Nokia 3 Gamme
Processeur: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762, Mediatek MT6737, Mediatek MT6750N, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 429, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 460Carte graphique: ARM Mali-T720, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Qualcomm Adreno 504, Qualcomm Adreno 610
Écran: 5.00 pouces, 5.20 pouces, 6.00 pouces, 6.26 pouces, 6.39 pouces
Poids: 0.138kg, 0.141kg, 0.18kg, 0.181kg
Prix: 159, 200 euros
Moyenne de 152 notes (à partir de 299 critiques)
Nokia 3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Nokia 3Processeur: Mediatek MT6737
Carte graphique: ARM Mali-T720
Écran: 5.00 pouces, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.141kg
Prix: 159 euros
Liens: Nokia Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Bon retour ! Nokia revient sur le marché des fabricants de smartphone, et y ajoute un appareil d’entrée de gamme, le Nokia 3. Dans nos tests, nous allons découvrir ce qu’il se cache derrière ce nom agréable à réentendre.
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Mais revenons-en au Nokia 3 proprement dit qui pourra convenir à des utilisateurs peu exigeants en terme de performances, mais qui veulent un smartphone pas trop cher, doté d’un joli design et d’une bonne qualité de fabrication.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Mais revenons-en au Nokia 3 proprement dit qui pourra convenir à des utilisateurs peu exigeants en terme de performances, mais qui veulent un smartphone pas trop cher, doté d’un joli design et d’une bonne qualité de fabrication.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
N’achetez pas le Nokia 3 si vous cherchez un smartphone pour un usage régulier intensif à base de jeux vidéo et de photos à poster sur Instagram au fil de la journée. Mieux vaut dépenser un peu plus pour acheter l’excellent Moto G5. En revanche, le Nokia 3 est fait pour vous si vous voulez un téléphone très abordable pour passer des appels, gérer vos courriels et converser sur Whatsapp.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
N’achetez pas le Nokia 3 si vous cherchez un smartphone pour un usage régulier intensif à base de jeux vidéo et de photos à poster sur Instagram au fil de la journée. Mieux vaut dépenser un peu plus pour acheter l’excellent Moto G5. En revanche, le Nokia 3 est fait pour vous si vous voulez un téléphone très abordable pour passer des appels, gérer vos courriels et converser sur Whatsapp.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Pour un prix très attractif, nous avons un design et une finition vraiment très réussis, HMD s'est vraiment donné la peine de créer un smartphone plaisant autant à l'œil qu'au toucher. Il est vrai qu'il s'agit d'un appareil d'entrée de gamme, il ne faut donc pas s'attendre à des miracles : les performances, la photo et l'autonomie laissent à désirer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Pour un prix très attractif, nous avons un design et une finition vraiment très réussis, HMD s'est vraiment donné la peine de créer un smartphone plaisant autant à l'œil qu'au toucher. Il est vrai qu'il s'agit d'un appareil d'entrée de gamme, il ne faut donc pas s'attendre à des miracles : les performances, la photo et l'autonomie laissent à désirer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It may look like one of the best cheap phones on the market but the Nokia 3 is style over substance, struggling with long load times and poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It may look like one of the best cheap phones on the market but the Nokia 3 is style over substance, struggling with long load times and poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We had high hopes for the Nokia 3, but the final phone is a bit of a disappointment. We can't deny that it looks absolutely fantastic for the price, and we're fans of Nokia's decision to stick to stock Android, but it's just cut too many corners on the internal specs to make the 3 stand out amid a fiercely competitive budget smartphone market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We had high hopes for the Nokia 3, but the final phone is a bit of a disappointment. We can't deny that it looks absolutely fantastic for the price, and we're fans of Nokia's decision to stick to stock Android, but it's just cut too many corners on the internal specs to make the 3 stand out amid a fiercely competitive budget smartphone market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
At £130, there isn't much direct competition, aside from the 2016 Motorola Moto G4, which you can still buy for £140. But, as long as you don't mind buying a generation-old phone, the Moto is the better choice. It has a bigger, higher-resolution screen, faster performance, a better camera and superior battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
At £130, there isn't much direct competition, aside from the 2016 Motorola Moto G4, which you can still buy for £140. But, as long as you don't mind buying a generation-old phone, the Moto is the better choice. It has a bigger, higher-resolution screen, faster performance, a better camera and superior battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s perfectly functional as a backup phone – decent battery life means it can happily be thrown into a bag and forgotten about during a festival or camping holiday – but there are better choices out there for anything more. The Moto G5 isn’t much more expensive and offers a 1080p screen, much snappier Snapdragon CPU, a camera that’s surprisingly good and a fingerprint scanner. There’s also the Wileyfox Swift 2 and a good selection of carrier-locked options from Vodafone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s perfectly functional as a backup phone – decent battery life means it can happily be thrown into a bag and forgotten about during a festival or camping holiday – but there are better choices out there for anything more. The Moto G5 isn’t much more expensive and offers a 1080p screen, much snappier Snapdragon CPU, a camera that’s surprisingly good and a fingerprint scanner. There’s also the Wileyfox Swift 2 and a good selection of carrier-locked options from Vodafone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is now available in India priced at Rs. 9,499. It is a good-looking smartphone, and also supports 4G with VoLTE. One big positive point is that the company has promised future Android updates. Overall performance and camera results aren't its biggest highlights. We also missed a fingerprint scanner, which really should be a standard feature now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is now available in India priced at Rs. 9,499. It is a good-looking smartphone, and also supports 4G with VoLTE. One big positive point is that the company has promised future Android updates. Overall performance and camera results aren't its biggest highlights. We also missed a fingerprint scanner, which really should be a standard feature now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 feels like the wrong first step for a new Nokia. We accept that there's a great demand for phones that are affordable, but with the likes of Motorola offering some great devices around this price or a fraction higher, it's hard to see how the Nokia 3 competitively fits into the equation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 feels like the wrong first step for a new Nokia. We accept that there's a great demand for phones that are affordable, but with the likes of Motorola offering some great devices around this price or a fraction higher, it's hard to see how the Nokia 3 competitively fits into the equation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
At the end of the day, the Nokia 3 is a well-designed phone that catches the eye, but this impression turns out to be only superficial. Using the phone reveals many shortcomings: the stuttery, underpowered performance, the camera that is completely inept in video and one terribly imbalanced display. If you are on the hunt for that perfect cheap phone… well, who knows if it even exists, but we know that it most likely is not the Nokia 3.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
At the end of the day, the Nokia 3 is a well-designed phone that catches the eye, but this impression turns out to be only superficial. Using the phone reveals many shortcomings: the stuttery, underpowered performance, the camera that is completely inept in video and one terribly imbalanced display. If you are on the hunt for that perfect cheap phone… well, who knows if it even exists, but we know that it most likely is not the Nokia 3.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
If your budget will stretch further, there are superior handsets such as the Motorola Moto G5 and Lenovo P2. If it won’t? Vodafone’s Smart N8 only costs £85, and that manages to pack in a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
If your budget will stretch further, there are superior handsets such as the Motorola Moto G5 and Lenovo P2. If it won’t? Vodafone’s Smart N8 only costs £85, and that manages to pack in a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has the looks of one of the best cheap phones on the market but under scrutiny it struggles with long load times and poor battery life. If you value style over substance as well as saving a quick buck, it may be right for you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has the looks of one of the best cheap phones on the market but under scrutiny it struggles with long load times and poor battery life. If you value style over substance as well as saving a quick buck, it may be right for you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Buying on a budget is always a compromise, but there's a lot to like about the Nokia 3. It punches above its weight in the looks department and the inclusion of NFC is a plus. Unskinned Android with the promise of regular updates will also go down well with many potential buyers, but the screen resolution is disappointing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Buying on a budget is always a compromise, but there's a lot to like about the Nokia 3. It punches above its weight in the looks department and the inclusion of NFC is a plus. Unskinned Android with the promise of regular updates will also go down well with many potential buyers, but the screen resolution is disappointing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 sacrifices too much processing power to achieve its low price. You’re better off spending a bit more on the Motorola Moto G5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 64% performances: 40% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 sacrifices too much processing power to achieve its low price. You’re better off spending a bit more on the Motorola Moto G5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 64% performances: 40% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/12/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/12/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
On the whole, Nokia 3 seems to be a decent start for the company’s Android smartphone journey. This budget Nokia phone from HMD ticks most of the factors in good terms, except for a few shortcomings. Having said that, at this price point, you can get other smartphones with Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. If you spend more and wait for some time, you can get the Nokia 6 that will be available soon from Amazon India with much better specifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
On the whole, Nokia 3 seems to be a decent start for the company’s Android smartphone journey. This budget Nokia phone from HMD ticks most of the factors in good terms, except for a few shortcomings. Having said that, at this price point, you can get other smartphones with Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. If you spend more and wait for some time, you can get the Nokia 6 that will be available soon from Amazon India with much better specifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has every prospect to sell equally well. But even if it flops, the little budget Nokia shouldn't really be more than a tiny snag on the tracks of the massive hype train HMD is currently piloting. All eyes are now fixed on the company's eagerly-anticipated flagship offer. It could really make or break the reinvented Nokia brand, so be sure to keep close taps on those developments.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has every prospect to sell equally well. But even if it flops, the little budget Nokia shouldn't really be more than a tiny snag on the tracks of the massive hype train HMD is currently piloting. All eyes are now fixed on the company's eagerly-anticipated flagship offer. It could really make or break the reinvented Nokia brand, so be sure to keep close taps on those developments.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is not a perfect smartphone. Its performance could have been better. The cameras are average and the battery life, while decent, is not mind-blowing. The Nokia 3 is not for enthusiasts or those who push their devices.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is not a perfect smartphone. Its performance could have been better. The cameras are average and the battery life, while decent, is not mind-blowing. The Nokia 3 is not for enthusiasts or those who push their devices.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3 is one of the most awaited device of 2017 but unfortunately Nokia 3 has not surprised me with it’s any feature. We have explained its every feature in Nokia 3 Review – 2017. The price is very affordable by which it can hit the users otherwise it has very normal specifications. I have found its camera results are very weak and the battery should be bigger. We were expecting a lot more from Nokia because it is Nokia not any other company. Body and shape wise, Nokia 3 is very solid and strong furthermore it has very light weight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3 is one of the most awaited device of 2017 but unfortunately Nokia 3 has not surprised me with it’s any feature. We have explained its every feature in Nokia 3 Review – 2017. The price is very affordable by which it can hit the users otherwise it has very normal specifications. I have found its camera results are very weak and the battery should be bigger. We were expecting a lot more from Nokia because it is Nokia not any other company. Body and shape wise, Nokia 3 is very solid and strong furthermore it has very light weight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 looks to be a strong budget offering and its stylish design and extremely low price tag could shake up the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 looks to be a strong budget offering and its stylish design and extremely low price tag could shake up the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Budget phones are getting better all the time, and the Nokia 3 certainly seems like it’s worthy of battling the Moto G series when it comes to supremacy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Budget phones are getting better all the time, and the Nokia 3 certainly seems like it’s worthy of battling the Moto G series when it comes to supremacy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Connect - 10/17
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% équipement: 55% mobilité: 71% ergonomie: 73%
Source: Connect - 10/17
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% équipement: 55% mobilité: 71% ergonomie: 73%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66% performances: 78% équipement: 49% écran: 78% mobilité: 68%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66% performances: 78% équipement: 49% écran: 78% mobilité: 68%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 54% écran: 56% mobilité: 80%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 54% écran: 56% mobilité: 80%
Source: Android TV DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Android TV DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 69%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 69%
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2017
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 70% équipement: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 70% équipement: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/17/2017
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/17/2017
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 61% performances: 40% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 61% performances: 40% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 20% écran: 75% mobilité: 60% finition: 85%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 20% écran: 75% mobilité: 60% finition: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 44% performances: 30% écran: 40% mobilité: 50% finition: 60%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 44% performances: 30% écran: 40% mobilité: 50% finition: 60%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 59% prix: 60% écran: 50% mobilité: 50% finition: 80%
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 59% prix: 60% écran: 50% mobilité: 50% finition: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/19/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/19/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 58%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 58%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% écran: 68% mobilité: 70% finition: 75%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% écran: 68% mobilité: 70% finition: 75%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: Puhelinvertailu →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Puhelinvertailu →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Nokia 3.1
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Nokia 3.1Processeur: Mediatek MT6750N
Carte graphique: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Écran: 5.20 pouces, 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.138kg
Prix: 159 euros
Liens: Nokia Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Round two for the Nokia 3, which has been revised in terms of both looks and internal hardware. For less than $160 you get a decently equipped Android One smartphone made by HMD Global. Find out what we think in our extensive review.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Nostalgia for the brand aside, it is hard to recommend the Nokia 3.1 given its Php 9,990 price tag. Save for the Android One branding, there are other phones that offer a better spec sheet at roughly the same price. Speaking of Android One, Xiaomi’s Mi A2 Lite offers vastly superior specs compared to the Nokia 3.1 while having the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/17/2018
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Nostalgia for the brand aside, it is hard to recommend the Nokia 3.1 given its Php 9,990 price tag. Save for the Android One branding, there are other phones that offer a better spec sheet at roughly the same price. Speaking of Android One, Xiaomi’s Mi A2 Lite offers vastly superior specs compared to the Nokia 3.1 while having the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/17/2018
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
Heading into 2019, there’s minimal doubt that HMD Global can change our perception of a bargain. The Nokia 3.1 costs little, but it provides a whole lot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
Heading into 2019, there’s minimal doubt that HMD Global can change our perception of a bargain. The Nokia 3.1 costs little, but it provides a whole lot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is priced at Php 9,990 and should be available nationwide. Even if is an Android One phone, the Nokia 3.1 will be facing a tough competition with the said price segment. We will be publishing a more comprehensive review in the coming days to see if this phone is worth considering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is a smartphone that picks its wars wisely. If you’re looking to fight those same battles on a budget, it shouldn’t be overlooked.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is priced at Php 9,990 and should be available nationwide. Even if is an Android One phone, the Nokia 3.1 will be facing a tough competition with the said price segment. We will be publishing a more comprehensive review in the coming days to see if this phone is worth considering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is a smartphone that picks its wars wisely. If you’re looking to fight those same battles on a budget, it shouldn’t be overlooked.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/05/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is not a bad device, on the contrary - it's a well-designed and balanced smartphone. It's just that the competition has more attractive offers to earn your cash. But if HMD considers a minor price drop and thus moves the Nokia 3.1 to a lower price tier, then it would be a nice beginner's device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 48%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is not a bad device, on the contrary - it's a well-designed and balanced smartphone. It's just that the competition has more attractive offers to earn your cash. But if HMD considers a minor price drop and thus moves the Nokia 3.1 to a lower price tier, then it would be a nice beginner's device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 48%
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
For an affordable price, you can get a phone that gets all of the basics done pretty well. It has a good quality screen and nice hardware, and is a compact option among lots of big budget phones. Its slow performance and lack of a fingerprint sensor are disappointing, but you get good Android One software in return.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/23/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
For an affordable price, you can get a phone that gets all of the basics done pretty well. It has a good quality screen and nice hardware, and is a compact option among lots of big budget phones. Its slow performance and lack of a fingerprint sensor are disappointing, but you get good Android One software in return.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/23/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is available in the United States through Nokia dot com right this minute. They’ll redirect you to Best Buy, more than likely, where you’ll find the device appearing for approximately $160 USD right this minute. Have a peek, and let us know if you find it available in any fancy color combinations – right now it’s all about black.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 is available in the United States through Nokia dot com right this minute. They’ll redirect you to Best Buy, more than likely, where you’ll find the device appearing for approximately $160 USD right this minute. Have a peek, and let us know if you find it available in any fancy color combinations – right now it’s all about black.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Nothing on the Nokia 3.1 is set to blow you away, but it seems to be a solidly built phone with an interesting design and suitable specs. Plus the price looks to be affordable as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/29/2018
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Nothing on the Nokia 3.1 is set to blow you away, but it seems to be a solidly built phone with an interesting design and suitable specs. Plus the price looks to be affordable as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/29/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 52% performances: 86% écran: 64% mobilité: 20% finition: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 52% performances: 86% écran: 64% mobilité: 20% finition: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 62% performances: 65% équipement: 43% écran: 78% mobilité: 83%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 62% performances: 65% équipement: 43% écran: 78% mobilité: 83%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Heute DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/02/2018
Source: Heute DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/02/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Giz Blog IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2018
Source: Giz Blog IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/21/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/06/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/14/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/14/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2018
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 64%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/31/2018
Notes: Note globale: 64%
Nokia 3.1 Plus
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Nokia 3.1 PlusProcesseur: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Carte graphique: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Écran: 6.00 pouces, 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.18kg
Prix: 200 euros
Liens: Nokia Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Le Nokia 3.1 Plus se vente de pouvoir tenir plusieurs jours tout en offrant une expérience Android One fluide et efficace. Découvrez dans ce rapport de test ce que l’on peut attendre du Nokia 3.1 Plus.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The affordable Nokia 3.1 Plus for Cricket offers decent performance and good quality for the price, but does little to stand out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/08/2019
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The affordable Nokia 3.1 Plus for Cricket offers decent performance and good quality for the price, but does little to stand out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/08/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
They absolutely did. While it took them several months (the Nokia 3.1 launched last February 2018, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus launched in October 2018), HMD Global was able to get the right balance of what a budget Android One phone should be: a phone with decent internals, essential features and speedy Android updates.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
They absolutely did. While it took them several months (the Nokia 3.1 launched last February 2018, while the Nokia 3.1 Plus launched in October 2018), HMD Global was able to get the right balance of what a budget Android One phone should be: a phone with decent internals, essential features and speedy Android updates.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
With the Nokia 3.1 now priced at Php 8,990, the Nokia 3.1 Plus gets its predecessor’s original price of Php 9,990. While it is better than the Nokia 3.1, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is facing tough competition against the likes of Huawei, vivo, Xiaomi, and OPPO.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
With the Nokia 3.1 now priced at Php 8,990, the Nokia 3.1 Plus gets its predecessor’s original price of Php 9,990. While it is better than the Nokia 3.1, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is facing tough competition against the likes of Huawei, vivo, Xiaomi, and OPPO.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
This may not be the best phone we've seen from Nokia as of late, but it's a great reminder that this is one of the few companies in the business that knows how to make an exceptional phone at a low cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global is bringing the Nokia brand back to the U.S. through Cricket Wireless. This affordable phone finds a good spot in Cricket's lineup of entry-level devices. Anyone on a budget should consider the Nokia 3.1 Plus thanks to its adept handling of smartphone basics.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
This may not be the best phone we've seen from Nokia as of late, but it's a great reminder that this is one of the few companies in the business that knows how to make an exceptional phone at a low cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global is bringing the Nokia brand back to the U.S. through Cricket Wireless. This affordable phone finds a good spot in Cricket's lineup of entry-level devices. Anyone on a budget should consider the Nokia 3.1 Plus thanks to its adept handling of smartphone basics.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus stands out for its build quality and design. However, the competition is ahead when it comes to overall performance. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a Snapdragon 636 processor and a 20MP front camera with flash. The battery is a much bigger 4,000mAh. Realme U1 is another stylish option in the budget segment. It gives Nokia 3.1 Plus a tough competition with Helio P70 processor, 25MP selfie camera, face unlock, and more features. Nokia 3.1 Plus might appeal to loyal Nokia users. For others, options are plenty.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus stands out for its build quality and design. However, the competition is ahead when it comes to overall performance. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a Snapdragon 636 processor and a 20MP front camera with flash. The battery is a much bigger 4,000mAh. Realme U1 is another stylish option in the budget segment. It gives Nokia 3.1 Plus a tough competition with Helio P70 processor, 25MP selfie camera, face unlock, and more features. Nokia 3.1 Plus might appeal to loyal Nokia users. For others, options are plenty.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is for you if you want a smartphone for around Rs 11,000 that’s great on build, design, and software. It’s not for you if you’re expecting outright performance or quick clicks from either of its cameras.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The nokia 3.1 plus is a well-built smartphone staying up to its name – nokia. while it has a good feel in the hand, it fails to deliver in performance. The processor is slow resulting in longer load times and slower multitasking. however, we have seen more powerful processors in phones at much lower price points, making it hard for the nokia 3.1 plus to justify its cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is for you if you want a smartphone for around Rs 11,000 that’s great on build, design, and software. It’s not for you if you’re expecting outright performance or quick clicks from either of its cameras.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The nokia 3.1 plus is a well-built smartphone staying up to its name – nokia. while it has a good feel in the hand, it fails to deliver in performance. The processor is slow resulting in longer load times and slower multitasking. however, we have seen more powerful processors in phones at much lower price points, making it hard for the nokia 3.1 plus to justify its cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 80% finition: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is not the most competitive phone at its price level; not by a long shot. No matter how good it looks on the outside, it's hard to ignore just how much smoother the usage experience is with other models. If you're spending this much money, you should expect nothing less, and physical durability isn't worth much if your needs are going to outgrow its capabilities within a year or two.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is not the most competitive phone at its price level; not by a long shot. No matter how good it looks on the outside, it's hard to ignore just how much smoother the usage experience is with other models. If you're spending this much money, you should expect nothing less, and physical durability isn't worth much if your needs are going to outgrow its capabilities within a year or two.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a budget phone with a not so budget pricing, which is perhaps what most people are going to be talking about the most. At Rs 11,499, the phone is pricier than the Nokia 5.1 Plus, which comes with a better chipset. But with that being said, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is also a classy phone. It may not get a glass back, but the design still manages to feel premium. It also gets a bigger display for those who find the Nokia 5.1 Plus a little too compact. While a Helio P22 chipset does leave you wanting more, the battery life will surely not. It is a pretty good Nokia 5.1 Plus alternative, but in the larger scheme of things, the phone falls a little flat among competitors in this price segment. I reckon HMD will have a good chance selling the phone through offline channels rather than online, but we will have to wait and see on that.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus is a budget phone with a not so budget pricing, which is perhaps what most people are going to be talking about the most. At Rs 11,499, the phone is pricier than the Nokia 5.1 Plus, which comes with a better chipset. But with that being said, the Nokia 3.1 Plus is also a classy phone. It may not get a glass back, but the design still manages to feel premium. It also gets a bigger display for those who find the Nokia 5.1 Plus a little too compact. While a Helio P22 chipset does leave you wanting more, the battery life will surely not. It is a pretty good Nokia 5.1 Plus alternative, but in the larger scheme of things, the phone falls a little flat among competitors in this price segment. I reckon HMD will have a good chance selling the phone through offline channels rather than online, but we will have to wait and see on that.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus launch makes it clear that the HMD Global ...
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus launch makes it clear that the HMD Global ...
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: The Times of India EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus impresses us with its unique design and build quality. Performance, however, is rather disappointing. Camera can also be a lot better. At price point, Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 or Redmi 6 Pro and Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 are better alternatives. ALSO READ: Nokia 6.1 Plus review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/14/2018
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: The Times of India EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.1 Plus impresses us with its unique design and build quality. Performance, however, is rather disappointing. Camera can also be a lot better. At price point, Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 or Redmi 6 Pro and Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 are better alternatives. ALSO READ: Nokia 6.1 Plus review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/14/2018
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global is on a roll with its budget and mid-range smartphone portfolio, especially in India. After launching the Nokia 6.1 Plus and Nokia 5.1 Plus in India in quick succession, and the Nokia 7.1 globally, the company has now launched the Nokia 3.1 Plus in India.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/11/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global is on a roll with its budget and mid-range smartphone portfolio, especially in India. After launching the Nokia 6.1 Plus and Nokia 5.1 Plus in India in quick succession, and the Nokia 7.1 globally, the company has now launched the Nokia 3.1 Plus in India.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/11/2018
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus comes loaded with a premium metal design and it surely has some interesting display. The performance is one thing we need to check, while the initial impression of the camera is not that great. The battery should comfortably last a day and you will not face any major issue in the software department. Overall, the Nokia 3.1 Plus seems to be an interesting smartphone, although the competition is pretty tough here.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/11/2018
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.1 Plus comes loaded with a premium metal design and it surely has some interesting display. The performance is one thing we need to check, while the initial impression of the camera is not that great. The battery should comfortably last a day and you will not face any major issue in the software department. Overall, the Nokia 3.1 Plus seems to be an interesting smartphone, although the competition is pretty tough here.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/11/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2018
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/05/2018
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/05/2018
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/30/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/30/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/26/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/26/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/14/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/14/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/14/2018
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/14/2018
Nokia 3.2
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Nokia 3.2Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 429
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 504
Écran: 6.26 pouces, 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.181kg
Prix: 159 euros
Liens: Nokia Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Le Nokia 3.2 propose un grand écran IPS, un design moderne, et une intégration poussée de Google Assistant, pour se démarquer des autres smartphones à petit prix. Android One rend l’appareil plus attractif, mais l’absence de lecteur d’empreintes digitales pourrait en gêner plus d’un. Lisez ce rapport de test pour en savoir plus.
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 3.2 est un grand et lourd smartphone qui n’a pas grand-chose pour lui. Qu’il s’agisse de son écran, ses performances ou son appareil photo, il demeure bien en dessous de son principal concurrent le Samsung Galaxy A10. Il propose une bonne autonomie mais son temps de recharge atteint un triste record.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 3.2 est un grand et lourd smartphone qui n’a pas grand-chose pour lui. Qu’il s’agisse de son écran, ses performances ou son appareil photo, il demeure bien en dessous de son principal concurrent le Samsung Galaxy A10. Il propose une bonne autonomie mais son temps de recharge atteint un triste record.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
You can purchase the Nokia 3.2 from Harvey Norman in Black or Steel colours or Big W (black colour only) for $249, or you can also get the device on a plan through Pennytel mobile for $186.79 with free phone cover and with plans starting from $11 per month.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
You can purchase the Nokia 3.2 from Harvey Norman in Black or Steel colours or Big W (black colour only) for $249, or you can also get the device on a plan through Pennytel mobile for $186.79 with free phone cover and with plans starting from $11 per month.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia 3.2 debuted earlier this year at MWC 2019, it has a disappointing price-to-specs ratio. With its Php 6,990 price tag, it is expensive for a quad-core smartphone. You can opt instead for the Nokia 6.1, which has a massive price cut and the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/19/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia 3.2 debuted earlier this year at MWC 2019, it has a disappointing price-to-specs ratio. With its Php 6,990 price tag, it is expensive for a quad-core smartphone. You can opt instead for the Nokia 6.1, which has a massive price cut and the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/19/2019
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
Like all smartphones, the Nokia 3.2 has its pros and cons. It has Android One as its operating system, possesses a dedicated micro SD slot, has a dedicated Google Assistant button, and pretty modest battery life. Its cons outweigh the pros though, such as its disappointing performance, washed-out front, and rear camera photo quality, lack of portrait mode, poor audio quality, and honestly, its asking price of PHP 7,990 is just too steep for its league. We think there are other smartphones out there that are more worth your PHP 8,000 and can turn those 3.2 cons into pros.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2019
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
Like all smartphones, the Nokia 3.2 has its pros and cons. It has Android One as its operating system, possesses a dedicated micro SD slot, has a dedicated Google Assistant button, and pretty modest battery life. Its cons outweigh the pros though, such as its disappointing performance, washed-out front, and rear camera photo quality, lack of portrait mode, poor audio quality, and honestly, its asking price of PHP 7,990 is just too steep for its league. We think there are other smartphones out there that are more worth your PHP 8,000 and can turn those 3.2 cons into pros.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2019
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 comes with plus points like a large display, big battery and stock Android experience. But the phone lags in performance with underpowered processor and camera. At the price range of around Rs 9,500 which will get you the 3GB variant of the Nokia 3.2, there are other better options available in the market like the Redmi Note 7 or the Realme 3 Pro which offer much better performance, cameras. One can only consider this phone for its stock Android experience, solid build, and a decent battery backup.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/04/2019
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 comes with plus points like a large display, big battery and stock Android experience. But the phone lags in performance with underpowered processor and camera. At the price range of around Rs 9,500 which will get you the 3GB variant of the Nokia 3.2, there are other better options available in the market like the Redmi Note 7 or the Realme 3 Pro which offer much better performance, cameras. One can only consider this phone for its stock Android experience, solid build, and a decent battery backup.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/04/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 is targeted at folks looking for a phone with a large display suitable for multimedia consumption, and also one that packs a large battery that easily lasts over a day. And even though the display quality could have been better, the Nokia 3.2 delivers on those two counts. The bloatware-free Android experience and timely updates are also bonuses, but that is just about all there is on the positive side.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 60%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 is targeted at folks looking for a phone with a large display suitable for multimedia consumption, and also one that packs a large battery that easily lasts over a day. And even though the display quality could have been better, the Nokia 3.2 delivers on those two counts. The bloatware-free Android experience and timely updates are also bonuses, but that is just about all there is on the positive side.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 60%
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 10,790 (3GB/32GB), the Nokia 3.2 might not be the best phone in terms of performance and camera. Consider this phone for its pure and optimised stock Android experience, solid build and a decent battery with good on-battery time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/10/2019
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 10,790 (3GB/32GB), the Nokia 3.2 might not be the best phone in terms of performance and camera. Consider this phone for its pure and optimised stock Android experience, solid build and a decent battery with good on-battery time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/10/2019
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 variant line-up ends where the Nokia 4.2 begins. According to Nokia’s website, the 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 3.2 costs Rs 10,790. The 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 4.2 costs Rs 10,990. This slim difference in price gives a buyer very little reason to consider the Nokia 3.2 over the Nokia 4.2. In almost every way except the screen size, the Nokia 4.2 is better and offers more bang for the buck. Unless you desperately crave the larger 6.26-inch screen, go with the Nokia 4.2 if a classy budget Nokia smartphone is what you want to buy. If you're open to other brands, consider the Redmi 7 too. In summary, the Nokia 3.2 offers mediocre performance on almost all fronts, making a very weak case for itself in front of its slightly costlier sibling.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 61%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 variant line-up ends where the Nokia 4.2 begins. According to Nokia’s website, the 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 3.2 costs Rs 10,790. The 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 4.2 costs Rs 10,990. This slim difference in price gives a buyer very little reason to consider the Nokia 3.2 over the Nokia 4.2. In almost every way except the screen size, the Nokia 4.2 is better and offers more bang for the buck. Unless you desperately crave the larger 6.26-inch screen, go with the Nokia 4.2 if a classy budget Nokia smartphone is what you want to buy. If you're open to other brands, consider the Redmi 7 too. In summary, the Nokia 3.2 offers mediocre performance on almost all fronts, making a very weak case for itself in front of its slightly costlier sibling.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 61%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 is a big screen phone with optimal battery life. However, the slow-performance and not-so-good camera quality holds the device back against its competitors. It is a budget phone priced under Rs 10,000 category. It will directly compete with the recently launched Redmi Y3 and Realme C2. Both these devices have better specifications, at least on paper, when compared to Nokia 3.2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 is a big screen phone with optimal battery life. However, the slow-performance and not-so-good camera quality holds the device back against its competitors. It is a budget phone priced under Rs 10,000 category. It will directly compete with the recently launched Redmi Y3 and Realme C2. Both these devices have better specifications, at least on paper, when compared to Nokia 3.2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 and Nokia 4.2 share much of the same philosophies when it comes to design, hardware and software. The Nokia 3.2 comes with a similar waterdrop display, a dedicated Google Assistant button, a notification light power button and a stock Android Pie experience. But the Nokia 3.2 is a big phone with a tall display and a large battery life, which are some of its best features. It is quite simply a phone that aims to please users who consume a lot of media on a phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 looks are quite decent in nature and the display is large, which some might find useful. The hardware seems to be an underdog when compared to the rest of the competition in this price range. The cameras are not that interesting, to be honest. The only takeaway here is the Android One branding and large 4,000mAh battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 has a very sturdy build and feels like a premium device in hand even though it is made out of plastic. It has a good display, stock Android UI and a good battery for the price. However, considering that the performance and the cameras will struggle against phones like Realme 3, Redmi Note 7, Redmi 7, which are in similar price range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 and Nokia 4.2 share much of the same philosophies when it comes to design, hardware and software. The Nokia 3.2 comes with a similar waterdrop display, a dedicated Google Assistant button, a notification light power button and a stock Android Pie experience. But the Nokia 3.2 is a big phone with a tall display and a large battery life, which are some of its best features. It is quite simply a phone that aims to please users who consume a lot of media on a phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 looks are quite decent in nature and the display is large, which some might find useful. The hardware seems to be an underdog when compared to the rest of the competition in this price range. The cameras are not that interesting, to be honest. The only takeaway here is the Android One branding and large 4,000mAh battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 has a very sturdy build and feels like a premium device in hand even though it is made out of plastic. It has a good display, stock Android UI and a good battery for the price. However, considering that the performance and the cameras will struggle against phones like Realme 3, Redmi Note 7, Redmi 7, which are in similar price range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s not going to redefine mobile phones, but the Nokia 3.2 still feels like a useful device for those on a budget, especially with its bulky battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We really like what HMD is doing with the Nokia brand in both the middle and higher range and we applaud the company for its grit and dedication that it takes to be successful in this business. Keep it up, HMD - just be cautious, because rapid growth is a double edged sword.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s not going to redefine mobile phones, but the Nokia 3.2 still feels like a useful device for those on a budget, especially with its bulky battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We really like what HMD is doing with the Nokia brand in both the middle and higher range and we applaud the company for its grit and dedication that it takes to be successful in this business. Keep it up, HMD - just be cautious, because rapid growth is a double edged sword.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2020
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/12/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/12/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/25/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/25/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Phong Vu VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/03/2019
Source: Phong Vu VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/03/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/23/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/22/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2019
Nokia 3.4
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Nokia 3.4Processeur: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 460
Carte graphique: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Écran: 6.39 pouces, 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixels
Poids: 0.18kg
Prix: 159 euros
Liens: Nokia Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Nokia's 3.4 wants to stir up the lower mid-range with a brand-new interior and triple camera. Strong competitors face the Chinese-Finnish phone, but the smartphone can actually convince in some points.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR
Unfortunately, I don’t recommend the Nokia 3.4 – for one reason. Its day-to-day performance is poor, and this rapidly becomes a headache, one that will likely make you wish you’d spent slightly more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2021
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Speed Magazine EN→FR
The Nokia 3.4 is a good phone for productivity thanks to its clean and straightforward UI (it runs pure Android 10 and is Android 11-ready), decent processor, and impressive battery life. However, if mobile photography is important to you, you might want to look elsewhere. When it was launched, it was priced at P7,990. In February however, it got a price cut and now retails for P6,990, which is a better price point for the features the phone offers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/17/2021
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR
But, at the price of RM599 – the Nokia 3.4 is not a bad phone, honestly. But only if you can buy it, honestly. Currently, the phone is not available for sale on Lazada or Shopee but it’s only available on RedOne via a contract.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR
Overall, the handset finds its strength in its build quality and software. If you are looking to buy a low-cost smartphone that comes with a promise of regular software updates, then the Nokia 3.4 may appear to be a perfectly good option to consider.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/22/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR
The Nokia 3.4 is a well-built smartphone that promises guaranteed Android updates. This will appeal to an Android purist who looks forward to running the latest software without spending significantly on a new smartphone. However, there is nothing about the Nokia 3.4 that stands out other than this promise. The competition offers bigger batteries, faster charging, better displays, and better camera quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/25/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR
The Nokia 3.4 offers a premium feel and decent specs for its asking price, and I am curious to see how it will fare in our benchmark and camera tests. If you want to know whether this phone is worth buying, stay tuned to Gadgets 360.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/19/2021
Source: Yugatech EN→FR
Now let’s talk about the price. The Nokia 3.4 is priced at PHP 7,990, and honestly, we think it’s a good phone but too steep for its league. We still stand by our word that there are better-specced smartphones at this price range, but hey, it’s Nokia. You get an excellent battery life on this phone and a widescreen real estate, and not to mention, it’s pure Android! So if those are just some of the aspects you look for in a phone, then the Nokia 3.4 is one good choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2021
Source: Yugatech
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/25/2021
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR
Nokia 3.4 offers long-term user support just like other Nokia smartphones, and as a consumer, this will be the main reason why I will buy the product. For P7,990 (4GB+64GB), it is a worthy device. As a daily driver it gave us an easy and convenient user experience because of its navigation features. It also has a pretty good build like the cutout, the Type-C charging port, and also the gyroscope which is perfect for VR and games. This is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers a future proof user experience with good and acceptable performance and better camera quality versus its price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2021
Source: Manila Shaker
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/17/2021
Source: Yugatech
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/16/2021
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.4 comes with one major selling point, and that's its low, low price. You'll struggle to find a smartphone available for much cheaper than this, but if you're going to limit your budget to this level, make sure you know what you're getting in return.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.4 is a cheap phone with a battery that should last two days for many, along with clean software and the promise of updates. But limited RAM makes it run slower than we’d like, and as such it's hard to fully recommend even at its low price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia has the right motives with the 3.4, in that those looking for a budget phone shouldn’t have to settle for poor specs. The cameras on this handset are capable of some truly excellent results, the display is a decent panel at this price, and the Android One platform makes it a nice user experience all round.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/30/2021
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: News Bytes DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/06/2021
Source: Area DVD DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/20/2021
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Windows United DE DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/12/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/08/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/27/2020
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/22/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2021
Notes: Note globale: 71% prix: 75% équipement: 75% écran: 75% mobilité: 75% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/03/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/28/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/10/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/07/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/05/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/24/2020
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/12/2021
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/15/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Commentaire
Nokia:
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
ARM Mali-T720:
Carte graphique pour SoCs ARM. Peut être modulée en 1 - 8 cœurs (T720 MP8) cadencés à 650 MHz (gravure en 28nm). Support des librairies OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3 et Renderscript.
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
Carte graphique intégrée pour les SoC ARM de milieu de gamme.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
Qualcomm Adreno 504:
Qualcomm Adreno 610:
Carte graphique intégrée (dans le Snapdragon 665) basée sur l'architecture Adreno 600. Les performances de cette puce graphique se situent entre celles de l'Adreno 510 et des 512/612, et la situent de ce fait dans le bas du milieu de gamme. Compatible DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Mediatek:
MT6737:
SoC ARM quad-core 64 bit intégrant quatre cœurs processeurs Cortex-A53 cadencés jusqu'à 1.3 GHz.
MT6750N:
SoC ARM octocœur (4 Cortex A53 montant à 1,5 GHz, et 4 Cortex A53 montant à 1 GHz) avec compatibilité 64 bits et un modem LTE Cat. 6. Par rapport au MT6750, le MT6750N semble avoir une fréquence de puce graphique plus élevée.
Mediatek Helio 20:
Helio P22 MT6762:
SoC ARM octocur ARM (8 Cortex-A53) montant à 2 GHz. La puce intègre égalmeent un modem LTE cat. 7 (300 Mbit/s en réception).
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 429:
SoC d'entrée de gamme annoncé à la mi-2018. Intègre 4 cœurs ARM Cortex-A53 cadencés à 2 GHz, un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR3 (933 MHz) et des radios sans-fil pour le Wifi et la 4G / LTE (maximum 150 / 75 Mbit/s). La puce est gravée en 12 nm, et s'avère également adaptée aux petits appareils.
SD 460:
Octa-core de bas de gamme avec quatre grands cœurs ARM Cortex-A73 et quatre petits cœurs ARM Cortex-A53 SoC cadencés jusqu'à 1,8 GHz. Il intègre en outre le GPU Adreno 510, un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR4X-3733 à double canal ainsi qu'un modem X1 LTE (Cat. 13 / 12).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
No weight comment found (one expected)!
65.49%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.