Nokia 3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2.0, contraste AF, vidéos à720p / 30 FPS
Price comparison
Moyenne de 38 notes (à partir de 59 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Nokia 3
Bon retour ! Nokia revient sur le marché des fabricants de smartphone, et y ajoute un appareil d’entrée de gamme, le Nokia 3. Dans nos tests, nous allons découvrir ce qu’il se cache derrière ce nom agréable à réentendre.
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Mais revenons-en au Nokia 3 proprement dit qui pourra convenir à des utilisateurs peu exigeants en terme de performances, mais qui veulent un smartphone pas trop cher, doté d’un joli design et d’une bonne qualité de fabrication.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
N’achetez pas le Nokia 3 si vous cherchez un smartphone pour un usage régulier intensif à base de jeux vidéo et de photos à poster sur Instagram au fil de la journée. Mieux vaut dépenser un peu plus pour acheter l’excellent Moto G5. En revanche, le Nokia 3 est fait pour vous si vous voulez un téléphone très abordable pour passer des appels, gérer vos courriels et converser sur Whatsapp.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Pour un prix très attractif, nous avons un design et une finition vraiment très réussis, HMD s'est vraiment donné la peine de créer un smartphone plaisant autant à l'œil qu'au toucher. Il est vrai qu'il s'agit d'un appareil d'entrée de gamme, il ne faut donc pas s'attendre à des miracles : les performances, la photo et l'autonomie laissent à désirer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
It may look like one of the best cheap phones on the market but the Nokia 3 is style over substance, struggling with long load times and poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We had high hopes for the Nokia 3, but the final phone is a bit of a disappointment. We can't deny that it looks absolutely fantastic for the price, and we're fans of Nokia's decision to stick to stock Android, but it's just cut too many corners on the internal specs to make the 3 stand out amid a fiercely competitive budget smartphone market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
At £130, there isn't much direct competition, aside from the 2016 Motorola Moto G4, which you can still buy for £140. But, as long as you don't mind buying a generation-old phone, the Moto is the better choice. It has a bigger, higher-resolution screen, faster performance, a better camera and superior battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s perfectly functional as a backup phone – decent battery life means it can happily be thrown into a bag and forgotten about during a festival or camping holiday – but there are better choices out there for anything more. The Moto G5 isn’t much more expensive and offers a 1080p screen, much snappier Snapdragon CPU, a camera that’s surprisingly good and a fingerprint scanner. There’s also the Wileyfox Swift 2 and a good selection of carrier-locked options from Vodafone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is now available in India priced at Rs. 9,499. It is a good-looking smartphone, and also supports 4G with VoLTE. One big positive point is that the company has promised future Android updates. Overall performance and camera results aren't its biggest highlights. We also missed a fingerprint scanner, which really should be a standard feature now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 feels like the wrong first step for a new Nokia. We accept that there's a great demand for phones that are affordable, but with the likes of Motorola offering some great devices around this price or a fraction higher, it's hard to see how the Nokia 3 competitively fits into the equation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
At the end of the day, the Nokia 3 is a well-designed phone that catches the eye, but this impression turns out to be only superficial. Using the phone reveals many shortcomings: the stuttery, underpowered performance, the camera that is completely inept in video and one terribly imbalanced display. If you are on the hunt for that perfect cheap phone… well, who knows if it even exists, but we know that it most likely is not the Nokia 3.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
If your budget will stretch further, there are superior handsets such as the Motorola Moto G5 and Lenovo P2. If it won’t? Vodafone’s Smart N8 only costs £85, and that manages to pack in a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has the looks of one of the best cheap phones on the market but under scrutiny it struggles with long load times and poor battery life. If you value style over substance as well as saving a quick buck, it may be right for you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Buying on a budget is always a compromise, but there's a lot to like about the Nokia 3. It punches above its weight in the looks department and the inclusion of NFC is a plus. Unskinned Android with the promise of regular updates will also go down well with many potential buyers, but the screen resolution is disappointing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 sacrifices too much processing power to achieve its low price. You’re better off spending a bit more on the Motorola Moto G5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 64% performances: 40% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/12/2017
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
On the whole, Nokia 3 seems to be a decent start for the company’s Android smartphone journey. This budget Nokia phone from HMD ticks most of the factors in good terms, except for a few shortcomings. Having said that, at this price point, you can get other smartphones with Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. If you spend more and wait for some time, you can get the Nokia 6 that will be available soon from Amazon India with much better specifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 has every prospect to sell equally well. But even if it flops, the little budget Nokia shouldn't really be more than a tiny snag on the tracks of the massive hype train HMD is currently piloting. All eyes are now fixed on the company's eagerly-anticipated flagship offer. It could really make or break the reinvented Nokia brand, so be sure to keep close taps on those developments.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/30/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 is not a perfect smartphone. Its performance could have been better. The cameras are average and the battery life, while decent, is not mind-blowing. The Nokia 3 is not for enthusiasts or those who push their devices.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 3 is one of the most awaited device of 2017 but unfortunately Nokia 3 has not surprised me with it’s any feature. We have explained its every feature in Nokia 3 Review – 2017. The price is very affordable by which it can hit the users otherwise it has very normal specifications. I have found its camera results are very weak and the battery should be bigger. We were expecting a lot more from Nokia because it is Nokia not any other company. Body and shape wise, Nokia 3 is very solid and strong furthermore it has very light weight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 3 looks to be a strong budget offering and its stylish design and extremely low price tag could shake up the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/28/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Budget phones are getting better all the time, and the Nokia 3 certainly seems like it’s worthy of battling the Moto G series when it comes to supremacy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/07/2017
Source: Connect - 10/17
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% équipement: 55% mobilité: 71% ergonomie: 73%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66% performances: 78% équipement: 49% écran: 78% mobilité: 68%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/23/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 54% écran: 56% mobilité: 80%
Source: Android TV DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 69%
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2017
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 70% équipement: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2017
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/17/2017
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 61% performances: 40% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 20% écran: 75% mobilité: 60% finition: 85%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 44% performances: 30% écran: 40% mobilité: 50% finition: 60%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/19/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 59% prix: 60% écran: 50% mobilité: 50% finition: 80%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/19/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 58%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% écran: 68% mobilité: 70% finition: 75%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: Puhelinvertailu →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T720:
Carte graphique pour SoCs ARM. Peut être modulée en 1 - 8 cœurs (T720 MP8) cadencés à 650 MHz (gravure en 28nm). Support des librairies OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3 et Renderscript.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
MT6737:
SoC ARM quad-core 64 bit intégrant quatre cœurs processeurs Cortex-A53 cadencés jusqu'à 1.3 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
64.26%: Une note aussi moyenne est rare. Il y a peu d'ordinateurs portables aussi mauvais.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.