Notebookcheck Logo

MSI GP65 10SFK (i7-10750H, RTX 2070, FHD)

Intel 10th Gen Power.

MSI has beaten most other OEMs to market with laptops sporting Intel's latest Comet Lake-H processors. After having checked out the Core i5-10300H and Core i9-10980HK, let's see how the Core i7-10750H fits in the lineup.
Gaming Geforce Comet Lake MSI Laptop / Notebook
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US (GP65 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 Go VRAM, Processeur: 1260 MHz, Mémoire: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 445.87, Optimus
Mémoire
32 Go 
, Apacer DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Écran
15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, LGD0625, brillant: non, 144 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 Go 
, Secondary: Seagate ST2000LM007
Carte son
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD reader
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248
Batterie
51 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6-cell
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 1 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2x 2 W, Clavier: Chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, Dragon Center 2.0, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.322 kg, Alimentation: 729 g
Prix
1500 USD
Liens
MSI Page d'accueil
MSI Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Remarque : le fabricant peut utiliser des composants provenant de différents fournisseurs, notamment des panneaux d'affichage, des lecteurs ou des clés USB ayant des spécifications similaires.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Meilleur prix
83.2 %
v7 (old)
06/20
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
10/19
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.4 %
v6 (old)
08/19
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.2 kg26.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.2 %
v6 (old)
06/19
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.5 %
v6 (old)
08/19
Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg24.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
❌
383 mm 260 mm 29 mm 2.5 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s +186%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.4 MB/s
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
24.96 MB/s -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.84 MB/s -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s +167%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.92 MB/s
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
 
29.14 MB/s -9%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
18.73 MB/s -41%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s +15%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1434 (736min - 1523max) MBit/s 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (808min - 1646max) MBit/s
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1030 (722min - 1235max) MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1379 (858min - 1529max) MBit/s +5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1314 (949min - 1439max) MBit/s
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1295 (1184min - 1487max) MBit/s -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s -5%
ColorChecker
1.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP65 10SFK-047US: 4.6 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 10.21 ∆E
350.5
cd/m²		361.9
cd/m²		370.9
cd/m²
336.7
cd/m²		384.9
cd/m²		366.3
cd/m²
339.7
cd/m²		360.8
cd/m²		354
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 384.9 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 358.4 cd/m² Minimum: 19.19 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 384.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 574:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
LG Philips LGD0625, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display
2%
4%
-37%
-0%
23%
Display P3 Coverage
63.5
64.8
2%
66.2
4%
39.56
-38%
63.8
0%
85.8
35%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
96.2
2%
97.1
3%
59.5
-37%
93.4
-1%
100
6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.1
66.3
2%
67.6
4%
40.91
-37%
65
0%
84.2
29%
Response Times
11%
-10%
-161%
-14%
-174%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
10.4 ?(6.4, 4)
9.6 ?(6, 3.6)
8%
15 ?(8, 7)
-44%
30.4 ?(14, 16.4)
-192%
14 ?(7, 7)
-35%
34.4 ?(22.4, 12.4)
-231%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
13%
9 ?(5, 4)
25%
27.6 ?(17.6, 10)
-130%
11 ?(7, 4)
8%
26 ?(20, 6)
-117%
PWM Frequency
250 ?(20)
200 ?(99)
Screen
15%
-16%
-61%
2%
-104%
Brightness middle
384.9
348.3
-10%
309
-20%
286.2
-26%
316
-18%
265.7
-31%
Brightness
358
327
-9%
284
-21%
267
-25%
295
-18%
243
-32%
Brightness Distribution
87
85
-2%
88
1%
84
-3%
84
-3%
87
0%
Black Level *
0.67
0.4
40%
0.42
37%
0.33
51%
0.42
37%
0.63
6%
Contrast
574
871
52%
736
28%
867
51%
752
31%
422
-26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.43
1.6
34%
3.99
-64%
5.45
-124%
2.7
-11%
9.6
-295%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.58
5.07
-11%
8.3
-81%
18.08
-295%
5.65
-23%
18.5
-304%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.03
1
51%
1.12
45%
4.47
-120%
1.58
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.3
12%
5.43
-109%
5.3
-104%
2.35
10%
12.7
-388%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.203 100%
2.57 86%
2.1 105%
2.41 91%
2.01 109%
CCT
6981 93%
6707 97%
7767 84%
7679 85%
6904 94%
13654 48%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.7
61
2%
63
6%
37.6
-37%
60
1%
76
27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93.9
96
2%
97
3%
59.1
-37%
93
-1%
100
6%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
9% / 12%
-7% / -11%
-86% / -69%
-4% / -0%
-85% / -88%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
12 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.8 ms hausse
↘ 5.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.1 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (21 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
10.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.4 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.165 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (32.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 53 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 8746 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 343500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

 
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1240 (1233.16-1291.57)
Maingear Vector 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1181 (1168.74-1264.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Dell G7 17 7790 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1081 (1056.8-1189.87)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points +45%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3795 Points +28%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
3677 Points +24%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
2960 Points
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3133, n=55)
2564 Points -13%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points -36%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points -41%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1633 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points +7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
479 Points +3%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
463 Points
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=55)
443 Points -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points -6%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points -10%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
403 Points -13%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
352 Points -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points +11%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +4%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points -3%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points -5%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points -10%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
157 (155min - 159max) Points -17%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
143 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points +44%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points +41%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points +29%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points +26%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1617 (1603min - 1630max) Points +25%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1292 (1233.16min - 1291.57max) Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Intel Core i7-9750H
1227 Points -5%
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -9%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points -14%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points -35%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points -38%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
734 Points -43%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * -51%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
527 Seconds * -44%
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (342 - 495, n=21)
433 Seconds * -18%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
367 Seconds *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * +14%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * +19%
AMD Ryzen 1800X - Asus Crosshair VI Hero
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
290 Seconds * +21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS +9%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5367 MIPS +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
4954 MIPS
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=21)
4846 MIPS -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS -6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS +34%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS +23%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
43805 MIPS +20%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
36370 MIPS
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=21)
32357 MIPS -11%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS -39%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points +1%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1206 Points
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=13)
1190 Points -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points -5%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
874 Points -28%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points +16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points +13%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
6604 Points
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=13)
5597 Points -15%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points -39%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3537 Points -46%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
12.35 fps +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.19 fps +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)
8.72 fps -15%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps -38%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
86.6 s *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s * +3%
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)
59 s * +32%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s * +32%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec * -9%
Moyenne Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)
0.643 sec * -3%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.623 sec *
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * +11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13457
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7275
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37009
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
78.7 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
118 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1292 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
463 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2960 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6254 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5834 Points -7%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5761 Points -8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points -24%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
4568 Points -27%
Essentials
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
10017 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points -2%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
9502 Points -5%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9379 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8912 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points -17%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
7644 Points -24%
Productivity
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8193 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
8106 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7507 Points -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points -11%
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7311 Points -11%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
6713 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points -20%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8088 Points
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7570 Points -6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7221 Points -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
6999 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points -18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points -35%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5040 Points -38%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5081 Points +13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +12%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4860 Points +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4516 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
4456 Points -1%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
3928 Points -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5913 Points 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5894 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points -1%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5808 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5697 Points -3%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5130 Points -13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4516 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5894 points
PCMark 10 Score
6254 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1172 μs *

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
AS SSD
-79%
-46%
-19%
-49%
-94%
Seq Read
2066
1163
-44%
1019
-51%
2485
20%
1848
-11%
1307
-37%
Seq Write
2418
919
-62%
889
-63%
1575
-35%
601
-75%
730
-70%
4K Read
54.2
48.88
-10%
48.22
-11%
53.4
-1%
35.84
-34%
27.58
-49%
4K Write
129
90.1
-30%
115.5
-10%
113.5
-12%
112
-13%
80.3
-38%
4K-64 Read
1865
323.8
-83%
321.5
-83%
725
-61%
628
-66%
878
-53%
4K-64 Write
1878
403.8
-78%
787
-58%
1371
-27%
428.2
-77%
246.8
-87%
Access Time Read *
0.042
0.24
-471%
0.065
-55%
0.059
-40%
0.079
-88%
0.231
-450%
Access Time Write *
0.091
0.046
49%
0.047
48%
0.032
65%
0.034
63%
0.223
-145%
Score Read
2126
489
-77%
472
-78%
1027
-52%
849
-60%
1036
-51%
Score Write
2249
586
-74%
992
-56%
1642
-27%
600
-73%
400
-82%
Score Total
5482
1332
-76%
1717
-69%
3163
-42%
1829
-67%
1940
-65%
Copy ISO MB/s
2927
1269
-57%
942
-68%
1128
-61%
993
-66%
Copy Program MB/s
728
452.8
-38%
444.5
-39%
326.3
-55%
309.5
-57%
Copy Game MB/s
1614
755
-53%
867
-46%
442.8
-73%
582
-64%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-34%
-33%
-27%
-25%
-33%
Write 4K
145
133.3
-8%
137.5
-5%
50.2
-65%
158.4
9%
99.3
-32%
Read 4K
46.84
55.3
18%
57
22%
35.32
-25%
45.04
-4%
46.96
0%
Write Seq
2377
980
-59%
984
-59%
991
-58%
622
-74%
Read Seq
2185
1406
-36%
1564
-28%
1526
-30%
1592
-27%
Write 4K Q32T1
463.5
286.3
-38%
237.4
-49%
445.1
-4%
434.2
-6%
240.1
-48%
Read 4K Q32T1
527
331.5
-37%
340.7
-35%
526
0%
590
12%
581
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
2395
976
-59%
959
-60%
1647
-31%
630
-74%
686
-71%
Read Seq Q32T1
3470
1520
-56%
1732
-50%
3427
-1%
2108
-39%
1581
-54%
Write 4K Q8T8
748
268.1
Read 4K Q8T8
344.6
977
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-57% / -63%
-40% / -41%
-23% / -22%
-37% / -41%
-64% / -75%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3470 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2395 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 527 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2185 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2377 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.84 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
33935 Points +66%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points +25%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23833 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
22326 Points +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
20392 Points
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=19)
20123 Points -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
17466 Points -14%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
17119 Points -16%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15164 Points -26%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
12441 Points -39%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11563 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
9428 Points -54%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7866 Points -61%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14492 Points +93%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points +32%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9656 Points +29%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8379 Points +12%
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=18)
7651 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7492 Points
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6695 Points -11%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6340 Points -15%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5931 Points -21%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4298 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3568 Points -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2330 Points -69%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
14057 Points +90%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9508 Points +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
8043 Points +9%
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (6890 - 8253, n=18)
7537 Points +2%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7404 Points
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6521 Points -12%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
6117 Points -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5944 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
4105 Points -45%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
3559 Points -52%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
2474 Points -67%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
43576 Points +68%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points +34%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
30746 Points +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
30456 Points +17%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
26005 Points
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27298, n=21)
25775 Points -1%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22523 Points -13%
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
21492 Points -17%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20862 Points -20%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
16335 Points -37%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14723 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
13575 Points -48%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
9394 Points -64%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points +38%
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X
18534 Points +35%
Zotac GeForce RTX 2070 AMP Extreme
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13804 Points +1%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
13722 Points
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
12758 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
12708 Points -7%
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=21)
12534 Points -9%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11914 Points -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9839 Points -28%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9107 Points -34%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H
7309 Points -47%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7163 Points -48%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
6838 Points -50%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 06 Standard Score
39513 points
3DMark 11 Performance
21386 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39359 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17768 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7404 points
Aide
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
178 fps +32%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
135 fps 0%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
135 fps
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
133 fps -1%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
129 fps -4%
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (91.3 - 160, n=9)
124.5 fps -8%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
111 (83min) fps -18%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
95 (65min) fps -30%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
141 fps +32%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
116 fps +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
107 fps
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (86 - 114, n=10)
100.4 fps -6%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
100 fps -7%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
86 (71min) fps -20%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
84 (56min) fps -21%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
81 fps -24%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
124 fps +33%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
110 fps +18%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
93 fps
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (74.2 - 97, n=11)
88.7 fps -5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps -11%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
79 (52min) fps -15%
Asus G752VS
Intel Core i7-6820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
72 (59min) fps -23%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
64 fps -31%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
414.3 fps +27%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
326.4 (306min - 354max) fps
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
301 (256min - 341max) fps -8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
295.3 fps -10%
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (193.9 - 357, n=12)
290 fps -11%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
287.9 fps -12%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
284.2 fps +16%
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
263 (219min - 293max) fps +8%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
244.5 (232min - 258max) fps
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (154 - 250, n=12)
222 fps -9%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
215.4 fps -12%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
191.6 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
182 (156min - 213max) fps +13%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
175.9 fps +9%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
160.8 (152min - 177max) fps
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (115.7 - 160.8, n=17)
140.1 fps -13%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
131 fps -19%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
116 fps -28%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
109 (94min - 120max) fps +33%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.5 fps +16%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
82.1 (77min - 86max) fps
Moyenne NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=21)
74.3 fps -10%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.9 fps -16%
MSI GF65 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
60.6 fps -26%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø70.5 (64-79)
BasMoyenÉlevéUltra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 352 316 288.9 164.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 326.4 244.5 160.8 82.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152 139 128 120
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 102 91.7 77.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 135 107 102 93
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
Noise
5%
10%
3%
7%
12%
off / environment *
29.3
30
-2%
28.2
4%
30.5
-4%
28
4%
28.2
4%
Idle Minimum *
31.9
30.6
4%
28.2
12%
32.8
-3%
32.2
-1%
29.5
8%
Idle Average *
31.9
30.6
4%
28.2
12%
32.8
-3%
32.2
-1%
29.6
7%
Idle Maximum *
33.5
37.7
-13%
31.4
6%
32.8
2%
32.2
4%
29.6
12%
Load Average *
47
36.5
22%
39.8
15%
42.5
10%
40.9
13%
33
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.8
52.1
3%
47
13%
45.4
16%
47.2
12%
Load Maximum *
56.7
48.1
15%
50.2
11%
47.5
16%
48.6
14%
52
8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31.9 / 31.9 / 33.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
47 / 56.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (à 15 cm de distance)   bruit ambiant: 29.3 dB(A)
A pleine charge
 40.8 °C49.4 °C36.4 °C 
 38.6 °C49 °C36.4 °C 
 28.6 °C30.8 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Moyenne: 37.4 °C
55.2 °C33.4 °C57.2 °C
32 °C38.8 °C43.6 °C
28.6 °C32.8 °C30 °C
Maximum: 57.2 °C
Moyenne: 39.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  51 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) La température moyenne de la face supérieure sous charge maximale est de 37.4 °C / 99 F, par rapport à la moyenne de 33.9 °C / 93 F pour les appareils de la classe Gaming.
(-) La température maximale du côté supérieur est de 49.4 °C / 121 F, par rapport à la moyenne de 40.5 °C / 105 F, allant de 21.2 à 68.8 °C pour la classe Gaming.
(-) Le fond chauffe jusqu'à un maximum de 57.2 °C / 135 F, contre une moyenne de 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) En utilisation inactive, la température moyenne du côté supérieur est de 30.6 °C / 87 F, par rapport à la moyenne du dispositif de 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) En jouant à The Witcher 3, la température moyenne du côté supérieur est de 34.3 °C / 94 F, alors que la moyenne de l'appareil est de 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Les repose-poignets et le pavé tactile sont plus froids que la température de la peau avec un maximum de 30.8 °C / 87.4 F et sont donc froids au toucher.
(±) La température moyenne de la zone de l'appui-paume de dispositifs similaires était de 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / #-3.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.647.846.62541.140.441.13138.638.838.64039.837.739.85039.637.939.66338.737.138.78038.636.338.610038.335.438.312540.536.340.516046.936.646.920052.533.252.525052.13252.131554.332.154.340057315750056.130.356.163068.230.368.28007530.975100082.729.282.7125080.429.280.4160079.72979.7200078.729.178.7250076.228.876.2315077.928.677.9400079.128.579.150007628.276630075.52875.5800079.127.979.11000079.327.779.31250078.227.878.21600071.827.771.8SPL90.341.390.3N81.54.281.5median 76median 29.2median 76Delta10.7210.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GP65 10SFK-047USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Diagramme de fréquence (les cases peuvent être cochées et décochées pour comparer les appareils)
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US analyse audio

(+) | les haut-parleurs peuvent jouer relativement fort (90.3# dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | presque aucune basse - en moyenne 28.5% plus bas que la médiane
(+) | les basses sont linéaires (6.2% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | médiane réduite - en moyenne 8.2% inférieure à la médiane
(±) | la linéarité des médiums est moyenne (9.1% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Aiguës 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | des sommets équilibrés - à seulement 1.8% de la médiane
(+) | les aigus sont linéaires (4% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | la linéarité du son global est moyenne (23.5% de différence avec la médiane)
Par rapport à la même classe
» 83% de tous les appareils testés de cette catégorie étaient meilleurs, 5% similaires, 12% pires
» Le meilleur avait un delta de 6%, la moyenne était de 18%, le pire était de 132%.
Par rapport à tous les appareils testés
» 67% de tous les appareils testés étaient meilleurs, 7% similaires, 26% pires
» Le meilleur avait un delta de 4%, la moyenne était de 25%, le pire était de 134%.

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz analyse audio

(+) | les haut-parleurs peuvent jouer relativement fort (83.6# dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | basse réduite - en moyenne 11.3% inférieure à la médiane
(±) | la linéarité des basses est moyenne (14.2% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | médiane équilibrée - seulement 2.4% de la médiane
(+) | les médiums sont linéaires (5.5% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Aiguës 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | des sommets équilibrés - à seulement 2% de la médiane
(+) | les aigus sont linéaires (4.5% delta à la fréquence précédente)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | le son global est linéaire (10.2% différence à la médiane)
Par rapport à la même classe
» 6% de tous les appareils testés de cette catégorie étaient meilleurs, 2% similaires, 92% pires
» Le meilleur avait un delta de 5%, la moyenne était de 19%, le pire était de 53%.
Par rapport à tous les appareils testés
» 4% de tous les appareils testés étaient meilleurs, 1% similaires, 95% pires
» Le meilleur avait un delta de 4%, la moyenne était de 25%, le pire était de 134%.

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.5 / 1.23 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 14.2 / 18.8 / 23.9 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 96.9 / 233.4 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption
11%
12%
22%
-4%
8%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
14.2
11.4
20%
14.7
-4%
14.6
-3%
20
-41%
13.6
4%
15
-6%
Idle Average *
18.8
13.5
28%
18.6
1%
17.2
9%
23
-22%
17.9
5%
19
-1%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
21.6
10%
22.6
5%
17.3
28%
29
-21%
20.6
14%
26
-9%
Load Average *
96.9
106
-9%
90
7%
82.7
15%
87
10%
96
1%
101
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
185
186
-1%
107
42%
136
26%
154.6
16%
177
4%
Load Maximum *
233.4
196
16%
120
49%
136.7
41%
173
26%
218.6
6%
245
-5%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
WiFi Websurfing
3h 40min
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 41 Wh		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
51%
30%
-10%
-21%
-23%
6%
WiFi v1.3
220
333
51%
285
30%
197
-10%
174
-21%
169
-23%
234
6%
Reader / Idle
466
301
259
208
359
Load
87
69
41
122
65

Points positifs

+ 144 Hz refresh rate and fast black-white response times as standard
+ lightweight for a GeForce RTX 2070 laptop
+ well-calibrated display out of the box
+ M.2 2280 + 2.5-inch SATA III bays
+ comfortable keyboard
+ bright display
+ SD reader

Points négatifs

- servicing requires breaking a factory seal sticker
- high core temperatures when gaming
- ports are crowded and tightly packed
- no battery life improvements
- loud fans when gaming
- no Thunderbolt 3
In review: MSI GP65 10SFK-047US. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King
In review: MSI GP65 10SFK-047US. Test unit provided by Computer Upgrade King

On the Comet Lake-U series, the gen-to-gen performance differences between it and the outgoing Whiskey Lake-U series is minimal unless if you opt for the high-end Comet Lake-U Core i7-10710U. Otherwise, lesser options like the Core i7-10510U will perform nearly the same as the older Core i7-8565U.

The same can be said for the Comet Lake-H series. The Core i7-10750H performs very closely to the Core i7-9750H to the point where any differences would be unnoticeable especially if gaming where games are more likely to be GPU bound than CPU bound. Instead, users will have to consider the higher-end Core i7-10875H option for any significant raw performance gains over the Core i7-9750H.

While not the news most enthusiasts like to hear, it's nonetheless good news for gamers looking to upgrade their old laptops. The fact that 10th gen Comet Lake-H is only marginally faster than 9th gen Coffee Lake-H at the mid-range SKU level means you can upgrade to a 9th gen Intel gaming laptop and still get essentially the same gaming experience as a more expensive 10th gen Intel model. The money saved could be used to upgrade other more tangible aspects of the laptop like display or RAM or even a better model altogether like the MSI GS65, GE65, or GS65.

The MSI GP65 10SFK is the same laptop as last year's GP65 9SE but with a slightly faster and newer processor. Users won't be missing any exciting features or enormous performance advantages by sticking with a Coffee Lake-H CPU.

MSI GP65 10SFK-047US - 05/06/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Châssis
68 / 98 → 69%
Clavier
83%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
61 / 80 → 77%
Poids
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Autonomie
56 / 95 → 59%
Écran
87%
Performances en jeu
93%
Performances dans les applications
92%
Chauffe
84 / 95 → 88%
Nuisance sonore
67 / 90 → 75%
Audio
75%
Appareil photo
54 / 85 → 64%
Moyenne
74%
83%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Allen Ngo, 2020-06- 5 (Update: 2020-06- 5)