Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix 8 MP, f/2.0, autofocus
Price comparison
Moyenne de 20 notes (à partir de 46 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Xiaomi Mi Note 2
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Once you get to know the device inside and out, you’ll soon realize that the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 offers an experience that is quite compelling in both hardware and software, and instead of just being a clone, is instead a worthy alternative to the Galaxy Note 7.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 95% finition: 85%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
If we were getting this device for the price it goes for in China, converted directly to USD, it’d be a real deal. As it stands, we still need to go through 3rd-party retailers to get the device. I mean the standard 128GB version in China, which can be found for around RMB 3299 which is around $480 USD, compared to the version we have. We have the version called Mi Note 2 Global.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is not a Samsung Note 7 rip-off, but even if it was, the Note 7 is dead anyway. The Note 2 is not original either. It’s not a cheap phone, but it’s still somewhat cheaper than similar devices from mainstream brands. It’s might not be as big as you’d expect from a 5.7-inch beast, yet it doesn’t exactly have a small footprint (Samsung still beats it on account of its smaller bezels, made possibly by the curvier AMOLED display). That’s sort of our problem with the Mi Note 2. It feels like it was designed by a committee.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We approached the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 review with high expectations. The vacant spot left by Samsung's phablet this fall season was prime for the taking and we really wanted to see the Mi Note 2 as a product that's as at least as much disruptive as its pedigree suggests.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/09/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Mi Note 2 was wrongly overshadowed at its launch. This is a gorgeous big-screen Android phone with very decent performance, a great camera and plenty of storage. We'd like to see a Quad-HD screen on Xiaomi's flagship phone, but this one should prove plenty sharp and clear. Google apps are not preinstalled, but there is a workaround if you are happy to do some tweaking.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 90%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 is expected at P28,990 $580 for the version with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage while higher specced version will land at about P34,990 or $700 6GB/128GB variant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 90% performances: 70% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is the Mi Note 2 going to win acclaim this year? Probably not. The unveiling of the Mi Mix all but guaranteed that it’ll be taking a backseat. But priced at just $413 ($2800 rmb) and $488 (3300 rmb), this is — like most Xiaomi phones — one of the best value smartphone on the market. You’re getting a Snapdragon 821 device, with 4/6GB of RAM and a great build for half the price of the Google Pixel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/05/2016
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
The original Mi Note was well-spec’ed and launched with a lot of fanfare, but for whatever reason - maybe it’s the price, maybe it’s just the wrong timing - it didn’t help Xiaomi crack the premium smartphone segment. As Samsung stumbles, there’s now a sliver of opening here, a great chance that I’m sure the Chinese and Taiwanese companies would not let slip. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2, packed with all the technical and practical wizardry CEO Lei Jun and his team could muster, couldn’t have arrived at a better time. Well, at least for the good folks in China.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/30/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
In conclusion, Xiaomi mi note 2 keeps the good level in its inner design and craftsmanship, although there is no big innovation, it’s good for maintenance. The most improvement of Xiaomi mi note 2 is to use dual curved screen. So are you ready to catch one?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi MI Note 2 uses dual curved 3D glass with great holding grip. We can confirm Xiaomi MI Note 2 is the most beautiful smartphone until now. It’s 5.7inch screen with ultra narrow frame which makes us fall in love with it deeply. So we are quite satisfied with the design, as for hardware, Xiaomi mi note 2 doesn’t let us down, Snapdragon 821 processor, RAM 4GB ROM 64GB, RAM 6GB ROM 128GB, two versions, and 8MP front camera and 23MP back camera. Most importantly, it sells at the most competitive price right now. So are you ready to get one?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Concerning the packaging, we witness the new trend with the box. Instead of mimicking Apple’s iPhone box, Xiaomi came up with their idea which seems to be perfection. Xiaomi has decided to walk with simplicity and elegance as the package appears to be plain white with an engraved Mi Logo at the center. We observe no diagram of Xiaomi Mi Note 2 at all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
It was a very well-documented fact that Xiaomi’s new Mi Note 2 would be a device that had a dual-curve display. Previously a feature unique only to Samsung devices, Xiaomi and others are now jumping on the bandwagon.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
While there's a version of the Mi Note 2 that will have LTE support for the US and lots of other countries, the bad news is that the phone will be China-only, and Xiaomi has no plans to sell this elsewhere, even in places like Singapore or Hong Kong. It's a surprising move, but perhaps Xiaomi is looking inwards to its homeground as it aims to regain market share, having slipped to fourth position as rivals Oppo and Vivo have surged ahead.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/08/2017
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/28/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/27/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 96% équipement: 90% écran: 89% mobilité: 91%
Source: Golem DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 92% écran: 91% mobilité: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 100% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 87%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/10/2016
Source: Key for web IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 50%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 70% équipement: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 87% ergonomie: 87%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/29/2016
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 72% mobilité: 85% finition: 89%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 85% équipement: 98% écran: 65% mobilité: 89% ergonomie: 82%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 75% équipement: 90% écran: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/21/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/09/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2016
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
Carte graphique intégrée au SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 cadencée jusqu'à 624 MHz. Il s'agit d'un circuit graphique haut de gamme pour début 2016 se destinant aux Smartphones et tablettes Android. La puce ne devrait avoir aucun mal avec les titres du moment.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 821:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.70": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
84.95%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.