Test du SSD NVMe x4 Lexar NM610 de 1 To : un SSD en berne
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Lexar NM610 Lexar NM610 1TB | Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 HP SSD EX950 HP SSD EX950 PCIe x4 NVMe 2TB 5MS24AA#ABC | Western Digital Blue SN550 NVMe Western Digital Blue SN550 NVMe SSD 1 TB WDS100T2B0C | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 14% | 5% | 63% | -10% | |
| Seq Read | 1411 | 987 -30% | 1852 31% | 2066 46% | 1237 -12% |
| Seq Write | 1440 | 2085 45% | 1322 -8% | 2418 68% | 1069 -26% |
| 4K Read | 31.57 | 47.99 52% | 26.84 -15% | 54.2 72% | 52.1 65% |
| 4K Write | 153.3 | 121.2 -21% | 165.7 8% | 129 -16% | 134.7 -12% |
| 4K-64 Read | 839 | 1279 52% | 386.4 -54% | 1865 122% | 585 -30% |
| 4K-64 Write | 685 | 826 21% | 1098 60% | 1878 174% | 854 25% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.021 | 0.025 -19% | 0.024 -14% | 0.042 -100% | 0.05 -138% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.252 | 0.088 65% | 0.096 62% | 0.091 64% | 0.117 54% |
| Score Read | 1011 | 1426 41% | 598 -41% | 2126 110% | 761 -25% |
| Score Write | 982 | 1156 18% | 1396 42% | 2249 129% | 1095 12% |
| Score Total | 2516 | 3373 34% | 2280 -9% | 5482 118% | 2255 -10% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1633 | 1772 9% | 1496 -8% | 2927 79% | 1714 5% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 737 | 147.2 -80% | 799 8% | 728 -1% | 511 -31% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1458 | 1587 9% | 1488 2% | 1614 11% | 1187 -19% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | 38% | 38% | 10% | |
| Write 4K | 114.9 | 109 -5% | 234.3 104% | 145 26% | 140.7 22% |
| Read 4K | 35.11 | 52.7 50% | 53.1 51% | 46.84 33% | 55.6 58% |
| Write Seq | 1451 | 1922 32% | 1978 36% | 2377 64% | 1415 -2% |
| Read Seq | 1528 | 850 -44% | 1102 -28% | 2185 43% | 1516 -1% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 392.4 | 425.3 8% | 573 46% | 463.5 18% | 474.5 21% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 477.8 | 488.5 2% | 763 60% | 527 10% | 403.4 -16% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1695 | 2689 59% | 2011 19% | 2395 41% | 1796 6% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2107 | 1907 -9% | 2355 12% | 3470 65% | 1913 -9% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1469 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1434 | ||||
| Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 13% /
13% | 22% /
17% | 51% /
53% | 0% /
-3% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Lexar NM610 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2107 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1695 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
477.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
392.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1528 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1451 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
35.11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
114.9 MB/s
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Lexar NM610 , , Lexar NM610 1TB | Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 HP SSD EX950 , , HP SSD EX950 PCIe x4 NVMe 2TB 5MS24AA#ABC | Western Digital Blue SN550 NVMe , , Western Digital Blue SN550 NVMe SSD 1 TB WDS100T2B0C | Intel NUC8i7BEH Asura NVMe SSD Iris Plus Graphics 655, i7-8559U, Asura Genesis Xtreme NVMe M.2 SSD 1 TB | Samsung 960 Pro 1TB Titan X Pascal, E5-2680 v4, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATTO Disk Benchmark | 28% | 9% | 41% | 49% | |
| 8192KB write | 1570000 | 2680000 71% | 1830000 17% | 1960000 25% | 2079890 32% |
| 4096KB write | 1580000 | 2700000 71% | 1760000 11% | 1960000 24% | 2090010 32% |
| 2048KB write | 1580000 | 2700000 71% | 1760000 11% | 1970000 25% | 2090010 32% |
| 1024KB write | 1610000 | 2680000 66% | 1780000 11% | 1960000 22% | 2100230 30% |
| 512KB write | 1600000 | 2700000 69% | 1810000 13% | 1960000 23% | 2090010 31% |
| 256KB write | 1470000 | 2680000 82% | 1780000 21% | 1920000 31% | 2098690 43% |
| 128KB write | 1580000 | 2480000 57% | 1780000 13% | 1940000 23% | 2078800 32% |
| 64KB write | 1550000 | 2140000 38% | 1740000 12% | 1870000 21% | 2073620 34% |
| 32KB write | 1510000 | 1710000 13% | 1640000 9% | 1620000 7% | 2054220 36% |
| 16KB write | 1150000 | 1240000 8% | 1390000 21% | 1160000 1% | 1102410 -4% |
| 8192KB read | 1910000 | 1810000 -5% | 2260000 18% | 2970000 55% | 2960680 55% |
| 4096KB read | 1930000 | 1690000 -12% | 2310000 20% | 2960000 53% | 3019900 56% |
| 2048KB read | 1940000 | 1790000 -8% | 2290000 18% | 2920000 51% | 3026480 56% |
| 1024KB read | 1940000 | 1980000 2% | 2260000 16% | 2860000 47% | 3263860 68% |
| 512KB read | 1860000 | 1900000 2% | 1630000 -12% | 2820000 52% | 3197250 72% |
| 256KB read | 1870000 | 1580000 -16% | 2280000 22% | 3080000 65% | 3230230 73% |
| 128KB read | 1700000 | 1800000 6% | 2070000 22% | 2670000 57% | 3003310 77% |
| 64KB read | 1480000 | 1590000 7% | 1430000 -3% | 2550000 72% | 2458920 66% |
| 32KB read | 1210000 | 1320000 9% | 917140 -24% | 2190000 81% | 2432300 101% |
| 16KB read | 799250 | 1040000 30% | 550840 -31% | 1440000 80% | 1257110 57% |
La concurrence dans les 1 To est rude en ce moment. Le Western Digital SN550 par exemple possède des vitesses en écriture et en lecture plus rapides, une durée de vie supérieure, une garantie de base plus longue, et un prix moins élevé. Ce n'est pas pour autant que le Lexar n'est pas un bon SSD, mais sa cible d'utilisateurs sensibles au prix risquent de ne pas s'y attarder, puisqu'il y a des alternatives moins chères et potentiellement plus efficaces déjà disponibles.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Price comparison
