Oppo Reno4 Pro
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix IMX616, f/2.4, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Price comparison
Moyenne de 53 notes (à partir de 113 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Oppo Reno4 Pro
With the Reno4 Pro, Oppo is going after buyers who like to shoot video. The Reno4 Pro comes with improved image stabilisation and camera software. Read our review to learn how well the camera system of the 5G smartphone performs.
Source: Meilleurmobile
Quelques défauts sont tout de même à pointer du doigt sur le smartphone. D’abord le choix de la Snapdragon 765G, une puce jugée milieu de gamme pour un produit du genre. L’appareil photo est également moins performant que son prix ne le laisse présager. A 799 euros, il est aisé de lui trouver de meilleurs concurrents sur le marché disponibles moins chers. De même il n’est pas assez bien doté pour se ranger dans la catégorie premium où des S21 et des iPhone 12 le surclassent dans tous les aspects.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/07/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Top for Phone
OPPO est une marque intéressante… voire impressionnante. Filiale d’un groupe (BBK Electronics) qui fait partie du Top5 des constructeurs de smartphones. OPPO est également une marque surprenante, car elle est capable de faire le grand écart entre des smartphones très entrée de gamme, et des smartphones très haut de gamme. Et dans la catégorie des haut de gamme, mais encore accessibles se trouve l’OPPO Reno4 Pro. Le plus performant, et coûteux des “Reno4” (prix max. conseillé : 799€).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/29/2021
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
L'Oppo Reno 4 Pro remplit son cahier des charges de smartphone haut de gamme avec un design soigné, un bel écran AMOLED, de bonnes performances, une partie photo perfectible mais efficace, une autonomie honorable et une charge ultra-rapide. Malgré tout, et c'est indéniable, il souffre de la comparaison avec le Find X2 Neo sorti quelques mois plus tôt et désormais bien plus abordable. Il peine également à rivaliser avec certains concurrents moins chers mais tout aussi convaincants comme le OnePlus 8T.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/30/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Les Mobiles Archive.org version
Sous ses airs de smartphone haut de gamme, le modèle Premium Oppo Reno4 Pro est un excellent appareil qui ne propose peut-être pas les meilleures performances du marché mais s’en sort beaucoup plus qu’honorablement offrant une expérience Android agréable et fluide au quotidien. La prise en main est très bonne. Sa recharge est très rapide, l’écran est magnifique et on peut compter sur une configuration photo d’un très bon niveau même si nous aurions préféré un grand angle plus large. On peut seulement lui reprocher un positionnement tarifaire un peu élevé et l’impossibilité d’étendre la mémoire interne.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Nous avons peu de reproches à faire à l'encontre de l'Oppo Reno 4 Pro. Son design est exceptionnel, son écran n’est pas le meilleur mais impressionne à bien des égards, son temps de recharge en une demi-heure bat des records, son autonomie s’avère très satisfaisante et ses performances, bien qu’inférieures à celles d’un smartphone haut de gamme, ne sont pas du tout contraignantes au quotidien.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 80% mobilité: 100%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Dans les faits, l’Oppo Reno 4 Pro est un bon smartphone. Mais faut-il craquer pour un téléphone vendu 200 euros plus cher (sur les sites marchands) que l’Oppo X2 Neo, et dont les caractéristiques et les usages se rejoignent fortement ?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek Archive.org version
Le Oppo Reno 4 Pro est un excellent smartphone en soi. Il est équilibré en proposant une excellente finition, de bonnes performances, un excellent écran, un bloc photo polyvalent et capable, la 5G, une bonne autonomie et une recharge super rapide.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/02/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le Reno4 Pro est un smartphone à qui nous n'avons rien à reprocher outre quelques imperfections. Son seul vrai défaut est de ne pas se démarquer suffisamment de son prédécesseur. Vendu bien plus cher que ce dernier, il est aussi chahuté par une concurrence plus acérée.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR
The Oppo Reno 4 Pro is a good-looking piece of hardware that might cut it for someone who values design and needs a phone for general use. However, it really isn’t meant for photography enthusiasts or gamers. The 65W charging is handy to have, but since the Snapdragon 720G doesn’t really tax the 4,000mAh battery, it can be a bit of overkill. After all is said and done, it’s hard to justify the chipset and average cameras at this price point. This makes the Oppo Reno 4 Pro a tough sell unless you really want the fastest charging speeds around.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2022
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 50% performances: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR
The mid-range market is really heating up this year, and Oppo is constantly refreshing its offering to stay on top. The Reno 4 Pro is a really attractive option, too, although its slightly high price point may push people towards a cheaper option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: It Pro EN→FR
With the Reno4 Pro 5G, Oppo has released an exquisitely-manufactured smartphone that’s fully capable in terms of its performance and photography, sitting between devices in the conventional premium and mid-range brackets. In light of its excellent build quality and dazzling OLED display, it’s often easy to forget you aren’t handling a more premium device, although the lack of high-end features does occasionally snap you back into reality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/26/2021
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Talk Android EN→FR
If you are in the market for a smartphone that has a premium build, looks good, and is comfortable to hold with many of the features associated with more expensive handsets, the Reno 4 Pro 5G is certainly worth splashing the cash. The AMOLED display shines and the cameras produce good results, reliably, and the phone is pretty to look at too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/27/2021
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR
While there's not a lot wrong with the Reno4 Pro, it goes up against phones such as the Galaxy S20 FE and OnePlus 8T that do a better job in almost any area you're likely to be interested in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/22/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G offers very high-resolution 32 MP selfies characterized by stable and consistent focus with fairly good detail if you keep your face close to the screen. It’s fair to say it doesn’t really trouble the best mid-range front cameras we’ve tested for overall image quality, though. If super selfies are a key driver in your smartphone requirements, similarly priced devices such as the Google Pixel 5 or ZenFone 7 Pro offer a step up for color, detail, and dynamic range. That said, the Reno4 Pro 5G nails the most important aspect of selfies with nicely exposed faces in most shots. Add to that fairly neutral white balance, a competent bokeh mode, along with acceptable overall video quality, and the Reno4 Pro 5G’s front camera will keep the Oppo faithful happy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/21/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
Oppo’s latest headlining Reno may well be a premium mid-ranger smartphone, but when it comes to audio, it is only an average performer. That said, the 4 Pro 5G is extremely consistent, delivering an average performance in almost every sub-category of our Audio protocol. Its main weakness is a lack of high- and low-end extension in both playback and recording, which impairs its timbre, dynamics, and spatial performance. Further, its microphones are easily occluded, and its recordings exhibit fairly low loudness in most use cases. Still, the Reno4 Pro 5G delivers a very good playback volume performance, better timbre and spatial results when filming in loud environments, and relatively clean background recordings.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→FR
The Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G turns in a mixed imaging performance. In good light it captures a lot of detail with nice colors, but noise impacts quality in both stills and videos. The tele camera has some weaknesses, too, though it’s much better than not having one. Relatively speaking, video performance is bit stronger than stills, especially if you don’t like to walk and shoot video at the same time. As of this writing, the Reno4 Pro’s pricing puts it on the higher end of mid-range handsets and competition in this segment is fierce, but phone pricing can fluctuate quite a bit over time and from region to region, so interested buyers should have a closer look at this phone, especially if video is high up on your list of priorities.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/07/2021
Source: Phandroid EN→FR Archive.org version
It should come as no surprise that we were left feeling a bit empty after spending time with the Reno 4 Pro. It’s time for phone makers to stop adding camera sensors just to say that the phone has them. It’s also time for there to be a little bit more focus on software integration with the camera if these companies really want to turn some heads. Truth be told, if the Reno 4 Pro had a little bit better camera performance and a faster chipset, then it would be amongst the best phones of the year. The plastic back feels great, the display is not overly curved, and the extra features like the faster refresh rate and headphone jack are nice touches. But Oppo just missed the mark in too many other areas for us to be blown away.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/29/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
An incredible all-round with a beautiful design, standout video capture capabilities and excellent fast charging. Just be sure this phone's makeup is exactly what you're looking for, otherwise, you can find similar for a lot less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
That's not to say it's a bad phone - quite the opposite. An enjoyable handling experience gets you started, and you then go ahead to enjoy its bright 90Hz display. Pictures come out great under most circumstances, with respectable performance into the night as well. The battery will easily carry you there too, and you don't need to bother with overnight charging when a full charge takes half an hour. Solid stuff indeed. But not at €750, not at all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2020
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
At €799/£699, it can be a bit hard to justify those sacrifices, but this is still a good phone. I'd say it might be more justified if you get the Green Glitter version, since you're getting something that looks unique and absolutely beautiful. However, that model only seems to be available in the UK. You can find the phone on OPPO's website, if you're interested, and you also get Bang & Olufsen H4 headphones - which are worth £250/€300 - for free until November 13.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/07/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
With its sleek looks and well-rounded feature set, the Reno 4 Pro 5G seems an appealing mid-range option until you look at the price tag. Aside from best-in-class 65W fast charging, nothing about the Reno 4 Pro 5G stands out in a fiercely competitive market space.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 770%
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/01/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 4 Pro has found itself at the wrong place at the wrong time. The new Oppo does everything it sets out to do, with ludicrously fast charging, snappy performance and a delightful main camera, but it’s price places it up against far too strong competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
The Reno 4 Pro has a sleek design that stands out, and the phone is one of the lightest in this segment. The 90Hz AMOLED display is fantastic, you get 65W fast charging, and even a 3.5mm jack. But the Snapdragon 720G is just not fast enough in this segment, and that ultimately makes the Reno 4 Pro a non-starter.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo has produced another impressive smartphone in the shape of the Reno 4 Pro 5G, with decent levels of performance and camera quality, and amazing 65W fast charging – but do other phones at this price point offer packages that are more compelling overall?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/16/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno4 Pro looks set to continue a strong 2020 for the Chinese brand. The tall and slim design gives off premium vibes at an a decent price. Despite not sporting ultra-premium flagship specs, the performance rarely stutters and the camera gives a strong initial account of itself. The key downside of the device looks to be its screen, failing to turn heads with colours that lack a decent punch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2020
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The mid-range market is really heating up this year, and Oppo seems super keen to make sure it's constantly refreshing its offering here. On first looks, the Reno 4 Pro seems a really attractive option, although the slightly high price point may push people towards a cheaper option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: iTech Post EN→FR Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 4 Pro 5G has just recently been launched with a base price of £699. Compared with its non-5G sibling, it has most of the same specs and features. However, it comes with additional hardware tweaks.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
We found that the standard Reno 4 Pro lacked in performance and in camera quality. Thankfully, it looks like the bump to a Snapdragon 765G could fix one of those downfalls in the 5G version. We’ll have to wait until camera testing to see if Oppo fixed the latter in this updated model.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
Other options in the same price range would be the vivo X50, realme X3 Super Zoom, and nubia Red Magic 5G. If you love playing games on your phone, then the Red Magic 5G is the better option. For those who want to game and take pictures, there's the realme X3 Super Zoom. Lastly, for those who want a phone with more modest specs but even better cameras, you can go for the vivo X50 instead.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/29/2020
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo Reno 4 Pro is a beautiful looking device but the pricing is on the higher side. The coice of the processor is a bit od as we have the same processor used in a couple of smartphones which are priced around Rs 20,000 mark. If you are going to buy a smartphone for it looks Reno 4Pro can be your next buy but if you er lookinga t complete package their are many other options available in the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/23/2020
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Oppo Reno 4 Pro is a strong mid-range phone on its own, given the vast variety of competitors in this field, savvy consumers have plenty of options to choose from, and it would seem that Oppo Reno4 Pro’s high asking price could make it lose out to its competitors without its own niche and strong unique selling point to differentiate itself. Perhaps it’s a great asset to IG and TikTok creators who need a device out of the box to fulfil their immediate needs with a great looking screen, super-fast charging and pleasing images and videos that are ready to be published, but is that really enough when numerous third-party camera apps and shooters exist to complement any other phone device of choice? It’s a tough ask for S$899.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/08/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% performances: 70% finition: 85%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Midrange phones have developed a reputation for being boring over the past few years. They often come with overused features and unmemorable names. But Chinese phone-maker Oppo's new Reno 4 Pro is chipping away at that narrative. The Reno 4 Pro, which launched in India in July, is technically a midrange phone, but it's packed with features typically found in more fancy flagships. It has a curved 90Hz display, ultrafast charging and a set of stereo speakers. But because it is a midrange phone after all, it does make some sacrifices. The biggest thing missing is 5G capability which, if you're planning on keeping the Reno 4 Pro for a few years, you'll want your next phone to have. Oppo says that's because it wants the phone to "better fit" the countries it'll be released in.
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/07/2020
Source: Geek Culture EN→FR Archive.org version
A one-trick pony, the Oppo Reno4 Pro is great for those who want the fastest charging speeds around. For the general user, however, it wouldn’t impress much, offering a standard experience that should be more premium for its price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 65% performances: 70%
Source: Pokde EN→FR Archive.org version
After using both the Reno4 and Reno4 Pro for quite some time, I feel that both are rather capable smartphones. I feel fine with the hardware that the OPPO Reno4 brings but you are missing out on the nicer finish of the Reno4 Pro and the 90Hz refresh rate.
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 65% performances: 78% mobilité: 78% finition: 80%
Source: Androidcommunity.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno 4 Pro ticks the boxes when it comes to the basics, but the clear winner is the charging speed, which is the biggest grouse for most smartphone users. This strong smartphone has a lot to offer, but it’s one of many in the mid-tier smartphone market. In fact, with OnePlus Nord’s sleeker offerings in the same pricing, makes the OPPO Reno 4 Pro lag behind.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/03/2020
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
In addition to that, OPPO will be picking 10 lucky winners to get free tickets to Sunway Lagoon Theme park, as well as a 1-night stay at the hotel. Other than that, the My OPPO App offers various discounts on selected products as well as loyalty points, which you can use to exchange for more discounts as well as coupons.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/01/2020
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno4 Pro supports Dual 4G VoLTE, Wi-Fi 802.11 ac (2.4GHz + 5GHz), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS/GLONASS/Beidou, and USB Type-C. The in-display fingerprint scanner is snappy and fast. The call quality over earpiece and headphones is excellent.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/25/2020
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno4 Pro is expensive and might not stand a chance to compete with other heavyweights in the midrange smartphone segment — such as the Realme X2 Pro (review), OnePlus 7T (review), OnePlus Nord (review), etc. It does well in isolated departments but fails to impress as a complete package, especially in the light of its premium midrange pricing. It lacks the performance and imaging you expect from a midrange smartphone. The silver lining, though, are design, display and battery.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/19/2020
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 4 Pro could have been a strong contender in the Indian mid-tier smartphone segment, if only Oppo had launched the global model in India with the Snapdragon 765G SoC and the better selection of secondary rear cameras. The one we have here is still a good product, but at its current price of Rs. 34,990, it's just too expensive and there's no getting around this fact.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
Buy the Reno4 Pro if all you want from a smartphone is a lightweight, ergonomic design and hyper-fast charging. For everything else, there are better alternatives like the OnePlus Nord, iQOO 3 and the Realme X3 SuperZoom.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/13/2020
Notes: Note globale: 61% prix: 38% performances: 71% finition: 58%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Midrange phones have developed a reputation for being boring over the past few years. They often come with overused features and unmemorable names. But Chinese phone-maker Oppo's new Reno 4 Pro is chipping away at that narrative. The Reno 4 Pro, which launched in India last month, is technically a midrange phone, but it's packed with features typically found in more fancy flagships. It has a curved 90Hz display, ultrafast charging and a set of stereo speakers. But because it is a midrange phone after all, it does make some sacrifices. The biggest thing missing is 5G capability which, if you're planning on keeping the Reno 4 Pro for a few years, you'll want your next phone to have. Oppo says that's because it wants the phone to "better fit" the countries it'll be released in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/11/2020
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
If you know your smartphone hardware, you may have realised by now that there’s no 5G here because it packs a 720G chipset. OnePlus definitely has an edge here with Sub-6Ghz 5G bands in the Nord, but at the moment, 5G is irrelevant in India.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 100%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
At a price tag of Rs 34,990, the Oppo Reno 4 Pro is a good looking device and comfortable to use. The preloaded app could have been avoided and the camera needs an update. Stay tuned for our full review where we will talk about the performance of the device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/06/2020
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 4 Pro looks great and feels featherlight thanks to the plastic build. It has a fantastic display and one of the fastest charging solutions around. However, it's hard to ignore the underpowered Snapdragon 720G chipset and the less-than-stellar camera performance — even more so for the price the phone commands.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
OPPO just released the OPPO Reno3 Pro on last May in Malaysia and suddenly we got ourselves a new series called the Reno 4 series for you. Coming in two variants - the vanilla Reno 4 and Reno 4 Pro, they both cost RM1699 and RM2399 respectively. So is it worth the upgrade or worth buying the Reno4 Pro?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/05/2020
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The Reno 4 Pro, which launched in India on Friday, is technically a midrange phone, but it's packed with features typically found in more fancy flagships. It has a curved 90Hz display, ultrafast charging and a set of stereo speakers. But because it is a midrange phone after all, it does make some sacrifices. The biggest thing missing is 5G capability which, if you're planning on keeping the Reno 4 Pro for a few years, you'll want your next phone to have. Oppo says that's because it wants the phone to "better fit" the countries it'll be released in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/03/2020
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno4 Pro is a very attractive package, both in terms of its looks and what it offers. It's super thin and light, but it still has features that might usually be sacrificed for thinness, like a sizeable 4,000mAh battery and a headphone jack. It's also just a very well-rounded phone, with a beautiful and smooth display, a pretty good camera in daytime - and some unique camera features to boot - and all the performance most people will need.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
We go hands-on with the newly-announced OPPO Reno4 Pro, a mid-range smartphone with a Snapdragon 720G chipset and 8GB of RAM. It has a 90Hz refresh rate display and a quad-camera setup on the back.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2020
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
For Rs 34,990, Reno 4 Pro is overpriced for the specifications it offers. Yes, it has the industry-best 65W fast charging, some really good cameras, and a marvellous design but the trade-offs are not compelling enough to justify the price. Moreover, OnePlus Nord and Realme X3 are more competitive and offer more features, better gaming performance, and on par photography just without the 65W fast charging. The price gap is so wide the Oppo's six-month-old Reno 3 Pro seems pricier than the OnePlus Nord. But well, if its good looks are anything that can win you over despite it being an overpriced deal, you can surely get the Reno 4 Pro as soon as it goes on sale on August 5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Oppo Reno 4 Pro is a good-looking smartphone with a good set of features, but I feel its price of Rs. 34,990 will hurt its appeal, especially since nearly every good competitor at this price level offers a faster SoC. Can the super fast charging and premium design make up for this lack of power? I'll be testing the Reno 4 Pro over the next few days, and I'll be in a better position to answer that question in the full review. In the meantime, let me know your thoughts in the comments below. Would you be willing to sacrifice a bit of processing power for a lighter and slimmer phone?
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2020
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo has made a capable midranger with the Reno4 Pro, its focus clearly on the display and battery, delivering a dual-curved AMOLED with flagship-level brightness and industry-leading charging speed. The camera system wasn't that high on the priorities list, yet the Reno does a very good job with what it's got. The extensive list of small nice-to-haves rounds off a very appealing package.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo is the next far-eastern star on the mobile horizon and the goal is obviously to catch up with Huawei and Xiaomi. Oppo is doing this by trying to push innovations like periscope cameras, in-display fingerprint scanners, and, of course, Super VOOC fast charging in its phones. This technology alone is enough to wow many people and rightfully so. The Oppo Reno4 Pro takes the fast charging game to new levels, offering a full charge of its 4000 mAh battery in just 43 minutes (36 minutes advertised).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO Reno 4 Pro is clearly a capable phone that checks all the basics and meets most users’ requirements. It is plenty strong and its cameras are good and the charging speed addresses one of the biggest pain points in mobile life. That, however, may not be enough for the phone to stand out in an increasing monoculture that is the mid-tier smartphone market. Especially with the recent announcement of the OnePlus Nord, OPPO banking on the phone’s accessible price tag might no longer be enough to set it apart from the crowd.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
OPPO has done an amazing job in the design department, the 3D curved screen, the lightweight design, gives the phone a distinct look. The phone surprised us with its 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 fast charging, it charges fully in 36 minutes which is hard to compete with any other smartphone in this segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2020
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
OPPO is not necessarily a trend-leading manufacturer. But it must be a manufacturer that stands at the forefront of the trend. While each family was still “fighting” for photos, OPPO released Reno2, the main video stabilization video phone; while each family was still rushing to launch a heavy and thick 5G mobile phone, OPPO launched a 171g thin and light 5G video Mobile phone Reno3 Pro.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/06/2020
Source: Chip (Print) - 10/22
Comparaison, , De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2022
Notes: Note globale: 94%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/18/2021
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/02/2020
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/05/2020
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 90%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/05/2020
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 75% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 100%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2020
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/11/2020
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 88% écran: 88% mobilité: 88% finition: 88%
Source: Tuexperto ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/03/2020
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2020
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/23/2021
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/29/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 60%
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 72% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 96% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 100%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2020
Source: Everyeye.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 70% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 49% équipement: 77%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 69% écran: 86% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Want.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/03/2020
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/23/2020
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Portablegear NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/21/2020
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/19/2020
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/12/2020
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2020
Source: Inceleme.co TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/17/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80% écran: 85% mobilité: 95% finition: 75%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/19/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/28/2020
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/28/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/26/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/13/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/07/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/06/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/06/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/05/2020
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/04/2020
Source: Genk VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/03/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/03/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/03/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/03/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/30/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/28/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/24/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/24/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/23/2020
Source: Genk VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/05/2020
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
Carte graphique intégrée (dans les Snapdragon 765 et 765G) basée sur l'architecture Adreno 600. Compatible DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2. La variante 765G est de 10 % plus rapide que celle du 765, et de 20 % que l'Adreno 618 d'ancienne génération.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 765G:
SoC ARM puissant du milieu de gamme, avec 8 cœurs Kryo 475 (un cœur ARM Cortex-A76 rapide montant à 2,4 GHz, un cœur A76 Gold montant à 2,2 GHz, et 6 cœurs économes en énergie Cortex-A55 montant à 1,8 GHz). Un des premiers SoC à intégrer un modem 5G (Snapdragon X52 jusqu'à 3,7 / 1,6 Mbit/s en réception et en envoi, prise en charge mmWave et Sub-6). Le processeur est gravé en 7 nm EUV, procédé récent et efficient, par Samsung.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.50": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
91.74%: Il n'y a pas beaucoup de modèles avec une meilleure note. La plupart des portables ont des notes en dessous.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.