Oppo R9s
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 5 notes (à partir de 17 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Oppo R9s
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
We’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/02/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The OPPO R9s has an excellent camera, offers impressive battery life, and features a nice display. However, the number of compromises here is staggering. Among derivative design and software, the R9s has sloppy software, offers below average performance, and has a bleak software support outlook. For Western users, the strange display coating, YouTube audio sync issue, and limited availability are even bigger issues to consider.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 80% écran: 75% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Cybershack EN→FR Archive.org version
Selling for AUD$598 with 64GB of storage, the OPPO R9s is a great deal, but it’s slightly difficult to recommend over the significantly cheaper F1s if you don’t need the extra bells and whistles, such as the better camera or the horsepower. Vanilla Android would push this phone over the edge and make it an easily recommendable device over its competitors, but as it stands you’ll have to weigh up whether you can deal with the slightly odd operating system. If the operating system isn’t a problem, then you’re getting one of the best value-for-money phones on the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Bill Bennett EN→FR Archive.org version
Oppo’s R9s story is all about the price. We don’t know for sure but if it lands in New Zealand at NZ$750 it’ll be competitive. For that money you get most of what you’ll find in premium phones selling for twice the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/15/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→FR Archive.org version
So, great value for money and general performance ranging from very good to excellent. Oppo is on a winner with the R9s phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 90%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
Comparing it with the F1s, both phones share a lot of similarities and one might even opt for the F1s for being cheaper at RM1198, whereas the R9S stands at RM1798. That’s a RM600 difference and it’s easily understood why some customers won’t go for the R9S. However, the R9S is a lot better in terms of picture quality, and the performance is better with a Snapdragon 625 processor. Let’s not forget the awesome battery recharge technology as well. Despite these good points, we still wished OPPO could have been more creative in their design department for it. Seriously, guys.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
For the past one year, it is hard not to relate the word “selfie” with OPPO Malaysia’s smartphones given how the company has been working hard to establish its devices which include F1, F1 Plus, and F1s as the “Selfie Expert” devices. This year though, the company has somehow decided to focus on the power of rear camera with the arrival of R9s in our market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/14/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Mi 5 is a worthy contender, although it doesn’t have the same expandable storage, and the excellent OnePlus 3 is a smidge more expensive, but packs a more powerful Snapdragon 820 chip. In any case, both examples do not have the will to last as long as the R9s.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, Oppo's execution is the best, and this isn't just because of the six-string antenna design (though that's a big part of it). The R9s has the same screen size as the iPhone 7 Plus, but you wouldn't guess it - the Oppo is so much more compact and lighter. The fingerprint reader is faster than Apple's too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Source: Lowyat.net EN→FR Archive.org version
True to its promise, OPPO today has unveiled two new smartphones called R9s and R9s Plus. As indicated by their names, these new devices are generally the successor to the R9 (released in Malaysia as F1 Plus) and R9 Plus smartphones which themselves were just launched around seven months ago.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/19/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 50% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 100%
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/14/2016
Source: Webriyota.com TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: TechZ VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/16/2017
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
625:
SoC ARM milieu de gamme octo-cœur Cortex-A53 cadencé jusqu’à 2 GHz, intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 506. SoC gravé selon un procédé d'une finesse de 14nm. Embarque un contrôleur mémoire DDR3L-1866 et un modem X9 LTE (Cat 7).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
82.4%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.