Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Moyenne de 45 notes (à partir de 98 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Xiaomi Redmi Note 4
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 n'est certes pas exempt de petits défauts comme une interface un peu fouillis uniquement en anglais ou encore l'absence du Play Store (voir notre tuto pour l'ajouter). Son poids élevé peut aussi être un frein. Mais si vous n'avez pas peur de mettre les mains dans le cambouis et de passer un peu de temps à peaufiner vos réglages, vous ne le regretterez pas. Le Redmi Note 4 jouit d'un joli design, d'une bonne autonomie, de bonnes performances et d'un bel écran, le tout à un prix très attractif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 n'est certes pas exempt de petits défauts comme une interface un peu fouillis uniquement en anglais ou encore l'absence du Play Store (voir notre tuto pour l'ajouter). Son poids élevé peut aussi être un frein. Mais si vous n'avez pas peur de mettre les mains dans le cambouis et de passer un peu de temps à peaufiner vos réglages, vous ne le regretterez pas. Le Redmi Note 4 jouit d'un joli design, d'une bonne autonomie, de bonnes performances et d'un bel écran, le tout à un prix très attractif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 n'est certes pas exempt de petits défauts comme une interface un peu fouillis uniquement en anglais ou encore l'absence du Play Store (voir notre tuto pour l'ajouter). Son poids élevé peut aussi être un frein. Mais si vous n'avez pas peur de mettre les mains dans le cambouis et de passer un peu de temps à peaufiner vos réglages, vous ne le regretterez pas. Le Redmi Note 4 jouit d'un joli design, d'une bonne autonomie, de bonnes performances et d'un bel écran, le tout à un prix très attractif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 n'est certes pas exempt de petits défauts comme une interface un peu fouillis uniquement en anglais ou encore l'absence du Play Store (voir notre tuto pour l'ajouter). Son poids élevé peut aussi être un frein. Mais si vous n'avez pas peur de mettre les mains dans le cambouis et de passer un peu de temps à peaufiner vos réglages, vous ne le regretterez pas. Le Redmi Note 4 jouit d'un joli design, d'une bonne autonomie, de bonnes performances et d'un bel écran, le tout à un prix très attractif.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Si le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 est assez semblable à son prédécesseur sur bien des points, il signe avec son élégance une montée en gamme. Le smartphone de Xiaomi c'est aussi un bel écran et un capteur d'empreintes très performant. Cependant, l'interface est encore déconcertante et peu stable, les problèmes de langues et de bandes passantes liés à l'import ou encore l'APN déçoivent. Ces quelques points ne permettent pas d'élever plus que cela notre note pour le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Le Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 n’est certes pas exempt de petits défauts comme une interface un peu fouillis uniquement en anglais ou encore l’absence du Play Store (voir notre tuto pour l’ajouter).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Encore une fois (One more time…), Xiaomi nous montre sa capacité à produire de très bons mobiles à prix abordables. Car pour environ 155 Euros HT, on peut s’offrir un excellent smartphone performant et au design premium.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/26/2016
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
All said and done, would we recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4? Without a doubt, yes! At its price point, it's just amazing how complete and fulfilling a device you're getting that can go toe-to-toe with devices that cost up to twice its price. It's hard to go wrong with this phone and we reckon many might even consider getting it as their secondary/backup device. It's also fine as your main device if your budget is tight, but as pointed above, the costlier devices do have their own appeal that you will appreciate when looking for an even more capable primary device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/18/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
All said and done, would we recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4? Without a doubt, yes! At its price point, it's just amazing how complete and fulfilling a device you're getting that can go toe-to-toe with devices that cost up to twice its price. It's hard to go wrong with this phone and we reckon many might even consider getting it as their secondary/backup device. It's also fine as your main device if your budget is tight, but as pointed above, the costlier devices do have their own appeal that you will appreciate when looking for an even more capable primary device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi continues to bring great value to consumers with its Redmi Note series. It has found the right formula for delivering an unrivaled device in its price point - solid design with some refinements for a more premium look and feel, a great design, fast fingerprint reader, smooth MIUI 8 navigation, an overall good performance with decent image quality. Although it fell short of its counterparts in battery mileage, the Redmi Note 4 is on-par in the other benchmark tests.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi continues to bring great value to consumers with its Redmi Note series. It has found the right formula for delivering an unrivaled device in its price point - solid design with some refinements for a more premium look and feel, a great design, fast fingerprint reader, smooth MIUI 8 navigation, an overall good performance with decent image quality. Although it fell short of its counterparts in battery mileage, the Redmi Note 4 is on-par in the other benchmark tests.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 85% performances: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
Last year, I thought the price of the Redmi Note 3 (RM849) was unbelievable but they did it again and even better with the Redmi Note 4. This is all because of the 14nm chipset, it has improved the performance, battery life, with no trouble of overheating. The picture quality has also improved as well, although it won't reach the high-tier phone levels, but I'm very satisfied with how the images turned out. But if I must complain anything about the phone, it's that the fingerprint sensor could use some work there and charging takes too long (no quick charge).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/08/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, when judged as a stand-alone device, is an excellent smartphone. It probably has more bang for your buck than most of its competitors, making the Note 4 a worthy purchase.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
Budget-minded smartphones have come a long way, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is one of the best examples of this. It feels more premium and polished than its price tag would suggest, and its battery life is simply phenomenal – even in comparison to flagship-tier smartphones.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The clever Helio X20’s CorePilot architecture gives a user the high performance A72’s, at the same time, two Cortex A53 clusters to save significant power. All three clusters work together to give one the optimal solution which yields performance and power. No chip company in the market today has engineered their brains to work in this manner.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 offers a great specification and performance. It is a complete package that delivers best user experience and a large storage space of 64GB. In the price range of 13K, it is the best device you can go for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
We personally think that Xiaomi Note 4 is all in all a great device with some amazing features. The tests that we carried out are a proof in that case. This device is a good addition to the smartphone market in Pakistan. But the problem arises when take a look at the smartphone competition in the market. There are many other better and better phones available in the market that will hide Xiaomi’s availability therefore, instead of bringing the same old features that we get in any other smartphone, Xiaomi needs to come up with something new and unique that directly captures the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 80% performances: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 is not perfect – the camera still misses the beat – but it is a well-rounded package that one wouldn’t hesitate to recommend – especially if one needs a big screen and long battery life. Packed in a neat chassis, the smartphone performs great and is a compelling smartphone that gets a direct entry into any best-of lists. Interestingly, there’s nothing revolutionary in the Redmi Note 4, yet it’s a nice progression from the predecessor that fixes most of latter’s flaws and presents itself as a fantastic value-for-money device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
When Xiaomi announced the Redmi Note 4, we had our doubts that it may just be a case one step forward, two steps back over the Redmi Note 3. The Snapdragon 650 processor was one of the star attractions of the device and dialing it back in favor of the Snapdragon 625 on the new model seemed like a significant drawback on paper.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 isn’t a huge upgrade over the Redmi Note 3 in terms of core hardware, with simply a greater amount of storage and a faster processor, but the design changes are a huge improvement over its predecessor. If you don’t care about looks and can make do with less storage then the cheaper Redmi Note 3 may well meet your needs. The Redmi Note 4 remains a great buy, but the omission of Google Play support may put off some users. O2 and Giffgaff customers should also note the lack of support for 800MHz 4G.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
On paper, the Redmi Note 4 might not seem like a game-changer as its predecessor, the Redmi Note 3. But once you look closely at the handset, you will realise that it has all the right changes and improvements that make it a worthy successor to the Redmi Note 3. What makes the handset even better is its pricing. Despite all the improvements it offers, Xiaomi has priced the Redmi Note 4 at the same level as the Note 3. In fact, the handset’s value for money ratio is now even higher since it comes with more storage. This means that for Rs 9,999, you get the 2GB/32GB variant of the Redmi Note 4 while paying an additional Rs 1,000 will get you the 3GB/32GB variant. For power users, Xiaomi is also offering a 4GB/64GB variant of the Redmi Note 4 for only Rs 12,999.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/05/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
There are probably less reasons to upgrade if you are using Redmi Note 3. Assuming that the camera needs an improvement and the battery life is inadequate, these are the only reasons to upgrade to Redmi Note 4 according to me.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/02/2017
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
Upon turning on the device, you will be greeted with the MIUI 8.1 which is a custom OS from Xiaomi based on Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow. Xiaomi has told that an OTA of Android 7.0 Nougat preview will be available soon. And that’s pretty much exciting for us considering there are very few devices that run on latest Android Nougat update.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/25/2017
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has been always been spot on with the pricing and including the new variant was also a good decision. The 2GB+16GB variant is priced at Rs 9,999, 3GB+32GB for Rs 10,999 and 4GB+64GB for Rs 12,999. There are some good offerings in the market, but considering Xiaomi’s reputation, the Redmi Note 4 will be a hot seller.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 75% écran: 75% mobilité: 85% finition: 75%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
If you compare Redmi Note 3 and the Redmi Note 4, benchmark scores are higher on Redmi Note 3, but in real usage scenario you will hardly find any differences. Battery life is even better on the Note 4. Also heat up is much less on the Note 4 when compared with Note 3. The only issue with Note 4 is the camera, Note 3 camera is better.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Priced at Rs 12,999, the Xiaomi Note 4 is a good option in its price segment. The smartphone offers premium features like metallic body design and good camera at a competitive price. Those looking for alternatives can consider buying Moto G4 or the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
If you’re on the Redmi Note 3, you might not see a lot of reason to upgrade. For those looking for a new phone for under Rs 13,000, the market is flood with options and it can be confusing. Lenovo K6 Power is an obvious competitor that comes to mind, given the battery, and yes the camera is impressive on that one. But there’s no doubt that Xiaomi’s extra storage at Rs 12,999 is an excellent deal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/20/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 has some big shoes to fill. Xiaomi has sold over 3.6 million units of the Redmi Note 3 in 2016, according to the company. It will eventually discontinue the Redmi Note 3 in the days to come. The Redmi Note 4 will carry its legacy forward. If you already own a Redmi Note 3, you might just want to hold on to it for some more. If not, you should know that the Redmi Note 4 is a (really) good phone, but, also it has lots of competition. Mostly from Lenovo and Moto. Xiaomi's phone is an all-rounder, no doubt, but the company will have to pull up its socks (now more than ever) and make (more of) its phones available for buying.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 is a great package with the only downsides being its hybrid SIM slot, lack of quick charging, and excess of preloaded apps. We think that the Redmi Note 4 will provide tough competition to other smartphones in its price segment, and even some priced a little higher. It scores very well in terms of design, battery life, and performance. For those who are looking for a smartphone with a big screen and great battery performance on a budget, the Redmi Note 4 is easy to recommend.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
At its prices of Rs 9,999 (2 GB/ 32 GB), Rs 10,999 (3 GB/ 32 GB) and Rs 12,999 (4 GB/ 64 GB), the Redmi Note 4 is as tempting a deal for anyone looking for a rock solid smartphone as its predecessor was. Some might consider this to be a slight rather than a spectacular upgrade, although the design is more handsome and there are improvements in the camera and sound departments (which needed them) and the battery (which actually was already pretty good), but considering how well the Note 3 performed and did, even that is quite an achievement.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi played a gamble by going in with a slightly lower-end chip given that Redmi Note 4 already had a pretty high bar to clear, thanks to the outstanding success Xiaomi's Redmi Note 3 tasted last year. In our opinion, this phone does a pretty competent job of building on the success of the Note 3. The performance of this device is not a let down by any means except slightly slow app load timings. Apart from that, Redmi Note 4 lived up to our expectations and even surpassed them in the battery department. If you can compromise a bit on the processor for a stress relieving battery, then this phone will not let you down.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
I usually tend to overlook/ignore Twitter hashtags that company PR and marketing folks blatantly use to market their products. I somehow could not do it in the case of the Redmi Note 4. Flipkart (that will be exclusively selling the phone initially) calls it an all-rounder. I couldn't agree more. Because, simply put, the Redmi Note 4 is an all-rounder that's also very affordable. But is it any better than the Redmi Note 3? Yes and no.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 is a fantastic device in its own right. The build quality has seen improvements in all the right places, battery life and performance are better than ever and even the camera has gotten better.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is a jack of all trades, offering something for everyone. Xiaomi got the pricing right, making it an able smartphone. However, if you can spend more, the Coolpad Cool 1 has a better camera and comparable battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 77%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 isn’t a huge upgrade over the Redmi Note 3 in terms of core hardware, with simply a greater amount of storage and a faster processor, but the design changes are a huge improvement over its predecessor. If you don’t care about looks and can make do with less storage then the cheaper Redmi Note 3 may well meet your needs. The Redmi Note 4 remains a great buy, but the omission of Google Play support may put off some users. O2 and Giffgaff customers should also note the lack of support for 800MHz 4G.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 isn’t a huge upgrade over the Redmi Note 3 in terms of core hardware, with simply a greater amount of storage and a faster processor, but the design changes are a huge improvement over its predecessor. If you don’t care about looks and can make do with less storage then the cheaper Redmi Note 3 may well meet your needs. The Redmi Note 4 remains a great buy, but the omission of Google Play support may put off some users. O2 and Giffgaff customers should also note the lack of support for 800MHz 4G.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 is not really a true successor or an upgrade to the Redmi Note 3 as its name might suggest. I wouldn’t recommend this to someone who has a Redmi Note 3/Note 3 Pro or a device that is similarly specc’d.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
As an everyday driver, the Redmi Note 4 will not disappoint. It’s all you’ll need for a smartphone that’ll function well and will last for a whole day of use on a single charge. Its build is also attractive and solid on hand. What will hinder the phone’s winning streak of balanced features and price is its availability. It’s only available through local online gadget stores with very limited warranty.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/14/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is a phone that will change your buying habits in the future because it casts a different light on flagships. Its metal evokes some high-end classics, the display is impressive, the chipset stood its own against some flagships. With all this, you'd never guess it's a sub-€200 phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/06/2016
Source: Android Headlines EN→FR Archive.org version
That’s not to say there aren’t some issues with the phone, but all of them are weird software issues that will likely either be fixed with updates or just a bit of tweaking to the system. When it all comes down to it there is simply no better deal on the market, regardless of price, and it’s extraordinarily difficult not to recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 to anyone who’s willing to use a 5.5-inch phone and has a bit of patience to tweak software a bit out of the box. If you’re willing to take the steps necessary to fix some stuff that Xiaomi broke and don’t need a phone with the absolute cream of the crop specs, this is the phone you should get in Fall of 2016.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/29/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 isn’t a huge upgrade over the Redmi Note 3 in terms of core hardware, with simply a greater amount of storage and a faster processor, but the design changes are a huge improvement over its predecessor. If you don’t care about looks and can make do with less storage then the cheaper Redmi Note 3 may well meet your needs. The Redmi Note 4 remains a great buy, but the omission of Google Play support may put off some users. O2 and Giffgaff customers should also note the lack of support for 800MHz 4G.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90% performances: 80% équipement: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 advanced version and Redmi Pro standard version have much similarity in hardware, although they are different in price. Redmi Pro is better than Redmi Note 4 in design, holding feel and camera. But Redmi Note 4 has better price. And Redmi Note 4 advanced version is the first to improve to ROM 64GB . Under this kind of specs, Redmi Note 4 advanced version has better price. Therefore, if you care more about design and camera, Redmi Pro is more suitable for you. But if you don’t mind USB type c port and dual rear camera, Redmi Note 4 will be a good choice.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi Note 4 is a pretty good smartphone for its price. It's a capable performer and a decent snapper, but there's nothing exceptional about it. Except the price of course. If you're in India, you'd not get this variant, mind you. Due to an ongoing legal tussle with Ericsson, Xiaomi cannot sell MediaTek-based devices in India. So, like in the past, Xiaomi will come out with a Qualcomm-based Redmi Note 4 for the Indian market. Hence, there is also a chance, Xiaomi only launches one variant of the same which would then most likely be the 3GB variant, or so we hope.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/10/2016
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Redmi Note 4 from a distance looks to be a fairly impressive phone. It wasn’t all that long ago that things like aluminum unibody design, fast-focusing rear cameras, high quality, high density displays, and fingerprint scanners were impossible to find in a single package for a phone under 200 USD, and Xiaomi has managed to ship a phone with all of these things.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: Android TV DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 90% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 85%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Putoinformatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/22/2017
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/10/2017
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Andro Asia ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 85% écran: 75% mobilité: 80%
Source: El Sabio Informatico ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 80% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Geektopia ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 77% prix: 90% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 85% performances: 85% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 85% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/25/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Best Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/12/2016
Source: Optima IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 75% finition: 65%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 88% équipement: 86% écran: 82% mobilité: 90% finition: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 89% écran: 83% mobilité: 90% finition: 88% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 68% prix: 75% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 89%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 80% écran: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/04/2018
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 85% écran: 80% mobilité: 95% finition: 75%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: AndroidInsider.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Mobilizujeme CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/20/2016
Source: Mobilenet.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/18/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/08/2017
Source: Sohoa VN Express VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/09/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/19/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/05/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/13/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/25/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Reviewzat →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/17/2017
Source: Go4it.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/13/2017
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T880 MP4:
Carte graphique intégrée pour smartphones et tablettes à SoC ARM tels que le HiSilicon Kirin 950.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
unknown:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
78.96%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.