Sony Xperia XA
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix (autofocus f/2.0, vidéo 1080p @ 30 ips)
Price comparison
Moyenne de 39 notes (à partir de 65 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Sony Xperia XA
La belle époque ? Avec son Xperia XA, Sony essaie de renouveler le design des smartphones de milieu de gamme. Les esthètes remarqueront les bords de l'écran relativement fins et le style épuré du boitier. Assez pour tenir les rivaux loin de ses clients ?
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Commercialisé à moins de 280 Euros en ce mois d’octobre 2016, l’Xperia XA est probablement le mobile le plus cohérent de la nouvelle série X de Sony.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2016
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
À moins que le design ne soit votre absolue priorité, délaissez l’Xperia XA au profit d’un mobile moins cher et plus riche en fonctionnalités.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is slim and pocketable, but problems with performance and battery life mean there are better choices out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Girl EN→FR Archive.org version
Yes, the Sony Xperia XA does everything it is supposed to. It has the things you need but you won’t want it. We’re in a boom of mid level phones. All the major names are dropping mid range smartphones monthly. This phone is already out of date and over priced compared to the likes of Xiaomi offering cheaper phones that are so incredibly impressive in what they offer. I always try to find one positive and when it comes to the XA, other than the display that spans across the screen that’s really about it. Its a pity because there was a time where I’d lament the Xperia range as one of the best but this is not what we’ve come to expect from Sony.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/04/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
A cute little phone with a big battery life problem and no other chart-topping features to make you forget that, the Sony Xperia XA is ultimately disappointing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is slim and pocketable, but problems with performance and battery life mean there are better choices out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: T Break EN→FR Archive.org version
I really wanted to like the Xperia XA, solely based on its looks. But once you look deeper you find a phone that while on the more affordable side of the spectrum, doesn’t offer up much in terms of performance. I’d much rather throw in a little bit more money and pick up one of Sony’s flagship phones, just so that I get better performance for what I’m paying for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 65% équipement: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Androidcommunity.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is an ‘OK’ phone that looks great but is simply priced too high for me to recommend it over the alternatives mentioned in this review. Listed at $249.99, it’s outperformed by devices checking in at least $50 cheaper that provide double the storage, a more robust design, and a longer list of features.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Our main pain point with Sony Xperia devices of the past has always been its price and with the Sony Xperia XA, you can really see how the Japanese brand tries to take the fight to the mid-ranged segment. It is a beautiful phone and the price is closer to other offerings in the market in the same range at Php 13,990. However, the dips in performance and other flaws are a little hard to ignore. A solid effort that dared to be different from previous Xperia smartphones, but it would pain us to fully recommend the XA without exploring other options.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: G Style Magazine EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xperia XA is a really good budget phone. If you want to spend less than $300 and get a really good phone then I wouldn’t be mad at you if this phone was your choice. It has a lot going for it. Sturdy design, sleek, curved glass, bezel-less edges, great camera, lightweight. The XA also has some negatives. A screen only at 720p is a letdown, no remote play and shitty speakers. What do you really want for $279 dollars? Maybe you can get a little more from another phone. Maybe, but what that phone may do better than the XA it’ll be lacking in something else.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/12/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
For $280, the Sony Xperia XA just doesn't bring enough to the table to justify its price. Despite a high-quality build it suffers from sluggish performance, mediocre battery life, and a relatively low-resolution display. The Blu R1 HD gets you better performance and battery life for a fraction of the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
A cute little phone with a big battery life problem and no other chart-topping features to make you forget that, the Sony Xperia XA is ultimately disappointing. There's now a lot of competition in this affordable mid-range area, and the Motorola Moto G4 really shows it up, with better performance in most areas and a much lower price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
Sony Xperia XA is one of the most stylish smartphones on the market, and this is due to its ultra thin side bezels. It also has a 5-inch HD display, and even though you can find such screens in phones that are 50% cheaper, we can’t say that it is a drawback because it offers a good image detail, colors and viewing angles. Nonetheless, if we compare it to Xperia X, you will certainly notice a difference in this respect. What’s more, the battery life on this device is quite poor, but the quick charging and power saving modes seem to compensate for this to a certain extent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/30/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
We can say this: the XA comes off a lot better than the horribly disappointing Xperia X. Had Sony taken the best parts from each we might be in a different place today, but as it stands (and despite a few high points) the Xperia XA feels a little insignificant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Unless you can get a particularly tasty offer, there are so many better options out there than the run-of-the-mill Sony Xperia XA. The screen is low-res, and the camera is slow and unreliable. Sony has kitted the XA out with only the minimum required spec in each area – something you simply cannot do any more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Sony Xperia XA is a surprisingly bad phone with short battery life, disappointing performance and a questionable appearance. It’s not completely without merit - it has a respectably responsive touchscreen and a competent camera, but that’s not enough to make the XA worth buying.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Ultimately, the Xperia XA's mediocre screen and diabolical battery life just aren't good enough to recommend it. Had Sony mashed the Xperia X and Xperia XA together, marrying the XA's edge-to-edge screen design and camera sensor with the X's more accurate display, faster processor and longer-lasting battery, it might have created a great smartphone. On their own, though, they both have too many flaws to make them good value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
When you draw the line, the Sony Xperia XA appears to be nothing more than a good-looking affordable phone with little extraordinary above that. Apart from its looks and decent performance for most daily tasks, it’s really all downhill: the display has bluish, oversaturated colors and is not sharp enough, heavier tasks make the phone stutter, camera quality is uninspiring and battery life is below average. Lack of proper 4G LTE bands for the United States is also a downer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 55%
Source: PC Perspective EN→FR Archive.org version
In the end, you have to look at the opposition to set the Xperia XA in context, and right now it’s just too strong for this handset to stand out in any meaningful way. The Motorola Moto G4, king of the budget smartphones, is slicker, longer-lasting and costs much less. The OnePlus 2 is only £10 more expensive and is a much faster, more competent smartphone. By all means take your pick, but don't choose the Sony Xperia XA.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xperia XA is a cheap but not-so-cheerful cousin to the Xperia X, and while the gorgeous design promises a slick and affordable smartphone, the Xperia XA sadly loses out to similarly-priced rivals. It can certainly beat them for looks, but when it comes to smarts, as well as longevity, we would rather get our hands on the Moto G4 Plus instead.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Of Sony's 2016 offerings, the Xperia XA is the one that managed to get under our skin. It reminds us of the Xperia T, which sold us on a curved back, solely on the basis of aesthetics and ergonomics. The Xperia P too, which tried to prove that metal phones do belong in the midrange (back in 2012, long before it became commonplace). The XA is the narrowest phone with a 5" screen and even without calipers you can feel it when you handle the phone. Its proportions - width, thickness, weight - are just right and we're especially fond of the way the front and back neatly curve into the sides. This is the phone that makes all others feel chunky.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/22/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 88% performances: 60% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 40% finition: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 83% performances: 86% équipement: 56% écran: 89% mobilité: 66%
Source: Area DVD DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/22/2016
Source: eTest DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/17/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/03/2016
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 91% équipement: 94% écran: 87% mobilité: 80%
Source: Verivox DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 64% équipement: 65%
Source: A1 Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/17/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 15/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% équipement: 80% finition: 92% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/07/2016
Source: Basic Tutorials - Heft 8/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: e-media - Heft 08/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 08/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 73% écran: 68% mobilité: 68%
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/16/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% écran: 75% mobilité: 55% finition: 85%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/27/2016
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Canaltech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2016
Source: 4G News PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 65% performances: 75% écran: 60% mobilité: 65% finition: 85%
Source: Tech Different IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: Key for web IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 60% performances: 65% écran: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 75%
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/25/2016
Source: Consumentenbond NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/06/2016
Source: One Tech PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/05/2016
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76% équipement: 74%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/12/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/20/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Techbox SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Fony.sk SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/16/2016
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Helio P10 MT6755:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
Sony: Sony Corporation est l'une des plus grandes sociétés japonaises d'électronique. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1946 sous un autre nom et produisait initialement des poêles à riz. La société a lancé la première radio à transistors. En 1958, la société a été rebaptisée Sony. Sony est une combinaison du mot latin sonus (son) et du mot anglais sonny (petit garçon). Aujourd'hui, son cœur de métier est l'électronique grand public. La société est engagée dans le développement, la conception, la fabrication et la vente d'équipements électroniques, d'instruments, d'appareils, de consoles de jeux et de logiciels. Sony opère dans les segments suivants : jeux et services réseau, musique, images, divertissement et son à domicile, produits et solutions d'imagerie, communications mobiles, semi-conducteurs, services financiers et autres.
69.02%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.