Samsung Galaxy S7
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix f/1.7
Price comparison
Moyenne de 52 notes (à partir de 134 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy S7
Vers de nouveaux horizons ? Samsung vogue-t-il vers de nouveaux horizons ? Un SoC plus puissant, une batterie de plus grande capacité, un écran premium et un superbe design : la série S de Samsung rime avec "excellence", et nos attentes sont, de ce fait, très élevées. Elles sont globalement satisfaites, mais le Galaxy S7 n'est pas exempt de défauts.
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Avec le Galaxy S7, Samsung a écouté ses utilisateurs par rapport au Galaxy S6. La batterie a été augmentée, Samsung a optimisé l'ergonomie général du téléphone et l'a rendu résistant à l'eau et à la poussière. Mieux, la firme sud-coréenne a même remis un emplacement pour une carte microSD. Samsung a donc repris les ingrédients d'une recette qui marche tout en ajoutant ce qui manquait à son Galaxy S6. Seule déception, Samsung semble dire adieu pour de bon à la batterie amovible.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Que dire si ce n’est que vous recommandons vivement ce mobile, pour peu que vous disposiez du budget nécessaire. Car s’il a connu une forte baisse de prix, il reste toujours proposé à plus de 400€.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/09/2017
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it for this look back at the Samsung Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge! These phones may have been released early last year, but they definitely don’t feel outdated at all. They’ve aged very well inside and out, and are phones that you will certainly be happy with, not only if you already own one, but if you are considering buying it soon. The Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge were great smartphones when they were launched, and remain really good smartphones one year later.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/17/2017
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung's Galaxy S8 is primed to be one of the biggest phones of the year. But at prices that reach all the way up to $850, you'd be forgiven for wanting to wait on it. That means its a good time to look at one of the hottest phones of last year, the Galaxy S7. Is it still worth putting down your hard-earned dollars for last year's leftovers?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/01/2017
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
Fantastic bit of kit, stuffed to the gills with well-implemented features that'll have you grinning ear-to-ear.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Business News Daily EN→FR Archive.org version
Google's Pixel smartphone and Apple's iPhone 7 are also strong picks. But for the average worker who wants the most well-rounded work phone out there, the Galaxy S7 is our top choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
In all, Xiaomi MI5S can compare with Galaxy S7 with the good performance to prove Xiaomi has entered into the International market to compete with Samsung and Apple. Personally, we think we don’t have to spend much money on a smartphone.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
If the Galaxy S7 was expecting an easy fight against the “same old” iPhone 7, it is in for a surprise. Apple managed to pull ahead in staples like battery life, color presentation, outdoor visibility, and audio prowess – in fact, most departments that are near and dear to the average user. The wide color display and camera alone are worth the jump, as these are futureproofing the iPhone 7 for the next two years at least. Boosted by a greatly enhanced iOS 10, the iPhone's software ecosystem has never been richer or more refined, too.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
Considering how well the Galaxy S7 has held up to my use, I still have no hesitation in recommending it someone who wants the best of hardware, performance and camera in a phone that's still a manageable size. Even six months on with some price cuts the GS7 is still quite expensive, but it continues to offer excellent value that few other phones can match.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/28/2016
Source: Know Your Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
What can I say? A tremendously pleasing smartphone to use. It's been a while since I test-drove something I didn't want to give back, but the Galaxy S7 fits into that category quite comfortably. It looks sharp, feels reassuringly expensive and robust in the hand, the camera experience is an absolute joy. Performance is what you hope for from a flagship; it's fast, smooth and responsive, while the battery life is amongst the best available. The software is as close to stock Android as Samsung has ever come and as a result is one of the most hassle-free Samsung Galaxy devices I've used to date.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
While the iPhone 7 is available in different storage options, the Samsung Galaxy S7 has a base 32GB of storage and extra storage can be added using a Micro SD card. This means that a 200GB of storage can be easily added to the phone. The iPhone 7 finally sees the end of the 16GB base model, which left very little room for storing anything.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/14/2016
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S7 offers faster internal components, at a slightly lower price. But the iPhone 7 is a better-looking and more interesting device thanks to its Force Touch home button and twin-speakers. The removal of the headphone jack is going to remain controversial. Ultimately, it falls down to software and we prefer the iOS operating system and its apps. Both devices are incredibly fast, and will work for many years to come, but we'd rather spend those years in iOS than Android. It's close, though.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
Whether you prefer the iPhone 7 or the Galaxy S7 comes down to personal preference, but both are fairly evenly matched when it comes to specifications. The Galaxy S7 has a bigger, higher-resolution screen, bigger battery and a microSD slot, while the iPhone 7 has the fastest available processor in any smartphone and a 12MP camera described as the best on the market.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: International Business Times EN→FR Archive.org version
If you are tired of iPhone, the iPhone 7 is not going to change your mind, especially if you have a lovely pair of wired headphones and are not keen on using an adapter with its Lightning port. In the same breath, the Samsung Galaxy S7 retains some of the software niggles found on any Android device and the Google Play Store cannot compare to the iOS App Store. However, it definitely offers some clear hardware advantages - most notably with its beautiful screen and cheaper cost.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/08/2016
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S7 may be ‘just’ an evolution and a refinement of the Galaxy S6, but it has almost everything you could want in a smartphone. It’s a great and highly desirable phone with our enthusiasm tempered only slightly by the strength of the competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: APC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s a lot to offer in this exceptionally well-groomed flagship and, like the regular S7, there aren’t many ways to fault it. The increased size-difference and the $100 price bump between the two phones should certainly make choosing between them a bit easier — but whichever tickles your fancy, you’ll end up with a bloody great phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
With a more elegant and palm-friendly chassis, superior camera, and much faster charging, the Galaxy S7 is the clear winner here. On paper the phones are near equals, but when we got down to the details, Samsung's flagship turned out to be better in almost every important aspect of daily operations. Moreover, Sony priced its finest for the season on par with the Galaxy S7, yet it will be sold unlocked in the US for usage on AT&T and T-Mobile only, and with a finger scanner missing. Thus, the Xperia X Performance is not in a fair fight against the S7 in the US, but even in other markets, the Galaxy S7 is definitely the better choice.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/07/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy S7 Active is the S7 in everything but looks. In fact, the hardened handset offers a few advantages over its close cousin, particularly the extra protection and superior battery. If you prefer your phone to be functional rather than fancy, the S7 Active could be the perfect fit. We'll hold out hope that Samsung sees fit to bring it over the water (after all, it could probably survive the dip).
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/14/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xperia X feels a bit pricey, especially in this fiercely competitive market. Its display might look good to lay-men, but upon closer inspection, you’d notice that it's a bit bluish and colors are not well-balanced; its Snapdragon 650 is a noticeable step below the Snapdragon 820, which will be noticed for those who edit pictures, browse the web a lot, and play games on their phones. And then, the image quality and camera experience is a bit below expectations. It also lacks catchy new features that the Galaxy S7 has aplenty in the form of Motion Photo, Always-on Display, Game Center, and so on.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/08/2016
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is one of the best Android smartphones in India right now. It performs better than any other device in the market, and has the best camera. It's beaten only by the S7 Edge, but in terms of looks, this is still not up to the mark.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Finally, we’d like to re-emphasize our point from the beginning of this comparison: the Xiaomi Mi 5 might have prices starting from $300 ($340 for the mid-tier 64 gig model and $400 for the 128GB one) in China, but if you import it from your average eBay re-seller you’d have to put a $100 on top of each of those prices. And all you get usually is a shabby 30-day warranty with no manufacturer service or warranty. No surprise: the Xiaomi Mi 5 is NOT meant to be sold outside of China (and maybe India and the adjacent markets). And that’s a risk that you have to know about.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/13/2016
Source: Tested EN→FR Archive.org version
We've been using Samsung's latest flagship smartphone for over a month, and here are our testing results. While processor performance improvements alone aren't enough to justify an upgrade, the new camera, water resistance, battery capacity, and return of expandable storage makes the Galaxy S7 an excellent Android phone.
video review
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/11/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Smartphone cameras has come a long way since the early days. It's safe to say that photography in good light has been mastered and we've seen impressive advances in low-light shooting. The quality of 4K videos is still improving (while 1080p clips seem to have hit the ceiling of what's possible). HTC is hopeful selfies are the "next big thing" and that OIS would give them the edge.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/11/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it for this closer look at the HTC 10 vs Samsung Galaxy S7 / Galaxy S7 Edge vs LG G5! The big question here which device each of us would pick, and Lanh’s choice is the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Samsung has really refined the design, and key improvements across the board have made a big difference. The Galaxy S7 Edge comes with a bigger display, bigger battery, and more functionality with the Edge panels, making the curved edges more than just about the aesthetics.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/06/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Honestly, with these two you can't go wrong. Sure, we prefer the no-nonsense approach that HTC took with the Sense interface of the 10, and that does mean even better performance, but we can't fault anybody for their preferences. Preferences that might dictate that more features are better, and there are some well-executed ones you might enjoy with the Galaxy S7—such as one-handed mode and MultiWindow.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/03/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
For some people, these improvements may totally be worth the extra cash; for others, it might not. Also, some of you may just prefer the smaller size and better one-handed usability the Samsung galaxy S7 offers. It all comes down to what you really need or want out of a smartphone, but whichever you choose, there’s no denying that the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge are worthy of your money.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/02/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has the better hardware. It feels more substantial in the hand and can stand up to the elements - yet ironically, it's the more fragile handset. The screen is perfect and the battery life is long. It provides the better headphone audio experience (though it lost the loudspeaker challenge). The Dual Pixel autofocus is great and we would love to see it in more cameras.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/29/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
We often hear the claim that handsets running stock Android or close-to-stock offer the best battery life but considering the data, this doesn’t appear to be the case. In fact, considering all the battery life reviews we’ve run so far, and it’s clear that Android running a skin can actually be good for the battery. In the case of Samsung, the per-app power management feature in TouchWiz also helps to improve the actual day-to-day battery life without impacting on the overall performance.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/28/2016
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
Having trouble choosing between two of this year's biggest flagships? Let us help.
video review
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 04/22/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S6 was the best phone of 2015 and, although it’s still early days, the Galaxy S7 is a serious contender for best phone of 2016. Samsung has taken into account what its fans want, addressing the three main areas of concern: removable storage, waterproofing and battery life. It’s also upgraded the core hardware and photography gear, added an always-on display and some useful software. Right now the Galaxy S7 is simply unbeatable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 100% équipement: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
On many of the counts listed above - waterproofing, battery capacity, removable storage, screen quality - Samsung's S7 has scored notable victories over one of the highest-profile devices it will be competing with. At least until the iPhone 7 appears in the autumn of 2016... Which leads us to one key point to remember here: we're comparing one device that's been on the market for six months with another that's brand new, so it's inevitable that Samsung will come out on top in some areas. Apple has a few months to respond, and we're excited to see what it comes up with.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/19/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We won’t give our final verdict until we’ve thoroughly tested the HTC 10. However, it’s clear each phone has its advantages. You might like the LG G5, with its modular design, generous display size and removable battery. Alternatively, the more compact Galaxy S7 is fastest of the lot, with extras such as waterproofing, fast wireless charging, a heart-rate sensor and more common Micro-USB port. But don’t write off HTC: while the One M9 was mildly disappointing, the company has really pulled up its socks with the HTC 10, which is now a true rival to Samsung and LG and may just win you over with its fantastic design, awesome selfies and Hi-Res audio.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/12/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
What does the data show us? There’s a few things we can take away from this test, not least that the Exynos version of the handset does offer better battery life than the Snapdragon version. There’s a couple of reasons for this; first, as we discovered in our Galaxy S7 review, there is a noticeable difference between the two handsets (which was around one hour). Secondly, carrier bloat has an effect on battery life, but just how big the effect is something we’ll test and answer in a future piece.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/07/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
If the S7 Edge was big, brash and bold, the S7 is the sensible, quieter sibling. We love the small design details like the slight tapering of the screen and gentle sloping edges that make it a joy to hold. These elements alone are more nuanced than anything found on the flashy Galaxy S7 Edge.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Gizmag EN→FR Archive.org version
Battery life is also outstanding. In our test, streaming video over Wi-Fi with an absolute brightness measured at 25 lux in a dark room (the same level we set for all phones we battery-test), it only dropped 9 percent per hour. For some perspective, the iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy S6 edge+ (our top scores from 2015) all dropped 13 percent per hour under the exact same conditions. Extending that hourly average out, that's more than four extra hours of video streaming for the S7.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/29/2016
Source: Tested EN→FR Archive.org version
Putting up with TouchWiz is easier than ever with Android 6.0. Samsung's propensity to overload a phone with background services won't matter when Doze mode kicks in, and the main feature set is more focused. I don't know that the Edge variant is really taken advantage of in software, but it sure looks neat. The biggest knock against the GS7 is that it's running Marshmallow, and in a few months that won't be the current version of Android anymore. Samsung will take months to update the GS7, and during that time you might wish you'd gotten a Nexus device.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/28/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Clearly, the Galaxy S7 siblings are excellent smartphones, and do pretty much everything that their predecessors can do, but better. If you want bragging rights and money is no object, these are two very compelling options. You'll be certain to dazzle your friends by taking incredible pictures at night and in dark places. You also get health monitoring and the Concierge services to show off - things that don't come with just any old phone, at least not yet.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/26/2016
Source: Hot Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
At this point you've probably guessed that we're rather fond of Samsung's new Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge. Again, Samsung's iterative upgrades for their new flagship devices--from their larger batteries, to their faster processors and more responsive cameras--have brought refinement and a bit of excitement to an already great smartphone legacy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2016
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
Is the Galaxy S7 edge worth a $100 or more than the smaller GS7? Does the edge's curved display really do anything valuable, or just look cool? This hands-on GS7 versus GS7 edge video answers these questions and more.
video review
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/23/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple and Samsung users see the world differently. When a typical Galaxy S buyer lands on a customization page, they instinctively tick all the checkboxes. And since phones aren't (yet) customizable, the Samsung Galaxy S7 just includes every feature plus several not yet seen on a mobile device.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/22/2016
Source: Pocketnow EN→FR Archive.org version
To answer the question posed at the top of this review, this year’s Galaxy phones present us with the most complete vision yet of what a Galaxy phone should be. Nearly every issue we had with the Galaxy S6 has been addressed, and most everything we liked about the S6 has been refined. There’s precious little fault we can find here, and most of the criticisms we can lob at this phone will largely come down more to personal preferences than objective examinations.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% équipement: 90%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→FR Archive.org version
We’ve certainly seen some great phones over the years, but this year’s range well and truly takes the cake, and not only do we have a device that seriously gives Apple’s phones a good run for their money, but packs so many features in, you’d be hard pressed not to consider a Samsung Galaxy S7 or S7 Edge as your next phone, especially if you were upgrading this year.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100% prix: 90% performances: 100% équipement: 100% finition: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
For the first pair of samples, the Galaxy S7 scored 93% of the votes, for the second "only" 87%. It's pretty clear that our readers prefer the sharper camera of the S7, even if the sharpening is a bit too strong when you view the photo at 100%.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/21/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy S7 and iPhone 6S are both great phones, and there can't be many out there who don't already have some sort of inherent preference for Android or iOS. If you're truly agnostic, though, then we'd say the S7 has the edge, as it not only has a longer-lasting battery and a better camera, but its display and overal design are also more impressive.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/21/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The rest of this season's top-shelf models will have a hard time competing with the Galaxy S7. It's another exceptional all-round performance from a Samsung flagship, which takes the best from the company's recent high-end phones and puts it all in a single device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
For us, the S7 is well-priced and definitely worth the premium for new buyers, especially if you're coming from an S5 or something even older. While the benefits probably aren't quite enough to persuade current S6 users to ditch their current phone and upgrade to the S7 right this second, those looking for a fast smartphone at a great price should definitely consider Samsung's latest and greatest.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/17/2016
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S6 was the best phone of 2015 and, although it’s still early days, the Galaxy S7 is a serious contender for best phone of 2016. Samsung has taken into account what its fans want, addressing the three main areas of concern: removable storage, waterproofing and battery life. It’s also upgraded the core hardware and photography gear, added an always-on display and some useful software. Right now the Galaxy S7 is simply unbeatable.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 100% équipement: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
There isn’t a better Android phone out there right now. The Nexus 6P comes close, but it’s much larger, and the Galaxy S7 Edge is a lot more expensive. For the majority of people, I’d say the Galaxy S7 is the phone to pick. It looks great, feels a lot better than the Galaxy S6 due to the curved back, and it performs like a champ.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100% prix: 80% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Phandroid EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no question the Galaxy S7 is, as a piece of smartphone hardware, by far the best Samsung has ever built. It’s a direct answer to some of the most glaring shortcomings found in last year’s model, a welcomed upgrade from the Galaxy S6. Samsung’s kitchen sink approach to both hardware and software has been refined over the years with the S7 being the successful culmination of all those years of R&D. It may not be such a huge leap if you’re coming from an S6 (even less so if you already have a Note 5 or Galaxy S6 Edge Plus), but anyone looking to upgrade their 2-year-old device will be blown away.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy S7 fixes the main problem of the excellent Galaxy S6, namely the lack of expandable storage, while tweaking other elements such as the gorgeous design to make them even better. The result is a very good flagship phone, although not quite perfect. The S7 will swiftly be beaten when it comes to quick charging, for instance, while many of Samsung’s bolt-on features such as Upday and the Always On Display are badly implemented. Still, if you can afford that hefty asking price, there’s plenty to love here.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Droid-Life EN→FR Archive.org version
I hate to go into this section and knock a phone for something that hasn’t even happened yet, but I feel like potential owners of the Galaxy S7 deserve to know Samsung’s background. From the beginning of time, Samsung has been one of the worst at Android updates. We keep hoping that they will get better, since everyone else (HTC, LG, and maybe even Motorola again) seems to be getting quite quick with updates these days. But if we look at the most recent major update to Android Marshmallow, it’s safe to say that Samsung isn’t interested in being quick.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/15/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
There are two reasons why you might be interested in comparing these two handsets. You either own an LG G4 and are interested in upgrading to one of this year's heavy hitters, or are looking for a new phone and are wondering whether it's a good idea to shell out for the shiny new Samsung Galaxy S7, or just go for a discounted, slightly older model in the face of the LG G4.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/14/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
On the face of it, the Galaxy S7 may not seem like a major upgrade to the Galaxy S6, but the few tweaks that Samsung has made have all been in the right place and the contrast between the two handsets couldn’t be starker. Although I really enjoyed the Galaxy S6 last year, I did feel the handset’s shortcomings were enough to be a deal breaker, but thes Galaxy S7 is almost perfect in so many ways.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 88% mobilité: 90% finition: 93%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Of course, it's difficult to make a final judgement about which S7 you should buy when I haven't had a chance to test the S7 Edge yet, but I'll be updating this review with my definitive verdict on both phones as soon as I can. There's also the LG G5 and HTC's One M10 to watch out for on the horizon as well, but right now, the S7 certainly makes a compelling case as the early leader in this year's flagship race. There's more to come, but I doubt you'd be gutted if you simply grabbed an S7 today.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
There's time to wax poetic, and there's time to tackle the facts head on. And the facts are that the Galaxy S7 is an evolutionary step forward for Samsung, but no more. Sure, we're more than happy to see that the company has improved on ergonomics and that the handset is now dust- and water-resistant, but much everything else is very comparable to the Galaxy S6, or even slightly worse.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/11/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
This year, there is more of a difference between the S7 and S7 Edge: the S7 Edge is larger. But is this enough of a reason for both phones to exist? Samsung has done a commendable job squeezing the 5.5” display of the S7 Edge in a very compact body for that screen size. With the richer Edge UX functionality, slightly better battery life, and overall more modern form factor, we still feel that Samsung could have easily just released the S7 Edge and called it a day. It’s the better phone all around.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/11/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As usual though, the numbers don't tell the whole story. The design of the S7 builds on the Note5, which was in turn a more polished (and obviously larger) Galaxy S6. The S7 adds more curves on the front, not as much as to undermine the S7 edge's claim to fame, but just enough to let your fingertips know.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/11/2016
Source: AnandTech EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, I think the Galaxy S7 is looking to be one of the better devices of the year. Of course, there’s still a lot more to test, but the initial indications are already looking quite good. If you absolutely want the Galaxy S7 now, I don’t think there will be any major showstoppers present in this phone.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Another year, another Galaxy S. While the new S7 isn't as dramatic a departure for Samsung as the S6 was, it benefits immensely from a year's worth of refinement. It's more powerful, not to mention even more beautiful than the S6, but Samsung hasn't attained perfection just yet.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy S7 is slightly more expensive than the basic iPhone 6s, but offers more internal storage, so pricing is more or less on equal footing. Samsung's Galaxy S7 comes with tons of features, it's easily one of the most versatile smartphones out there, and that counts for something. While it may not be on quite the same level as the iPhone 6s when it comes to quality of design and user experience, the troves of functionality it offers make it a worthy alternative for the tech-savvy nation.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Always a relevant player in the space, Samsung has yet another formidable offering that sets the benchmark high for all other phones coming out this year. The specs might not be a tremendous upgrade, but at the end of the day, when you want a phone that just works, the Galaxy S7 fits the bill. When we think of a flagship, we envision something that just works flawlessly and without much hassle. This is exactly that!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung's latest flagship devices are impressive, but are only worth the upgrade if you don't have last year's devices.
video review
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
Here’s the deal: if you’ve got a Galaxy S6 in your hands already, keep it. You’re definitely good for another year, and some of the software features that come with the new GS7 will eventually make their way to your phone. But, if you’re still wielding a Galaxy S4 or Galaxy S5 or some other Android phone that’s let you down too many times, this is the best it’s going to get at this point in time—as long as you’re still convinced it’s worth spending gobs of money on a flagship device. If not, there’s always the Moto X Pure Edition or Nexus 6P, two perfectly-alright smartphones free from bloatware that cost far less than what your carrier will sell you the Galaxy S7 for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Computerworld.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Over the past couple of years, Android phones have been gaining in power and sophistication, and the Samsung S7 series is pretty much the state of the art. The physical package is right: top-end build quality, waterproofing, switches in the right place, long battery life, expandability, a knock-out screen and plenty of processing power. The software is right: Smartly implemented UI enhancements and Android's increasingly seamless melding of device and cloud.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has returned water-resistance to the Galaxy S7, without the need for the irritating port cover from the Galaxy S5. This time, it's using a water-repellent coating inside the device. I washed and dried the phone, and even spilled hot coffee on it, with no issues. The phone is rated IP68, which means it's fully waterproof and dustproof.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
Here’s the deal: if you’ve got a Galaxy S6 in your hands already, keep it. You’re definitely good for another year, and some of the software features that come with the new GS7 will eventually make their way to your phone. But, if you’re still wielding a Galaxy S4 or Galaxy S5 or some other Android phone that’s let you down too many times, this is the best it’s going to get at this point in time—as long as you’re still convinced it’s worth spending gobs of money on a flagship device. If not, there’s always the Moto X Pure Edition or Nexus 6P, two perfectly-alright smartphones free from bloatware that cost far less than what your carrier will sell you the Galaxy S7 for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
It continues Samsung's great design reinvention, though, refining what started with the SGS6, but adding some really compelling options in waterproofing and microSD card inclusion. There's plenty of power too - even if we're predicting some sort of international outrage over the Qualcomm vs Exynos debate - paired with a great display, pretty good battery performance and a camera that's consistently good.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
The quality of a flagship device isn’t measured by the visual changes it got from the previous generation, but rather the improvements and new features it brings to the table. Keeping this in mind, we can say that the comparison between the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S7 is completely in favor of this year’s model. It is way more powerful, thanks to the Exynos 8890 SoC, which managed to achieve great scores in our performance tests. Moreover, the device offers longer battery life due to its larger capacity. Nevertheless, we are somehow disappointed by the fact that Samsung didn’t go along with the USB-C port, as LG and other OEMs did, and this might be the main reason the Galaxy S7 doesn’t support Quick Charge 3.0. Something very useful for phones without removable batteries. We do have to mention, though, that Sammy’s new flagship supports fast wireless charging if you are not into cables anymore.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The result is refinement, a more usable camera, and solid battery life, wrapped up in a premium-feeling shell. Certainly, it will face stiff competition from LG's G5 when that arrives later in the year, while the specter of the iPhone 7 looms large already, but there's a reason Samsung holds the top spot in Android devices and the Galaxy S7 will only strengthen that grip.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
Where past Galaxy S handsets have felt like a checklist of enviable specs, this device is a complete all-rounder. More than offering you a tremendous processor or bumper battery, the S7 focuses on how these components tally together and whether you’re going to enjoy using them. Holding back on any grandstanding new features has allowed Samsung to make improvements on a smaller scale.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Recode EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the new Galaxy S7 models are excellent phones for buyers who can afford them. Their build quality, design and cameras put them in the same ballpark as the iPhone. But the needlessly confusing software bloat and the clumsy Edge settings I found on the Samsung devices still leaves Apple in the lead, in my opinion. And that’s despite what I perceive to be a gradual decline in the quality of Apple’s software.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a worthy recipient of a five-star techradar review. That's no easy feat – only a handful of phones have ever hit the top mark – but the Galaxy S7 has earned its place in our hall of fame. The differences between the two variants (global vs North America) may frustrate mentally, but you won't see any differences day to day, so don't fret.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
f the S6 brought premium design to Samsung's flagship phones, the Galaxy S7 refines and combines those trend-setting good looks with all the features you really wanted from the phones that came before it. The S7's camera is faster and better in low light, its battery life is better, its body is more seductive and water-resistant, and as a whole, this phone pushes the smartphone bar higher than it's been before.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
I do like the calendar and it’s the option I’ve used the most, but it would be nice to see Samsung expand upon this feature in a future software update to make it a lot more robust. Overall, there’s no denying that Samsung has definitely made some big improvements with the Galaxy S7 Edge, and while we’re reserving final judgement for the full review – which is going to be in-depth and should be out within a week or so – the Galaxy S7 Edge certainly has me impressed so far.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/07/2016
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
It does have a few negative points, it's a fingerprint magnet, and TouchWiz still looks cartoonish. However, the pros far outweigh the cons. Whether you should get the S7 or S7 Edge is a different question altogether. This is the more sensible option, but the S7 Edge is sexier... tough choice, but you can't really go wrong with either.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/07/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it: the S7 Edge differs from the standard Galaxy S7 with its larger, dual-edge screen, higher-capacity battery and extra colour option. It sounds great, but the cheaper price and smaller dimensions of the standard Samsung Galaxy S7 may make the Edge your second-best.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/03/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Technically speaking, the Galaxy S7 is the superior smartphone here and it has things which you can't get on the iPhone 6S like a Micro-SD card slot, waterproofing and wireless charging. However, it's more expensive and the design of the iPhone 6S combined with the usability of iOS will make it a better choice for some. These are first impressions as we've only had hand-on time with the Galaxy S7.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/02/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Not forgetting that this comparison is based on our hands-on review of the S7 and considerably more in-depth testing and prolonged use of the 6P, we can only come to preliminary conclusions about this particular battle. The Nexus 6P has two main advantages over its rival: price and plain Android. Those who use their phone’s built-in speakers a lot will also like the front-facing stereo speakers. The bigger screen may also be an advantage if you want a larger phone. The S7 is more expensive, but is also faster, has expandable storage, is waterproof, and has optical stabilisation for the camera and native support for 1080p60. Few will buy it for the heart-rate monitor. For some people, that list will make the S7 worth the extra price, while others will see the 6P’s drawbacks as reasonable compromises for the cheaper price.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/29/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
We really don't believe the Samsung Galaxy S7 is the minor update many are billing it as - Samsung has looked at the features real users want and need, and thus made a good thing a lot better. However, if waterproofing, expandable storage and improved battery life are not your primary concerns, we'd advise looking to the much cheaper Galaxy S6 over the Galaxy S7, or at least waiting a few months for its price to come down. If we are to believe Samsung the S7 should be faster and with a better camera, but don't forget the S6 is also incredibly fast and its camera is excellent - and right now it's a not insignificant £200 cheaper.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/29/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Our early impressions suggest the S7 wins this battle, but it's going to be a very close call. Check back soon for our full verdict after some more in-depth testing.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/29/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
These are both great phones, and there can't be many out there who don't have some inherent preference for Android or iOS? If you're truly agnostic though then the S7 looks to have the edge at present, with a much bigger battery and impressive-sounding camera, of course those'll need to be tested before they can be confirmed but the S7 is shaping up to be its billing as the world's best smartphone.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/28/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no doubting that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is a very good phone. It is super fast in operation, has an excellent, vibrant Super AMOLED screen, and plenty of other bells and whistles to make it a distinct improvement over last year’s model even though it’s not a complete overhaul.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/26/2016
Source: Tested EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung plans to release the Galaxy S7 on March 11th across the globe. US carriers are already taking preorders for the GS7 and GS7 Edge. You're looking at roughly $700-800 depending on the carrier and model you choose. Preorders will get a free Gear VR as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/23/2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
So there you have it for this quick look at the Samsung Galaxy S7 vs iPhone 6s! Things were a lot closer between the two last year in terms of design, build quality, and hardware features, but with key elements like expandable storage and water and dust resistance making a return, there is actually more separation this time around. 3D Touch is a useful addition with the iPhone that can prove to be game changer over time, so it really comes down to what features are more important to you.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/23/2016
Source: Gadgetguy EN→FR Archive.org version
The new S7’s are designed to keep cool with an innovative new ‘heat pipe’, which is a water filled copper pipe that runs next to the processor, and draws heat away by vaporising the water, which then moves to the centre and then down the pipe, where it condenses back to liquid again in a continuous loop. Clever stuff.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/22/2016
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no doubt that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is set to be a better phone than the S6 – its camera, battery and performance are all likely to see an increase, and it now has storage expansion and disaster-proofing, too. However, its popularity and success will hinge on the price and, most importantly, the price differential between it and the larger, more exotic Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/21/2016
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy S7 is a remarkable smartphone. The Galaxy S6 pretty much lead the Android market for all of 2015, and the Galaxy S7 is giving them a good chance to do the same in 2017. For this generation, Samsung has once again chosen to focus on what arguably matters the most: larger battery, camera performance, great (waterproof) design and next-gen computing and communications capabilities.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/21/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Price is going to be important, but it's hard to directly compare the models, as the S7 can be upgraded via its microSD card slot, whereas the S6 can't. As a result, it seems fair to compare the 32GB S7 to the 64GB S6. Currently, SIM-Free direct from Samsung, the S6 64Gb costs £479 and the S6 Edge costs £499; The 32GB S7 Edge costs £639 and the S7 costs £70 less at £569. To me, the S7 is well-priced and worth the premium for new buyers. There're even enough features to tempt some S6 users, but probably not quite enough to make most people upgrade. However, those looking for a fast smartphone at a great price should still think about the S6, which will most likely have some top deals available for it on contract.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/20/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung's re-invention has gone into season 2 with the Samsung Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 edge. They ramp up the camera to a whole new level, make the display Always On and retool the other features.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/20/2016
Source: Computerbild - 4/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/13/2017
Notes: performances: 100% équipement: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 100% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Dual-SIM Handy Test DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 97% prix: 87% performances: 99% équipement: 100% écran: 94% mobilité: 93%
Source: Smart Web DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 96% équipement: 98% écran: 95%
Source: RP-Online DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Basic Tutorials - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 11/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: rro DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/20/2016
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 99%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 91%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/23/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 97% performances: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 95% finition: 100% ergonomie: 90% degré de nuisance: 95%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/14/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 100% écran: 100% finition: 100%
Source: eTest DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/11/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Turn On DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 96%
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 99% équipement: 98% finition: 100% ergonomie: 99%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 95% écran: 93% mobilité: 90%
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/08/2016
Source: Turn On DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/21/2016
Source: Android Welt - Heft 3/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 97% équipement: 99% mobilité: 98%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Target HD PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: Wiz Blog IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/26/2016
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T880 MP12:
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Exynos 8890:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.10": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
92.63%: Cette note est très bonne, Il n'y a pas beaucoup de portables avec de meilleures notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.