Xiaomi Redmi Pro
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 13 notes (à partir de 25 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Xiaomi Redmi Pro
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Pro is a very good smartphone and once again Xiaomi has struck the perfect balance between features and pricing. Its top variants may be perceived as expensive by some, but they do have additional storage, RAM, and a better chipset in them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: DP Review EN→FR Archive.org version
In its price bracket the Xiaomi Redmi Pro can score a lot of points with its premium look and materials, a bright and sharp OLED display and very good battery life. The 13MP camera delivers good color and exposure across the ISO range but our test sample suffered from strong lens softness away from the center of the frame.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Digital Trends EN→FR Archive.org version
No, not if you live in the U.S. or U.K. The lack of 4G connectivity in the U.S. is a serious problem. The phone is great, the camera extremely competent, and its special features highly enticing. We even like MIUI. Add in that we don’t have to spend much to buy it, and under any other circumstances, we’d be telling you to rush out and buy it right now. Sadly, the lack of connectivity makes the Redmi Pro a no go.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techspot EN→FR Archive.org version
With that said, there are some reasons to consider the Redmi Pro. Xiaomi clearly has the best mid-range phone design and battery life of the trio, and the depth sensing features could appeal to some. At $250 for the 64GB model, the Redmi Pro also provides a lot more storage than either the Nexus 5X or Moto G4 Plus, which only include 16 GB at that price (and the 5X doesn’t include expandable storage). When storage is factored in, and you end up saving $30-50, this could swing things in favor of Xiaomi’s strongest mid-range offering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 advanced version and Redmi Pro standard version have much similarity in hardware, although they are different in price. Redmi Pro is better than Redmi Note 4 in design, holding feel and camera. But Redmi Note 4 has better price. And Redmi Note 4 advanced version is the first to improve to ROM 64GB . Under this kind of specs, Redmi Note 4 advanced version has better price. Therefore, if you care more about design and camera, Redmi Pro is more suitable for you. But if you don’t mind USB type c port and dual rear camera, Redmi Note 4 will be a good choice.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: Android Headlines EN→FR Archive.org version
Almost no one does value better than Xiaomi in the smartphone market, and the Redmi Pro is proof of that. Top tier hardware build and design, tons of software features and great battery life are a few of the highlights of the Redmi Pro. Better than average sound output and camera performance in this price category are also worth noting, and an excellent display coupled with great every day and gaming performance round out the device as a whole.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro offers unbeatable value for money at around £250, undercutting every flagship yet offering much the same performance and many comparable features. Due to the lack of Google Play and a number of Chinese preinstalled apps we’d recommend Xiaomi phones only to seasoned Android users, however.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 80% finition: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Pro will have an easy time drawing eyes to itself if people figure out that dual cameras are a feature they like to have on their phone. And this may happen sooner than later having in mind the iPhone 7 Plus has a dual camera setup as well. But even if you are not that much into the faux bokeh effects, the Redmi Pro with its large battery, punchy screen, solid metal build and reasonably quick performance, is an excellent deal all-around.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Pro is one of the devices in the market right out the gives you the best value for your hard-earned money. With its OLED display, interesting camera setup, and smooth performance, Xiaomi still managed to keep the pricing low. Howver, they are not releasing any new devices in the market officially, so we’ll have to rely on other sellers to bring it here. Widget City is selling the device for Php13,500 in black, gray, or gold colors (see listing here).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/26/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/17/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 85% écran: 83% mobilité: 78%
Source: Kustruki ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 90%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 85% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 90% écran: 95% finition: 90%
Source: Optima IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 68% prix: 70% écran: 60% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2016
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/29/2016
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tecnoandroid.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% équipement: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% écran: 75% mobilité: 78% finition: 75% ergonomie: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% écran: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% finition: 89%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2016
Source: Mobilenet.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Mobilizujeme CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/21/2016
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T880 MP4:
Carte graphique intégrée pour smartphones et tablettes à SoC ARM tels que le HiSilicon Kirin 950.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
unknown:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
77.77%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.