Vivo X60 Pro
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)
Price comparison
Moyenne de 54 notes (à partir de 97 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Vivo X60 Pro
Le X60 Pro commence avec des lentilles Zeiss et un nouveau système de caméra à cardan. Si la collaboration avec le fabricant allemand traditionnel fait oublier la stabilisation OIS classique ou sert davantage à des fins de marketing, vous pouvez le découvrir dans notre revue du téléphone Vivo.
Source: Les Mobiles
De notre point de vue, le smartphone Vivo X60 Pro peut séduire extérieurement, mais lorsqu’on y regarde d’un peu plus près, il accuse tout de même quelques petits manques notamment par rapport à la concurrence où aucune pitié n’est accordée à ce prix d’autant qu’il est disponible depuis quelques mois maintenant et que les constructeurs proposent maintenant des appareils tout aussi capables, voire plus. On apprécie la qualité de l’écran, les performances, la stabilisation en vidéo ainsi que celle des photos produites par le mobile. Par contre, on regrette le son mono, l’absence d’étanchéité et la charge à « seulement » 33 watts.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/03/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet France
Le Vivo X60 Pro séduit sans briller. On apprécie se perdre dans son grand écran de très bonne facture et la fluidité de son interface plutôt bien pensée. Ses différents modules photo livrent une solide prestation mais le système gimbal ne tient pas ses promesses. Le flagship du fabricant chinois aurait pu se démarquer de la concurrence avec un tel équipement et c'est raté. On regrette également son manque d'endurance et sa puissance de charge limitée à 33W.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/28/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Meilleurmobile
Cette version du téléphone arrive avec son lots de promesses. Le X60 Pro se présente sous la forme d’un appareil avec beaucoup de qualités et quelques défauts préjudiciables. Malgré tout l’impression laissée par ce test est plutôt bonne. Dans son design, peu de nouveautés sont à noter. Le X60 Pro n’a pas de grandes différences avec le X51 5G. Le smartphone reste joli avec un bel écran tactile et des performances très solides. L’autonomie est tout de même bonne malgré quelques faiblesses mais la charge rapide pallie à tout cela. L’appareil photo du smartphone est lui aussi très polyvalent malgré un zoom optique parfois défaillant. L’impression générale est excellente sur ce téléphone. Le Vivo X60 Pro est un smartphone commercialisé à 799 euros. La marque chinoise propose de belles promotions au bout de quelques mois. Par exemple le X51 5G voyait son prix chuter de 300 euros six mois après sa sortie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/28/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fredzone
Si vous avez vu mon test du Vivo X51 5G, alors vous devez certainement avoir repéré de nombreuses similitudes. Et c’est normal puisque ces deux téléphones sortent un peu du même moule. Le X60 Pro va cependant un peu plus loin sur le plan technique en proposant un SoC plus puissant. Un SoC qui pourra faire la différence pour les personnes les plus exigeantes, ou plus globalement pour celles et ceux qui souhaitent pouvoir conserver leur téléphone longtemps. Si le Snapdragon 870 n’atteint pas la puissance d’un Snapdragon 888, il reste en effet bien suffisant pour la plupart des usages. En tout cas, je trouve la proposition de Vivo intéressante et ce X60 Pro coche au final pas mal de cases. Les deux seules choses qui lui manquent, finalement, c’est un second haut-parleur et la charge filaire rapide.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/18/2021
Source: Journal du Geek
Le Vivo X60 Pro se présente comme une évolution du X51 5G et en soi, le dernier smartphone du constructeur chinois est réussi avec un design premium, un écran agréable des performances haut de gamme, le tout avec une surcouche relativement légère, ce qu’on apprécie. L’autonomie est la même que l’année dernière mais un an après, on voit que c’est juste dans la moyenne. On aurait également aimé avoir enfin des haut-parleurs stéréo. Et enfin la photo où Vivo aurait pu frapper bien plus fort. En dehors du branding avec Zeiss, on ne mesure pas forcément une grande avancée dans le domaine et c’est bien dommage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phonandroid
Le X60 Pro est un véritable équilibriste, aussi à l'aise en photo qu'en jeu vidéo. Il est doté d'une plate-forme puissante, qu'il maitrise suffisamment pour éviter les surchauffes et les baisses de performance. Il profite d'un excellent stabilisateur sur son capteur principal. Son écran, son design et son interface sont également des points forts. Le tout à un prix lui aussi équilibré. Une autonomie un peu juste dans certaines situations ternit un tableau presque parfait.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/02/2021
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Frandroid
Sur certains points, le Vivo X60 Pro n’a rien à envier à ses concurrents : entre son design maîtrisé et abouti, son écran AMOLED et 120 Hz très agréables à manipuler et ses excellentes performances - bien qu’en dessous du Xiaomi Mi 11 et du OnePlus 9 -, cet appareil mobile coche beaucoup de belles cases. Du côté de la photo et de la vidéo, le système gimbal ne corrige pas vraiment ses erreurs du passé, mais la polyvalence du module rattrape le tout et offre des perspectives intéressantes pour les amateurs de photo. Par ailleurs, le mode macro impressionne. Finalement, c’est du côté de l’autonomie et du logiciel que nous aurions à redire, sans que cela ne soit catastrophique. Le mobile tient grosso modo une journée avec un usage classique, et s’appuie sur une recharge de « seulement » 33 W. Funtouch OS, lui, mériterait un poil plus de personnalisations.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/26/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Nextpit France
Avec la caméra gimbal, Vivo offre également un argument de vente dans son flagship de 2021 que vous ne trouverez nulle par ailleurs. Les performances de stabilisation vidéo sont excellentes et si vous enregistrez souvent des vidéos ou si vous êtes un vlogger, ce smartphone sera un succès. Vous cherchez une alternative? Voici notre liste des meilleurs smartphones haut de gamme à choisir en 2021. Si vous pouvez vivre sans cette fonctionnalité, des alternatives comme le Zenfone 8 ou le Xiaomi Mi 11 peuvent être plus intéressants. Cela est principalement dû à des défauts mineurs tels que l'application de l'appareil photo, l'absence de charge sans-fil, la certification IP inadéquate et la légère baisse des performances due au SoC, mais au moins vous n'aurez pas à faire face aux problèmes de surchauffe du Snapdragon 888.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/16/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
Par contre, si vous voulez bénéficier de toutes les fréquences 4G LTE nécessaires à une utilisation complète en France et en Europe, il vous faudra impérativement choisir la version globale du VIVO X60 Pro. Attention qu’en France, et plus largement en Europe, vous bénéficiez d’une garantie de 2 ans, mais de seulement 1 an sur un modèle d’import. Chacun verra donc midi à sa porte.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/04/2021
Source: Frandroid
Vivo est un géant dans le monde des smartphones, mais encore méconnu en France et en Europe. Avec son X51 — et d’autres modèles plutôt dans le milieu de gamme –, la marque a su montrer de belles ambitions pour s’imposer parmi les plus grands.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/22/2021
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) smoothly adapts to changing light conditions and has accurate color rendering. However, it lacks brightness in most tested conditions, and this has an impact on the user experience, especially when watching HDR10 videos, which lack contrast and appear somewhat flat. Dark tones are missing and a green cast is noticeable. The device has a smooth feel when browsing the web and when gaming. Although the screen reacts accurately when gaming, touch reactivity in the corners is poor, and aliasing is visible.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) arrived on the market in March 2021. Belonging to our Premium ($600-799) segment, it has a display with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a 240 Hz touch sampling rate, among other nice features. Let’s see how it did in our Battery protocol tests. The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) put in an above-average performance in our Battery protocol tests. Showing no weaknesses, it takes over the top spot in the Premium segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/21/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the EU version of the mobile phone, which differs from the China-exclusive Exynos version in terms of chipset among other characteristics. The EU model features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. For selfies, both the EU and China models use the same front camera module. There’s a 32 MP sensor coupled with an f/2.45 aperture lens. Video is also captured at full HD 1080p at 30 fps resolution.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/18/2021
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR
The VIVO X60 Pro costs £748, so it is not what you’d call a cheap phone. It’s not even a mid-range phone. It is a flagship phone that costs about as much as the Galaxy S21, the iPhone 12, and the Xiaomi Mi 11. For this amount of money, you expect a few things to be in place, things like an IP rating, solid battery life, and a high-resolution display. You’d also expect to have the best CPU money can buy. But on the VIVO X60 Pro, all of these things are missing. I do like the VIVO X60 Pro and I had a great time testing it but for the asking price, it does fall short in my eyes. If it cost £499, I’d be recommending this phone to everyone. But it doesn’t. And at this price point, the VIVO X60 Pro, with all of its foibles, just isn’t as competitive as the competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/31/2021
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: GSM Choice EN→FR
Vivo X60 Pro entered European markets just over half a year after the brand's debut on the Old Continent and the launch of quite successful Vivo X51. Is the successor better than the predecessor? You will find out from the following review! At the outset, let me explain that in this review we are talking about the European variant of Vivo X60 Pro, labeled V2046. You must know that there is also a "Chinese" version of this phone, with the same name, but different interface and - more importantly - processor. We got the Snapdragon 870 instead of the Exynos 1080. Unfortunately, along the way, the European variant lost its telephoto camera - making it a bit weaker than its predecessor . But maybe something has also changed for the better...?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
In 2020, Vivo released the X60 Pro, driven by an Exynos chip, in China. In April of this year, the X60 Pro went global, but this time, it was equipped with the Snapdragon 870 5G chipset. The X60 Pro is one of the brand’s flagships, just downstream from the X60 Pro Plus, with features like a 6.56 inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a four-camera array, and a fast-charging 4200 mAh (TYP) battery. Vivo’s website does not mention the X60 Pro’s audio specifications, but it has one speaker that is bottom right-side firing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: Talk Android EN→FR
On sale in Europe, UK, India, and a few other Asian countries, the Vivo X60 Pro is being sold at £749/€799 which is pretty much the same price as the X51 5G from 2020. This time around, though, there’s a flagship (ish) processor in the form of the Snapdragon 870 which brings a nice performance boost to a svelte-looking handset. The Vivo X60 has its strengths such as the very capable 48MP main camera with Gimbal Stabilization 2.0, a very good AMOLED display, and a stunning design, but there are glaring omissions such as wireless charging, the limited 33W fast-charging speed, an IP rating, and the expensive price tag. Much like the X51 5G, the X60 Pro is a very good phone that is weighed down by its RRP when compared to competitors such as the Galaxy S21 and Mi 11i.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/16/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the global release of this device and differs from the China-only Exynos version not only in the chipset but also in the photography specifications, with only a single tele-lens included on the Snapdragon model versus two teles on the model for the Chinese market. The handset features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. Aside from dropping the second tele-lens, the camera is the same as in the Exynos version. Co-engineered with Zeiss, the primary camera is built around a 48 MP Quad Bayer sensor (12 MP output) with a f/1.48-aperture lens. Both zoom cameras utilize 13 MP sensors, with a f/2.56-aperture lens on the tele and a f/2.2-aperture lens on the ultra-wide.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/11/2021
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR
The vibrant competition Vivo faces give us pause before recommending it as a top-of-mind purchase. Unfortunately, this choice dilemma results in the X60 Pro losing a little of its lustre, despite the phone being relatively well put together. Really, if you’re able to fork out close to S$1,200, there are so many other true flagships with other perks to consider, even before you look at this pretty phone. Even the S$999 non-Pro based Vivo X60 that loses the gimbal stabilisation feature is still a hard choice against the ASUS and Xiaomi options. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2021
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro has upped the cameraphone game with the addition of ZEISS Vario-Tessar lenses, Gimbal stabilisation 2.0 and a cute rotating Biotar bokeh effect. It is also one of the best-looking smartphones we have seen. To give you an idea of how good its camera is, DXOMark gives the X60 Pro+ (has a periscope zoom in addition to the X60 Pro lenses) 128 – a score reserved for Apple iPhone 12 Pro/Max and just three points off the incredible OPPO Find X3 Pro camera. Yet this costs a mere $1099 against the best at >$1500. We will come to the camera later, but you need to know that there are no obvious or hidden downsides to saving $500 by purchasing this impressive device. The highlights are Qualcomm SD870, Gimbal camera and a 120Hz, HDR10+, Gorilla Glass 6, AMOLED screen that is a sheer delight in its almost 19.8:9 tall and thin format.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/14/2021
Notes: Note globale: 94% prix: 90% performances: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR
The audio quality also did no favours to the Vivo phone. If anything, medium-to-heavy users of music and videos would likely consider another device based on this alone. That leaves us with its excellent form factor and amazing battery life. Its longevity may satisfy some folks, but buyers would also need to consider if they can say no to the ASUS ZenFone 8’s imaging quality, or the 1440p display on Xiaomi Mi 11, or perhaps the Samsung Galaxy S21’s robust ecosystem and UI polish. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2021
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR
With a good-looking design, well-rounded camera array and slick user interface, the Vivo X60 Pro is a solid jack-of-all-trades Android phone. However, it launched at the same price as some higher-spec contemporaries, making it harder to recommend.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is no game of two halves, it's an outright winner. The design is largely on point, in particular that soft-touch rear finish, and while its cameras aren't as all-singing, all-dancing as the Zeiss badge on the camera unit might suggest, the main snapper is certainly capable enough. Even the software is largely like stock Google Android, with only minor bouts of foul play - like rare blank notification hiccups - showing its typically inconsistent competition, such as Xiaomi, how things can be done. What's particularly standout about the X60 Pro, however, is the gimbal camera system - delivering stabilisation for video capture that's unlike what any other phone company can muster. The smoothness is mightly impressive, making for a striking feature. Sure, the X60 Pro is a timely launch for Vivo, given Euro 2020, but this isn't a device that only sells itself through the company name being splashed around stadium ad boards, its one that sells itself on sheer ability. Back of the net!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
Basic specs include a 6.56-inch 120 Hz AMOLED display, a 4200 mAh battery with fast 33W charging, and 256 GB storage with 12 GB RAM. Like the X60 Pro+ variant, the X60 Pro 5G (Exynos) is quad-camera device, with dual tele-lenses and an ultra-wide complementing the main camera. Sensor and lens specs differ between the two models, however. That, combined with the change in chipset and image processing pipeline, should make for an interesting comparison between the two devices.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR
Extremely stylish, and with an excellent 48-megapixel rear camera, the Vivo X60 Pro is the kind of smartphone that you would want to accompany you on trips to scenic places to snap beautiful pictures. Its unique photography modes provide endless possibilities to snap new and interesting photos for your albums.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/24/2021
Notes: Note globale: 95%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR
Instead of going after the current crop of megabucks flagships, the X60 Pro is well-placed to shake things up in the mid-tier. It's a great-looking handset with a gimbal-stabilised camera that really helps it stand out from similarly-priced rivals. Prospective buyers should ask themselves how much video they actually shoot on their smartphone, though. It's not so competitive in other areas, and offers little else that you won't find in alternatives like OnePlus, Xiaomi or even Samsung. Given those brands will all be more familiar to UK customers, it makes the X60 Pro that bit harder to recommend, despite being so well-rounded.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/24/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/20/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Business Standard EN→FR
Priced at Rs 49,990 (12+256GB), the Vivo X60 Pro is a surprise package, at least for those who did not experience the X50 Pro. It has set the new benchmark for premium-midrange smartphones, considering the number of photography features and updates it offers. The X60 Pro is more than just a camera phone. It is an all-round smartphone with strengths across.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is a phone that I think will find a lot of takers, simply because it is priced right. Despite not being the flagship of the series, it manages to sacrifice precious little in the end. I think a value-conscious market like India will appreciate the balance this phone has managed to achieve. Vivo does, however, need to rethink FunTouch OS, starting with the name but more deeply with the inclusion of unescapable paid content and app pushes. Vivo: please start sparing the Pro and Pro+ versions of your phones from this. People have paid extra for a better device, charge them a little more so you don’t have to push this content onto them.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/30/2021
Notes: Note globale: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is a good successor to the Vivo X50 Pro, and improves in areas that the latter lacked in. Performance has gotten a good bump thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SoC. Photo and video quality are also better than with the predecessor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/23/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR
There are lingering question marks over its price and availability so I won't be scoring the Vivo X60 Pro yet, but as it stands this is a unique upper-mid-range/entry-flagship phone with a remarkably stable camera, a highly desirable design and solid performance. It isn't the best-specced phone in its class, however, and for all its camera charms it doesn’t take the best photos. As a value proposition, we suspect it’s going to struggle against the altogether more capable OnePlus 9. But for those looking for something a little different in a rather samey field, it’s a sleek and stylish alternative.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/14/2021
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR
It's among the finest-built handsets that you can get, and the color version we reviewed has an understated beauty that we find very stylish. The AMOLED display is simply gorgeous, the chipset is predictably potent, and the cameras are excellent for most anything.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/14/2021
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR
And finally – the price. At RM3,299 – the Vivo X60 Pro does seem to be pricy at the time being. As it stands now, the Vivo X60 Pro doesn’t seem like a worthy upgrade over the X50 Pro from last year as I think that there is still a lot of room for improvement on the X60 Pro.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/07/2021
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is priced at Rs 49,990 making this a flagship level offering for 12GB RAM and 256GB storage space. The obvious competitor is the OnePlus 9, which now starts at Rs 49,999 for the 8GB/128GB variant and Rs 54,999 for the 12GB/256GB variant, but it runs the Snapdragon 888, which is the latest and more powerful processor. If you are looking to spend Rs 50,000 on a smartphone, the vivo X60 Pro is a worthy contender. The camera, performance and battery life are all excellent, and you are getting 256GB storage, which is an added advantage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/02/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Business Standard EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is a flagship smartphone and it feels just that in every respect. A major downside is that it lacks assured protection from water and dust, so users will have to be extra careful with the phone. While there is no lag in performance, the camera is one area where we would like to dig deeper. We will reserve for now our verdict on the Vivo X60 Pro, as we explore this device further and write about it in our in-depth review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR
The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Think Digit EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is the coming of age for Vivo. This smartphone establishes that Vivo can make a smartphone with an incredible camera stack, as the Zeiss partnership has yielded very impressive results. The new Gimbal 20 stabilisation also works ridiculously well and the overall camera experience is so good that you'd want to take more photos and shoot more videos. Vivo hasn't skimped out on the hardware either, giving you a flagship Snapdragon 870 SoC, 12GB LPDDR4x memory and even 256GB of UFS3.1 storage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/26/2021
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 85% performances: 82% finition: 75%
Source: India Today EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro is the dark horse of 2021. Almost no one expected Vivo to come with such a powerful smartphone in India and the smartphone has surprised. OnePlus has made few sacrifices on the OnePlus 9 this year which may force few potential buyers to at least consider alternatives and the Vivo X60 Pro could just be that smartphone. Also, Vivo now has a chance to feed into some of OnePlus’ market share in the mid-premium category with the latter deciding to move towards the premium category.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR
2021 started with a bit of uncertainty, especially for the smartphone market. Has the economy recovered enough to take big risks in new products? Or are consumers still opting to make “safe” purchases of familiar and tested products? The one thing that remains unchanged even with the pandemic is people’s needs for an accessible smartphone with top-notch cameras that can capture their memories in perfect detail and performance that goes beyond its price tag. That’s what Vivo is promising with the Vivo X60 Pro, one of its first to be made in collaboration with famed optics company ZEISS, and we take an intimate look to see if it all checks out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR
The Vivo X60 Pro comes really close to being a perfect flagship. It has a great display, top-level performance and some great pair of cameras that help in elevating the experience to new heights. But compared to its main competitor - OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60 Pro despite being a great device falls short on the pricing because of which it might fail to appeal to the audience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR
Vivo has launched the X60 Pro at the same price as it had launched the X50 Pro. If you compare it to just that, you find that the company has offered improvements in terms of processor, internal storage, RAM and to some extent in terms of the camera also.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/25/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR
I’ll save my full thoughts for the full review, but it is clear gimbal stabilisation makes a huge difference – though I can’t say I completely love it. Yes, the footage is very stable and this is good if you’re moving quickly. There is an almost faux-look to video and it takes a while to adjust. If your stabilisation seems off then there’s a handy tool to calibrate it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR
When I tested the Vivo X50 Pro, I was impressed with its gimbal camera stabilisation system. Now, I am curious to see what has improved. If you shoot a lot of videos and have the Vivo X60 Pro on your mind, then don't miss my full review, coming up soon.
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: 91mobiles EN→FR
There is no doubt in my mind that the Vivo X60 Pro has the best design in all the flagship devices I have tested so far this year. It feels extremely premium in the hand and at the same time, it’s been constructed with durability in mind. There is very little to complain about in the performance department apart from the unusual heating of the device during some heavy-ended graphics-based usage. The cameras are also exceptional, especially when you compare the low-light capabilities to some of the competing devices. Apart from that, the X60 Pro’s superlative display matches up to industry standards and packs in all the features that you could possibly want. Could the haptics have been better? Most definitely. The battery life is nothing to write home about and the lack of wireless charging or an official IP rating makes me question the price tag. FunTouch is in a state of improvement and still has some way to go.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 90%
Source: Pokde EN→FR
All in all, the vivo X60 Pro was pretty fun to use and it feels premium. Despite that, some may argue that vivo is asking a lot for the device considering that it is priced at RM3,299. At that price, you’d definitely find other flagships that offer a higher-end Snapdragon 888 chip more attractive. Don’t get me wrong though as the Snapdragon 870 is still a powerful SoC, but I just feel that they should offer more for the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 83% mobilité: 85% finition: 87%
Source: Engadget EN→FR
vivo and ZEISS believe they are ideal partners that go beyond simple unilateral pursuits; in fact, the brands reached a consensus through fruitful communications, series of virtual meetings and mutual site visits, hoping to achieve greatness in this new era. With that being said, vivo and ZEISS will collaborate on an ongoing basis and have established the “vivo ZEISS Imaging Lab” as a joint R&D team and facility. We’re expecting more exciting new developments and mobile photography breakthroughs to come!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/11/2021
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
From the results, as the first finished product of Vivo and Zeiss, the performance of Vivo X60 Pro is also remarkable. In particular, the “Vivo Zeiss Joint Imaging System” is equipped to bring a rich and transparent imaging effect. Of course, this is just the beginning. With the continuous development of cooperation between the two parties, I believe that Vivo Zeiss will continue to promote mobile imaging technology to go further.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/31/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/04/2021
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 62% performances: 79% mobilité: 84% finition: 87%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/14/2021
Source: Stadt-bremerhaven DE→FR
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Android Mag DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/01/2021
Notes: Note globale: 94% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 88% finition: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/29/2021
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/20/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/15/2021
Notes: Note globale: 91%
Source: Nextpit Germany DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/14/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/13/2021
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/12/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/06/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/20/2021
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 95% écran: 88% mobilité: 78% finition: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Tuexperto ES→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/21/2021
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Geek 4 You IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/15/2021
Notes: Note globale: 95%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/16/2021
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/01/2021
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/01/2021
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2021
Source: Notebook Italia IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 60% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/21/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 53% équipement: 81%
Source: DDay IT IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/21/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 69% écran: 85% mobilité: 73% finition: 89%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 90% mobilité: 78% finition: 88%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/11/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/11/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/28/2021
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/09/2021
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Product Test RU→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/07/2021
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% écran: 94% mobilité: 80%
Source: Zoom RU→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2021
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2021
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/09/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/13/2021
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 91% équipement: 86% mobilité: 75% finition: 92%
Source: FPT shop VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Genk VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Zing VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→FR
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/22/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Arena IT →FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/11/2021
Notes: Note globale: 92% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 90% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 650:
Puce graphique pour smartphones et tablettes, intégrée au SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 865. Qualcomm affirme qu'elle est de 25 % plus puissante que l'Adreno 640 du Snapdragon 855, et qu'elle possède 50 % d'unités de calcul en plus (ALU). Cela devrait être la carte graphique la plus puissante de 2020 pour les utilisateurs Android.
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 870:
SoC haut de gamme pour smartphones, introduit à la mi-2020 et fabriqué en 7 nm chez TSMC (N7P amélioré). Il intègre un cœur Prime basé sur une architecture ARM Cortex-A77 cadencée jusqu'à 3,2 GHz. Trois autres cœurs de performance sont également basés sur l'A77 mais cadencés jusqu'à 2,42 GHz. En outre, quatre cœurs d'économie d'énergie sont intégrés, basés sur l'architecture ARM Cortex-A55 et cadencés jusqu'à 1,8 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.56": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
81.64%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.