var $extPath="typo3conf/ext/nbc2bestprice/";
Notebookcheck Logo

Nokia Lumia Icon

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Nokia Lumia Icon
Nokia Lumia Icon (Lumia Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 4 x 2.3 GHz, Krait 400
Carte graphique
Écran
5.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, brillant: oui
Poids
170 g
Prix
500 euros

 

Price comparison

Note moyenne: 80% - Bon
Moyenne de 6 notes (à partir de 11 critiques)
prix: - %, performances: 80%, équipement: - %, écran: 80% mobilité: - %, finition: 80%, ergonomie: - %, degré de nuisance: - %

Critiques pour le/la Nokia Lumia Icon

Nokia Lumia Icon
Source: Hot Hardware Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Lumia Icon’s overall strong performance might be enough to persuade potential buyers to snap it up. Though, the Icon has a number of additional attractive features that may catch a consumer’s fancy such as well, like the bright, crisp full HD display with beveled edges, or the excellent (for a smartphone) 20MP camera that offers plenty of manual controls and relatively high picture and video quality.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/03/2014
80% Nokia Icon Review
Source: Ubergizmo English Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia Icon is a wonderful Windows Phone device, which is well designed and great to use. It could be a strong phone if you like the OS in general, or if your activities are very much focused on email, mobile photography, web browsing — plus other apps that you need. At a price point of $199 (with contract) to $550 (without contract), there is plenty of very worthy competitors that run on a similar hardware platform. Of course Nokia has a slight advantage when compared to others, thanks to an impressive display and camera, but it’s really about how you want to use it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/31/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%
80% Nokia Lumia Icon review
Source: Stuff TV Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia Lumia Icon is probably the best Windows Phone around at the moment: it bests the Lumia 1020 in every major respect except looks and camera skills, boasts quad-core power and a fantastic screen. And it isn’t even particularly pricey. That being said, the spec is just a little bit "best of 2013", we have little doubt the coming 2014 crop of new Windows smartphones from Nokia and elsewhere may surpass it on specs and design. And that means, in the end, that the lack of availability on this side of the pond may end up being only a fleeting loss.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/16/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% finition: 80%
90% Verizon Nokia Lumia Icon review: There's a new Windows Phone champ on the block
Source: Zdnet.com Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia now has Windows Phone devices with internal specs matching the leading smartphones. They take it further with their advanced camera, fantastic display, and more and the Lumia Icon is an excellent smartphone to consider.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/05/2014
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Nokia Lumia Icon Review: Verizon does Windows Phone better than before
Source: Mobileburn Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Lumia Icon is almost the best Lumia smartphone to date. The only thing holding it back is that the Lumia 1020 has a better camera and the Lumia 925 has a better body. Still, it's in the elite company of being a Windows Phone that I could actually see myself using on a daily basis. Were it not for my reliance on Google services, there would be very little to complain about. Windows Phone's shortcomings have been chipped away at a slow pace, but there are fewer reasons to take issue than there have been in the past.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/28/2014
80% Nokia Lumia Icon review: The best Windows Phone so far
Source: PC World Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia Lumia Icon for Verizon remains the best Windows Phone we've tested in 2014, noticeable shutter lag and a nagging lack of applications still hold it back. Owning a Windows Phone, however, still feels like living a year or so behind the rest of the market. If you’re an app fiend, you’d still be better off buying an iPhone or Android phone, which dependably receive third-party apps. But the Icon and Lumia 1520 are clearly the best Windows Phones on the market. Deciding between them simply depends on which size you prefer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/21/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Nokia Lumia Icon Review
Source: Slashgear Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
You could accuse Nokia and Verizon of tempting fate, hopping off the traditional numbered Lumia naming scheme and giving their new phone an ambitious title like Icon. To do so invites all manner of comparisons, and while Nokia's Icon may be one of its more beautifully crafted phones, little things like over-badging, some glitches in how the camera performs, and the overall bulk mean it's not quite ready for sainthood. As with any good icon, then, the Lumia Icon can't simply show up and expect to be worshipped. Nokia will need to make sure the sales staff out in stores are proselytizing its message if it wants what's a great smartphone to get the attention it both needs and deserves.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2014
70% Nokia Lumia Icon
Source: Wired Magazine Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia Lumia Icon is definitely a more grown-up Windows Phone, more austere than earlier Lumias in appearance but just as powerful. And that’s part of the problem. The Icon features almost all the same specs as the larger 6-inch Lumia 1520, but at a more palatable 5-inch screen size. Other than that size reduction and the gradual improvement to the Windows Phone app store, there’s really nothing extra that helps it live up to its name.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/20/2014
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Nokia Lumia Icon Doesn’t Quite Live Up to Its Name
Source: Recode Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
As I mentioned earlier, the Lumia Icon features a quad-core processor, and the smartphone handled all tasks without a problem. Call quality was clear, though the audio can be piercing if you have the volume set on high, as I painfully found out. I didn’t run a formal battery test on the phone, but with moderate usage I was able to go a full day before needing to recharge. Like many of Nokia’s high-end smartphones, the Lumia Icon supports wireless charging. The Lumia Icon is undoubtedly the best Windows Phone device in Verizon’s lineup. But Nokia and Microsoft will need to come up with something more interesting and iconic to convince consumers to switch to the platform.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/20/2014
Nokia Lumia Icon review: a big step forward for Windows Phone
Source: Engadget Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
When Nokia came out with the Lumia 1520, we were treated to a new side of Windows Phone. The Lumia Icon is the solid high-end Windows Phone that we've wanted for a long time. It has an amazing display, great performance and solid imaging capability, but its exclusivity to Verizon will severely limit its appeal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/19/2014
80% Nokia Lumia Icon
Source: Laptop Mag Anglais EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia Icon has everything we're looking for in a Windows Phone. You get a brilliant AMOLED display, a premium (albeit somewhat hefty) design, and fast performance. Plus, the Icon's 20-MP camera lets you get very creative with your photography, both while snapping shots and afterwards. We also appreciate the noise reduction made possible by the four mics.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/12/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Commentaire

Qualcomm Adreno 330:

Puce graphique intégrée prenant en charge les librairies OpenGL ES 3.0

Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.


>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.


800 MSM8974: SoC ARM haut de gamme quad-core cadencé jusqu'à 2.3 GHz intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 330 cadencé jusqu'à 450 MHz. SoC basé sur l'architecture Qualcomm Krait 400, gravé dans procédé d'une finesse de gravure de 28nm HPM.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.


5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).


80%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.


>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Ordinateurs portables similaires avec les mêmes spécifications techniques

Nokia Lumia 930
Adreno 330

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants

Amazon Fire
Adreno 330
Sony Xperia Z1s
Adreno 330

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Fairphone 2
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA
Asus Padfone S PF500KL
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
HTC One M8 Eye
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
Sony Xperia Z3v
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
HTC Desire EYE
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
Motorola Moto X 2014
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Sony Xperia Z3
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
HTC One M8 For Windows
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport
Adreno 330, unknown
ZTE Grand S Pro
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
HTC One E8
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Samsung Galaxy S5 Active
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
Samsung Galaxy S5
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
HTC One M8
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB
Sony Xperia Z2
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique

Xiaomi Mi4
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, 0.50", 0.149 kg
Lenovo ZUK Z1
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, 5.50", 0.175 kg
ZTE Grand S3
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, 5.50", 0.17 kg
OnePlus One
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, 5.50", 0.164 kg
BlackBerry Passport
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB, 4.50", 0.196 kg
LG G3
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, 5.50", 0.149 kg
LG Optimus G Pro 2
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, 5.90", 0.17 kg
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, 4.30", 0.137 kg
Comparaison des prix
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2014-02-18)