Samsung Galaxy J5 2016

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy J5 2016

Test Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Galaxy S, Galaxy A, voilà les Galaxy J. Après nous être intéressé au J3, nous nous attaquons au J5. Que vaut de le haut de gamme de l'entrée de gamme de Samsung en 2016 ? Réponse dans ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/14/2016

Critiques dans des langues étrangères

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G series has been the gold standard in budget smartphones, but the Samsung Galaxy J5 is a great alternative thanks to its superlative screen and long lasting battery. It's an excellent choice for anyone who's looking for quality on a budget. Having said all that, it’s worth waiting for the new 2016 Moto G4 (the fourth generation Moto G) which is due any day now. Unless you need a cheap phone right away, it’s worth waiting to see if the now Lenovo-owned Motorola can continue its success streak.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 review
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

100% Samsung Galaxy J5 review: A good alternative to the Moto G4
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite this, it’s clear that the Motorola Moto G4 is the phone to beat in the budget smartphone space right now. But that’s not to say there are no reasons to choose the Samsung Galaxy J5. It remains a good option if you value screen quality and battery life above all else. You might prefer it if you're switching across from another Samsung handset and don't fancy changing to a different manufacturer. And you might prefer a smaller handset; the Samsung Galaxy J5 is more compact, more easily usable in one hand and easier to slip into a pocket. Despite the emergence of the Moto G4, then, it hangs on to its Recommended award.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%

A decent choice for everyday usage
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
We are living in a world where sub-RM1000 smartphones are coming out with features taken from flagships that were around scantly a couple of years ago. This scenario has created phones such as the Honor 5X, Vivo X3, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Alcatel Flash Plus 2 and so on. Samsung has a tough road ahead to go against the pack with the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), but we think they can do it - while breaking some sweat, especially for Samsung fans looking for an affordable metal frame Samsung phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/11/2016

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
As we wrap up the review, we can say that the Galaxy J5 (2016) is a well-built phone with decent specs. Although, a usual concern for most thrifty consumers is the pricing of the device. For something this underpowered yet encased in an above average body and topped with a vibrant display, the brand is asking for Php11,990. The official pricing may have put a frown on some but rest assured, it’s a pretty good handset with nifty features crafted for everyday use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2016

73% The gateway to the Galaxy
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→FR Archive.org version
Make no mistake, with an asking price of RM799 for the J5 and RM999 for the J7, you're pretty much paying a premium for the Samsung brand instead of actual performance. If you're one of those people that wouldn't be caught dead with a phone that isn't from a well recognized international brand, the J5 and J7 can be considered. However, if the Samsung name doesn't mean all that much to you, then you should probably opt for one of the many entry/mid-level smartphones that come from brands located in mainland China.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 80% performances: 75% équipement: 75% mobilité: 75% finition: 80%

80% Samsung Galaxy J5
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Worthy successor to an affordable and popular smartphone
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup proved yet again that affordability and reliability can coexist successfully. After Galaxy J7 and Galaxy J3 performed very well in our reviews, Galaxy J5 (2016) did not let us down, either. On the contrary, it has great features for the asking price. This is a model with nice design, thin profile and metal frame. It offers a 5.2-inch Super AMOLED HD display which is a very good choice both in terms of size and of image quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2016

60% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is a smartphone of reasonably good quality. It looks elegant and its screen is fairly pleasant. Its software experience is well-accomplished and its camera can land surprisingly good shots. While the Galaxy J5 (2016) does cover the essentials, it does so with the absolute minimum amount of design flair and hardware power required. Priced at around $255 in Asia and €280 in Europe, it becomes easy prey for comparably priced alternatives that present better value for money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%

80% x 03-06-2016
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The third-gen Moto G just retains its place in our budget smartphone affections thanks to its classier looks and build quality as well as its clean version of Android and waterproofing. Even so, the J5 has a lot going for it and is a very good alternative if you want a better looking screen and a replaceable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

59% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Review
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) is not the smartphone you should buy. It is quite underpowered compared to other offerings in the market, doesn't have a fingerprint sensor, and its pros don't outweigh the cons. The compromise isn't worth Samsung's brand value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 59%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag suggests and is rocking top-notch build quality. However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger screen and battery are always a good way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/25/2016

90% Samsung Galaxy J5 Review: In Depth
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
At this price, the Galaxy J5 is a very strong rival for the Moto G and other cut-price handsets. It's a solid all-rounder, offering dependable performance and excellent battery life as well as some brilliant camera tech. We prefer the vanilla Android Marshmallow experience of the Moto G, but Sammy fans will love what the Galaxy J5 has to offer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%

100% A cracking budget handset
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s a shame to end on the slight downer of the camera because it’s the only area where the Samsung Galaxy J5 puts a foot wrong as far as I’m concerned. Usually, when I’ve reviewed a budget handset, I’m extremely eager to get back to my own phone, but in this instance, I’ll actually be a little sad to see the back of the J5. It’s smooth, stylish, and performs nicely with a bright screen and an incredible battery life. On one such day when I barely used the phone, it lost just 3% of its life from sitting in standby.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%

86% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Source: Computerbild - 2/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%

78% Everybody's darling
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% équipement: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%

71% Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016), análisis y opinión
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 71% prix: 60% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Ventajas y Desventajas a Fondo
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/22/2016

Características Del Nuevo Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2016

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 review: niet echt anders
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

75% Krótki test smartfonu Samsung Galaxy J5
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% équipement: 73%

67% Recenzja Samsung Galaxy J5: Przeciętniak w (prawie) każdym calu
Source: Teleguru PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 50%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) – godny następca czy odcinacz kuponów?
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/17/2016

80% Samsung Galaxy J5 – 2016
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Đánh giá Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016): đủ dùng phổ thông, pin tốt, chơi game đuối
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016

Review Samsung Galaxy J5: Low-End Samsung Jagokan Layar AMOLED
Source: Jagat Review ID→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/15/2016

92% Samsung Galaxy J5 2016: Samsung pre menej náročných | RECENZIA
Source: Moj Android SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 81% écran: 82% mobilité: 92% finition: 80%

Commentaire

Qualcomm Adreno 306:

Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

410 MSM8916:

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

Ordinateurs portables similaires avec les mêmes spécifications techniques

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids