Nokia 3.2

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Nokia 3.2

60% Test du Nokia 3.2 : l’autonomie et puis c’est tout
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 3.2 est un grand et lourd smartphone qui n’a pas grand-chose pour lui. Qu’il s’agisse de son écran, ses performances ou son appareil photo, il demeure bien en dessous de son principal concurrent le Samsung Galaxy A10. Il propose une bonne autonomie mais son temps de recharge atteint un triste record.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%

Critiques dans des langues étrangères

60% Nokia 3.2 Review – is budget the new black?
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
You can purchase the Nokia 3.2 from Harvey Norman in Black or Steel colours or Big W (black colour only) for $249, or you can also get the device on a plan through Pennytel mobile for $186.79 with free phone cover and with plans starting from $11 per month.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

Nokia 3.2 Unboxing, Review: Caught in the Crossfire
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia 3.2 debuted earlier this year at MWC 2019, it has a disappointing price-to-specs ratio. With its Php 6,990 price tag, it is expensive for a quad-core smartphone. You can opt instead for the Nokia 6.1, which has a massive price cut and the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/19/2019

Nokia 3.2 Review
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
Like all smartphones, the Nokia 3.2 has its pros and cons. It has Android One as its operating system, possesses a dedicated micro SD slot, has a dedicated Google Assistant button, and pretty modest battery life. Its cons outweigh the pros though, such as its disappointing performance, washed-out front, and rear camera photo quality, lack of portrait mode, poor audio quality, and honestly, its asking price of PHP 7,990 is just too steep for its league. We think there are other smartphones out there that are more worth your PHP 8,000 and can turn those 3.2 cons into pros.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2019

Nokia 3.2 Review: Big on Battery but Low on Performance
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 comes with plus points like a large display, big battery and stock Android experience. But the phone lags in performance with underpowered processor and camera. At the price range of around Rs 9,500 which will get you the 3GB variant of the Nokia 3.2, there are other better options available in the market like the Redmi Note 7 or the Realme 3 Pro which offer much better performance, cameras. One can only consider this phone for its stock Android experience, solid build, and a decent battery backup.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/04/2019

60% Nokia 3.2 Review
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 is targeted at folks looking for a phone with a large display suitable for multimedia consumption, and also one that packs a large battery that easily lasts over a day. And even though the display quality could have been better, the Nokia 3.2 delivers on those two counts. The bloatware-free Android experience and timely updates are also bonuses, but that is just about all there is on the positive side.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 60%

Nokia 3.2 review: Average performer with big display, good on-battery time
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 10,790 (3GB/32GB), the Nokia 3.2 might not be the best phone in terms of performance and camera. Consider this phone for its pure and optimised stock Android experience, solid build and a decent battery with good on-battery time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/10/2019

61% Nokia 3.2 Review
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 variant line-up ends where the Nokia 4.2 begins. According to Nokia’s website, the 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 3.2 costs Rs 10,790. The 3GB RAM variant of the Nokia 4.2 costs Rs 10,990. This slim difference in price gives a buyer very little reason to consider the Nokia 3.2 over the Nokia 4.2. In almost every way except the screen size, the Nokia 4.2 is better and offers more bang for the buck. Unless you desperately crave the larger 6.26-inch screen, go with the Nokia 4.2 if a classy budget Nokia smartphone is what you want to buy. If you're open to other brands, consider the Redmi 7 too. In summary, the Nokia 3.2 offers mediocre performance on almost all fronts, making a very weak case for itself in front of its slightly costlier sibling.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 61%

50% Nokia 3.2 Review: Still a long way to go
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 is a big screen phone with optimal battery life. However, the slow-performance and not-so-good camera quality holds the device back against its competitors. It is a budget phone priced under Rs 10,000 category. It will directly compete with the recently launched Redmi Y3 and Realme C2. Both these devices have better specifications, at least on paper, when compared to Nokia 3.2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 50%

75% Nokia 3.2 review: Big display, long-lasting battery and Android One goodness
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 and Nokia 4.2 share much of the same philosophies when it comes to design, hardware and software. The Nokia 3.2 comes with a similar waterdrop display, a dedicated Google Assistant button, a notification light power button and a stock Android Pie experience. But the Nokia 3.2 is a big phone with a tall display and a large battery life, which are some of its best features. It is quite simply a phone that aims to please users who consume a lot of media on a phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%

Nokia 3.2 First Impressions: Will the large screen display be the only deciding factor here?
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3.2 looks are quite decent in nature and the display is large, which some might find useful. The hardware seems to be an underdog when compared to the rest of the competition in this price range. The cameras are not that interesting, to be honest. The only takeaway here is the Android One branding and large 4,000mAh battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2019

60% Nokia 3.2 review: Good build quality, but how does it perform?
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3.2 has a very sturdy build and feels like a premium device in hand even though it is made out of plastic. It has a good display, stock Android UI and a good battery for the price. However, considering that the performance and the cameras will struggle against phones like Realme 3, Redmi Note 7, Redmi 7, which are in similar price range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

Hands on: Nokia 3.2 review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s not going to redefine mobile phones, but the Nokia 3.2 still feels like a useful device for those on a budget, especially with its bulky battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/24/2019

Nokia 4.2, 3.2, 1 Plus and 210 hands-on review
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We really like what HMD is doing with the Nokia brand in both the middle and higher range and we applaud the company for its grit and dedication that it takes to be successful in this business. Keep it up, HMD - just be cautious, because rapid growth is a double edged sword.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2019

Обзор плюсов и минусов Nokia 3.2. Бюджетник с аккумулятором на 4000 мАч
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2020

Tầm hơn 2 triệu, Nokia 3.2 mang đến mọi thứ bạn cần trong một mức giá hợp lý
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/12/2020

Ngân sách hạn chế vẫn trải nghiệm màn hình lớn, nhiều tính năng thú vị với Nokia 3.2!
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/25/2019

Đánh giá Nokia 3.2 sau 48 giờ: Mỗi sản phẩm đều có sứ mệnh riêng
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/09/2019

Đánh giá Nokia 3.2: Giá tốt, mượt mà, phím cứng trợ lý ảo hiệu quả
Source: Phong Vu VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/03/2019

Những điểm nhấn khiến Nokia 3.2 là smartphone đáng mua trong phân khúc giá rẻ
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/26/2019

Đánh giá Nokia 3.2: smartphone “ăn chắc mặc bền” của mọi nhà
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2019

Chỉ với 3 triệu, đây là chiếc smartphone giúp bạn thỏa sức “phiêu” công nghệ
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/23/2019

Tại sao nên mua Nokia 3.2 ngay lúc này?
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/22/2019

Trên tay Nokia 3.2: Màn hình lớn, pin trâu, giá từ 2,9 triệu
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/21/2019

5 Lý do nên mua Nokia 3.2 giá chỉ từ 2,99 triệu đồng
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2019

Commentaire

Qualcomm Adreno 504:

Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

SD 429:

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

6.26": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran. 

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).

63.1%: Une note aussi moyenne est rare. Il y a peu d'ordinateurs portables aussi mauvais.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids