Samsung Galaxy J5 Gamme
Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Samsung Exynos 7870 OctaCarte graphique: ARM Mali-T830 MP1, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, Qualcomm Adreno 306
Écran: 5.20 pouces
Poids: 0.158kg, 0.159kg, 0.16kg
Prix: 279 euros
Moyenne de 67 notes (à partir de 108 critiques)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy J5 2016Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 306
Écran: 5.20 pouces, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.159kg
Prix: 279 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Métalleux. Du plastique avant, du métal maintenant : la nouvelle génération du Galaxy J5 se veut plus qualitatif. L'intérieur semble avoir peu changé, est-ce suffisant pour en faire un rafraichissement réussi ?
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Galaxy S, Galaxy A, voilà les Galaxy J. Après nous être intéressé au J3, nous nous attaquons au J5. Que vaut de le haut de gamme de l'entrée de gamme de Samsung en 2016 ? Réponse dans ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/14/2016
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Galaxy S, Galaxy A, voilà les Galaxy J. Après nous être intéressé au J3, nous nous attaquons au J5. Que vaut de le haut de gamme de l'entrée de gamme de Samsung en 2016 ? Réponse dans ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/14/2016
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/11/2016
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/11/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2016
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→FR Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 80% performances: 75% équipement: 75% mobilité: 75% finition: 80%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→FR Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 80% performances: 75% équipement: 75% mobilité: 75% finition: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2016
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 59%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 59%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2016
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Computerbild - 2/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Computerbild - 2/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% équipement: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% équipement: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 71% prix: 60% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 71% prix: 60% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2016
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2016
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% équipement: 73%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% équipement: 73%
Source: Teleguru PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 50%
Source: Teleguru PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 50%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Source: Jagat Review ID→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Jagat Review ID→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Moj Android SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 81% écran: 82% mobilité: 92% finition: 80%
Source: Moj Android SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 81% écran: 82% mobilité: 92% finition: 80%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosProcesseur: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
Carte graphique: ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Écran: 5.20 pouces, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.158kg
Prix: 279 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
All good things... With the update of its attractive Galaxy J series, we have the third generation of the J5 in our test. Samsung has radically changed the design and otherwise performs meaningful fine tuning. Fans of removable batteries will be disappointed, since the battery is now also built into the J5.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 72% équipement: 50% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 72% équipement: 50% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Teleguru PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2018
Source: Teleguru PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy J5 2017Processeur: Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa
Carte graphique: ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Écran: 5.20 pouces, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.16kg
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) offre un design plus élégant que la génération précédente et propose maintenant un lecteur d'empreintes digitales. Dans l'ensemble, il s'agit d'une version améliorée, capable de satisfaire des utilisateurs non exigeants (les joueurs éviteront cet appareil). L'autonomie est également une bonne surprise, tout comme son écran ou la qualité des selfies.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles Archive.org version
Grâce à cette montée en gamme, Samsung rattrape une partie de son retard pris sur les constructeurs low-cost et chinois, lesquels sont plus agressifs sur les segments compris entre 90 euros et 250 euros. Chez eux, les chipsets octo-core, les lecteurs d’empreinte et les châssis entièrement métalliques étaient déjà présents depuis un an (voir un peu plus pour Meizu). Reste encore à monter un peu plus la définition de l’écran. Mais pour cela, Samsung devra aussi monter la RAM. Voire même changer de chipset. Ce qui reviendrait à entrer en concurrence avec la gamme A. Ce que la firme ne veut évidemment pas...
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Malgré sa puissance toujours limitée, le Galaxy J5 progresse dans tous les domaines. Il bénéficie de meilleures finitions, d’un bel écran, d’une qualité photo très honorable et d’une autonomie exceptionnelle. A 279 euros, il devient l’une des valeurs sûres à ce niveau de de prix. Mais il n’est pas pour autant le seul. A 249 euros, le Huawei P8 Lite (2017) pourra séduire par son design en verre, au même titre que le Galaxy A3 (2016), dont le prix est descendu sous la barre des 250 euros. Les amateurs de photo pourront aussi miser sur le Moto G5 Plus, vendu à 279 euros.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 60% mobilité: 100%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
La concurrence est donc rude… mais le J5 2017 sait tirer son épingle du jeu… pour quelques dizaines d’euros supplémentaires tout de même.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
En conclusion, le Galaxy J5 dans sa version 2017 demeure un appareil convaincant, ses performances sont honorables, l'interface est plaisante et l'appareil photo s'en sort convenablement (en plein jour). C'est un smartphone équilibré qui offre toujours un bon rapport qualité / prix et qui ne devrait pas décevoir. Un choix raisonnable si vous recherchez un smartphone sous la barre des 300€.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
Really quite an impressive low-cost smartphone with a lot of bang for your buck. Arguably one of the best budget handsets on the market thanks to Samsung's mastery of Super AMOLED display technology and some sterling battery performance, both of which put it ahead of rivals such as the Moto G, while in other areas it's quite comparable with that very capable handset. The trade-off, however, is that the Moto G does get stock Android and timely updates, while Samsung's Galaxy J5 has TouchWiz on-top and requires a bit of extra fettling between software versions.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/07/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
Best in class of the budget Android category; you will struggle to find battery and display performance this good anywhere else at this price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→FR Archive.org version
With better performance and a longer battery life, Samsung’s updated Galaxy J5 is a low-cost marvel android 7.0 smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) brings many improvements compared to its successful predecessor and this makes it more than accomplished model. First of all, the device comes with an entirely metal design which is not always seen in this price range. There is a fingerprint sensor built in the hardware Home button. It is quite surprising that we don’t find a USB Type-C port but this is a drawback which can be ignored.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung's alphabet soup is making less and less sense. Here we have the Galaxy J5 (2017) that's got a premium metal build, a frugal 14nm chipset, an excellent Super AMOLED display, and Samsung's latest software. How is that lower midrange?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy J5 Pro has 4G supported device with some mid-range features. The device is especially for Samsung lovers because other device lovers will have some issue with its price which is a little bit expensive compared to other smartphones.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
It has one of the best interfaces around: sleek and modern-looking, it has Samsung’s excellent apps, and it has a very solid battery life. But its camera and, most importantly, performance are underwhelming. The phone often feels stuttery and the camera lacks in detail and speed. And we know the terrible state of Android updates for phones like the J5 (2017). In such a fiercely competitive market, the J5 (2017) does too little to stand out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% prix: 92%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 74% écran: 82% mobilité: 82%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/08/2018
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/10/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/10/2017
Notes: prix: 80% équipement: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/10/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/09/2017
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2017
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% écran: 75% mobilité: 85% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 60% équipement: 75% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 69% équipement: 68% écran: 78% mobilité: 82% ergonomie: 85%
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/29/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2017
Source: Yamobi RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: CZC CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/23/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/14/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Commentaire
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
ARM Mali-T830 MP1:
Carte graphique intégrée pour smartphones et tablettes avec un cluster (MP1) supportant OpenGL ES 3.2.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
Carte graphique intégrée pour smartphones et tablettes. Dotée de deux clusters et prenant en charge les instructions OpenGL ES 3.2.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
410 MSM8916:
Quad-Core 64-Bit Cortex-A53 avec carte graphique Adreno 306 gravé en 28nm
Samsung Exynos:
7870 Octa:
SoC Exynos 7 octocore comprenant huit cœurs Cortex-A53 cadencés jusqu’à 1.6 GHz. Gravé en 14 nm. Embarque un circuit graphique ARM Mali T830-MP2 ainsi qu’un contrôleur mémoire bicanal (LPDDR3-1866).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
No weight comment found (one expected)!
78.8%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.