to 2K resolution, Xiaomi chose to keep the Full HD screen, and we don't mind that. A pixel density of 428ppi is more than respectable and leaves the Snapdragon 820 chip with power to spare on tasks and productivity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 features a new 5.15" IPS display of 1080p resolution. Even though most of the rumors suggested an upgrade to 2K resolution, Xiaomi chose to keep the Full HD screen, and we don't mind that. A pixel density of 428ppi is more than respectable and leaves the Snapdragon 820 chip with power to spare on tasks and productivity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 14/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 14/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93%
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81%
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 96%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 96%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 92% écran: 92% mobilité: 85%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 92% écran: 92% mobilité: 85%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/29/2016
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/29/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/20/2016
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/20/2016
Source: Teknofilo ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/20/2016
Source: Teknofilo ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/20/2016
Source: Tecno User IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 90% écran: 85% finition: 90% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Tecno User IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 90% écran: 85% finition: 90% ergonomie: 80%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% performances: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% performances: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 100%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 100%
Source: Spiders Web PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Spiders Web PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: Chip Online TR TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 9% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 9% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Teknokulis TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 88% finition: 85%
Source: Teknokulis TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 88% finition: 85%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/08/2016
Xiaomi Mi Max 6.4 inch
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Max 6.4 inchProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Carte graphique: unknown
Écran: 6.40 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.203kg
Prix: 400 euros
Liens: Mi Max 6.4 inch (Modèle)
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Comme le Mi 5, et les autres produits plutôt "premium" de Xiaomi, le Mi Max laisse une très jolie impression. La qualité de fabrication est au rendez-vous, et il s'agit d'un joli produit, qui ne conviendra toutefois pas à toutes les mains. Hormis une partie multimédia un peu light, le Mi Max se montre plutôt équilibré, assez doué dans tous les domaines, et sans gros défaut visible. Son point fort, c'est évidemment l'autonomie puisque les tests effectués et l'usage quotidien nous ont prouvé qu'il est possible de compter sur le Mi Max pour au moins deux journées. Mordus d'autonomie et de phablettes, ne passez pas votre chemin.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Design wise Xiaomi Mi Max is brilliant and big screen device lovers will definitely love this handset . It has 32GB ROM and 3GB RAM furthermore with 16 MP rear camera and 5MP back camera. All these specifications are directly for those people who wants a slim and stylish phone with full entertainment package. The device has great camera results and fast processor so you should consider this device before buying any other device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 90% performances: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: T Break EN→FR Archive.org version
Simply put, the Mi Max is a great phablet device, especially when you look at the pricing which is just AED 899. Xiaomi has cut corners in some places such as design and build quality, but makes up for it with its performance and battery life. So, if you are on the lookout for a cheap phablet, but are willing to look over some minor flaws, then the Xiaomi Mi Max is a good choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 85% performances: 80% finition: 65%
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Max is a weird device. It sits halfway between Redmi and Mi series products, but in most respects, it’s closer to Redmi devices in terms of overall performance and build quality. This is reflected in the price as well, so you can pick up an entry-level Mi Max for about $170, which is quite nice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
You never feel like you’ve been short changed in any area, with a Full HD IPS display that’s vibrant enough for on-the-go movie watching, performance that lets Android tick along nicely, and a design that doesn’t feel too cheap either. There are even some clever software tweaks going on behind the scenes, something we hope Xiaomi brings back for its top-end phones. Sure, it’s plastic fantastic when you get close, and it doesn’t have the best camera, but if all you care about is a massive display, the Mi Max has got you covered.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→FR Archive.org version
Now for how much all this will cost. Xiaomi has fitted the Mi Max with a R4 700 price tag. As such, for the outlay of a mid-range device, users will be getting something close to a flagship phablet range, minus a few frills of course. In terms of value for money and sheer inches then, the Mi Max is a standout. That said, the 6.44" frame is not for everyone and only those that will be consuming a lot of content, as well as doing a fair bit of multitasking will get the most out of the Mi Max.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Review Zat EN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Htxt Africa EN→FR Archive.org version
If you can look beyond the huge dimensions of the Mi Max you'll discover a great smartphone with enough performance to keep you moving at a comfortable pace. It also helps that the battery will last four days on the trot. It's great, but only if you can handle a big chunk of aluminium.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
I have to admit that Xiaomi Mi Max look much better from Cubot Max. But if we take under consideration that the Cubot has a better camera from Mi Max, the battery is removable and for only 114.99€, you get a very good and big mobile, I would toss it easily. On the other hand, Mi Max comes for 195.99€, almost twice the price from Cubot, but with better characteristics. So if you are looking for a good, big mobile, Cubot Max is your choice. If you can afford more money, then you should look at Mi Max.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Techspot EN→FR Archive.org version
Using the Xiaomi Mi Max for a couple of weeks was an enlightening experience. The phone is enormous, but there’s no doubting the quality of the hardware Xiaomi has managed to include at an affordable price point. Most of the issues I had with the Mi Max relate to its size. At 6.44-inches, there is simply no comfortable way to hold and operate this smartphone in one hand, at least without resorting to constantly using the one-handed software mode. Restricted to two-handed use in the majority of circumstances, the Mi Max quickly became cumbersome, particularly when I wanted to hold another object while operating this device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Max bridges the gap between a tablet and a large smartphone by bringing you the best of both worlds. While this phone is not meant for everyone, it is a definite choice for someone in search of a compact tablet. I am one of those and absolutely enjoyed my time with the MI Max. And before you ask – Yes, it does fit in a jeans pocket and it will restrict certain movements, but when out of pocket, be prepared for some massive fun.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Xiaomi Mi Max is one of the very few in its segment, the trend of smartphones with display sizes bigger than 6 inches and less than 7 inches is expected to rise in the next few months. Xiaomi seems to have hit the centre point between offering the immersive experience of tablets with the design and features of a smartphone. While the handset is definitely big, the experience while gaming or watching videos or consuming other media is definitely noteworthy. Added to that, the performance and long-lasting battery life make it just perfect.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/28/2016
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max has few competitors in the ‘Max’ category. As we have mentioned in past reviews, it’s not just the battery life that matters but the overall package and Xiaomi seems to have built a solid smartphone with a solid battery life. We were not fans of the software but the camera won us over and the same goes for the overall package.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 75% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
It's safe to say that the Mi Max is yet another solid offering from Xiaomi, only this time, it's targeted at a rather niche market. There could be some demand for phones with enormous displays, and now buyers have a decent option. The Mi Max could potentially inject new life into this segment as it's a very good all-rounder. Its size is a subjective matter, as many people don't make a lot of voice calls, but do like watching movies and reading books. A device such as this could eliminate the need to use a separate phone and tablet, at home and also while traveling or commuting.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
If you want a huge phone and you don’t want to pay as large a wedge of cash, the Xiaomi Mi Max is a fantastic phablet with good looks, decent performance, strong runtime and, most importantly of all, a gigantic screen. Not ideal for novice users, but otherwise the Mi Max is a highly recommended smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80% équipement: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Max certainly feels like a first attempt at what is largely unchartered territory for Xiaomi. While it has undercut the competition in price, it has also cut corners in many areas: the device's cheap build quality, poor imported device software experience, and lack U.S. availability are clearly disappointing attributes. But no smartphone is perfect, and the Mi Max has plenty to offer for the price. Its impressive camera, excellent battery life, and smooth performance are all great reasons to buy this phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 85% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 75%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We live in the digital renaissance where everything can be found online, but our windows to it are tiny - as tiny as the screens of the phones we're holding. There are people in developing markets whose only computer is their phone. From this perspective, you can clearly see there is a market niche for big screen phones. The nice is not necessarily a big one but it's big enough to fit these large-screen monsters.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/06/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
There are few direct competitors to the Mi Max, for handsets with screens this big are rare and you're more likely to settle for a 6-inch or 7-inch device if you are looking for an alternative. And then, there's the price. In China, India and neighboring countries, the phablet starts from $230, which is a very good price. But the rest of the world will have to deal with markups, shipping, and import costs that could push the device between $300 to $400.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/01/2018
Source: Andro Asia ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/31/2016
Notes: mobilité: 95% finition: 85%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/03/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/19/2016
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% équipement: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% écran: 90% mobilité: 95% finition: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/20/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/05/2016
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% performances: 70%
Source: Fony.sk SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/24/2016
Source: Reviewzat →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/31/2016
Xiaomi Mi5s
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi5sProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 5.15 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.145kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Sur le papier, le Xiaomi Mi5s n’a rien à envier à des concurrents comme le OnePlus 3T, le ZTE Axon 7 ou le Honor 8. Ce smartphone se montre à la hauteur en termes de performances (y compris face aux ténors du secteur) et rejoint même le Honor parmi nos coups de coeur esthétiques.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% mobilité: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Ses performances sont aussi excellentes et dignes des meilleurs smartphones de cette année, tout comme son appareil photo. Finalement, l'un de ses plus grands concurrents est le OnePlus 3T qui a le mérite de s'acheter plus facilement en Europe et offrir un meilleur suivi logiciel. Mais lorsque son prix baissera, le Mi 5s n'aura aucun rival dans le secteur.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Il présente une très bonne qualité de fabrication, il est très agréable à prendre en main, il affiche une très belle image et offre un son de qualité, il fait de belles photos, il est présente une très bonne autonomie, et surtout il est doté de très très bonnes performances.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Clubic Archive.org version
Xiaomi nous impressionne à chaque fois, ce Mi 5s ne déroge en rien à la règle. C'est même un smartphone qui nous procure du plaisir à l'usage, tellement il est bien conçu. Design, finition, encombrement parfait et superbe écran apportent déjà une excellente approche. La puissance généreuse, l'autonomie monstrueuse et la très bonne couche photo finissent de convaincre.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Commercialisé à moins de 300€ et proposant la même puissance que des smartphones deux fois plus chers, le Xiaomi M5s est incontestablement une belle réussite. Il ne souffre d'aucun réel défaut si ce n'est l'absence de la 4G à 800 MHz et d'un port micro-SD. Il faut aussi le faire importer via des sites chinois, ce qui ne plaira pas forcément à tout le monde. En dehors de ça, je ne peux que vous recommander de foncer, vous ferez une superbe affaire !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi 5s est clairement LE meilleur rapport qualité-prix. Lancé 100 euros moins chers que le OnePlus 3 et le Honor 8, il propose des caractéristiques équivalents, voire meilleurs. Il est alors dommage qu'il faille passer par un importateur pour se le procurer en France, où il n'est d'ailleurs pas complètement compatible avec le réseau 4G. De plus, le SAV se fera avec le site marchand qui l'a importé pour vous. C'est donc quitte ou double.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi 5s est clairement LE meilleur rapport qualité-prix. Lancé 100 euros moins chers que le OnePlus 3 et le Honor 8, il propose des caractéristiques équivalents, voire meilleurs. Il est alors dommage qu'il faille passer par un importateur pour se le procurer en France, où il n'est d'ailleurs pas complètement compatible avec le réseau 4G. De plus, le SAV se fera avec le site marchand qui l'a importé pour vous. C'est donc quitte ou double.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
As the Mi 5s has been in the market for a few months now, it has picked up a price cut that brings the cost of the phone down to under $300. As you can't buy it directly from Xiaomi, you'll have to rely on resellers. GearBest is selling it for $289 after entering code Mi5GSB. If you're in a market where LTE connectivity is available, the Mi 5s is a no-brainer for the cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi5s is an evolution of the Mi5, and it’s better than its predecessor in almost every respect. However, it’s not that much better, because it’s almost the same phone, updated with a new SoC and camera module. In other words, nobody who owns a Mi5 or a different Snapdragon 820 device will be interested in the Mi5s.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Mobile Choice EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi's revised Mi 5 adds in some key areas, like camera quality, while leaving us wanting more in others. Built quality is suspect, and that much-hyped fingerprint scanner truly is one of the worst we've used - it only worked about 60% of the time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 100% mobilité: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We cannot recommend the Xiaomi Mi5s enough. This is the smartphone every 2016 flagship wanted to be, and it comes with a price tag half that of theirs. Fantastic build quality, fantastic performance, fantastic storage, battery and connectivity options - the Xiaomi Mi5s gets a big thumbs-up from us.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi 5s is the perfect ‘s’ upgrade to the Mi 5. It improves in all key areas — build quality, camera, and performance — to deliver a vastly improved experience than its predecessor. Ideally, the Mi 5s is what the Mi 5 should have originally been. Nonetheless, if you have been holding out on buying the Mi 5 for some reason, go ahead and just buy the Mi 5s. It can hold its own against many other newer flagships and is a great phone for the price it commands. It truly is a shame that Xiaomi will not be bringing the Mi 5s to India where it could have been a formidable competitor to the likes of OnePlus 3 and Moto Z Play.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi 5s is a great flagship with excellent build quality, performance, battery life, and imaging skills. It makes a few notable upgrades over the Mi 5 predecessor - a metal unibody, a bigger battery, a more power-efficient chipset, and a capable main camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
Nubia Z11 Mini S and Xiaomi MI5S can have nice similarity in camera, design, and battery, but in terms of hardware, Xiaomi MI5S can win over Nubia Z11 Mini not only in terms of antutu. But considering the price, Nubia Z11 Mini S RAM 4GB ROM 64GB version sells at 1499 yuan, $250, RAM 4GB ROM 128GB black golden advanced version at 1899 yuan, $316, but Xiaomi MI5S RAM 3GB ROM 64GB at 1999 yuan, $330, and RAM 4GB ROM 128GB version at 2299 yuan, $383. Therefore, if you don’t pursue too high-end performance, Nubia Z11 Mini S is enough to use, but you are a game lover, we highly recommend choosing Xiaomi MI5S.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
In all, Xiaomi MI5S can compare with Galaxy S7 with the good performance to prove Xiaomi has entered into the International market to compete with Samsung and Apple. Personally, we think we don’t have to spend much money on a smartphone.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Although Xiaomi MI5S and ZUK Z2 Pro has different processor, according to real test, they have no large gap in hardware, however, in design and camera, ZUK Z2 Pro can win over Xiaomi MI5S. Therefore, we still think ZUK Z2 Pro is more beautiful, especially back design. Just share more with us.
Critique d'utilisateur, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
According to teardown, Xiaomi MI5S internal design has nice layout, the back metal cover has used Injection molding with exquisite processing for better cooling, such as the graphite stickers, in order to keep the phone’s thickness, it uses shield to ditch the OIS and Infrared function. The overall tear down is not so difficult, but about the maintenance, if the ultrasonic fingerprint scanner is broken, it is a little difficult to repair or change.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 94% équipement: 58% écran: 90% mobilité: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 94% performances: 96% équipement: 93% écran: 97% mobilité: 98%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 93% écran: 92% mobilité: 88%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Andro Asia ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 85%
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 75%
Source: El Sabio Informatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/10/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 95%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/10/2016
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% écran: 84% mobilité: 84% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% écran: 84% mobilité: 84% finition: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% équipement: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 90% équipement: 93% écran: 93% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 86%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Panorama IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: One Tech PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: Spiders Web PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 100% écran: 88% mobilité: 78%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% écran: 80% finition: 80%
Xiaomi Mi 5S Plus
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 5S PlusProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 5.70 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.168kg
Prix: 400 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi5s touchait du doigt la perfection, la version Plus ne parvient pas à faire mieux. Elle fait même un peu moins bien. Ambitieux, le double capteur photo est finalement plus pénalisant qu’autre chose. Malgré tout, le Xiaomi Mi5s Plus, avec son superbe écran, sa grande puissance et son endurance satisfaisante reste une excellente affaire pour un tarif de 330 euros. A ce prix, il peut rivaliser avec le très réussi Mate 9 de Huawei. Mais il faudra faire avec un défaut récurrent : la non-compatibilité avec les fréquences 4G de 800 MHz surtout utilisées chez SFR.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 100% mobilité: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
One of the Xiaomi Mi 5SPlus’s main weaknesses for video is the lack of effective stabilization, which makes smooth videos a challenge; we recommend some phone support for improved results. Video autofocus is fast and accurate, however, with no performance issues shooting video in bright light. This said, some noticeable steps in focus, together with an increase in instability and slow convergence (including unnecessary refocusing during panning), result in more focus failures shooting video under changing lighting conditions. Some visible ringing, aliasing, and blocking artifacts are also visible in videos shot under all lighting conditions.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi5S Plus is a really amazing mobile. Very fast, very strong, elegant, light at the hand, you are going to fall in love with it! You can find it at Coolicool the 6/128GB version for $509.99 or $429.99 the 4/64GB version. Do you have one to? Write me down your impressions about it! What ROM you have and can you beat this score with your ROM? I want to hear news from you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi 5s Plus is also the fastest Android smartphone today, with great screen and battery life. MIUI8 is a nice launcher, too. Unless you are after the whole Leica experience from Huawei or the water-proof body from Sony or Samsung, you would probably find the Mi 5s Plus to be an excellent deal that's really tempting.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
The handset has a solid build quality although personally, I’m not a fan of its gold color. We’re also not complaining that it only has a Full HD resolution as battery life greatly benefitted from it. We’re also fans of the dual camera setup ala Huawei P9 and its Monochrome mode that shoots sharp photos with great contrast.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: University Herald EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus is specced slightly higher than the Mi 5 but is it really match to Google Pixel XL performance? Find out here!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
The main difference between Xiaomi MI5S Plus and Huawei P9 Plus is in their hardware, due to Snapdragon 821 processor, it makes Xiaomi MI5S enjoy higher performance than Huawei P9 Plus, but Huawei P9 Plus still performs nice in dual camera. If you are looking for a cheaper but higher performance smartphone, Xiaomi MI5S Plus can be your first choice, but if you are more into better quality, Huawei P9 Plus will not let you down.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/07/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
According to comparison between Xiaomi MI5S Plus and Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe., we know Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe has some advantages in design, craftsmanship, performance and camera, but Xiaomi MI5S Plus also has its own merits such as battery and price. If you are looking for a cheaper RAM 6GB Snapdragon 821 smartphone, Xiaomi MI5S Plus is a good choice, if you don’t mind the price, of course, you can try Asus Zenfone 3 Deluxe first.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI5S Plus in terms of its design looks a little like Redmi Pro, but according to the hardware, it can be called the flagship right now in MI series. If we enjoy larger screen, better camera, why not have a try this Xiaomi MI5S Plus? Welcome to share more with us.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/22/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 94% écran: 84% mobilité: 87%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 85% finition: 75%
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Canaltech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Canaltech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/17/2017
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 94% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 100%
Source: Canaltech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/11/2016
Notes: performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/29/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 88% finition: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 85% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Xiaomi Mi Max Prime
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Max PrimeProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 510
Écran: 6.44 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.203kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/10/2016
Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Note 2Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 5.70 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.166kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Once you get to know the device inside and out, you’ll soon realize that the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 offers an experience that is quite compelling in both hardware and software, and instead of just being a clone, is instead a worthy alternative to the Galaxy Note 7.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 95% finition: 85%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
If we were getting this device for the price it goes for in China, converted directly to USD, it’d be a real deal. As it stands, we still need to go through 3rd-party retailers to get the device. I mean the standard 128GB version in China, which can be found for around RMB 3299 which is around $480 USD, compared to the version we have. We have the version called Mi Note 2 Global.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is not a Samsung Note 7 rip-off, but even if it was, the Note 7 is dead anyway. The Note 2 is not original either. It’s not a cheap phone, but it’s still somewhat cheaper than similar devices from mainstream brands. It’s might not be as big as you’d expect from a 5.7-inch beast, yet it doesn’t exactly have a small footprint (Samsung still beats it on account of its smaller bezels, made possibly by the curvier AMOLED display). That’s sort of our problem with the Mi Note 2. It feels like it was designed by a committee.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We approached the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 review with high expectations. The vacant spot left by Samsung's phablet this fall season was prime for the taking and we really wanted to see the Mi Note 2 as a product that's as at least as much disruptive as its pedigree suggests.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 is expected at P28,990 $580 for the version with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage while higher specced version will land at about P34,990 or $700 6GB/128GB variant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 90% performances: 70% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is the Mi Note 2 going to win acclaim this year? Probably not. The unveiling of the Mi Mix all but guaranteed that it’ll be taking a backseat. But priced at just $413 ($2800 rmb) and $488 (3300 rmb), this is — like most Xiaomi phones — one of the best value smartphone on the market. You’re getting a Snapdragon 821 device, with 4/6GB of RAM and a great build for half the price of the Google Pixel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
The original Mi Note was well-spec’ed and launched with a lot of fanfare, but for whatever reason - maybe it’s the price, maybe it’s just the wrong timing - it didn’t help Xiaomi crack the premium smartphone segment. As Samsung stumbles, there’s now a sliver of opening here, a great chance that I’m sure the Chinese and Taiwanese companies would not let slip. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2, packed with all the technical and practical wizardry CEO Lei Jun and his team could muster, couldn’t have arrived at a better time. Well, at least for the good folks in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
In conclusion, Xiaomi mi note 2 keeps the good level in its inner design and craftsmanship, although there is no big innovation, it’s good for maintenance. The most improvement of Xiaomi mi note 2 is to use dual curved screen. So are you ready to catch one?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 uses dual curved 3D glass with great holding grip. We can confirm Xiaomi MI Note 2 is the most beautiful smartphone until now. It’s 5.7inch screen with ultra narrow frame which makes us fall in love with it deeply. So we are quite satisfied with the design, as for hardware, Xiaomi mi note 2 doesn’t let us down, Snapdragon 821 processor, RAM 4GB ROM 64GB, RAM 6GB ROM 128GB, two versions, and 8MP front camera and 23MP back camera. Most importantly, it sells at the most competitive price right now. So are you ready to get one?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Concerning the packaging, we witness the new trend with the box. Instead of mimicking Apple’s iPhone box, Xiaomi came up with their idea which seems to be perfection. Xiaomi has decided to walk with simplicity and elegance as the package appears to be plain white with an engraved Mi Logo at the center. We observe no diagram of Xiaomi Mi Note 2 at all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
It was a very well-documented fact that Xiaomi’s new Mi Note 2 would be a device that had a dual-curve display. Previously a feature unique only to Samsung devices, Xiaomi and others are now jumping on the bandwagon.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
While there's a version of the Mi Note 2 that will have LTE support for the US and lots of other countries, the bad news is that the phone will be China-only, and Xiaomi has no plans to sell this elsewhere, even in places like Singapore or Hong Kong. It's a surprising move, but perhaps Xiaomi is looking inwards to its homeground as it aims to regain market share, having slipped to fourth position as rivals Oppo and Vivo have surged ahead.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/27/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 96% équipement: 90% écran: 89% mobilité: 91%
Source: Golem DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 92% écran: 91% mobilité: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 87%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Key for web IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 50%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 70% équipement: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 87% ergonomie: 87%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/29/2016
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 72% mobilité: 85% finition: 89%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 85% équipement: 98% écran: 65% mobilité: 89% ergonomie: 82%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 75% équipement: 90% écran: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/21/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi MixProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Écran: 6.40 pouces, 17:9, 2040 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.209kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Tout est dans l’écran. Xiaomi a intégré un énorme écran de 6,4 pouces dans le boîtier de sa nouvelle phablette haut-de-gamme, juste un peu plus grand que celui des smartphones premium conventionnels. Avec un prix débutant aux alentours de 700€, ce n’est pas vraiment une bonne affaire. Néanmoins, est-ce qu’importer ce produit innovant peut être une bonne idée ?
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Finalement, la conclusion doit répondre à une question simple : peut-on conseiller ce smartphone ? Notre réponse doit donc être limpide et claire. Pour ma part, mon avis est partagé. Sa conception impressionnante et son design qui ne passe pas inaperçu en font un smartphone atypique qui offre des performances très correctes et des caractéristiques confortables (6 Go de RAM et 256 Go de stockage interne). Par contre, ses soucis d'ergonomie et son niveau médiocre en photographie en font un smartphone surclassé par les autres produits à un prix similaire. Personnellement, j'ai apprécié passer deux semaines en sa compagnie, mais mes photographies restent malheureusement inexploitables au delà des réseaux sociaux, et ma poche de jean s'est déformée.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Finalement, la conclusion doit répondre à une question simple : peut-on conseiller ce smartphone ? Notre réponse doit donc être limpide et claire. Pour ma part, mon avis est partagé. Sa conception impressionnante et son design qui ne passe pas inaperçu en font un smartphone atypique qui offre des performances très correctes et des caractéristiques confortables (6 Go de RAM et 256 Go de stockage interne). Par contre, ses soucis d'ergonomie et son niveau médiocre en photographie en font un smartphone surclassé par les autres produits à un prix similaire. Personnellement, j'ai apprécié passer deux semaines en sa compagnie, mais mes photographies restent malheureusement inexploitables au delà des réseaux sociaux, et ma poche de jean s'est déformée.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX fait une très bonne impression. Il est vrai que le boîtier en céramique est très sujet aux empreintes digitales, que l'écran est lisse et que ses 209 grammes gênent pour une bonne prise en main. Nous avons souvent l'impression que le smartphone pourrait nous glisser des mains et encaisser de gros dégats, mais une fois que l'écran borderless est allumé, on oublie vite tout le reste et on reste admiratif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX fait une très bonne impression. Il est vrai que le boîtier en céramique est très sujet aux empreintes digitales, que l'écran est lisse et que ses 209 grammes gênent pour une bonne prise en main. Nous avons souvent l'impression que le smartphone pourrait nous glisser des mains et encaisser de gros dégats, mais une fois que l'écran borderless est allumé, on oublie vite tout le reste et on reste admiratif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix est un smartphone qui a marqué la fin de l’année 2016 grâce à son écran quasi sans bordures qui lui permet d’avoir une taille équivalente à un iPhone 7 Plus, équipé d’un écran de 5,5 pouces, avec un écran beaucoup plus grand de 6,4 pouces. Lors de la conférence du fabricant … Lire la suite.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix est un smartphone qui a marqué la fin de l’année 2016 grâce à son écran quasi sans bordures qui lui permet d’avoir une taille équivalente à un iPhone 7 Plus, équipé d’un écran de 5,5 pouces, avec un écran beaucoup plus grand de 6,4 pouces. Lors de la conférence du fabricant … Lire la suite.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Aucun doute, le Mi MIX n’est pas juste un effet d’annonce. Outre ses bords ultra fins qui le distingue de ses concurrents en terme de design, il est doté d’un bel écran, embarque un processeur ultrapuissant tout en livrant une autonomie tout à fait satisfaisante. Seul ombre au tableau, son capteur photo et son autofocus vraiment en dessous de ce qu’on attend d’un téléphone à niveau de ce prix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 100% mobilité: 90%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Aucun doute, le Mi MIX n’est pas juste un effet d’annonce. Outre ses bords ultra fins qui le distingue de ses concurrents en terme de design, il est doté d’un bel écran, embarque un processeur ultrapuissant tout en livrant une autonomie tout à fait satisfaisante. Seul ombre au tableau, son capteur photo et son autofocus vraiment en dessous de ce qu’on attend d’un téléphone à niveau de ce prix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 100% mobilité: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX a fait une très bonne impression dans cette prise en main. Il est vrai que le boîtier en céramique est très sujet aux empreintes digitales, que l'écran est lisse et que ses 209 grammes gênent pour une bonne prise en main. Ceci dit, une fois que l'écran borderless est allumé, on oublie vite tout le reste et on reste admiratif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX a fait une très bonne impression dans cette prise en main. Il est vrai que le boîtier en céramique est très sujet aux empreintes digitales, que l'écran est lisse et que ses 209 grammes gênent pour une bonne prise en main. Ceci dit, une fois que l'écran borderless est allumé, on oublie vite tout le reste et on reste admiratif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix démontre les prouesses technologiques dont est capable Xiaomi. Bien qu’il vaille la peine d’être acheté, sa compatibilité 4G limitée fait courir un risque sur la possibilité de l’utiliser ailleurs qu’en Chine, ce qui ne devrait pas être le cas en France. Mais ne l’achetez pas si vous n’êtes pas prêts à accepter quelques défauts.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix démontre les prouesses technologiques dont est capable Xiaomi. Bien qu’il vaille la peine d’être acheté, sa compatibilité 4G limitée fait courir un risque sur la possibilité de l’utiliser ailleurs qu’en Chine, ce qui ne devrait pas être le cas en France. Mais ne l’achetez pas si vous n’êtes pas prêts à accepter quelques défauts.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a really great display overall. The only area where the MIX falls a little short is white balance, which is a little cool by default. It’s not nearly as bad as what we’ve seen on other Chinese phones, though, and it probably will not bother most people. Xiaomi provides the Cool and Warm color modes to shift the white point, but it would be nice to see finer grained controls.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a really great display overall. The only area where the MIX falls a little short is white balance, which is a little cool by default. It’s not nearly as bad as what we’ve seen on other Chinese phones, though, and it probably will not bother most people. Xiaomi provides the Cool and Warm color modes to shift the white point, but it would be nice to see finer grained controls.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/10/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix, for your reference, starts at RMB 3,499 (roughly Rs 34,500) for the base 4GB RAM and 128GB memory option while the top-tier 6GB RAM and 256GB storage option is available for RMB 3,999 (approx Rs 39,500) in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix, for your reference, starts at RMB 3,499 (roughly Rs 34,500) for the base 4GB RAM and 128GB memory option while the top-tier 6GB RAM and 256GB storage option is available for RMB 3,999 (approx Rs 39,500) in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Mi Mix - but it isn’t faultless. Beyond that stunner of a screen, its resolution could stand to be be higher, and camera quality is only average.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the Mi Mix - but it isn’t faultless. Beyond that stunner of a screen, its resolution could stand to be be higher, and camera quality is only average.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might sound expensive, but the £799 Xiaomi Mi Mix actually offers very good value when you consider its meaty core hardware and generous 256GB of storage - it's certainly less than you'd pay for an iPhone 7 Plus. This isn't a phone you buy with budget in mind, however: the Mi Mix is the phone you buy when you want onlookers to say "Oh my gosh, what is that? It's amazing - I want one of those!" The Mi Mix is a revolutionary phone that we hope is a sign of things to come, with that gorgeous bezel-less display, beautiful ceramic body, fantastic performance, long, long battery life and all the other fancy tech we can't even pronounce, let alone understand. No matter - it works. Highly recommended.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is gorgeous to look at and, once configured, superb to use, with high spec components throughout, camera permitting (for space reasons). As Unique Selling Points go, having almost zero bezels on three sides comes pretty high on the list and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see more and more smartphones come with similar designs in 2017. Imagine a phone with a 5.5” display in the body of what normally houses a 5” screen. Oh wait, such a Mi Mix ‘nano’ is already rumoured from Xiaomi – but they won’t be alone here. All I’m asking, aside from a properly thought out ‘world edition’ in terms of updates, bands and regions, is that the polished ceramic finish be dialled down somehow – smartphones don’t need to also be works of art!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is gorgeous to look at and, once configured, superb to use, with high spec components throughout, camera permitting (for space reasons). As Unique Selling Points go, having almost zero bezels on three sides comes pretty high on the list and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see more and more smartphones come with similar designs in 2017. Imagine a phone with a 5.5” display in the body of what normally houses a 5” screen. Oh wait, such a Mi Mix ‘nano’ is already rumoured from Xiaomi – but they won’t be alone here. All I’m asking, aside from a properly thought out ‘world edition’ in terms of updates, bands and regions, is that the polished ceramic finish be dialled down somehow – smartphones don’t need to also be works of art!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Mobile and Apps EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched this amazing piece for mass market as compared to other edgeless screen phones, which are available in extremely limited numbers (and places).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Mobile and Apps EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched this amazing piece for mass market as compared to other edgeless screen phones, which are available in extremely limited numbers (and places).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi was brave enough to go for something rather new, instead of pushing the limits of performance, screen resolution, camera skills, or battery endurance. Design is where Xiaomi desired to make a difference and an edge-to-edge screen is a game-changer in this department.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi was brave enough to go for something rather new, instead of pushing the limits of performance, screen resolution, camera skills, or battery endurance. Design is where Xiaomi desired to make a difference and an edge-to-edge screen is a game-changer in this department.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is a glimpse of the all-screen future of phones. But Xiaomi needs to improve on basics like the camera and find a way to make more of these before we can wholeheartedly recommend it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix is a glimpse of the all-screen future of phones. But Xiaomi needs to improve on basics like the camera and find a way to make more of these before we can wholeheartedly recommend it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Chinese users will get a big kick out of using this phone on the daily, especially those that consume and stream media a lot (a highly common occurrence in the East). And for a concept phone, it is surprisingly affordable – the RMB price roughly converts to just over $500 in the base model. This is mostly due to the small quantities that Xiaomi is actually manufacturing – they want to get the phone in as many hands as possible without creating so many that the price needs be higher to cover those costs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Chinese users will get a big kick out of using this phone on the daily, especially those that consume and stream media a lot (a highly common occurrence in the East). And for a concept phone, it is surprisingly affordable – the RMB price roughly converts to just over $500 in the base model. This is mostly due to the small quantities that Xiaomi is actually manufacturing – they want to get the phone in as many hands as possible without creating so many that the price needs be higher to cover those costs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
So in all, Xiaomi’s Mi Mix is not a phone without flaws. But if you want the latest, coolest tech that will catch other people’s eye, the Mi Mix is it. There’s no other phone on the market like it, and it makes the the iPhone and Pixel look outdated. Tech geeks are always complaining that smartphone designs have become boring. Well, this is anything but.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
So in all, Xiaomi’s Mi Mix is not a phone without flaws. But if you want the latest, coolest tech that will catch other people’s eye, the Mi Mix is it. There’s no other phone on the market like it, and it makes the the iPhone and Pixel look outdated. Tech geeks are always complaining that smartphone designs have become boring. Well, this is anything but.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Mashable EN→FR Archive.org version
The beautiful, innovative design of the Xiaomi Mi Mix has its compromises, but you'll happily deal with them to hold a phone from the future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Mashable EN→FR Archive.org version
The beautiful, innovative design of the Xiaomi Mi Mix has its compromises, but you'll happily deal with them to hold a phone from the future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi can make some truly remarkable devices; the Mi Mix is really a testament to that. However, I still think the company can still work on its software: MIUI 8 still doesn’t feel quite as polished and refined as other versions of Android.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi can make some truly remarkable devices; the Mi Mix is really a testament to that. However, I still think the company can still work on its software: MIUI 8 still doesn’t feel quite as polished and refined as other versions of Android.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix costs a mere 3499 Yuan, which translates to about Rs. 35,000. So, it’s essentially a phone that feels more premium than a Google Pixel XL, is just as fast, but is priced nearer to the OnePlus 3. While it isn’t comparable to the best flagships in all aspects, it’s a glimpse at where the competition is going to be in future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix costs a mere 3499 Yuan, which translates to about Rs. 35,000. So, it’s essentially a phone that feels more premium than a Google Pixel XL, is just as fast, but is priced nearer to the OnePlus 3. While it isn’t comparable to the best flagships in all aspects, it’s a glimpse at where the competition is going to be in future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Soycincau EN→FR Archive.org version
You won’t get very good mileage with a V12 Lambo. Nor will you be able to park it, or see out the back of it, or drive it in narrow town streets. Plus, it might catch fire in a traffic jam. But you’ll love a big V12 Lambo and I think love is the best way to describe my feelings towards the Mi MIX.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Soycincau EN→FR Archive.org version
You won’t get very good mileage with a V12 Lambo. Nor will you be able to park it, or see out the back of it, or drive it in narrow town streets. Plus, it might catch fire in a traffic jam. But you’ll love a big V12 Lambo and I think love is the best way to describe my feelings towards the Mi MIX.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you’ve it: the big surprise that is the Mi MIX. My hunch is that two things motivated Xiaomi into making this phone. One is to shake off its copycat reputation, which unfortunately has surfaced once again in some people’s minds because of the Mi Note 2. The other is a response to some critics (maybe even some of its most ardent fans) who observed that its recent phones all kind of look very similar to one another.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you’ve it: the big surprise that is the Mi MIX. My hunch is that two things motivated Xiaomi into making this phone. One is to shake off its copycat reputation, which unfortunately has surfaced once again in some people’s minds because of the Mi Note 2. The other is a response to some critics (maybe even some of its most ardent fans) who observed that its recent phones all kind of look very similar to one another.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX is the first smartphone to keep the balance between high-end specs but also design and price. More importantly, it only sells at 3499 yuan,$583 which makes us give them five start good comment. Although the stock is not stable, we think it will not stop our passion for grabbing one. Come on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, do not discount the fact that this will be a blueprint of sorts for smartphone designs of the future. There is a lot of tech that goes unnoticed underneath to make something like the Mi Mix a reality. And let’s also not forget that this is actually a working device that goes on sale in a week’s time; this phone is right up there with the best of today’s flagships with its hardware set.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
Smartphone designs today are beginning to be very predictable. After all, how much different can your rectangular slab be? As it turns out, quite a bit still, as Xiaomi showed earlier with its “concept” phone, the Mi Mix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, do not discount the fact that this will be a blueprint of sorts for smartphone designs of the future. There is a lot of tech that goes unnoticed underneath to make something like the Mi Mix a reality. And let’s also not forget that this is actually a working device that goes on sale in a week’s time; this phone is right up there with the best of today’s flagships with its hardware set.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
Smartphone designs today are beginning to be very predictable. After all, how much different can your rectangular slab be? As it turns out, quite a bit still, as Xiaomi showed earlier with its “concept” phone, the Mi Mix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Android Police EN→FR Archive.org version
This Mi Mix is very interesting. It might be the first time we see both the ultrasonic proximity sensor and the piezoelectric acoustic technology in the same device, and the fact that they come in such a beautiful package make them even more intriguing. I hate large bezels just as much as the next guy/gal, but I'm not sure I'd like an almost bezel-less phone. Where would I rest my fingers? How would I hold it? How durable is the frame with such a large display when surviving a fall? And would I spend my time wiping the screen from fingerprints now that I have to put my grubby mitts on it to even hold the phone? Gah. Too many questions that I can't answer because this is only being released in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Android Police EN→FR Archive.org version
This Mi Mix is very interesting. It might be the first time we see both the ultrasonic proximity sensor and the piezoelectric acoustic technology in the same device, and the fact that they come in such a beautiful package make them even more intriguing. I hate large bezels just as much as the next guy/gal, but I'm not sure I'd like an almost bezel-less phone. Where would I rest my fingers? How would I hold it? How durable is the frame with such a large display when surviving a fall? And would I spend my time wiping the screen from fingerprints now that I have to put my grubby mitts on it to even hold the phone? Gah. Too many questions that I can't answer because this is only being released in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/09/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/06/2017
Notes: performances: 100% équipement: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/06/2017
Notes: performances: 100% équipement: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Mac Life - 2/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Mac Life - 2/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/11/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/11/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 92% écran: 84% mobilité: 84%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 92% écran: 84% mobilité: 84%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/25/2016
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/25/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 95% finition: 95%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 95% finition: 95%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/30/2016
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 94% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 94% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 75% équipement: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 85%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 75% équipement: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 85%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 60% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 40%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 60% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 40%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 75% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 75% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 80% équipement: 89% écran: 98% mobilité: 92% ergonomie: 60%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 80% équipement: 89% écran: 98% mobilité: 92% ergonomie: 60%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: Bright.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Bright.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/18/2016
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/15/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 74%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 74%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Xiaomi Mi 5c
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi 5cProcesseur: unknown
Carte graphique: unknown
Écran: 5.15 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.135kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s the first time that Xiaomi enters into its own processor field. We can see Xiaomi has done well on its first own processor smartphone, Xiaomi MI5C. We can feel that Xiaomi MI5C is the successor of Xiaomi mi4c. This light and thin smartphone can be popular with different kinds of people. If you like 5 inch smartphone, you can consider this one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 70% écran: 100% mobilité: 60% finition: 90%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/10/2018
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/30/2017
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 73%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/22/2017
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2017
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% performances: 80% écran: 78% mobilité: 54%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/01/2017
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/04/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Xiaomi Mi6
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi6Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Écran: 5.15 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.168kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi6 a fière allure, c’est indéniable. Le constructeur chinois a soigné son appareil dans les moindres détails et les finitions semblent remarquables.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Avec sa fiche technique impressionnante, le Xiaomi Mi6 n'a pas grand chose à envier aux ténors du marché vendus deux fois plus chers. Il n'est cependant pas parfait. Il lui manque en premier lieu le support de la fréquence B20 pour la 4G, comme sur la plupart des smartphones asiatiques. Son design aurait gagné à être plus original comme c'était le cas avec le Mi Mix. L'absence de prise casque pourra aussi en rebuter plus d'un. Malgré ça, le Xiaomi Mi6 reste un excellent smartphone sous Android. Il est rapide, personnalisable et dispose d'un très bel écran. La surcouche MIUI pourra être sujette à controverse pour son aspect très proche d'iOS, mais pour ma part j'apprécie surtout ses possibilités de personnalisation. Si l'import ne vous fait pas peur, alors vous pouvez foncer, le Mi6 est un excellent choix !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
J'imagine que certains lecteurs vont se montrer très véhéments concernant ce test, notamment en ce qui concerne mon avis très tranché sur MIUI, une interface élevée au rang de religion pour certains. Pourtant, il est clair que Xiaomi a perdu de sa superbe ces dernières années et n'a pas su se réinventer aussi rapidement que la concurrence.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Even with the cons, the pros are stacked with the price point leading the way. It might not be perfect as a flagship, but if you can get your hands on it, this amalgam of features could be one of the best bang for buck phones in existence.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 85% écran: 75% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
This really is an amazing phone, and only the Chinese software puts us off recommending it for a UK audience. It is crazy fast, crazy beautiful and crazy priced. If you know your way around Android go and get one, and you won’t be disappointed.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi tried to put everything that's hot right now in a low-fare package and the resulting Mi 6 is an amazing phone for the price. Xiaomi's keen on making a statement with it and challenging the big names in the game. The way the Chinese go about it is probably not the most subtle but in terms of looks and specs, the Xiaomi Mi 6 is the best Mi yet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
If you’ve been searching for a smartphone with Snapdragon 835 that doesn’t break the bank, all you have to search for is Xiaomi. The Chinese tech company has been giving us the best specifications and performance for a certain price point like its latest flagship — the Mi 6. Launched just last month, the handset has 2017 flagship features you’d expect but not as expensive as the others. Here’s our review.
video review
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi is yet to announce India launch plans for the Mi 6, though a representative told Gadgets 360 that there's no truth to rumours claiming that the phone won't launch here at all. We can expect the Mi 6 to be priced at around the same aggressive level as it is priced in China, in order to take on the popular OnePlus 3T.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
My first impressions put the Mi 6 in a pretty positive spot, as Xiaomi attempts to make their flagship the place to find the best specs and features in one place. We will continue our testing over the next week or so before we give you our full review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI6 is quite amazing in terms of design, its hardware is quite powerful, until now, no Chinese smartphone can beat it. As for camera, its performance can compete with that of Huawei P10 or Huawei Mate 9. But the most competitive factor is the price, Xiaomi MI6 only sells at least, 2,499 yuan, $400. By the way, you can use coupon code: GB9% to save money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/20/2017
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
A premium ceramic version with 6GB RAM and 128GB onboard storage will retail for just a little more at 2,999 Chinese yuan (that's $435, £340 or AU$580). If you want to get one in the US, UK or Australia, you'll have to go through online third-party retailers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Golem DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/01/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 95% écran: 88% mobilité: 91%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/13/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 95% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 70% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: El Sabio Informatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/11/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Wiz Blog IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/05/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 75% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/24/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/19/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 75% équipement: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 90% équipement: 98% écran: 90% mobilité: 86% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% mobilité: 75% finition: 82%
Source: Panorama IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: Mobile Review RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/14/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% performances: 90% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/24/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/10/2017
Source: Yeu Laptop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/22/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/01/2017
Source: TechZ VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/25/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/19/2017
Xiaomi Mi Max 2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Max 2Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Écran: 6.44 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.211kg
Prix: 210 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
China import for phablet fans. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a screen size of over 6.4-inches - which you may or may not like. But if you do go for the XXL smartphone, you will find that it has quite a lot to offer for $370.
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Quoiqu’il en soit, pour environ 300 Euros les amateurs de multimédia trouveront un excellent compagnon en ce Xiaomi Mi Max 2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Grand et autonome. C'est ce que l'on retient particulièrement du Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Celui-ci s'adresse à un public bien particulier qui saura quoi faire d'un objet aussi encombrant. De leur côté, ceux qui cherchent un smartphone endurant pourront envisager cette phablette qui est une très bonne option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Si vous n'avez pas peur d'un smartphone de très grande taille et de tous les inconvénients que cela implique (difficulté pour le rentrer en poche, utilisation difficile pour les petites mains etc), vous apprécierez cet appareil à petit budget spécialement optimisé pour le multimédia. L'immense écran de 6,44 pouces permet de profiter très agréablement des contenus vidéo et des jeux, et le son stéréo assure une bonne expérience sonore. Les performances se chargent d'assurer la fluidité d'utilisation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
For a phablet its size, the Mi Max 2 has potential. It doesn’t have other gimmicky options that make it stand out compared to other phablets, but it works in delivering what people want in a phone, and with a powerful processor and surprisingly smooth interface, Xiaomi’s phablet is pretty good for its price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/03/2017
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
To put it in a nutshell, go for this device only if you have two major needs — long lasting battery and media consumption. The large battery and display are the unique selling points of this phone, as in every other department you can find better faring alternatives, some from Xiaomi itself. Also, the large size of the phone means that it is not suitable for use for everyone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 75%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is a bigger device compare to other devices so it is a little bit difficult and new thing to handle. It is a phablet size smart phone with good features. The users who like to have a big smart phone must go for Xiaomi Mi MAx 2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no doubt Mi Max 2 is a niche phone, which performs well and delivers on the core area of display, battery, and performance. Battery is one of its best features, and this could be the device that never dies. But unless you actively want a 6.4-inch phone to make your daily calls, you can look at other options in the market, including Redmi Note 4, Moto G5 Plus and others.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is certainly not everyone's cup of tea. Now, what we have here is more of a mug - if not the entire teapot - but you know what we mean. Stretching the limits of a smartphone screen is nothing new, but many have tried and failed to leave a meaningful mark in the 6-inch-and-above bracket. Sony's Ultra series are among the better examples and Huawei's had a few phablets right as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2, just like last year's Mi Max, is an all-rounder that pretty much checks in all the right boxes. But, at the end of the day, it's just another Redmi Note 4 clone -- in every sense of the word -- except that it has been made to order for people -- if any -- who like large-sized phablets. More or less, it shares all the plus and minus points of its younger (and more affordable) sibling. The Mi Max 2 is well-built, has a good display, is a slick and very capable performer, has excellent audio and a fantastic battery life. Is it any better than the Mi Max though? Well, only marginally. Which means, if you already happen to own a Mi Max, I would suggest you hold on to it for some more. If you don't however, and you're looking for a phone of such gigantic proportions, the Mi Max 2 is the only phone at its price point that -- as mentioned earlier -- checks in all the right boxes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2 is a nice, progressive iteration of the idea. The refined design and the incredible battery life make for a well-rounded package. The camera is not the best and the processing power isn’t top tier, yet at INR 16,999 ($270) in India, it is a great pick for anyone who wants a phone with a large display or wants a power bank with smartphone features thrown in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 81% écran: 82% mobilité: 100% finition: 82%
Source: iTech Post EN→FR Archive.org version
The device also has some cons like it's not easy to pick up, and, without a stand, it's unwieldy to hold and watch videos one-handed. Still, with good processing speed, multitasking features, a bright enough display Xiaomi Mi Max 2 comes just for INR 16,999 ($270), which looks like a nice deal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/07/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
In the end though, for the price that Xiaomi commands for the Mi Max 2 — Rs 16,999, it is almost impossible to ignore just how much of a value for money the device offers, especially since you are getting 64GB of storage and 4GB of RAM for that price. If you want a device that bridges the gap between a phone and a tablet, go for the Mi Max 2 with your eyes closed — you will not regret your decision.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
Large smartphones aren’t meant for everyone. The problems with the phablets are, they aren’t easier to carry in the hands, they can’t be able to fit inside your small pockets, feels bulkier, and so on. That said, in a nutshell, if you love big screen smartphones, want excellent battery life, and have the ₹17,000 budget to spend, Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is worthy in our opinion. If you have a lesser budget, the first generation Mi Max is still the right pick.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2017
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is definitely a charmer in multiple ways. An impressive performance courtesy the processor and ample RAM, decent display and camera, all mashed in an elegant-looking shell is what an everyday user would want in the given price range of Rs 16,999. However, as the name clearly says, it is a 'Max' sized smartphone and definitely not meant for a single-handed use. It is for those media consuming lot who love to watch movies, TV series and play games on the move with a larger and more engaging experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the smartphone is not just a regular phone you will in the market. It has a pretty large screen, which is ideal for media consumption but takes some time to get used to it. The phone comes with some impressive battery backup and the overall performance of the device is at par with the rest of the competition. So, if you fancy large screens and is looking to buy one, then Xiaomi Mi Max 2 can be considered as a good option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/27/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Max 2 is a unique device that is larger than most so-called phablets yet it is uniquely positioned to be much more portable than tablets. Given the success of the Mi Max, it is clear that a market most certainly exists that craves for a device that sits at the cross-section of these two categories. The Mi Max 2 takes everything good from the original and improves it further.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/27/2017
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
Excellent smartphone or call it a phablet, its powerful, does not heat up, camera is excellent and so is the battery life. The only thing to consider is the size, since this is big and if you are comfortable using it then there is no better option in this phablet category. Those who are already using the Mi Max can upgrade if required.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The overall design is impressive while performance smooth. Battery performance left us pleasantly surprised. On the other hand, the camera could have used improvement. There haven't been many good launches in the Rs. 15,000-20,000 price band of late, so we would recommend the Mi Max 2 to anyone looking for a great display and battery performance in a smartphone in this segment, if they don't mind its size.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
In a fiercly competitive mid-range segment, the Mi Max 2 is a smartphone that simply stands out. It certainly isn't for everyone, but it rewards those who can handle its size with a quality build, adequate performance, decent cameras, and exceptional battery life and multimedia experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
Likewise, how Redmi Note 3 and Redmi Note 4 price didn’t change, I was expecting a similar case with the Mi Max 2 with under ₹15,000 price. Its predecessor has a price of ₹14,999 whereas its second generation comes with a price hike, available at ₹16,999 which is ₹2,000 more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/20/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It might not be as fast as the original Mi Max, but performance isn’t the main reason you’ll be buying the MI Max 2. Crossing the boundary between phone and tablet, the gigantic 6.44in screen will leave those of you who like your phones big all hot under the collar. With more storage, an improved camera and longer battery life, the Mi Max 2 is a no-brainer of an upgrade.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is the right budget phablet for those who don't have the Mi Max already. Premium buyers can get a far better phone with the Galaxy C9 Pro.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum up, the Mi Max 2 banks heavily on display and battery performance. The smartphone is not a like a regular smartphone, you will find it in the market. The large screen is ideal for media consumptions, but it also makes it a bit difficult to operate as compared to other smartphones. As for the competition is concerned, the device will pit against Lenovo Vibe P2, Motorola Moto G5 Plus and others in terms of hardware specifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
While phablets are still too big for constant everyday use due to their large pocket footprint and degree of difficulty to hold, they are still perfect for leisurely use. The Mi Max 2 was an outstanding device to use for web browsing, social media, watching videos, and light gaming. Knowing that it will last a very long time on heavy use with its large battery makes it perfect for just that.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
In terms of Antutu performance, Xiaomi MI MAX 2 can be not so excellent, but in terms of photographing, battery life, craftsmanship, and price, Xiaomi MI MAX 2 can be a amazing smartphone, after all its official price is 1,699 yuan, $283. And it has large screen and durable battery life that most users like. We believe you will enjoy it a lot. You can use this coupon code: GB9% to catch Xiaomi MI MAX 2 at lower price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 92% prix: 91%
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/11/2017
Source: Android TV DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 85%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/07/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 84% écran: 82% mobilité: 98%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87% performances: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/12/2017
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/07/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 85% équipement: 76% écran: 85% mobilité: 96% finition: 78%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/25/2017
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Android Style HD IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 80% écran: 75% mobilité: 95% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 80% écran: 78% mobilité: 95% finition: 70%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/16/2017
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 85% équipement: 75% écran: 80% mobilité: 98% ergonomie: 55%
Source: One Tech PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/24/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/24/2017
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/26/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 74% écran: 90% mobilité: 100%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 61% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/27/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/25/2017
Source: VNReview VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/30/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/11/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/26/2017
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Reviewzat →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Xiaomi Mi5X
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi5XProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Écran: 5.50 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.165kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi 5X est un smartphone milieu de gamme très intéressant qui est proposé à un tarif très accessible. Ceux qui n’ont pas peur de se lancer dans un achat qui nécessite de passer par l’import peuvent foncer. Cependant, il faut garder à l’esprit qu’au moment où ces lignes sont écrites, la ROM Globale / Internationale n’est pas encore mise à disposition. Il est plus sage de patienter encore un peu dans le cas où cela peut vous poser un problème.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Sa qualité de fabrication est exemplaire, son écran est de toute beauté, le son délivré est un vrai régal pour les oreilles, il est doté de belles performances, il offre une très bonne autonomie et il produit de belles photos.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi 5X s'installe comme un modèle polyvalent qui vient renouveler le milieu de gamme du fabricant. Ce n'est pas une bête de puissance, mais il sait presque tout faire sans sourciller. Les nomades apprécieront la durée de vie de la batterie, les autres pesteront sur les longues heures de charge.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Mad Shrimps EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5X has impressed us quite a bit in terms of build quality, performance, camera quality, GPS locking speed, accuracy and also sports a decent battery life. This model is a 5.5’’ phablet with a Full HD resolution screen and runs the latest MIUI 9.2 version; the same hardware is also sold with a different name “Mi A1” under the Android One software, if you do prefer a clean, non-skinned Android experience. GearBest lends a helping hand in order to avoid Customs hassles for European customers, so they have this model as ready to ship from their EU warehouse. The product link for this particular model can be accessed from HERE.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Mi 5X from Xiaomi is one of the best devices in its price category. A powerful, powerful, reliable smartphone with an excellent screen and good autonomy. A lot of additional features and settings, high-quality cameras and a very smart fingerprint scanner make it a strong competitor to even more expensive flagships from second-tier manufacturers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the 5X is one of the best budget phones I have ever tried so much so that it feels like you are getting a 2000 ringgit device for the price of only 950 ringgit which the 5X cost. Xiaomi has also produced the Mi A1 which is basically the 5X running on a pure stock android. If you do not like the MIUI interface that comes with the 5X, you can easily opt of the A1 which is the exact same specs but running on stock android. If you are looking to pick up the 5x, you can head over to GearBest as they are having a promotion on the phone which you can pick up for under RM1,000.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 95% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi 5X is pretty straightforward - one of the most affordable smartphones in the upper midrange, where available, that is. It offers great dual-camera experience on the cheap and that can't be matched by any reputable maker.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Compared with Xiaomi MI5C, Xiaomi MI5X has more beautiful design, and it also has dual rear camera with more advantage, besides, its battery life and price are also attractive, if you want a competitive mid-range smartphone with good camera and battery, you can try this phone. Right now Xiaomi MI 5X 3GB 32GB version is in flash sale at $216.99, and 4GB+64GB version at $249.99.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5X is a mixed bag of goodies but not really a master of anything. It’s got a nice design, decent performance, and good hardware. But that’s just it — nothing really outstanding. Even the dual rear camera which is supposed to be its main selling point is only above average at best. It is only good on daylight shots and while the optical zoom feature of the secondary camera does the job well, we don’t see much use for it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite the disappointing numbers from its battery test, it’s not hard to see the value the Xiaomi Mi 5x gives. Again, you’re mostly seeing devices with the same processing package at a high price bracket, which already makes this phone from the Chinese brand worth a look. Perhaps, the only thing holding us back from giving it a glowing recommendation is the company’s status in the country and the lack of an official warranty. It’s still pretty tough to pass up though and you are getting an in-store warranty.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
If there’s one brand that always comes up, whether it’d be on reviews for the latest phone release or just leaks for devices to come, it has got to be Xiaomi. We can’t really blame you, they made a significant impact when they came to our shores in an official capacity, and a good portion of our readership still clamors for the bang-for-your-buck product from the Chinese brand. Thankfully, online retailers still keep stock of the phones from the popular brand and one of their latest devices just arrived at HQ. Today, we’re going to be taking the Xiaomi Mi 5x for a quick go-around before it goes in for its full review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Critique simple, , Très courte, Date: 11/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 52% écran: 82% mobilité: 74% finition: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 95% prix: 93%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/31/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87% performances: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/19/2017
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 80% performances: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 80% équipement: 65% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 75% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 82% écran: 82% mobilité: 88% finition: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 89% équipement: 77% écran: 75% mobilité: 83% ergonomie: 72%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/06/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% équipement: 85% écran: 80% mobilité: 85% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 89% écran: 79% mobilité: 85% finition: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/28/2017
Source: KinaTech HU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/29/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/24/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2017
Xiaomi Mi Note 3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Note 3Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 510
Écran: 5.50 pouces, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.163kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Certes le Xiaomi Mi Note 3 n’est pas exempt de défauts (pas de B20 en 4G, menus en anglais, absence de Google Play en natif, pas de jack 3.5), mais à côté de cela, son utilisation est un régal au quotidien.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2017
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Mi Note 3 est le parfait exemple d'une itération manquant de saveurs. Xiaomi ne fait certainement pas preuve d'originalité concernant ce modèle, inspiré tout droit du Mi 6, qui vient s'installer comme un successeur milieu de gamme par rapport au précédent Mi Note 2. On se retrouve alors avec un terminal correct, mais qui n'a pas vraiment d'argument valide pour convaincre par rapport aux autres modèles de la marque, ni face à la concurrence.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Au final, le Xiaomi Mi Note 3 est un solide smartphone milieu de gamme capable de titiller parfois des smartphones plus premium. A défaut d'un design borderless original, le smartphone conserve une certaine élégance et offre des prestations générales assez convaincantes. Le Mi Note 3 présente notamment des atouts intéressants comme son double capteur photo, son prix ou encore sa très bonne autonomie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Note 3 a beaucoup de qualités, à commencer par son design tout en verre très réussi et agréable en main, et son double capteur photo. Ses performances sont aussi très bonnes, dans la moyenne supérieure des téléphones à son prix, avec une autonomie excellente. Problème étant que le configurer est la croix et la bannière, et que sa surcouche très lourde nuit à l'expérience utilisateur notamment sur le plan des notifications. Aussi, du fait de son incompatibilité avec la 700 et 800 MHz, et de la relative difficulté de l'acquérir pour le simple quidam, mieux vaudra passer son chemin... ou l'importer avec une ROM globale déjà flashée pour les plus téméraires.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
Looking to improve features and performance principally for Chinese consumers, Xiaomi has really upped its game for photography with the Mi Note 3. Compared to the Mi 5 and Mi 5S Plus (the last Xiaomi devices we tested), the Mi Note 3 shows significant signs of development, improving still photos in many areas and adding those desirable zoom and bokeh features, which are well-implemented. Our new challenging test scenes highlight some issues with texture on moving subjects, but in static scenes detail is good both outdoors and indoors, and autofocus is fast. When all is said and done, by offering premium flagship photography features and performance at a mid-range price point, the Xiaomi Mi Note 3 is a great choice for the budget-savvy smartphone shooter.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 3 looks premium and performance was impressive, the MIUI 9 makes it even better. This handset is not available in India and if you are planning to buy this, you can order from GearBest, you will need to pay custom duty consider that too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
This Mi Note is not to be confused with Redmi Note series that is available in India, both are different. This variant I got comes with 6GB RAM and 64GB ROM. It packs a 3500 mAh battery. There is LED notification, there is dual SIM slot, you need 2x nano SIM’s there is no micro SD slot and OTG is supported. The home button on the front doubles up as finger print sensor, there is IR blaster too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: BGR EN→FR Archive.org version
Its similarities to the iPhone’s Plus models are hardly a knock against Xiaomi, as the company has never been shy about following trends set by the big dogs in mobile, but the real story here is how well they manage to pull it off. It would be much harder to excuse the obvious Apple inspiration if the phone wasn’t such a pleasure. Oh, and then there’s the little matter of it being incredibly affordable, with prices landing at around $450 depending on where you look. Gearbest (which provided our review unit) currently has the Mi Note 3 at $409.99.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Compared with Xiaomi mi note 2, Xiaomi MI Note 3 has different market position, since Xiaomi MI MIX series became the flagship, although Xiaomi MI Note 3 chooses Snapdragon 660 processor, it still has excellent design, craftsmanship, face ID, good camera, etc, so if you want larger screen, MI Note 3 will be better choice. Right now Xiaomi MI Note 3 is in flash sale from Gearbest at $549.99.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/15/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has announced three new products few day ago: The Xiaomi Notebook Pro, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 and grade 3 – and the Note 3 has surprised us! Had the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 still above the Mi5s filed, the Grade 3 now ranks below the MI6. The spearhead of Xiaomi will now form the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2ndInstead of MI6 Plus now the Mi Note 3 is coming! The Xiaomi Mi Note 3 slims, in contrast to its predecessor, significantly from: 5.5 “inches instead of 5.7”, a Snapdragon processor from the upper middle class and a significantly lower price. Succeeds, the attack on the iPhone Plus?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
If you're coming from the Mi Note 2, we suggest you look towards the Mi MIX 2 instead. That'll be a significant upgrade, since you'd get a 5.99-inch in a 5.5-inch body, instead of the 5.7-inch display Mi Note 2 users were working with previously.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 100%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/24/2017
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/25/2018
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/23/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 85% équipement: 80% écran: 75% mobilité: 85% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/14/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% performances: 85% équipement: 87% écran: 85% mobilité: 88% finition: 82% ergonomie: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 85% équipement: 88% écran: 89% mobilité: 93% ergonomie: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 85% écran: 75% mobilité: 87% finition: 81%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/14/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/12/2017
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Écran: 6.00 pouces, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.185kg
Prix: 600 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Neck and neck. One year after the launch of the predecessor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix, the Chinese manufacturer has now released a new model. Not much has changed on the outside, apart from the device shrinking slightly. While other Asian manufacturers are fighting for customers with very competitive prices, Xiaomi displays confidence in its pricing, thereby placing its focus on quality and design.
Source: Meilleurmobile Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 a de sérieux arguments. Il fait largement mieux que le premier Mi Mix sur tous les points. La firme chinoise a bien compris la leçon et a corrigé tout ce qui devait l’être. Néanmoins, la partie photo n’est toujours pas à la hauteur même si elle a été considérablement améliorée.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Xiaomi mûrit son smartphone borderless en proposant un terminal très attrayant. Pour 500€ environ, on a un smartphone à la fois élégant et puissant. Le Mix 2 est une super plateforme pour le multimédia grâce à un écran IPS au top. Certes, ce n'est pas de l'AMOLED, mais la qualité est au rendez-vous. MIUI 9 plaira aux fans, malgré le peu de changements apportés par cette nouvelle version de la surcouche asiatique. Finalement, le Mi Mix 2 ne pêche que par des petits défauts, notamment du côté de la photographie. Le placement de l'APN avant est particulièrement déstabilisant. Le poids du smartphone peut aussi être un frein à l'achat, le terminal étant assez lourd en main. Il n'y a rien de rédhibitoire cependant, j'ai réellement apprécié mon expérience avec ce Mi Mix 2. C'est un achat idéal si vous cherchez un smartphone borderless élégant et puissant, le tout ne dépassant pas un budget de 500€.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix 2 est le smartphone à écran sans bords qui ravira les fans d’Android. Il n’est toujours pas officiellement disponible en France, mais il existe des solutions pour se le procurer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
On ne va pas tourner autour du pot c’est un bon produit, il a certes quelques carences, mais après tout aucun smartphone n’est parfait. Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 jouit d’un excellent rapport qualité / prix, c’est indéniable. Le constructeur propose un flagship borderless disposant de solides atouts du point de vue performances et autonomie, sans oublier sa compatibilité avec toutes nos fréquences 4G. Vous l’associez à un design pour le moins réussi et on obtient là un appareil qui vaut la peine que l’on s’attarde sur son cas.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix 2 corrige en grande partie les défauts de son prédécesseur : moins imposant, de très hautes performances, un appareil photo sensiblement amélioré bien que capricieux, mais surtout, une compatibilité avec nos bandes de fréquences françaises… le tout pour un prix vraiment intéressant à moins de 500 euros pour sa version la plus accessible. Vraiment, ces axes d’améliorations sont tout à son honneur. Xiaomi a très bien rectifié le tir.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Je ne vais pas vous mentir, je ne m’attendais pas à un tel niveau de finition sur le téléphone et le bougre m’a ainsi laissé sans voix durant le déballage diffusé en live sur Facebook. L’effet miroir est vraiment réussi et le terminal a droit à des finitions extrêmement soignées.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: Journal du Geek Archive.org version
Au final, c’est une impression très positive qui se dégage de ce Mi Mix 2 ! Encore une fois, le constructeur chinois nous offre un produit compétitif, premium, à un prix abordable. Si le premier Mi Mix avait était un « test » pour Xiaomi, on peut dire que le Mi Mix 2 est cette fois-ci un produit aboutit, mais il est encore possible de faire mieux.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2017
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: PC Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
There are other negatives. It doesn’t have a 3.5mm jack, there’s no IP68 water-resistance, there’s no microSD slot (only two slots for nano SIMs), and the ceramic finish attracts fingerprints. Plus, if I’m being truly finickity, the camera housing protrudes a little. Nevertheless, if you can forgive these foibles and surmount that Chinese interface, then you will own an object of true beauty.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s only going be a small subset of customers for this device outside of the few countries where it’s officially sold. That’s really a shame because I believe that this was one of the best devices of 2017 and still remains a solid buy in 2018. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is coming soon, but it’s only a relatively small change and I think you could save the money and pick up the Mi Mix 2 and be just as happy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/30/2018
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 70% écran: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is a strikingly designed smartphone for a cut of the price compared to its flagship competitors. In most departments it more than gives them a run for their money, too. It's powerful, that ultra-trim bezel is well considered and gives the device a look like no other, while the 18:9 ratio screen is ideal for one-handed use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/29/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi MIX 2 is one of those handsets that you will probably never see another soul using if you live outside of Asia. If you are someone who likes having something unique, this is probably the handset for you. The device starts at $465 and can go a little higher if you choose to opt for more RAM and internal storage space. But considering that Samsung and LG are charging around $700 and over for their flagships, this isn't a bad price at all for what you get.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi 6 was already doing the bare minimum for budget flagships, and the same missing features on a pricier Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 places a huge emphasis on its bezel-less display, which in itself, isn't as feature-filled as its competition. However, it is still the most affordable bezel-less experience without the insane price tags as of late, paired with great performance returns. If you still want to experience using a bezel-less or edge-to-edge flagship smartphone before diving into the deep, pricey end with all the bells and whistles, the Mi MIX 2 is an excellent place to begin for S$699.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 offers incredible power, great looks and an excellent user interface experience at a price that puts many other top-tier phones to shame.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
In practically every regard the Mi Mix 2 is a flagship handset that can stand proud with the best the smartphone world has to offer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is a sleek looking flagship smartphone from Xiaomi. The phone features a design that is dominated by the immersive display and impressed with the edge-to-edge experience. Well, like any other device, the phone has its pros and cons. We witness a frequent call drop on both incoming and outgoing calls even though we have the strongest network in our area. The front camera is located at the unusual location which makes it difficult to capture good selfies unless you turn the phone by 180-degrees. It looks great and proves to be a winner when it comes to performance. If you can live with the Mi Mix 2’s average camera and Xiaomi’s own MIUI 9, then it is certainly a compelling flagship.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
For the money -- less than half the price of an iPhone X and two-thirds the price of a Samsung Galaxy S8 -- Xiaomi's Mi Mix 2 is a stunning smartphone. It looks and feels fantastic, performs well and represents a near-miracle of packaging. And on top of all that, you'll have a phone that none of your friends or colleagues have.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
It might seem alien at first, but there's little need to be sceptical: the Mi Mix 2 wraps all the home comforts of an Android flagship in an altogether more affordable device, without compromising the design. It's a great sign of the future to come from this maker.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/29/2017
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
As I mentioned at the beginning of this review, the Mi Mix 2 is a work of art. The design of the handset is straight up gorgeous and photos don’t do justice to just how beautiful it looks in real life. Once you have seen the Mi Mix 2 in real life, there’s no way you can ignore it. The handset is not without its own demerits which includes the 12MP primary camera being a disappointment and the weird position of the 5MP front camera. None of that, however, changes the fact that the Mi Mix 2 is an excellent smartphone. For its price of Rs 35,999, the handset rivals the incredibly popular OnePlus 5 in India which it handily beats in the design and build department.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is likely the most stylish smartphone with the full-screen display. It has good battery timings whereas it doesn’t have microSD card slot, no headset jack and the phone is not water-resistant. The device is a little bit expensive because Xiaomi is a new company in Pakistan so the audience will take time to spend that much money on Xiaomi device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, whether it is Mi Mix 2 ceramic version or all-ceramic version, the appearance of a full screen and ceramic body design, as well as the flagship processor brings powerful performance and low power consumption, so from which aspects it Is a very cool technology products.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/18/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s nothing bad here, so don’t take that the wrong way. But when you’re used to Samsung and Google’s way of handling Android, Xiaomi’s skin almost feels like a completely different operating system. I’m still not 100% used to it after a few weeks of playing with it, and I think most people in my situation would feel the same.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As Xiaomi marches ahead towards dominating smartphone sales in India, it can’t just count on the Redmi series to be its cash cow. Capturing the midrange and premium smartphone market with larger margins is the bigger play here. In spite of the me-too route, Xiaomi is smartly launching devices that have a gimmick to offer. The Mi A1 comes with stock Android, the Mi Mix 2 ships with almost no bezels. By differentiating themselves from the competition, the company hopes to offer a unique proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
But the Mi Mix 2 is still a fantastic phone: significantly faster than its predecessor, and much better looking. Better still, it's as affordable as ever, making it a great alternative to other Android flagships - provided you can either live without or cope with having to set up Google services yourself.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is the perfect bezel-less phone for Android fans all over the world, but can be hard to get if you don't live in China or India.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has tasted one success after another over the past 12-18 months, and the company looks set to dethrone Samsung as the number one player by volume in India’s smartphone market. This has largely been possible because of its budget Redmi offerings, but recently, we’ve seen the company looking to experiment with other price bands and product segments with the likes of the Xiaomi Mi A1 and the recently launched Redmi Y1 series.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Which, by and large, all sounds great, so surely the Mi Mix 2 is as pricey as its other 18:9 screen, trim bezel, high-powered flagship competitors? Well, no, not even nearly. With its €499 asking price in Europe - well, Spain for the time being, which is where the handset launches on 11 November 2017 (hopefully with more European nations to follow) - it's a lot, lot more affordable than the competition. It even has the potential to slap about OnePlus with its imminent 5T launch. Changing times.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum up, the smartphone comes loaded with some premium design along with top-of-the-line performance and battery comfortably last a day. However, both the cameras are average and there is no scaling option. To conclude, the phone can be considered as a good option if you fancy bezel-less display with some premium look, but overall, it faces a stiff competition with the likes of OnePlus 5, LG G6, and more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 carries on the legacy of its predecessor. It has a tall screen, minuscule bezels at three sides and has a ceramic back that makes the phone look more premium. Of course, the Mi MIX 2 comes with a smaller screen as compared to the Mi MIX, but, that makes it more compact and operable with one hand.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is an elite smartphone that offers a combination of cutting-edge performance, incredible bezel-less design and true premium feel in every way. In addition to some of the slight objections that apply to the Chinese version of the MIUI user interface, the average camera and slip in the hands of this device have nothing to complain about. We were really pleased with this smartphone in the world.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Gadget Diary EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is by far Xiaomi’s most good looking flagship, and the best part is that it isn’t just about beauty. The device performs equally well as the OnePlus 5, but you’ll have to shell out an extra some for that exceptional design.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has established itself as a force in the budget smartphone market in India, and as the number two smartphone vendor in the country, it is inching closer to the market leader Samsung with every launch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/27/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is not exactly an easy phone to recommend. Or, at least not universally applicable as such. For us reviewers, constantly entrenched in the thick of the smartphone realm, with dozens of handsets coming and going, it constitutes a breath of fresh air. A nice shift and interesting new trend in design and take on the tired "slab" form factor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
All in all, the Mi Mix 2 is one very exotic and unconventional smartphone.Xiaomi has put a big emphasis on the design of this handset, which has led to sacrifices being made in other key areas such as the camera department.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no doubt Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 delivers on the premium experience. Yes, the design is different and the display excellent. But that’s never enough. It’s definitely a phone worth considering, if you don’t really care for dual rear cameras. But nonetheless, Xiaomi will have a tough time convincing customers to pick this one from the several other mid-range flagships in the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum it up, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is indeed a beautiful smartphone, and, the bezel-less design makes it look more gorgeous. Of course, the phone does have a glossy back and it tends to slip off your hands, however, it does come bundled along with a nice quality hard case which you can snap on to the device for extra protection.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is Xiaomi’s best flagship smartphone offering yet. It almost is an all-rounder if you don’t factor in its abnormal low light camera performance. With that said, it performs equally good as the OnePlus 5 if not better on some fronts (just that it does not come with a Portrait mode).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 85%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2 is a great device and has its strengths lying in areas such as aesthetic bezel-less design, strong built quality and vibrant display. Apart from that, it performed very well in all the everyday tasks without any hiccups. It is easily Xiaomi's best built smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
I guess the review cleared all your doubt. If you are looking for a premium handset then Mi Mix 2 is an excellent option for the price. One thing is for sure, once you get this handset you are going to get a lot of attention, I mean the Mi Mix 2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 96%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi 6 was already doing the bare minimum for budget flagships, and the same missing features on a pricier Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 places a huge emphasis on its bezel-less display, which in itself, isn't as feature-filled as its competition. However, it is still the most affordable bezel-less experience without the insane price tags as of late, paired with great performance returns. If you still want to experience using a bezel-less or edge-to-edge flagship smartphone before diving into the deep, pricey end with all the bells and whistles, the Mi MIX 2 is an excellent place to begin.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% finition: 85%
Source: PC Quest EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi became the first to launch a truly full screen display smartphone in India with Mi MIX 2, a gorgeous evolution of Mi MIX, the revolutionary concept phone unveiled a year ago.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/11/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has launched its high-end flagship phone with a near bezel-less screen, the Mi Mix 2, in India at a hefty price tag of Rs 35,999. Successor to last year's concept phone Mi Mix, the Mi Mix 2, is notably Xiaomi's most expensive phone in India to date. Considering what it brings to the table, however, it takes no genius to ascertain that the Mi Mix 2 ought to be an expensive phone. In line with current-generation high-end flagship phones like the Samsung Galaxy Note 8, the LG V30 and even Apple's soon-to-be available iPhone X.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 has all the makings of a true flagship, but it's weak in the camera department. Barring that, this is the phone for those who have mid-ranged budgets and want a phone that feels extremely premium and high-end.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mix 2 has evolved from a crazy concept phone to a usable flagship phone. The all-screen front will ensure it stands out in the crowd. The ceramic back and the 18K-carat golden rim around the camera will ensure the phone looks premium. The Snapdragon 835 paired to 6GB of RAM will ensure you have a snappy experience throughout. The support for global LTE bands ensures one can use the Mix 2 no matter where they reside (you can purchase it from e-retailers like Gearbest and Aliexpress if you are not from China or India). If you can live with some obvious shortcomings in MIUI 9 and an average camera (by modern flagship standards), the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 has a lot to offer for ~$550 even after the vanity factor of bezel-less display wears off in the near future. For now, Xiaomi has blended all that style with a great deal of substance.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 85% performances: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 95%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MIX2 compared to MIX, improved the criticism of the handset problem, the use of conventional handset speaker with the catheter, the handset sound quality, and the normal mobile phone is no different The other is to reduce the screen to 18: 9 5.99 inches, one hand more friendly. Abandon the ceramic frame using the metal material, easier to mass production, reduce costs. unibody all ceramic enjoyment version is millet to explore the new ceramic material of another progress.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: BGR EN→FR Archive.org version
Much like a concept car which has its boldest, but ultimately unconventional aspects toned down before hitting the assembly line, the Mi Mix served as the inspiration for what is ultimately a more usable, but still unique device in the Mi Mix 2. The software is perhaps a bit rough around the edges if you’re buying one for use outside of China, but that shouldn’t stop you from enjoying the many upsides it has to offer. The Mi Mix 2 starts at around $600, depending on where you find it, but GearBest (which provided our review unit) currently has it for $569.99.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
So what’s our final verdict? Of the 7 factors we mentioned at the start of the post, the Mi Mix 2 passes most of them with flying colors, especially with Design (Build), Power, Display, and Battery Life. The only real issues are with the camera and the software (which can be remedied if you exert effort).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/29/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
All in all, the main problem the Mi Mix 2 is that the things its predecessor did differently are now standard in the smartphone world. The original Mi Mix was co-opted by the Essential Phone, among others, and we are seeing a move toward the phone’s 2:1 aspect ratio (well, 17:9 but close enough), along with minimal bezel displays, across the industry.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Last year Xiaomi mi mix made all of mi fans stunned, according to users’ feedback, it has some disadvantages, but Xiaomi MI MIX 2 has changed the disadvantages, lighter design, better camera, larger battery, latest OS, and improved hardware, etc. We believe most users will be very satisfied with it. Right now Geekbuying starts to sell Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 to $652.99 via coupon.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, a bezel-less display at just CNY3,299 (~S$681.23) is too affordable to ignore. The Mi MIX 2's design is appealing, and Xiaomi paid plenty of attention to maximizing the display's utility. We'd have a better assessment when we try the phone within the confines of our sunny shores, but until then, the Mi MIX 2 is what it is - innovative design at an accessible price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, what we really like about the Mi Mix 2 is that it takes a lot of the same cues from its predecessor while making it more accessible. The phone is a lot easier to handle even with a 6-inch screen, which alleviates one of the major concerns from last year.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
At the moment, it still remains to be seen if the Mi Mix 2 will ever be brought into Malaysia officially. Then again, considering the fact that the device supports 43 different bands, we reckon the Mi Mix 2 won’t just be a China-only product. Hopefully, the Mi Mix 2 will be officially sold in Malaysia in the near future; if priced right, it may be a winner for Xiaomi.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Smart Checker DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/28/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2018
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/08/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 96% prix: 87%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Hartware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/02/2017
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 96% prix: 87% performances: 100% équipement: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/03/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 95% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 93%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Kustruki ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 85% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/14/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/12/2018
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/06/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tutto App Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/20/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 75% équipement: 82% écran: 88% mobilité: 75% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 81% équipement: 95% écran: 89% mobilité: 81% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 60% écran: 79% mobilité: 50% finition: 88%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 95% écran: 95% mobilité: 95% finition: 90%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/18/2017
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/13/2017
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/28/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/12/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2017
Source: DGL.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 59% performances: 90% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/15/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/12/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: VNReview VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Tinh Te VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/16/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/11/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/30/2018
Notes: Note globale: 74%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Unlimited Tech →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/08/2017
Notes: performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Écran: 5.99 pouces, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.189kg
Prix: 799 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Première ligue. Un SoC Snapdragon 845, jusqu’à 8 Go de RAM, un appareil photo double capteurs, un écran de 6 pouces : avec ces composants haut-de-gamme, le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S s’attaque directement aux seigneurs du marché tel l’Apple iPhone X. Nos tests vont déterminer si le fleuron actuel de Xiaomi peut vraiment faire bouger les lignes du secteur des smartphones haut-de-gamme.
Source: Le monde numerique Archive.org version
Version améliorée du smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, le nouveau mobile Mi Mix 2S est proposé à un prix particulièrement attractif, bien qu’équipé de composants haut de gamme au regard des modèles conçus par de grandes marques affichant des prix supérieurs à 800 €. Large écran sans bord et sans encoche de 6 pouces, processeur Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, 6 Go de mémoire vive, double capteurs de 12 MP, lecteur d’empreinte digitale, très large connectivité et design plutôt séduisant, nous avons pu tester le smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S pendant un moment et voici nos impressions.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Le monde numerique Archive.org version
Version améliorée du smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, le nouveau mobile Mi Mix 2S est proposé à un prix particulièrement attractif, bien qu’équipé de composants haut de gamme au regard des modèles conçus par de grandes marques affichant des prix supérieurs à 800 €. Large écran sans bord et sans encoche de 6 pouces, processeur Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, 6 Go de mémoire vive, double capteurs de 12 MP, lecteur d’empreinte digitale, très large connectivité et design plutôt séduisant, nous avons pu tester le smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S pendant un moment et voici nos impressions.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix 2s a beau ne pas marquer une franche rupture dans la gamme, cela ne l'empêche pas d'avoir beaucoup de charme. En revanche, MIUI accuse un coup de vieux par rapport à ses concurrents. Dommage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 90% écran: 87% mobilité: 95% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Le Mi Mix 2s a beau ne pas marquer une franche rupture dans la gamme, cela ne l'empêche pas d'avoir beaucoup de charme. En revanche, MIUI accuse un coup de vieux par rapport à ses concurrents. Dommage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 90% écran: 87% mobilité: 95% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Troisième Mi Mix pour Xiaomi, mais le 2S est le premier terminal haut de gamme lancé en France par la firme. Écran borderless sans notch, Snapdragon 845 et double capteur photo pour moins de 500 euros. Xiaomi réussit-il à concurrencer les plus grands à ce prix serré ? Réponse dans ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Troisième Mi Mix pour Xiaomi, mais le 2S est le premier terminal haut de gamme lancé en France par la firme. Écran borderless sans notch, Snapdragon 845 et double capteur photo pour moins de 500 euros. Xiaomi réussit-il à concurrencer les plus grands à ce prix serré ? Réponse dans ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Lors de la présentation du terminal, beaucoup ont été déçus par le design du Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Il faut dire que les rumeurs laissaient présager d’un nouveau design plus moderne avec des bordures encore plus fines.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Fredzone Archive.org version
Lors de la présentation du terminal, beaucoup ont été déçus par le design du Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. Il faut dire que les rumeurs laissaient présager d’un nouveau design plus moderne avec des bordures encore plus fines.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/04/2018
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Le Xiomia Mi Mix 2S est un excellent mobile… et il est clairement digne de figurer dans le Top10 (potentiellement le Top5) des meilleurs mobiles haut de gamme de l’année 2018.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/04/2018
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Le Xiomia Mi Mix 2S est un excellent mobile… et il est clairement digne de figurer dans le Top10 (potentiellement le Top5) des meilleurs mobiles haut de gamme de l’année 2018.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/04/2018
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Avec le Mi Mix 2S, Xiaomi signe un très beau produit. Première particularité : son design si propre à cette gamme avec des bordures toujours plus fines. Certains n'aimeront pas, mais l'esthétique du smartphone se démarque et lui confère indéniablement une vraie personnalité.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Avec le Mi Mix 2S, Xiaomi signe un très beau produit. Première particularité : son design si propre à cette gamme avec des bordures toujours plus fines. Certains n'aimeront pas, mais l'esthétique du smartphone se démarque et lui confère indéniablement une vraie personnalité.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S est un excellent smartphone, avec un rapport qualité/prix presque imbattable. Les principaux concurrents de ce smartphone seront le OnePlus 6 avec son encoche, et le Honor 10 que l’on ne peut pas qualifier de borderless.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S est un excellent smartphone, avec un rapport qualité/prix presque imbattable. Les principaux concurrents de ce smartphone seront le OnePlus 6 avec son encoche, et le Honor 10 que l’on ne peut pas qualifier de borderless.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The original full-display smartphone is evolving into something really special. Now with wireless charging, faster performance and a dual-camera that builds in AI, the Mi Mix 2S is a closer rival to western flagships than ever - and at a fraction of the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The original full-display smartphone is evolving into something really special. Now with wireless charging, faster performance and a dual-camera that builds in AI, the Mi Mix 2S is a closer rival to western flagships than ever - and at a fraction of the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
At just over $500 but rivaling the specs of a Samsung flagship, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a fantastic value in the same vein as the OnePlus series of phones. While it has a couple head-scratching design snafus, you will never be disappointed by the performance of the device as a whole.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
At just over $500 but rivaling the specs of a Samsung flagship, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a fantastic value in the same vein as the OnePlus series of phones. While it has a couple head-scratching design snafus, you will never be disappointed by the performance of the device as a whole.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
I’ve only spent about a week with the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, but early returns on the device are great. It’s got a unique design, great aesthetic, phenomenal, flagship-caliber specifications and a much-improved UI that’s just different enough to set it apart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2018
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
I’ve only spent about a week with the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, but early returns on the device are great. It’s got a unique design, great aesthetic, phenomenal, flagship-caliber specifications and a much-improved UI that’s just different enough to set it apart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2018
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
For a price of Php 27,990 (6GB + 64GB storage) and Php 29,990 (6GB +128GB storage), this device is worth it if you’re the type of person that uses the phone for gaming, watching videos and web browsing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/13/2018
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
For a price of Php 27,990 (6GB + 64GB storage) and Php 29,990 (6GB +128GB storage), this device is worth it if you’re the type of person that uses the phone for gaming, watching videos and web browsing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/13/2018
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall Xiaomi offers a great product, while not perfect in every aspect, it also doesn’t have any immediate deal breakers that I would say would put it out of consideration for buyers. The screen is one thing that’s subjective and if you have the chance, it’s best to be experienced and evaluated it in person. Oh, and it doesn’t have a headphone jack, so that’s also a thing. All in all, it’s definitely priced where it should be.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/29/2018
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall Xiaomi offers a great product, while not perfect in every aspect, it also doesn’t have any immediate deal breakers that I would say would put it out of consideration for buyers. The screen is one thing that’s subjective and if you have the chance, it’s best to be experienced and evaluated it in person. Oh, and it doesn’t have a headphone jack, so that’s also a thing. All in all, it’s definitely priced where it should be.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/29/2018
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S has fixed battery of Li-ion 3400 mAh, the satisfactory battery. It would have been much better if they provide 4000 mAh battery because it has 6GB RAM or 8GB RAM with an octa-core processor. It will resume more energy than any other smartphone. Excessive usage of the camera can drain the battery very rapidly.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S has fixed battery of Li-ion 3400 mAh, the satisfactory battery. It would have been much better if they provide 4000 mAh battery because it has 6GB RAM or 8GB RAM with an octa-core processor. It will resume more energy than any other smartphone. Excessive usage of the camera can drain the battery very rapidly.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, although, an updated version of the Mi Mix 2, is a device worthy to be called a flagship and can compete with other devices in its class. Let’s do a rundown – it has a large 5.99 FHD+ display with slim bezels, Snapdragon 845 chipset, 6GB RAM, and great-performing dual rear cameras.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S, although, an updated version of the Mi Mix 2, is a device worthy to be called a flagship and can compete with other devices in its class. Let’s do a rundown – it has a large 5.99 FHD+ display with slim bezels, Snapdragon 845 chipset, 6GB RAM, and great-performing dual rear cameras.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/19/2018
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
With improved cameras, a large, notch-less display, Snapdragon 845 processor and great cameras (on the rear at least) the Mi Mix 2s is probably the most compelling budget flagship you can buy today under 30K. We have a feeling that we’ll be eating our words when the OnePlus 6 officially gets priced in the Philippines by Digital Walker in a few days but for now, the Mi Mix 2s is the best value for money flagship you can get if you’re cash strapped and need a powerful machine for less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
With improved cameras, a large, notch-less display, Snapdragon 845 processor and great cameras (on the rear at least) the Mi Mix 2s is probably the most compelling budget flagship you can buy today under 30K. We have a feeling that we’ll be eating our words when the OnePlus 6 officially gets priced in the Philippines by Digital Walker in a few days but for now, the Mi Mix 2s is the best value for money flagship you can get if you’re cash strapped and need a powerful machine for less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/24/2018
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
L’habit ne fait pas le moine, le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S reste une évolution majeure par rapport au Mi Mix 2. Certes son design est quasi identique. Cependant, nous avons droit à un appareil photo principal largement amélioré. Les performances assurées par le Snapdragon 845 sont tout simplement excellentes. L’autonomie et l’écran ne font pas non plus défaut à l’appareil. Cerise sur le gâteau, toutes nos bandes de fréquences 4G sont supportées.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/17/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
L’habit ne fait pas le moine, le Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S reste une évolution majeure par rapport au Mi Mix 2. Certes son design est quasi identique. Cependant, nous avons droit à un appareil photo principal largement amélioré. Les performances assurées par le Snapdragon 845 sont tout simplement excellentes. L’autonomie et l’écran ne font pas non plus défaut à l’appareil. Cerise sur le gâteau, toutes nos bandes de fréquences 4G sont supportées.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/17/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Its custom MIUI interface takes some getting used to, but the big and beautiful, notch-less display, the capable camera, the well-executed gesture navigation and the overall sophistication and elegance of the design more than make up for it. If you are willing to deal with something new and different, and if you happen to live in a country where Xiaomi actually sells its phones, you should definitely consider buying the Mi Mix 2s.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S majors on performance and design. With its ceramic, mirror-finish case and 18:9 display it looks and feels incredible in the hand.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Its custom MIUI interface takes some getting used to, but the big and beautiful, notch-less display, the capable camera, the well-executed gesture navigation and the overall sophistication and elegance of the design more than make up for it. If you are willing to deal with something new and different, and if you happen to live in a country where Xiaomi actually sells its phones, you should definitely consider buying the Mi Mix 2s.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S majors on performance and design. With its ceramic, mirror-finish case and 18:9 display it looks and feels incredible in the hand.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is yet another high end phone from the Chinese company that’s yet to make its way to the west. Though Xiaomi is strong in India and slowly popping up in Europe, plans for the U.S. seem inevitable but continue to be an ongoing internal discussion.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
The phone is slated to retail at Php 27,990, making it only Php 1,000 more than the flagship killer, OnePlus’ 5T, which currently retails for Php 26,990 for the 6GB/64GB version with last year’s SD835 processor. With rumors of the OnePlus 6 costing considerably more than last year’s model, it’s entirely possible that Xiaomi’s Mi Mix 2s may end up being the flagship killer of 2018, at least locally.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/13/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is yet another high end phone from the Chinese company that’s yet to make its way to the west. Though Xiaomi is strong in India and slowly popping up in Europe, plans for the U.S. seem inevitable but continue to be an ongoing internal discussion.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
The phone is slated to retail at Php 27,990, making it only Php 1,000 more than the flagship killer, OnePlus’ 5T, which currently retails for Php 26,990 for the 6GB/64GB version with last year’s SD835 processor. With rumors of the OnePlus 6 costing considerably more than last year’s model, it’s entirely possible that Xiaomi’s Mi Mix 2s may end up being the flagship killer of 2018, at least locally.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/13/2018
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
But that's not the reality. The Mi Mix 2S doesn't contend with the best devices in its class, and prospective buyers have to jump through too many hoops just to get their hands on one. It's interesting, but simply too inconvenient to recommend.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Regardless of how it would perform in the US, the Xiaomi Mi Mix lineup has morphed from a large unicorn in its original model, to a more manageable and streamlined model, fit for the average consumer. The Mi Mix 2S is an incredible value at its price point and one that will be hard to beat, but will see fierce competition in the category in the several months to come.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/06/2018
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
But that's not the reality. The Mi Mix 2S doesn't contend with the best devices in its class, and prospective buyers have to jump through too many hoops just to get their hands on one. It's interesting, but simply too inconvenient to recommend.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Regardless of how it would perform in the US, the Xiaomi Mi Mix lineup has morphed from a large unicorn in its original model, to a more manageable and streamlined model, fit for the average consumer. The Mi Mix 2S is an incredible value at its price point and one that will be hard to beat, but will see fierce competition in the category in the several months to come.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a phone that's as exciting as it is mystifying. The trim-bezel design and considerable power on board are great to behold for its price, yet the so-so screen and sometimes problematic software are just two of a handful of hurdles to overcome.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S is a phone that's as exciting as it is mystifying. The trim-bezel design and considerable power on board are great to behold for its price, yet the so-so screen and sometimes problematic software are just two of a handful of hurdles to overcome.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S, as we said, is an upgrade from last year's Mi Mix 2 phone. On the surface, the differences might look subtle, but in reality, the upgrade is noticeable and welcomed.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S, as we said, is an upgrade from last year's Mi Mix 2 phone. On the surface, the differences might look subtle, but in reality, the upgrade is noticeable and welcomed.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/24/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
We might not be 100 per cent on board with the software, and the front-facing camera is inherently poorly placed (it's got to go somewhere, eh?), otherwise the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is a shining example of just what can be achieved without a huge price tag being part and parcel of the deal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
We might not be 100 per cent on board with the software, and the front-facing camera is inherently poorly placed (it's got to go somewhere, eh?), otherwise the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 is a shining example of just what can be achieved without a huge price tag being part and parcel of the deal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/04/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi hasn't yet confirmed when or even if the Mi Mix 2S will launch in India, and what its price might be. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for updates, as well as our detailed review of the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, in which we will extensively test the phone's cameras, performance, software, and battery life, and deliver a final verdict.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/30/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi hasn't yet confirmed when or even if the Mi Mix 2S will launch in India, and what its price might be. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for updates, as well as our detailed review of the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, in which we will extensively test the phone's cameras, performance, software, and battery life, and deliver a final verdict.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/30/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S will be available in black and white for the price of 3,299 yuan ( about $524.54 ) for the 6/64 GB version (same price as the previous Mi MIX 2), 3,599 yuan ( about $572.24 ) for the 6 / model 128 GB, and finally 3,999 yuan ( about $635.84 ) for the top of the range, with 8/256 GB and with a wireless charging base included. The latter obviously also supports competing smartphones, such as iPhone X and Galaxy S8 / S9, and costs just 99 yuan, not even $15.74. Right now you can preorder it to use coupon code: VMSZDMWM at $589.99 for Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 6GB-64GB Black version.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
I will be using the Mi Mix 2S for a while in its “natural habitat”, as I travel through parts of Asia. This phone will not be made available in the West, but at least the global bands return if you wish to import it. Stay tuned for my full review of the phone including the better camera, and then, when I get my hands on the final review unit and software, I will do a camera follow up to give it the fair treatment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2S will be available in black and white for the price of 3,299 yuan ( about $524.54 ) for the 6/64 GB version (same price as the previous Mi MIX 2), 3,599 yuan ( about $572.24 ) for the 6 / model 128 GB, and finally 3,999 yuan ( about $635.84 ) for the top of the range, with 8/256 GB and with a wireless charging base included. The latter obviously also supports competing smartphones, such as iPhone X and Galaxy S8 / S9, and costs just 99 yuan, not even $15.74. Right now you can preorder it to use coupon code: VMSZDMWM at $589.99 for Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 6GB-64GB Black version.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
I will be using the Mi Mix 2S for a while in its “natural habitat”, as I travel through parts of Asia. This phone will not be made available in the West, but at least the global bands return if you wish to import it. Stay tuned for my full review of the phone including the better camera, and then, when I get my hands on the final review unit and software, I will do a camera follow up to give it the fair treatment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S is a good example of a device that aims very high, but at the same time is weighed down by costs and efficiency. Where the original Mi Mix was forward thinking, it had some issues that ultimately got Xiaomi to rethink the device’s direction, and to look for a balance between innovation, practicality, and cost. Does the Mi Mix 2S find that balance? We’re just as curious to find out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, though, we like what we are seeing so far from this camera. Xiaomi told us that this is the best camera they have ever put on a phone and it shows. We would definitely be interested in exploring this aspect in more detail when we get the final retail unit.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 2S is a good example of a device that aims very high, but at the same time is weighed down by costs and efficiency. Where the original Mi Mix was forward thinking, it had some issues that ultimately got Xiaomi to rethink the device’s direction, and to look for a balance between innovation, practicality, and cost. Does the Mi Mix 2S find that balance? We’re just as curious to find out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, though, we like what we are seeing so far from this camera. Xiaomi told us that this is the best camera they have ever put on a phone and it shows. We would definitely be interested in exploring this aspect in more detail when we get the final retail unit.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Critique simple, , Très courte, Date: 11/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 95% écran: 80% mobilité: 69% finition: 100%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Critique simple, , Très courte, Date: 11/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 95% écran: 80% mobilité: 69% finition: 100%
Source: Connect - 10/18
Critique simple, , De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% équipement: 82% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 77%
Source: Connect - 10/18
Critique simple, , De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% équipement: 82% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 77%
Source: Hartware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/02/2018
Source: Hartware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/02/2018
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/16/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 90%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 90%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/06/2018
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/06/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/17/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/17/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 95% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 93%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 95% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 93%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/02/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/02/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 85% finition: 100%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 85% finition: 100%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/25/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/25/2018
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/15/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/15/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 83% équipement: 95% écran: 89% mobilité: 82% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 83% équipement: 95% écran: 89% mobilité: 82% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/18/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 72% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 88%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/18/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 72% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 88%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/08/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/08/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 90% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 95%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 90% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 95%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 68% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 68% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/20/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/28/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Unlimited Tech →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Unlimited Tech →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Max 3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Max 3Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 636
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 509
Écran: 6.90 pouces, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.221kg
Prix: 250 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 de 6,9 pouces offre une surface d’écran encore plus grande que son prédécesseur, et sa partie matérielle a également légèrement été revue. Nous verrons dans ce rapport de test si cet import chinois mérite son prix d’environ 250 €.
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est clairement un OVNI dans le paysage. Il est loin d'être le meilleur, il n'est pas exempt de défauts, mais il ne fait jamais rien de mal et il se démarque clairement par sa taille et son autonomie. Si vous aimez les grands téléphones, vous avez ici un excellent représentant qui saura certainement vous convenir, d'autant plus qu'il possède une autonomie imbattable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 70%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est clairement un OVNI dans le paysage. Il est loin d'être le meilleur, il n'est pas exempt de défauts, mais il ne fait jamais rien de mal et il se démarque clairement par sa taille et son autonomie. Si vous aimez les grands téléphones, vous avez ici un excellent représentant qui saura certainement vous convenir, d'autant plus qu'il possède une autonomie imbattable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 70%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Concrètement, le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est un excellent mobile entrée de gamme qui offre une excellente expérience utilisateur.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/03/2018
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Concrètement, le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est un excellent mobile entrée de gamme qui offre une excellente expérience utilisateur.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/03/2018
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est un appareil que je vous recommande à l’achat. Cependant, c’est un smartphone que vous devrez acheter en prenant conscience qu’il affiche des dimensions généreuses. Si ce type de mobile vous convient, n’hésitez pas et franchissez le pas!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Max 3 est un appareil que je vous recommande à l’achat. Cependant, c’est un smartphone que vous devrez acheter en prenant conscience qu’il affiche des dimensions généreuses. Si ce type de mobile vous convient, n’hésitez pas et franchissez le pas!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Xiaomi nous fournit encore une fois un smartphone au rapport qualité-prix imbattable. Les utilisateurs recherchant un monstre d'autonomie seront séduits par le Mi Max 3. Il faut néanmoins aimer les écrans XXL, ce qui n'est pas forcément le cas de tout le monde mais ça c'est une affaire de goût. Quoiqu'il en soit, c'est une belle évolution de ses prédécesseurs, les Mi Max 1 et 2. Le design du smartphone fait de métal est appréciable, la partie photo est certes moins bonne que sur les flagships mais est toutefois très bonne et les performances sont tout à fait à la hauteur pour la plupart des utilisations.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Xiaomi nous fournit encore une fois un smartphone au rapport qualité-prix imbattable. Les utilisateurs recherchant un monstre d'autonomie seront séduits par le Mi Max 3. Il faut néanmoins aimer les écrans XXL, ce qui n'est pas forcément le cas de tout le monde mais ça c'est une affaire de goût. Quoiqu'il en soit, c'est une belle évolution de ses prédécesseurs, les Mi Max 1 et 2. Le design du smartphone fait de métal est appréciable, la partie photo est certes moins bonne que sur les flagships mais est toutefois très bonne et les performances sont tout à fait à la hauteur pour la plupart des utilisations.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
When you spend less than £250 on a phone you don't expect great things, but the Mi Max 3 might surprise you. This is not the fastest phone you'll find today, but it does have a very big, beautiful screen, capable cameras and some useful extra features.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/23/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
When you spend less than £250 on a phone you don't expect great things, but the Mi Max 3 might surprise you. This is not the fastest phone you'll find today, but it does have a very big, beautiful screen, capable cameras and some useful extra features.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/23/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Playing a particular angle in any product, especially tech is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you could limit your goals to a particular niche requirement alone and cruse though everything else, cutting corners as you please. Chances are that with a unique enough offering, you can still make the bottom line work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Playing a particular angle in any product, especially tech is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, you could limit your goals to a particular niche requirement alone and cruse though everything else, cutting corners as you please. Chances are that with a unique enough offering, you can still make the bottom line work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, at this price, the performance of Xiaomi Max 3 is still very good. Inheriting the price of 1699 yuan from the previous work, whether it is the feel, battery life, photo or experience is superior, for the users who like a big screen, so it is a great choice for them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, at this price, the performance of Xiaomi Max 3 is still very good. Inheriting the price of 1699 yuan from the previous work, whether it is the feel, battery life, photo or experience is superior, for the users who like a big screen, so it is a great choice for them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/08/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/08/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/08/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/07/2018
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/07/2018
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% performances: 81% mobilité: 92% finition: 79%
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% performances: 81% mobilité: 92% finition: 79%
Source: Optima IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 80% performances: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 65%
Source: Optima IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 80% performances: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 65%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/22/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/22/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 57% équipement: 84%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 57% équipement: 84%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 98% finition: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 98% finition: 71%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 98% finition: 71%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 98% finition: 71%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/17/2018
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/17/2018
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/25/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2018
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/20/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/20/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 90% équipement: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 90% équipement: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Écran: 6.39 pouces, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.218kg
Prix: 470 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 possède des technologies éprouvées, mais également un système coulissant et un design presque sans bordures, et surtout sans encoche. Mais le dernier-né de la série Mi Mix réserve une autre surprise.
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Ce Mi 9T Pro se montre encore plus puissant (processeur Qualcomm Snapdragon 855), plus moderne (lecteur d’empreintes digitales placé sous la dalle) et plus polyvalent en photo (il dispose d’un capteur photo principal de 48 MP). De plus, il ne rencontre pas les problèmes de poussière liés au slider puisqu’il est équipé d’une caméra frontale pop-up. Par contre, il n’est pas compatible avec la recharge sans fil.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/25/2019
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Ce Mi 9T Pro se montre encore plus puissant (processeur Qualcomm Snapdragon 855), plus moderne (lecteur d’empreintes digitales placé sous la dalle) et plus polyvalent en photo (il dispose d’un capteur photo principal de 48 MP). De plus, il ne rencontre pas les problèmes de poussière liés au slider puisqu’il est équipé d’une caméra frontale pop-up. Par contre, il n’est pas compatible avec la recharge sans fil.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/25/2019
Source: Meilleurmobile Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 est au final un très bon smartphone qui affiche un excellent rapport qualité/prix. Sa conception réussie, son écran de qualité, ses bonnes performances techniques et ses capacités photographiques en font un terminal particulièrement séduisant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Meilleurmobile Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 est au final un très bon smartphone qui affiche un excellent rapport qualité/prix. Sa conception réussie, son écran de qualité, ses bonnes performances techniques et ses capacités photographiques en font un terminal particulièrement séduisant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Si certains avaient encore un doute sur Xiaomi, le MWC 2019 aura fini par les chasser. Le Mi Mix 3G est le meilleur smartphone 5G présenté jusqu’à présent. Si le terminal ne se démarque pas par de nouvelles fonctionnalités par rapport à sa variante classique, il a le mérité d’être bientôt disponible sur le marché. Son prix de 599 euros séduira également tous les utilisateurs curieux de tester parmi les premiers la 5G. Chapeau, Xiaomi !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Si certains avaient encore un doute sur Xiaomi, le MWC 2019 aura fini par les chasser. Le Mi Mix 3G est le meilleur smartphone 5G présenté jusqu’à présent. Si le terminal ne se démarque pas par de nouvelles fonctionnalités par rapport à sa variante classique, il a le mérité d’être bientôt disponible sur le marché. Son prix de 599 euros séduira également tous les utilisateurs curieux de tester parmi les premiers la 5G. Chapeau, Xiaomi !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Xiaomi revient en ce début d'année avec le Mi Mix 3. Quatrième smartphone de la série "art et technologie" de la firme chinoise, il a pour particularité de proposer un système coulissant pour se débarrasser de l'encoche. De quoi avoir un téléphone vraiment sexy, mais pas exempt de défauts.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Xiaomi revient en ce début d'année avec le Mi Mix 3. Quatrième smartphone de la série "art et technologie" de la firme chinoise, il a pour particularité de proposer un système coulissant pour se débarrasser de l'encoche. De quoi avoir un téléphone vraiment sexy, mais pas exempt de défauts.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Non, le Mi MIX 3 n'est pas parfait. Il n'y a, par exemple, pas de lecteur d'empreintes digitales intégré dans l'écran ou de scanner de visage 3D, mais de nombreux autres smartphones haut de gamme 2018 se trouvent dans la même situation. L'écran n'offre pas une définition QHD mais l'absence quasi totale de bords, l'absence d'encoche et l'excellent rendu des couleurs compensent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Non, le Mi MIX 3 n'est pas parfait. Il n'y a, par exemple, pas de lecteur d'empreintes digitales intégré dans l'écran ou de scanner de visage 3D, mais de nombreux autres smartphones haut de gamme 2018 se trouvent dans la même situation. L'écran n'offre pas une définition QHD mais l'absence quasi totale de bords, l'absence d'encoche et l'excellent rendu des couleurs compensent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 réussit à être un smartphone original sur un marché où ses concurrents se ressemblent de plus en plus. Le grand retour du slider est ici parfaitement réussi, aussi bien dans sa construction que son utilisation, laissant la place majeure à un grand écran sublime.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 réussit à être un smartphone original sur un marché où ses concurrents se ressemblent de plus en plus. Le grand retour du slider est ici parfaitement réussi, aussi bien dans sa construction que son utilisation, laissant la place majeure à un grand écran sublime.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Clubic Archive.org version
À l'heure du verdict, nous ne pouvons ainsi décemment pas faire autrement que vous recommander chaudement ce Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Mais on n'oubliera pas non plus de vous avertir quant à son poids important qui, lors de longues sessions de frappe, aura vite fait de vous peser sur les poignets.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Clubic Archive.org version
À l'heure du verdict, nous ne pouvons ainsi décemment pas faire autrement que vous recommander chaudement ce Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Mais on n'oubliera pas non plus de vous avertir quant à son poids important qui, lors de longues sessions de frappe, aura vite fait de vous peser sur les poignets.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
A ce tarif, le Mi Mix 3 est très compétitif. Il dispose d’arguments de poids pour rivaliser avec les meilleurs smartphones du marché. Ce smartphone à la fiche technique très haut de gamme est positionné comme un concurrent du OnePlus 6T. Reste à voir si la notoriété de OnePlus ne fera pas trop d’ombre à Xiaomi, encore méconnu du public français.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/15/2018
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
A ce tarif, le Mi Mix 3 est très compétitif. Il dispose d’arguments de poids pour rivaliser avec les meilleurs smartphones du marché. Ce smartphone à la fiche technique très haut de gamme est positionné comme un concurrent du OnePlus 6T. Reste à voir si la notoriété de OnePlus ne fera pas trop d’ombre à Xiaomi, encore méconnu du public français.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/15/2018
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Ricks Tech
Soutien, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/07/2024
Source: Ricks Tech
Soutien, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/07/2024
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. The 5G variant is similarly good value, and not only the first 5G phone to go on sale in the UK but also the cheapest.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone. In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. Soon it will also be one of the first 5G phones in the world.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
In other respects Mi Mix 3 is not a huge upgrade over the 2S, and actually loses some of its bling over its predecessor with the absence of its 18K gold camera surround. But it's still a great phone - fast, stylish, feature-packed and available at an incredible price - and it's astonishing to see just how far the original full-display phone has come. Soon it will also be one of the first 5G phones in the world.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Phandroid EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is available on Amazon for $500 or as cheap as £400 in the UK. For the price, the device by Xiaomi is a great buy for those that want a premium feeling device without a notch. The specs on the device will handle anything you throw at it, which again for the price is impressive. However, MUI 10 may be a deal breaker for some that want a more vanilla Android experience and the sliding mechanism raises some longevity questions, which may deter some potential buyers. With solid battery life, a great display, decent camera, and good performance, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 should be on your list for consideration in the mid-range market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phandroid EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is available on Amazon for $500 or as cheap as £400 in the UK. For the price, the device by Xiaomi is a great buy for those that want a premium feeling device without a notch. The specs on the device will handle anything you throw at it, which again for the price is impressive. However, MUI 10 may be a deal breaker for some that want a more vanilla Android experience and the sliding mechanism raises some longevity questions, which may deter some potential buyers. With solid battery life, a great display, decent camera, and good performance, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 should be on your list for consideration in the mid-range market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
If you're intrigued by the device's neo-slider form-factor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 honestly feels like a downright steal at $899. The camera lacks the versatility or low-light performance you’d get out of the P30 Pro and it doesn’t feel as futuristic to use as something like the Samsung Galaxy S10 - but it’s still an incredibly compelling package at an incredibly compelling price and if you're looking for the best value-for-money flagship option available right this moment: this is probably it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
If you're intrigued by the device's neo-slider form-factor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 honestly feels like a downright steal at $899. The camera lacks the versatility or low-light performance you’d get out of the P30 Pro and it doesn’t feel as futuristic to use as something like the Samsung Galaxy S10 - but it’s still an incredibly compelling package at an incredibly compelling price and if you're looking for the best value-for-money flagship option available right this moment: this is probably it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
Outside of the score, we would like to praise Xiaomi for its “natural” camera tuning style, which is superior to Apple’s iPhone XS camera when it comes to capturing colors tones at night. The XS remains generally better with edge details and HDR in daylight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2019
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
Outside of the score, we would like to praise Xiaomi for its “natural” camera tuning style, which is superior to Apple’s iPhone XS camera when it comes to capturing colors tones at night. The XS remains generally better with edge details and HDR in daylight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
That annoying play between the two halves aside, Xiaomi’s flagship slider is a pretty good buy if you’re looking for a device that delivers an all-screen experience for not much money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
That annoying play between the two halves aside, Xiaomi’s flagship slider is a pretty good buy if you’re looking for a device that delivers an all-screen experience for not much money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
Still, I can’t recommend a phone that makes me feel less connected to the people in my life. Even after spending quite a bit of time in the settings making sure that there were zero settings stopping me from getting my notifications, the issues persisted. I even tried factory resetting and still had issues. If Xiaomi ever figures out software or gives users the option of using pure Android over its skin, I’ll be the first in line for its devices. Until then, buyer beware.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/09/2019
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
Still, I can’t recommend a phone that makes me feel less connected to the people in my life. Even after spending quite a bit of time in the settings making sure that there were zero settings stopping me from getting my notifications, the issues persisted. I even tried factory resetting and still had issues. If Xiaomi ever figures out software or gives users the option of using pure Android over its skin, I’ll be the first in line for its devices. Until then, buyer beware.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/09/2019
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
It has both pros and cons, but taken as a complete package the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is one of the best mid-to-upper-range Android phones on the market in 2019.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
It has both pros and cons, but taken as a complete package the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is one of the best mid-to-upper-range Android phones on the market in 2019.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→FR Archive.org version
Having recently told you about another SmartPhone from this company, here – their latest – has landed on my desk. Anything designed by Phillipe Starck is always eye catching; an early DAB radio was his work and still sits on my bedside table in daily use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→FR Archive.org version
Having recently told you about another SmartPhone from this company, here – their latest – has landed on my desk. Anything designed by Phillipe Starck is always eye catching; an early DAB radio was his work and still sits on my bedside table in daily use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 seems like a very deliberate attempt by Xiaomi to make a smartphone with a unique design that stands out from its rivals. That's an understandable impulse, but modern smartphone design and usage has become very standardized, especially in hardware, and users can get attached to certain features. Some people may balk at a phone with a slider and prefer similarly priced handsets like the Honor View 20 or OnePlus 6T, which have less idiosyncratic designs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 seems like a very deliberate attempt by Xiaomi to make a smartphone with a unique design that stands out from its rivals. That's an understandable impulse, but modern smartphone design and usage has become very standardized, especially in hardware, and users can get attached to certain features. Some people may balk at a phone with a slider and prefer similarly priced handsets like the Honor View 20 or OnePlus 6T, which have less idiosyncratic designs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, we like what Xiaomi is bringing to the table. The SD855 edition of the Mi Mix 3 sort of explains why the regular Mi Mix 3 comes with Snapdragon 845. The Explorer edition is a nice spin to the already quite intriguing specs that the regular Mi 9 has. And the Mi 9 SE, well, we're looking forward to putting it through its paces in our review routine.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, we like what Xiaomi is bringing to the table. The SD855 edition of the Mi Mix 3 sort of explains why the regular Mi Mix 3 comes with Snapdragon 845. The Explorer edition is a nice spin to the already quite intriguing specs that the regular Mi 9 has. And the Mi 9 SE, well, we're looking forward to putting it through its paces in our review routine.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi's flagship phone is almost the perfect phone, and the company's making it available in even more countries. The bad news is the US isn't one of them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi's flagship phone is almost the perfect phone, and the company's making it available in even more countries. The bad news is the US isn't one of them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Probably the only thing that’s working against the Mi Mix 3 is its small-ish battery capacity, coming in at 3200mAh. Thankfully the phone has Qualcomm’s QuickCharge 4 and wireless charging capability out of the box.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Probably the only thing that’s working against the Mi Mix 3 is its small-ish battery capacity, coming in at 3200mAh. Thankfully the phone has Qualcomm’s QuickCharge 4 and wireless charging capability out of the box.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 only came to Malaysia in January this year since it was released in China last year during October, but nothing is ever too late if the price is right which they nailed it. Starting at RM2199 (or RM2299 if you want the Sapphire Blue or Jade Green), this bad boy has most of the features covered - using the current best Snapdragon chipset, great camera performance, it can play games well, a true maximized full-screen for video playback and a classy design.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is the phone to buy if you like to watch movies and TV episodes on your way to work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/30/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 only came to Malaysia in January this year since it was released in China last year during October, but nothing is ever too late if the price is right which they nailed it. Starting at RM2199 (or RM2299 if you want the Sapphire Blue or Jade Green), this bad boy has most of the features covered - using the current best Snapdragon chipset, great camera performance, it can play games well, a true maximized full-screen for video playback and a classy design.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is the phone to buy if you like to watch movies and TV episodes on your way to work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/30/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo. And as the Mi Mix 3 arrives in the UK, it keeps its Honor and Lenovo competitors at bay.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo. And as the Mi Mix 3 arrives in the UK, it keeps its Honor and Lenovo competitors at bay.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
The last couple of years have been exciting for mobile photography, as manufacturers have developed multiple sensors and lenses for their rear cameras, and combined that hardware with advanced signal processing to maximize imaging possibilities. Xiaomi is one of the first to apply this approach to the front camera, and the benefits are clear, with the Mi MIX 3 delivering excellent results for flash and bokeh, thanks to the built-in selfie light and depth-sensing second sensor. Other attributes such as face exposure, color, and detail are also impressive, and thanks to generally good skin tone rendering, the Mi MIX 3 ranks high in our database of front camera image quality. There are things it can improve, of course, most notably the fact that both focus and depth of field are too limited. Denoising and dynamic range could be better as well, but given its many pluses, along with good results when shooting video, it’s clear that the Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 is a solid choice for the selfie enthusiast.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
The last couple of years have been exciting for mobile photography, as manufacturers have developed multiple sensors and lenses for their rear cameras, and combined that hardware with advanced signal processing to maximize imaging possibilities. Xiaomi is one of the first to apply this approach to the front camera, and the benefits are clear, with the Mi MIX 3 delivering excellent results for flash and bokeh, thanks to the built-in selfie light and depth-sensing second sensor. Other attributes such as face exposure, color, and detail are also impressive, and thanks to generally good skin tone rendering, the Mi MIX 3 ranks high in our database of front camera image quality. There are things it can improve, of course, most notably the fact that both focus and depth of field are too limited. Denoising and dynamic range could be better as well, but given its many pluses, along with good results when shooting video, it’s clear that the Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 is a solid choice for the selfie enthusiast.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Really, though, considering its price that is less than that of a OnePlus phone, there is little we could hold against the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. It looks gorgeous, the full screen experience is something really cool, the gesture navigation is among the best we’ve used and it’s a joy just navigation around, plus you have plentiful storage on board.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Really, though, considering its price that is less than that of a OnePlus phone, there is little we could hold against the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. It looks gorgeous, the full screen experience is something really cool, the gesture navigation is among the best we’ve used and it’s a joy just navigation around, plus you have plentiful storage on board.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an impressively high-end device for the price. However, its unique design solves a problem that newer phones have since managed to more elegantly.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is different; it's interesting, powerful and offers a distinctive, nearly bezel-free design with great screen quality. You get a lot of phone for your money, although it's hard to recommend above and beyond some more conventional rivals, as its slider mechanism doesn't really add that much and the selfie camera quality is poor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an impressively high-end device for the price. However, its unique design solves a problem that newer phones have since managed to more elegantly.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is set for release in the UK for £499 in Onyx Black or Sapphire Blue. There’s a limited deal appearing right out the gate for £449 when it launches at 12pm on the 16th of January 2019. If you’re buying from a source in China (online, even), you can find the device for around £445, shipped for free to the UK. This device isn’t currently available on Amazon, but if you’re getting one shipped to the USA through a source like GearBest, you can find this phone for around $550 USD.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is set for release in the UK for £499 in Onyx Black or Sapphire Blue. There’s a limited deal appearing right out the gate for £449 when it launches at 12pm on the 16th of January 2019. If you’re buying from a source in China (online, even), you can find the device for around £445, shipped for free to the UK. This device isn’t currently available on Amazon, but if you’re getting one shipped to the USA through a source like GearBest, you can find this phone for around $550 USD.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an excellent offer coming just before the next flagship season. Xiaomi will be upgrading the phone in a month or two with the next 5G-capable Snapdragon chipset, but the price will go north of the current €500 mark.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 92%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 is an excellent offer coming just before the next flagship season. Xiaomi will be upgrading the phone in a month or two with the next 5G-capable Snapdragon chipset, but the price will go north of the current €500 mark.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 92%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 doesn’t disappoint as a flagship smartphone. It offers fantastic specs with great performance, great design, a near bezel-less screen, and a fantastic camera that takes excellent photos in all conditions. It lacks battery capacity and isn’t water resistant, but that’s a sacrifice you’ll have to make if you want to experience a new take on an old design.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 doesn’t disappoint as a flagship smartphone. It offers fantastic specs with great performance, great design, a near bezel-less screen, and a fantastic camera that takes excellent photos in all conditions. It lacks battery capacity and isn’t water resistant, but that’s a sacrifice you’ll have to make if you want to experience a new take on an old design.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Swapping out the awkwardly placed selfie camera with a new dual-lens model that is tucked away behind the screen, the Mi Mix 3 is one of several new slider phones that shows how the concept *should* work. Not only allowing a proper full-display view, but adding new quick-access functionality to the phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an unquestionable looker, with a sliding mechanism that’s better engineered for real-world use than some of its motorised competitors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a true all-screen smartphone straight out of the future, yet it takes cues from our slider phone past. You physically slide the display down to expose the selfie camera, which does make it a bit thicker and heavier than your average phone, and we do have durability questions. But the price and flagship-level specs make it tempting.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future once more. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is an unquestionable looker, with a sliding mechanism that’s better engineered for real-world use than some of its motorised competitors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a true all-screen smartphone straight out of the future, yet it takes cues from our slider phone past. You physically slide the display down to expose the selfie camera, which does make it a bit thicker and heavier than your average phone, and we do have durability questions. But the price and flagship-level specs make it tempting.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 steps into the past to bring us the future once more. The slider phone design makes way for a display-forward and almost bezel-free design that's unlike its pricier mechanised alternatives from Oppo and Vivo.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Speaking of juice, the Mi MIX 3 only has a 3200mAh battery, mostly due to space constraints because of the sliding mechanism, though fast charging via QuickCharge 4+ and wireless charging capabilities make up for it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Speaking of juice, the Mi MIX 3 only has a 3200mAh battery, mostly due to space constraints because of the sliding mechanism, though fast charging via QuickCharge 4+ and wireless charging capabilities make up for it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 sets itself apart with its full-screen design, which targets a particular market of users who love having all the screen they can get – today. Because the design decisions behind this product are bold and therefore risky, the phone itself might be polarizing. Some people will love it, while others may laugh at the slider idea. In the end, it only matters how many people love it, and so far, the feedback is seemingly excellent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 sets itself apart with its full-screen design, which targets a particular market of users who love having all the screen they can get – today. Because the design decisions behind this product are bold and therefore risky, the phone itself might be polarizing. Some people will love it, while others may laugh at the slider idea. In the end, it only matters how many people love it, and so far, the feedback is seemingly excellent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
zSlider phones are back and I couldn’t be happier. Nothing beats that satisfying snap as the phone clicks back into place. Xiaomi has updated the form factor for 2018 though, with a large bezel-free display, four cameras and premium ceramic build material. This is our Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 hands-on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
zSlider phones are back and I couldn’t be happier. Nothing beats that satisfying snap as the phone clicks back into place. Xiaomi has updated the form factor for 2018 though, with a large bezel-free display, four cameras and premium ceramic build material. This is our Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 hands-on.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Sliders and flip phones were highly popular once, but the all touchscreen phone killed them off. The slider form factor is back and better than ever. Will the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 start a trend the same way that the original did (which was among the first tall aspect ratio smartphones)?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
All said, there's no doubt that the Mi Mix 3 continues in the run of exciting, adventurous and experimental phones to come out of China. Throughout 2018 it's been a veritable feature of future tech and, on this evidence, that strength will only continue.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
Packing the same camera hardware as the Mi 8, Xiaomi’s latest smartphone has managed an improvement in its photography capabilities with modifications to its software and image processing algorithms. For still photos, it’s up there with some of the best devices we’ve tested, with good color, dynamic range, texture, and flash performance. Video performance is very similar to the Mi 8’s, although improved stabilization gives the Mi MIX 3 an advantage when shooting low-light movies. In short, the new Xiaomi is an excellent all-rounder.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Sliders and flip phones were highly popular once, but the all touchscreen phone killed them off. The slider form factor is back and better than ever. Will the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 start a trend the same way that the original did (which was among the first tall aspect ratio smartphones)?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
All said, there's no doubt that the Mi Mix 3 continues in the run of exciting, adventurous and experimental phones to come out of China. Throughout 2018 it's been a veritable feature of future tech and, on this evidence, that strength will only continue.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
Packing the same camera hardware as the Mi 8, Xiaomi’s latest smartphone has managed an improvement in its photography capabilities with modifications to its software and image processing algorithms. For still photos, it’s up there with some of the best devices we’ve tested, with good color, dynamic range, texture, and flash performance. Video performance is very similar to the Mi 8’s, although improved stabilization gives the Mi MIX 3 an advantage when shooting low-light movies. In short, the new Xiaomi is an excellent all-rounder.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 96% écran: 86% mobilité: 86% finition: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 96% écran: 86% mobilité: 86% finition: 80%
Source: Connect - 4/19
Critique simple, , Longue, Date: 03/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 86% équipement: 86% mobilité: 99% ergonomie: 81%
Source: Connect - 4/19
Critique simple, , Longue, Date: 03/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 86% équipement: 86% mobilité: 99% ergonomie: 81%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 96% écran: 86% mobilité: 82% finition: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 96% écran: 86% mobilité: 82% finition: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/20/2018
Notes: Note globale: 95% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/20/2018
Notes: Note globale: 95% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/16/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/30/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 78% finition: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/30/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 78% finition: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/30/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/02/2019
Source: Tech Different IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 95% performances: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 95%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/02/2019
Source: Tech Different IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 95% performances: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 95%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/05/2019
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/05/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/16/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/16/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/06/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/06/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 64% équipement: 89%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 64% équipement: 89%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 75% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 75% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/07/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 86% équipement: 97% écran: 92% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 65%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/07/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 86% équipement: 97% écran: 92% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% équipement: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Notebook Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/20/2018
Source: Notebook Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/20/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/30/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/30/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 60%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 60%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2018
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2018
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/10/2019
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/10/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/05/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/05/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/01/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/01/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/25/2018
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: VNReview VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2019
Source: VNReview VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/14/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/14/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/03/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 60% finition: 100%
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% équipement: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 60% finition: 100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 SE
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 SEProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 835
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 540
Écran: 5.99 pouces, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.187kg
Liens:
Price comparison
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/09/2019
Xiaomi Mi Play
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi PlayProcesseur: unknown
Carte graphique: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Écran: 5.84 pouces, 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.15kg
Prix: 200 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Ce smartphone étant réservé aux consommateurs chinois, les acheteurs européens potentiels devront prendre en compte deux choses : l’absence du Français et celle des bandes B20 et B28 en 4G LTE.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/02/2019
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Play does not fight the price/performance ratio but attracts users through additional selling points. It is still innovative, but if it is heavy use of mobile phones or game players, it is still necessary to consider carefully. At present, most of the Xiaomi Mi Play on the market are used as spare machines or as old-age machines. If you don’t use Xiaomi Play as a daily heavy-duty model, you can still start. Right now you can buy it from Geekbuying at 199.99usd for 4GB 64GB version with coupon code: ELCKWJOI
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/29/2018
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/11/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/26/2018
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5G
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5GProcesseur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 640
Écran: 6.39 pouces, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Poids: 0.255kg
Prix: 600 euros
Liens:
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Now, after half a year, although the existence of the national version, the release time, and the price have not been announced, but with the multiple factors such as the decline in component costs, and the rumored millet 9S 5G version on the road, Xiaomi Mi MIX 3 5G does not return Then, once the return is bound to give a surprising price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/08/2019
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
If you can get past the fact the Mi Mix 3 5G will accidentally slide open and start doing stuff when you take it out of your pocket every so often, it’s a great phone and among the most affordable 5G options around. Whether you need a 5G option is another conversation entirely.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
As with all of the 5G phones we've reviewed, in isolation, the Mi Mix 5G is a great bit of kit, but the premium 5G adds is hard to justify until the service really takes off. We were only able to reach speeds of 250Mbps in our time with the phone, and we had to hunt for 5G in central London. And while we found EE to perform faster than Vodafone in general when we did have 5G signal in London, the service is in its infancy, and both networks are live in a handful of postcodes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Mix 3 5G is faster and has a higher-capacity battery than the standard Mi Mix 3, yet weighs only 8g more. And while Vodafone’s 5G network is patchy right now, by the time you’re even halfway through your 24-month contract we should be in a completely different situation in terms of coverage. But are you prepared to pay double dollar for the priviledge of future-proofed connectivity and slightly better performance on an already fast phone?
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2019
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% équipement: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Computerblog.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/16/2019
Commentaire
Xiaomi:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Carte graphique intégrée dans des SoC ARM. En fonction du SoC, la fréquence d'horloge devrait être aux alentours des 500 MHz. Intègre 48 unités de calcul shaders unifiées.
Qualcomm Adreno 418:
Carte graphique intégrée prenant en charge les instructions OpenGL ES 3.1 et DirectX 11 Feature Niveau 11_1 (prise en charge matérielle de la tessellation). Par rapport à l'Adreno 420, les performances de la 418 sont de 20% inférieures (à 600 MHz)
Qualcomm Adreno 330:
Puce graphique intégrée prenant en charge les librairies OpenGL ES 3.0
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail):
Qualcomm Adreno 510:
Carte graphique intégrée basée sur l'architecture Adreno 500 tout comme l'Adreno 520 du SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. Les performances devraient être de l'ordre de celles de l'ancien Adreno 330 du Snapdragon 801. Prend en charge les instructions DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
Qualcomm Adreno 430:
Carte graphique intégrée à des Smartphones et à des tablettes, prenant en charge les instructions OpenGL ES 3.1 et DirectX 11.2 Feature Niveau 11_1. 192 unités de calcul unifiées cadencées jusqu'à 650 MHz.
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
Carte graphique intégrée au SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 cadencée jusqu'à 624 MHz. Il s'agit d'un circuit graphique haut de gamme pour début 2016 se destinant aux Smartphones et tablettes Android. La puce ne devrait avoir aucun mal avec les titres du moment.
Qualcomm Adreno 540:
Carte graphique intégrée dans le SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Architecture légèrement optimisée par rapport à l'Adreno 530, mais avec une fréquence d'horloge plus élevée grâce au nouveau procédé 10 nm. Une des cartes graphiques pour smartphones Android la plus rapide début 2017.
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
Carte graphique intégrée dans le SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 845. D'après Qualcomm, plus rapide de 30 % par rapport à l'ancienne Adreno 540 du Snapdragon 835, avec une consommation en baisse de 30 %.
Qualcomm Adreno 640:
Puce graphique pour smartphones et tablettes, intégrée au SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm affirme qu'elle est de 20 % plus puissante que l'Adreno 30 du Snapdragon 845, et possède 50 % d'unités de calcul en plus (ALU).
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
unknown:
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
Carte graphique intégrée pour les SoC ARM de milieu de gamme.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
615 MSM8939:
SoC ARM milieu de gamme octocore (Cortex-A53, compatible 64-bit) intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 405. SoC gravé selon un procédé d'une finesse de gravure de 28nm LP.
810 MSM8994:
Système sur Puce/System on a Chip (SoC) intégrant quatre curs Cortex A57 et quatre curs Cortex A53, ainsi qu'une carte graphique Adreno 430. Gravé selon un procédé de gravure d'une lithographie de 20 nm HPM.
808 MSM8992:
Système sur Puce/System on a Chip (SoC) intégrant deux cœurs Cortex A57 et quatre cœurs Cortex A53, ainsi qu'une carte graphique Adreno 418. Gravé selon un procédé de gravure d'une lithographie de 20 nm HPM.
801 MSM8974AC: SoC ARM haut de gamme quad-core cadencé jusqu'à 2.45 GHz intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 330 cadencé jusqu'à 578 MHz. SoC basé sur l'architecture Qualcomm Krait 400, gravé dans procédé d'une finesse de gravure de 28nm HPM.
820 MSM8996:
Système sur Puce/System on a Chip (SoC) haut-de-gamme intégrant quatre cœurs (deux cœurs à 2,15 GHz et deux cœurs économes en énergie à 1,6 GHz) ainsi qu'une carte graphique Adreno 530. Gravé selon un procédé de gravure d'une lithographie de 14 nm HPM.
SD 835:
SoC haut de gamme pour smartphones, lancé début 2017, et fabriqué par Samsung en 10 nm LPE FinFET. Intègre 4 cœurs Kryo 280 cadencés à 2,45 GHz (max.) pour les performances, et 4 cœurs Kryo 280 cadencés à 1,9 GHz (max.) économes. Est également équipé d'un modem LTE X16, du Wifi ac et d'un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR4x 32 bits double canal.
625:
SoC ARM milieu de gamme octo-cœur Cortex-A53 cadencé jusqu’à 2 GHz, intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 506. SoC gravé selon un procédé d'une finesse de 14nm. Embarque un contrôleur mémoire DDR3L-1866 et un modem X9 LTE (Cat 7).
SD 845:
SoC haut de gamme pour smartphones lancé début 2018 et fabriqué en 10 nm LPP FinFET à TSMC. Intègre 4 cœurs Kryo 385 (Cortex-A75) qui montent à 2,8 GHz (maximum) pour les performances et 4 cœurs Kryo qui montent à 1,8 GHz (maximum) économes en énergie. Il possède également un modem LTE X20, le Wifi ac et un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR4X 1866 MHz 32 bits double canal.
SD 636:
SoC huit cœurs du milieu de gamme avec 8 cœurs physiques Kryo 260 qui montent à 1,8 GHz, un GPU Adreno 509, un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR4-2666 et un modem LTE X12 (Cat. 13/12, 300 / 150 Mbit/s en réception / envoi). Fabriqué avec le procédé récent 14 nm.
SD 855:
SoC haut de gamme pour smartphones, lancé fin 2018 et gravé en 7 nm par TSMC. Intègre un cur plus puissant basé sur l'architecteure ARM Cortex-A76 qui monte à 2,84 GH, en plus des trois curs performants également basés sur l'A76, mais qui ne montent qu'à 2,42 GHz. Quatre curs économes en énergie sont également présents, basés sur l'architecteure ARM Cortex-A55 et montant à 1,8 GHz. En plus de ces curs processeurs, le SoC intègre un modem LTE X24 (jusqu'à 2 Gigabit en réception), un nouveau modem Wifi (compatible Wifi 6, 60 GHz mmWave), un DSP Hexagon 690 avec des curs Tensor, pour l'intelligence artificielle, et un ISP Spectra 380 avec un moteur computer vision intégré et un contrôleur mémoire intégré LPDDR4x.
Intel Atom x5:
Z8500:
SoC intégrant un processeur quad-core Atom cadencé entre 1.44 et 2.24 GHz, un circuit graphique intégré Intel HD Graphics et un contrôleur mémoire double canal LPDDR3-1600.
:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.90: Cette diagonale d’écran fait office d’entre deux entre les tablettes et les smartphones. La grande majorité des tablettes possèdent un écran plus grand, mais de plus en plus de smartphones proposent cette diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
7.90: Cette diagonale d’écran est dite « petite » dans le monde des tablettes.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’une tablette plus compacte, plus légère et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
No weight comment found (one expected)!
82.18%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.