Samsung Galaxy J3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 14 notes (à partir de 21 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy J3
Source: Bit-Tech EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a great budget smartphone. It’s reasonably well made and has a great screen that leaves us wondering why more manufacturers don’t specify AMOLED panels on their cheap handsets.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
With a bright screen and slim design the Samsung Galaxy J3 makes a good first impression, but annoyances like a lack of auto brightness hold it back from greatness.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) is one of those devices that will likely end up free-on-contract or a similar carrier-subsidized deal. There really isn't all that much about the handset to leave a lasting impression. Now that the J2 (2016) is officially out, this became even more apparent, as the two devices are identical hardware-wise and price-wise, only the J2 has the added novelty of Samsung's new Smart Glow notifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/17/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Of course, there's also the 3rd Gen Moto G to consider as well. This is just as fast as the J5 and has one of the best budget cameras we've ever seen. It also runs the latest version of Android 6.0, making it feel newer and more up to date than Samsung's J series, all of which only run Android 5.1.1. Samsung's notoriously bad at providing its cheaper handsets with free OTA updates for newer versions of Android, so those that want all the latest Android features such as Doze and Now on Tap should probably pick the Moto G instead. For me, the Moto G is still our favourite budget smartphone, but if you're not fussed about what version of Android you're running and value having a long battery life, then Samsung's Galaxy J5 is still the J series phone to buy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J lineup cannot boast with the same premium looks of the Galaxy S or Galaxy A models, but compensates this with a price that’s easy on your budget. This is exactly the case with the Galaxy J3 (2016) which comes at a reasonable price and, at the same time, provides all necessary features for a mid-range smartphone. Such components are the 5″ Super AMOLED HD display with high contrast and detailed image. Also impressing is the battery which performed more than well in our tests, despite its not so great capacity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/21/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
If you're looking for an affordable phone on a major carrier, you typically need to prepare to make a compromise. The $169.99 (full price) Samsung Galaxy J3 on AT&T doesn't buck this trend, but unlike many other affordable smartphones, you won't be compromising on software. The J3 runs the latest version of Android, 6.0 Marshmallow, which is more than you can say for even plenty of higher-end devices. It also boasts a rich 5-inch 720p AMOLED display and great battery life, making it a solid choice for AT&T customers shopping on a budget.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a great budget smartphone. It’s reasonably well made and has a great screen that leaves me wondering why more manufacturers don’t specify AMOLED panels on their cheap handsets. The biggest problem the Galaxy J3 faces is the fact that its stablemate, the Galaxy J5, is better. That phone is not only faster, but also has a slightly better camera, a marginally bigger screen and better battery life than the J3. For a mere £10 extra, you can’t argue with the fact that it’s the better buy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this instead. Both have an excellent display, but the Galaxy J5 is faster, longer lasting and has a far superior camera, making it much better value overall.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is certainly a respectable budget smartphone for £150, but with very little difference compared to the Galaxy J5 in terms of price - just £10 at the time of writing - I can't think of any reason why you'd pick this instead. Both have an excellent display, but the Galaxy J5 is faster, longer lasting and has a far superior camera, making it much better value overall.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy J3 is a no-frills phone that will suit many users needs, but it's not quite cheap enough for our liking. At £150 it is underpowered and under-featured, though we like the microSD support and removable battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 60% équipement: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
At a price tag of Rs. 8,990, the Galaxy J3 (2016) is just an average budget 4G smartphone from Samsung. It comes with a good Super AMOLED display for the price, has 4G support and has unique S bike mode along with NFC, but Samsung has missed out the ambient light sensor for auto brightness adjustment, yet again and the performance is also not the best. Even though these is an 8-megapixel camera, the quality could have been better and just 4GB of usable storage is definitely not enough.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/18/2016
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The J3's strengths — its battery life and appealing exterior — can't obscure the device's glaring weaknesses. Even if you can overlook the phone's subpar performance, the blurry images taken by the J3's camera just aren't acceptable in an era when even low-priced phones feature cameras that can take sharper images.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 63% performances: 73% équipement: 42% écran: 84% mobilité: 63%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% mobilité: 76%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 62% équipement: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: A1 Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/14/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 11/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 80% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/04/2016
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/27/2016
Commentaire
ARM Mali-400 MP2:
GPU OpenGL ES 2.0 pour SoCs basés sur ARM avec 2 processeurs de fragment et 1 processeur de vertex.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SC8830:
SoC ARM d'entrée de gamme intégrant quatre cœurs processeur Cortex-A7 cadencés habituellement jusqu'à 1,2 GHz (sauf dans le Galaxy J1 où il n'est que dual-core). Intègre un contrôleur mémoire LPRDDR2/3.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
66.71%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.