Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 Gamme
Processeur: Intel Atom Z2560, Marvell Technology Group PXA986, Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHzCarte graphique: ARM Mali-400 MP4, PowerVR SGX544MP2, Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Écran: 7.00 pouces, 8.00 pouces, 10.10 pouces
Poids: 0.3kg, 0.31kg, 0.314kg, 0.512kg
Prix: 159, 199, 299, 469 euros
Moyenne de 63 notes (à partir de 86 critiques)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 inch
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 inchProcesseur: Marvell Technology Group PXA986
Carte graphique: Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Écran: 7.00 pouces, 16:10, 1024 x 600 pixels
Poids: 0.3kg
Prix: 199 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
The little three. The Galaxy Tab 3 in its 7-inch size is the cheaper and slightly smaller version of the already reviewed Galaxy Tab 3 8.0. So, does one have to deal with numerous restrictions or are Samsung's premium aspirations justified?
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Si cette tablette 7 pouces n’est pas un mauvais produit, elle n'a pas de quoi faire de l’ombre à la dernière Nexus 7 de Google. La Galaxy Tab fonctionne correctement, a une bonne autonomie et a l'avantage d'intégrer un lecteur de carte mémoire. Mais ce n’est pas vraiment suffisant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Il y a quelques semaines Samsung annonçait le lancement mondial de sa nouvelle tablette la Galaxy Tab 3 de 7 pouces. Le constructeur coréen vient de confirmer la prochaine commercialisation d’une gamme complète incluant aussi des modèles 8 et 10,1 pouces déclinés en version Wi-Fi et 3G/4G de 16 à 32 Go. Succédant aux Tab 2, les Tab 3 devraient se positionner dans le milieu de gamme avec un bon rapport qualité prix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/06/2013
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
There's no getting around it - the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 is a deeply average tablet that's been way over-priced by Samsung. But then, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 isn't really a modern tablet - it's a reminder of the way tablets used to be in the not-too-distant past. If you want to see where the next generation of Android tablets is headed, check out the similarly priced Google Nexus 7.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2013
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 40% performances: 50% équipement: 50% finition: 50%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The upgrade in specifications on paper from the Tab 2 to the Tab 3 isn't spectacular. For the price you pay, you get a tablet that gets the job done, but feels lacking if you are a heavy user and want to play graphically heavy games and want a lot of multitasking. For heavy-duty use, you have devices such as the Nexus 7 (even better if you can get your hands on the second gen one from the US) as the tablet has a better display, better power under the hood and a stock Android interface. If you are in the market to pick up a sub-Rs. 20,000 tablet, you may want to consider options such as the Nexus 7, Asus Fonepad, Zync Quad 8 before making your purchase decision.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/03/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 50% performances: 60% équipement: 60% finition: 50%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Tab 3 T211 is a real disappointment as it barely improves anything from last year’s model. In fact, the performance has gotten worse. With a retail price of Rs 18,890 for the 8GB variant, it’s highly overpriced and not worth the premium. The only redeeming feature is the relatively good battery life but it falls flat in almost every other department. The Asus Fonepad offers much better value at Rs 18,000 as it packs in the same feature set but with 32GB onboard memory and an HD IPS display. If you absolutely need calling capabilities then we highly recommend the Fonepad over the Galaxy Tab 3.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/28/2013
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 has a thinner bezel than the previous model and the look has been changed. It predictably falls in line with Samsung's latest devices like the Galaxy S4 and the Galaxy Note 8.0 — the familiar glossy plastic finish and rounded corners.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/29/2013
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2014
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/04/2013
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/27/2013
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1Processeur: Intel Atom Z2560
Carte graphique: PowerVR SGX544MP2
Écran: 10.10 pouces, 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixels
Poids: 0.512kg
Prix: 469 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Round 3. Un nouveau SoC utilisé et le modèle 3G remplacé par un module LTE. Avec un SoC Atom de Intel avec des bonnes performances. Quelles sont les différences avec la version 10 pouces précédente?
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Bonne pour la bureautique, le surf sur le Web et le visionnage de films, cette tablette Samsung est handicapée par la faible définition de son écran et son processeur peu puissant. A réserver à un usage familial basique. Difficile de lui trouver une réelle valeur ajoutée, à part son autonomie satisfaisante, d'autant que son prix initial est un peu élevé (379 euros).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/22/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Bonne pour la bureautique, le surf sur le Web et le visionnage de films, cette tablette Samsung est handicapée par la faible définition de son écran et son processeur peu puissant. A réserver à un usage familial basique. Difficile de lui trouver une réelle valeur ajoutée, à part son autonomie satisfaisante, d'autant que son prix initial est un peu élevé (379 euros).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/22/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Comp Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung tried to deviate from the standard design for an Android tablet and the gamble almost worked. Sure, the tablet runs Android on an Intel Atom processor, but there are lag issues that plague it such that it is not a good experience compared to the standard ARM based competitors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Comp Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung tried to deviate from the standard design for an Android tablet and the gamble almost worked. Sure, the tablet runs Android on an Intel Atom processor, but there are lag issues that plague it such that it is not a good experience compared to the standard ARM based competitors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung certainly improved the look of the Galaxy Tab 3 to reflect its smartphone Galaxy devices, which may be a hit or miss to some users depending on how you feel about either device’s plastic exterior. We just wish Samsung would put as much effort into the internal specs and overall performance of the Galaxy Tab 3 to help make it a must-have tablet, but at this point, it’s full of more disappointment than.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/27/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung certainly improved the look of the Galaxy Tab 3 to reflect its smartphone Galaxy devices, which may be a hit or miss to some users depending on how you feel about either device’s plastic exterior. We just wish Samsung would put as much effort into the internal specs and overall performance of the Galaxy Tab 3 to help make it a must-have tablet, but at this point, it’s full of more disappointment than.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/27/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has left the Galaxy Tab line languishing, as it focuses its efforts on its superior Note devices. The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 isn't much of an improvement over the Tab 2, which itself was only a modest update to the original Tab. This isn't a three-year-old tablet, but it feels dated right out of the box, thanks to its low-res display and middling real-world performance. That might be acceptable if this tablet was priced at $300, but at $400 it's tough to recommend the Tab 3 over the multitude of more capable competitors. The Nexus 10 is markedly better in nearly every way, and even the year-old Asus Transformer Pad TF300 offers a more compelling experience. And if you've got your heart set on a Galaxy Tab, the Tab 3 8.0 is the better choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/07/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has left the Galaxy Tab line languishing, as it focuses its efforts on its superior Note devices. The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 isn't much of an improvement over the Tab 2, which itself was only a modest update to the original Tab. This isn't a three-year-old tablet, but it feels dated right out of the box, thanks to its low-res display and middling real-world performance. That might be acceptable if this tablet was priced at $300, but at $400 it's tough to recommend the Tab 3 over the multitude of more capable competitors. The Nexus 10 is markedly better in nearly every way, and even the year-old Asus Transformer Pad TF300 offers a more compelling experience. And if you've got your heart set on a Galaxy Tab, the Tab 3 8.0 is the better choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/07/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Nothing ever really changes when it comes to Samsung's 10.1-inch Galaxy Tab. The Tab 3 10.1 is proof positive of that. This 2013 iteration is a parallel move for the line that attempts to mix up the package of mid-range specs with a terrible brown plastic coat.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/30/2013
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Nothing ever really changes when it comes to Samsung's 10.1-inch Galaxy Tab. The Tab 3 10.1 is proof positive of that. This 2013 iteration is a parallel move for the line that attempts to mix up the package of mid-range specs with a terrible brown plastic coat.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/30/2013
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
This device is ready to be a lovely addition to your Samsung Galaxy S 4 family of smart devices. If you’ve got a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, there’s little reason to upgrade – and you might just want to skip this generation if you really enjoy your front-facing speakers which do not appear here in 2013 – unless you’ve got the Galaxy Note 10.1, of course. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 instead is the topmost hero tablet for the Samsung universe at the moment, running a quad-core Samsung Exynos processor and rolling with an S-Pen to boot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2013
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
This device is ready to be a lovely addition to your Samsung Galaxy S 4 family of smart devices. If you’ve got a Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1, there’s little reason to upgrade – and you might just want to skip this generation if you really enjoy your front-facing speakers which do not appear here in 2013 – unless you’ve got the Galaxy Note 10.1, of course. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 instead is the topmost hero tablet for the Samsung universe at the moment, running a quad-core Samsung Exynos processor and rolling with an S-Pen to boot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2013
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 has all the makings of very nice tablet comfort food for Samsung phone owners. You get a design and software similar to those on the Galaxy S4 -- minus some features -- as well as the ability to control your TV. The robust quick settings and loud stereo speakers also help differentiate Samsung's midrange 10-incher.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 has all the makings of very nice tablet comfort food for Samsung phone owners. You get a design and software similar to those on the Galaxy S4 -- minus some features -- as well as the ability to control your TV. The robust quick settings and loud stereo speakers also help differentiate Samsung's midrange 10-incher.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 12/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 12/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Gamestar DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/06/2013
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 75% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Gamestar DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/06/2013
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 75% ergonomie: 90%
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/22/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/22/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tablety PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/10/2014
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Tablety PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/10/2014
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Notebook-Center.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/11/2014
Source: Notebook-Center.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/11/2014
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/18/2013
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/18/2013
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 SM-T310
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 SM-T310Processeur: Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz
Carte graphique: ARM Mali-400 MP4
Écran: 8.00 pouces, 16:9, 1280 x 800 pixels
Poids: 0.314kg
Prix: 299 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Tab, version 3.0. Samsung a tout pour tout le monde dans son offre tablette : la Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 vise ceux qui sont à la recherche d'une tablette de taille moyenne et qui peuvent se passer d'un stylet. En toute confiance, Samsung en demande 299 euros. Un prix raisonnable pour ce qu'elle a à offrir ?
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Hot Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
Keeping in mind that Samsung didn’t design the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 to be a flagship, ultra-powerful device, we feel this tablet performed adequately for its intended use. With that said, there’s one key aspect of the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 that holds us back and that’s the price. The 16GB version of Google’s new Nexus 7 sells for $229 which is a full $50 less than the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/08/2013
Source: Hot Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
Keeping in mind that Samsung didn’t design the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 to be a flagship, ultra-powerful device, we feel this tablet performed adequately for its intended use. With that said, there’s one key aspect of the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 that holds us back and that’s the price. The 16GB version of Google’s new Nexus 7 sells for $229 which is a full $50 less than the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/08/2013
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
If you are in the market to pick up an 8-inch tablet, you have the iPad mini as a great option as well. But the mini doesn't have calling capabilities. You have other budget devices such as the Zync Quad 8 too available in the 8-inch form factor but the overall performance of the Galaxy Tab 3 311 is better. If calling capability is a must, then the Galaxy Tab is the device for you. If not, you may want to consider the iPad mini since the Apple app ecosystem is great for tablets. If you want the best performing Android tablet and don't mind a 7-inch form factor and no calling capability, you can take a look at the second-generation Nexus 7 tablet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% équipement: 70% finition: 60%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
If you are in the market to pick up an 8-inch tablet, you have the iPad mini as a great option as well. But the mini doesn't have calling capabilities. You have other budget devices such as the Zync Quad 8 too available in the 8-inch form factor but the overall performance of the Galaxy Tab 3 311 is better. If calling capability is a must, then the Galaxy Tab is the device for you. If not, you may want to consider the iPad mini since the Apple app ecosystem is great for tablets. If you want the best performing Android tablet and don't mind a 7-inch form factor and no calling capability, you can take a look at the second-generation Nexus 7 tablet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% équipement: 70% finition: 60%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
We honestly believe both tablets are geared towards different people, so if you’re the kind of person who wants the most powerful tablet in a small frame, you shouldn’t be looking at the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as it’ll leave you disappointed. But if you’re looking for an 8-inch tablet that will allow you to keep up with your emails, browse Facebook and take photos with, then the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a pretty good choice, although it certainly isn’t the best. That crown would still have to go to the Nexus 7 (2013) at the moment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
We honestly believe both tablets are geared towards different people, so if you’re the kind of person who wants the most powerful tablet in a small frame, you shouldn’t be looking at the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 as it’ll leave you disappointed. But if you’re looking for an 8-inch tablet that will allow you to keep up with your emails, browse Facebook and take photos with, then the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a pretty good choice, although it certainly isn’t the best. That crown would still have to go to the Nexus 7 (2013) at the moment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/30/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Our biggest knock against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is its finicky performance, which admittedly is no minor complaint. Beyond that, though, the biggest fault we can find with the Tab is that it's simply not memorable. Sure, if you have $300 to spend and want an 8-inch Android tablet, it's an option worth considering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/02/2013
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Our biggest knock against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is its finicky performance, which admittedly is no minor complaint. Beyond that, though, the biggest fault we can find with the Tab is that it's simply not memorable. Sure, if you have $300 to spend and want an 8-inch Android tablet, it's an option worth considering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/02/2013
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has done a good job with multimedia support and features for its Galaxy tablets. For video, the Tab 3 8.0 supports MP4, H.264, DivX, Xvid, and WMV files at up to 1080p resolution. For audio you get MP3, AAC, FLAC, OGG, WAV, and WMA support. You can also mirror your screen using DLNA with supported HDTVs or use an MHL adapter to connect the Tab 3 8.0 with an HDMI cable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has done a good job with multimedia support and features for its Galaxy tablets. For video, the Tab 3 8.0 supports MP4, H.264, DivX, Xvid, and WMV files at up to 1080p resolution. For audio you get MP3, AAC, FLAC, OGG, WAV, and WMA support. You can also mirror your screen using DLNA with supported HDTVs or use an MHL adapter to connect the Tab 3 8.0 with an HDMI cable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a fine upgrade from what’s been offered at this size range by the manufacturer in past generations. While the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 bests this tablet in essentially every area save its smaller bezel, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 holds its own as a solid addition to the Samsung family of Galaxy S 4-era smart devices. Here the company brings an extremely thin and finely constructed mid-sized tablet that’ll serve its users well into the future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/17/2013
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is a fine upgrade from what’s been offered at this size range by the manufacturer in past generations. While the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 bests this tablet in essentially every area save its smaller bezel, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 holds its own as a solid addition to the Samsung family of Galaxy S 4-era smart devices. Here the company brings an extremely thin and finely constructed mid-sized tablet that’ll serve its users well into the future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/17/2013
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is an excellent 8-inch tablet, whether you're looking to multitask on the go or you want to kick back and control your TV. We like the thin and light design, bright and colorful display and the fact that you can enjoy many of the same software features found on Samsung Galaxy phones, such as Quick Settings and Multi Window.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 is an excellent 8-inch tablet, whether you're looking to multitask on the go or you want to kick back and control your TV. We like the thin and light design, bright and colorful display and the fact that you can enjoy many of the same software features found on Samsung Galaxy phones, such as Quick Settings and Multi Window.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC News - Heft 3/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/16/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC News - Heft 3/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/16/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 2/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/16/2014
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 2/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/16/2014
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 92%
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2013
Notes: Note globale: 92%
Source: Mobicroco DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/20/2013
Notes: Note globale: 77% équipement: 73% finition: 75% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Mobicroco DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/20/2013
Notes: Note globale: 77% équipement: 73% finition: 75% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2013
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2013
Source: Notebookjournal DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2013
Source: Teknofilo ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/27/2013
Source: Teknofilo ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/27/2013
Source: Wintech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/28/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Wintech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/28/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: PCM NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/27/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PCM NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/27/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Geeks.hu HU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/29/2013
Source: Geeks.hu HU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/29/2013
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 Lite
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 LiteProcesseur: Marvell Technology Group PXA986
Carte graphique: Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Écran: 7.00 pouces, 16:10, 1024 x 600 pixels
Poids: 0.31kg
Prix: 159 euros
Liens: Samsung Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Redundant successor? Samsung launched an entry-level tablet on the market that did not really convince us in several fields with its Galaxy Tab 3 7.0. Now, 7 months later, we have our hands on the Lite version - is it a sensible diet or simply nip/tuck madness?
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2014
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Wintech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/09/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80% finition: 80% ergonomie: 60%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/01/2015
Notes: Note globale: 63%
Source: Notebook-Center.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/08/2014
Source: Ixbt RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/26/2014
Source: Tablet.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/29/2014
Commentaire
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core:
Carte graphique intégrée pour SoC ARM
PowerVR SGX544MP2:
ARM Mali-400 MP4:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Marvell Technology Group :
PXA986: SoC dual-core Cortex-A9 intégrant les modules WCDMA et HSDPA.
Intel Atom:
Le processeur Intel Atom est un microprocesseur 64-bits pour ordinateurs portables petits et bon marché, les MIDs ou UMPC. La spécialité de la nouvelle architecture est dans le mode d'exécution "in order" (au lieu de l'habituel et plus rapide mode d'exécution "out of order"). Par conséquent, le coût du transistor de la série Atom est beaucoup plus faible, et donc moins cher à produire.
Z2560: SoC Intel intégrant un processeur Intel Atom dual-core cadencé entre 0.933 et 1.6 GHz, une carte graphique intégrée PowerVR SGX 544MP2 et un contrôleur mémoire double canal LPDDR2.
Samsung Exynos:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
No weight comment found (one expected)!
73.67%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.