Nokia 8
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 13 MPix f/2.0, 1,12 µm, champ de vision de 78,4˚, PDAF, flash écran
Price comparison
Moyenne de 78 notes (à partir de 153 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Nokia 8
Trois lentilles. Avec le Nokia 8, HMD Global redonne vie au finlandais légendaire dans le premium. Au prix raisonnable de 580 euros, le client obtient un appareil de 5,3 pouces bien construit et bien configuré, avec un double appareil photo doté d’une fonctionnalité inédite.
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Alors quelles conclusions tirer de ces quatre mois en compagnie du Nokia 8 ? Et bien que ce retour de Nokia est très réussi. Le Nokia 8 est un excellent smartphone que nous avons eu beaucoup de plaisir à utiliser durant plusieurs semaines. Il est beau, puissant, endurant et intègre Android dans sa version la plus pure. Surtout, son prix est extrêmement abordable et c'est ce qui finit de nous convaincre. Certes l'appareil photo n'est pas à la hauteur des espérances. Mais Nokia et HMD savent se montrer réactifs, le Nokia 8 Sirrocco aura certainement amélioré ce point. En attendant, pour son grand retour, Nokia a rendu une très belle copie. On peut le dire sans cacher notre émotion : Nokia is back !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Les tests plus complets sont en cours. Nos lecteurs analysent plus en détail tous ces points mais également les performances, la qualité de l’appareil photo ou encore l’autonomie du Nokia 8. Rendez-vous très bientôt pour le test complet de nos lecteurs !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/26/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 est un smartphone plaisant et constitue un premier flagship intéressant pour le retour de la marque finlandaise. Certes, son design ne présente pas un effet waouh comme on peut l'avoir avec le Samsung Galaxy S8 et son écran Infinity mais il reste assez attractif pour convaincre de nombreux utilisateurs. On se retrouve aussi séduit par son potentiel vidéo, particulièrement par le Bothie, son autonomie et les mises à jour rapides.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Clubic Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 est un très bon smartphone, pour qui recherche avant tout un terminal performant, agréable à prendre en mains, et très simple d'utilisation. Le dernier-né de la gamme HMD Global affiche en revanche un look très classique, sans la moindre originalité, mais il profite en contrepartie d'une excellente préhension et d'un très bon niveau d'assemblage. On reste en revanche sur notre faim en ce qui concerne la section Photo, assez moyenne globalement, ainsi que sur quelques détails comme le capteur ID qui manque de vélocité, une petite tendance à la chauffe ou encore quelques petits bugs logiciels.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 60%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 est un bon téléphone. Il a un design soigné et un bel écran. En plus de cela, il profite de performances de haute voltige et d'une autonomie très satisfaisante. Grâce à tous ces éléments, le flagship de HMD renvoie une image globalement positive. Et c'est ce que l'on retient essentiellement à la fin de ce test.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Nokia signe son grand retour avec son Nokia 8. Ce premier flagship de la marque a atterri quelques minutes dans nos mains, de quoi nous permettre de vous délivrer nos toutes premières impressions.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 ne sera pas le meilleur smartphone de l’année, mais il n’a pas besoin de l’être pour être un smartphone réussi. Ne pas succomber à la mode du borderless semble avoir permis à HMD de garder un prix raisonnable pour un smartphone haut de gamme.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/31/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 me plaît bien. Certes, quand on le voit on n'a pas un effet waouh comme on peut l'avoir avec le Samsung Galaxy S8 et son écran Infinity, mais avec son tarif de 599 euros l'appareil arrive sur le marché avec un bon prix. On oublie presque l'absence de certification IP68 tant on se retrouve impressionné par son potentiel vidéo, particulièrement par le Bothie, son prix attractif et les mises à jour rapides ne font qu'enfoncer le clou.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/21/2017
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→FR Archive.org version
Above all, it proves that HMD Global is on the right track as the Nokia 8 is a commendable effort on its part for the brand’s return to the flagship market. It leaves us with the hope that the company will be able to deliver better flagships that hold their own against rivals in the coming years.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/02/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8 is an easy to carry smartphone along with the decent features and specifications available in the high price value. The market has already so many smartphones with these features but in less price value. So, if you love Nokia so much then you must go for it otherwise except Bothie feature and QHD display it is offering nothing new.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 66% prix: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall though I was impressed with the Nokia 8. It costs around £500 SIM free in the UK. You have a chance to get a stunning looking device that packs a lot of punch. However, you may find it hard to compete with devices such as OnePlus with their 5T considering the better camera, dual SIM, 8GB RAM and 128GB storage for the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/05/2018
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8 est selon lecteurs un très bon smartphone. L’écran les a séduit, tout comme l’interface ou encore l’autonomie. Toutefois le haut de gamme de la marque a quelques petits défauts comme l’appareil photo qui pourrait être amélioré ou le design qui pourrait être plus proche des standards d’aujourd’hui. Comme l’explique très bien Sébastien (qui lui octroie la note de 4/5), « le Nokia 8 est un bel appareil, non exempt de petits défauts, mais qui ramène Nokia sur le marché des smartphones ». Le retour de Nokia est donc réussi et devra être confirmé en 2018.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Living with the Nokia 8 day in, day out is generally a good experience. Overall this is a good first effort for a flagship Android device. Let's not forget that despite Nokia's long history in mobile, that's exactly what it is - the first ever Nokia-branded top of the line model running Google's OS. The Nokia 8 has a good build, is easy to handle, and it feels quite premium with its metal unibody fit and finish.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/02/2018
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 offers a lot of great features such as a powerful chipset, dual-sensor camera and a perfectly sized QHD display, but compared to a lot of the competition right now it struggles to offer anything unique. With a super-high price point, the Nokia 8 is a good phone but far from a great one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/29/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8 is a stellar device from HMD Global and it almost checks all the right boxes for the first Nokia-branded flagship. HMD should be proud of what they made created in terms of build quality and software update cycle for an Android-based device. But the 'almost' part is problematic as the areas with issues are massive.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/29/2018
Notes: Note globale: 76% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
A safe return to the flagship smartphone market for Nokia, but it will need to do more with its next effort if the brand is to stand out among the elite like it once did.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/24/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→FR Archive.org version
If you can bag a bargain and get it between $500-600, then it’s a different story with competition more from OPPO, Samsung Galaxy A5/7, Moto G, Alcatel 4/5 and LG G6. Here it will likely outperform all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 100% finition: 70%
Source: DxOMark EN→FR Archive.org version
With top-end processing components, a 5.3-inch QHD IPS display, and an IP54-rated aluminum uni-body, the Nokia 8 is a high-end device inside and out, but the performance of its camera module lags behind our (admittedly high) expectations. The Nokia is capable of producing decent still images, but in many situations, it cannot match the image quality of the cameras in current high-end phones from most competitors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 is a flagship spec phone at mid-range price, and while it offers pure Android that's fast to update, the phone experience doesn't really raise itself above the average. It's a nice pure Android handset and you get a lot for your money, but it's not the best flagship experience out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8 is an easy to carry smartphone along with the decent features and specifications available in the high price value. The market has already so many smartphones with these features but in less price value. So, if you love Nokia so much then you must go for it otherwise except Bothie feature and WQHD display it is offering nothing new.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Reg Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
Having had a hands-on already, I didn't have high expectations from the Nokia 8, but it was a nice surprise. The proposition was interesting at £499, but looks quite compelling at £399. I'd like to see more originality from the company, but as a first flagship it's a promising start.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite the Nokia 8’s issues with its camera, its still a perfectly decent flagship for people not keen on dropping more than 30K for a new flagship. Its small size makes it extremely handy and easy to use one-handed, and it’s more than a match for most of the newer flagships today.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/19/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Nokia 8 is a well-rounded package with top-notch performance, an understated elegance, and a darn good camera. All that at the price of a mid-range flagship where it competes with the likes of Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, OnePlus 5, and Honor 8 Pro – each one with more than one standout features. Yet, it is the only one in the segment that offers pure and up-to-date Android experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/13/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Although the Nokia 8 offers some decent specs for the price, it's just not a device that stands out in a crowded market. Build quality should be better and the fingerprint scanner can be a real pain.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The only question that remains is whether, in 2017, there’s much appetite in the market for another high-end handset. It’s a long time since the Nokia brand alone was enough to sell phones. Even so, the Nokia 8 is, on its own merits, a worthy rival to the established giants of the market. It might not fully re-establish the prestige of the Nokia of old, but it’s a big, confident stride in the right direction.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Nokia 8 is quite a decent flagship. For its price of RM2299 featuring a sleek full metal design running on pure stock Android, dual rear cameras that capture great photos, excellent battery performance and maybe that #Bothie feature you may like, the Nokia 8 is pretty much worth it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8 comes with a price tag of Rs 35,999 and it offers all the high-end features and specifications that a flagship should have. It has the latest processor, dual camera setup, fast charging and an impressive metal body design. It also performs well and is a value-f or- money smartphone. If you are willing to spend above Rs 35,000 then you can definitely consider buying a Nokia 8. Those looking for alternatives can go for the OnePlus 5 which is also available at a similar price tag.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
If you don’t mistake it for “the next big thing” and just accept it as it is - a great value Android phone – the Nokia 8 is a safe choice that will do what a phone does well. But it’s hard to recommend it with so many other excellent phones to choose from.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The only question that remains is whether, in 2017, there’s much appetite in the market for another high-end handset. It’s a long time since the Nokia brand alone was enough to sell phones. Even so, the Nokia 8 is, on its own merits, a worthy rival to the established giants of the market. It might not fully re-establish the prestige of the Nokia of old, but it’s a big, confident stride in the right direction.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia made its name selling no-nonsense phones that were built to last, and while the ownership of the mobile brand might have changed hands, the Nokia 8 is a smartphone that would have been a worthy addition to the lineup of the Finnish company even in its heyday. It offers good build quality, a great display, excellent performance with stock Android, the promise of regular updates, first-class battery life, and good cameras with some neat tricks. On the flip-side, some might find the design boring, it isn’t fully waterproof like many competitors are, and the low-light camera performance could’ve been better.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa EN→FR Archive.org version
A great battery, a fantastic display and a speedy experience. There is really very little to fault the Nokia 8 on, so little in fact that we’re giving HMD Global full marks for this handset.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 is well made, although it lacks any design features that make it stand out from the crowd (unless you count the reflective copper finish on my review unit). It offers excellent battery life and a very good 5.3-inch screen. It's nice to see pure Android 7 on board, which should bode well for a fast upgrade to Android 8 (Oreo).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Bill Bennett EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD position the Nokia 8 as a premium Android phone. Yet it is well behind the best from rivals like Samsung, Huawei and Sony. It’s not a patch on this year’s or last year’s iPhones either.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8 has some positives, including the design and build quality, the display. The performance of the device is also fast, similar to other phones running this processor. But given the competition in this price range, Nokia 8 is not yet a flagship killer. In the camera department, I feel it has a long way to go before it can challenge either Apple or Samsung.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Let’s say this again… Nokia is back! HMD Global has done a wonderful job with the Nokia 8 and it is without a doubt one of the best devices in its price band. There’s no gimmicks here, the design is understated and elegant. The software is virtually untouched and the camera is pretty darn good. The Nokia 8 chooses a safe path and offers a reliable no-nonsense experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
To put it simply. The Nokia 8 is not cutting-edge. Nor is it glamorous. But it is elegant, refined and solid. The smartphone looks classy, is very durable, is extremely fast, slick and fluid and has cameras that produce great images. All for a mouth-watering price tag of Rs 36,999. You simply cannot go wrong.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Tech Girl EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia 8 is definitely not the worst smartphone on the market right now, it is also nowhere near the best. It feels and acts like a first time phone and that just isn’t good enough. While I enjoyed taking a break from my iPhone and playing with the Nokia 8, I worry that that was more nostalgia based because the child in me WANTED it to be great. But truth? I cannot wait to switch on my iPhone again and put the Nokia back in the nostalgic part of my memories, where it belongs. Oh and I’m also about to start a campaign to #freethebothie because I need that dual live streaming back in my life. I’ve lived in a world with it and now I just don’t want to go back!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/04/2017
Source: Soycincau EN→FR Archive.org version
If you were one of the people who thought that when Nokia launches its first flagship Android smartphone, they would remind the world why they were the best all those years ago. That they would spank the likes of Samsung and Apple, then I’d hate to be the one to break it to you but the Nokia 8 is not that phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
A safe return to the flagship smartphone market for Nokia, but it will need to do more with its next effort if the brand is to stand out among the elite like it once did.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Tech Smart EN→FR Archive.org version
There's a lot to like about the Nokia 8. Its design is sleek and refined, with a number of noteworthy specifications to ensure it is never underpowered or found wanting. Add to that a sub-R10k price tag, which is hard to find for a flagship phone these days, and the Nokia 8 is a great all-round device for the more cost savvy consumer out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 isn’t the best phone on the market right now, but it offers a lot of the features you expect from a great device in a well designed package with a retro name.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia, a brand once synonymous with mobile phones, made a comeback in January this year, courtesy HMD Global, the Finnish firm that develops and markets smartphones and feature phones under the “Nokia” brand name. Ever since the resurrection, it’s been a long wait for an Android smartphone that blended Nokia’s expertise in design and camera, and specifications that could take on the likes of flagships from Samsung and LG. After wooing the budget market with Nokia 3, Nokia 5 and Nokia 6, HMD Global launched the Nokia 8 in August, the most premium smartphone from the company so far.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/27/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
In terms of specifications, the Nokia 8 is a powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC, which powers nearly all other Android flagships of this generation. It comes with 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage, and support for microSD cards of up to 256GB capacity. As expected, India gets the dual SIM variant of the smartphone (1 nano-SIM + 1 nano-SIM/ 1 microSD card). Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for a detailed review of the Nokia 8.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/27/2017
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
A decent all-rounder, the dual-camera Nokia 8 gets the job done, but it doesn’t come close to today’s true Android stars.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% performances: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The success of the Nokia 8 will come down to price, which currently sits at €599. If that translates to around £549, it’s immediately taking on the OnePlus 5, and I’m not entirely convinced that’s a battle the Nokia 8 can win.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/07/2017
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
While the Nokia 8 is technically competent, there's little here to inspire or excite. For added extra features, the similarly priced Google Pixel represents a more attractive option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global’s accomplished something pretty special with the Nokia 8. It’s a big statement from a company that’s not even a year old, that they intend to be a serious contender at the high end of the market just as much as the low. Here’s hoping that the followup to the Nokia 8 will hit it out of the park.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/04/2017
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s easy to imagine an alternate reality where another, lesser, version of this device coasts along on the novelty of the Nokia brand. However, that’s not the case with the Nokia 8 that HMD have brought to market. There’s so much more to like about the Nokia 8 than just the mere nostalgia factor behind it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
I can’t shake the feeling that the Nokia 8 is a disappointment. It just doesn’t deliver on the stuff it claims it can do and lacks the ambition to truly establish itself as a flagship contender. In other words, it is the Arsenal of smartphones.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 offers a lot of great features such as a powerful chipset, dual-sensor camera and a perfectly sized QHD display, but compared to a lot of the competition right now it struggles to offer anything unique. With a super-high price point, the Nokia 8 is a good phone but far from a great one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/28/2017
Source: T Break EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 is a new chapter for the company’s re-entry into the premium smartphone segment. The device looks elegant and packs the fastest hardware available for this year. Although, the large bezels are going to be a problem for those who were expecting a great alternative for the Galaxy S8. That said, it’s good to see that Nokia’s first Android flagship is the world’s first to feature a dual-lens ZEISS camera. The new “Bothie” function is something we will have to wait and see if users are willing to use in the long run.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 85% performances: 90% finition: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
It's not by a stroke of luck that Nokia 8 is where it is today. It's hard work, respect of tradition and putting years of knowledge and experience to good use. It's long-standing partnerships too - like that with Zeiss.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Nokia 8 is a solid flagship device. Some smart hardware and a bit of vanilla Android marry together for a pleasing enough everyday user experience. And while the dual-lens camera isn’t the best out there, it’s perfectly good for capturing treasured memories (although a software update or two wouldn’t go amiss).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The success of the Nokia 8 will come down to price, which currently sits at €599. If that translates to around £549, it’s immediately taking on the OnePlus 5, and I’m not entirely convinced that’s a battle the Nokia 8 can win.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/21/2017
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Nokia 8 offers flagship-tier hardware, along with a dual rear-camera system that's created in collaboration with Zeiss optics. It will also offer some subtle, but practical features, along with stock Android OS for the purists among us. Our hands-on deconstructs some of these points.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 retails for €599, and while no UK pricing has yet been announced, current conversion rates put that at a minimum of £545. In practise, it's much more likely to be closer to £600, which puts it firmly in the same price bracket as the Pixel and around £150 more expensive than the OnePlus 5 - which matches its capabilities virtually identically.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
We liked the Nokia 8 a lot, it's an attractive flagship with a number of interesting features, made even more tempting by a competitive price (€599 / approx. £550).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
Therefore, Nokia 8 has good performance, especially in heat dissipation. It is said that Nokia 9 will start to sell officially in September, its official price is at 599 euros, will you consider buying?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: The Independent EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 goes on sale in early September with networks announced nearer to the time and an initial SIM-free price point of €599 (£545) – noticeably lower than most top-of-the-range from rival manufacturers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Upon first impressions, the Nokia 8 is a flagship that comes with everything you’d expect from a top of the range phone right now. There isn’t a standout feature to make you want to snap up the Nokia 8 though, and with such strong flagship competition right now it may be difficult to recommend this over alternatives.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
For us, the Nokia 8 is the device we've been waiting for since the company announced its plans to get back into the game. The competition is fierce and the Nokia 8 doesn't offer a huge amount that's unique. The build quality and specification can be found elsewhere and there's almost nothing on the software front to make it unique - unlike phones from the dominant Samsung.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
Sure, it might have a similar look, but the 8 feels a world apart from Nokia’s three other smartphones. The leap in build quality, hardware and general design is huge, and the dual camera tech shows plenty of promise.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD is targeting millennial content creators with the Nokia 8, an influential group to be sure. But are they old enough to remember Nokia in its glory days? We sure do and we're glad to have the brand back (less glad to have Nokia pricing back, though).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
We'll have to wait to properly test the Nokia in our full review to decide on whether it's a wise purchase over the S8 or OnePlus 5. A price closer to or below $600, £500 or AU$750 would really help sweeten the deal. There's no question, however, that splashing that top-end cash will snag you a top-end phone that's absolutely worth considering, particularly if you have any sort of nostalgia for the Nokia name.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
For a killer feature, I’m not sure that the bothie mode is really anything that couldn’t be accomplished on any other device with the right app (*cough* gimmick *cough*), but having the feature so readily available means that more users will be likely to try it and it is a good way to showcase what the phone is really all about.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/16/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/03/2018
Source: Android User DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2017
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 87%
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Verivox DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% équipement: 100% ergonomie: 93%
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 93% performances: 84% équipement: 96% écran: 97% mobilité: 99%
Source: RP-Online DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/06/2017
Source: Connect
Critique simple, , Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100% équipement: 100% ergonomie: 100%
Source: Heute DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/28/2017
Source: PocketPC DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/16/2017
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 95% prix: 93% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 94% écran: 90% mobilité: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/19/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/18/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 80% équipement: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/25/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 90% écran: 93% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: El Confidencial ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/26/2017
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/02/2017
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/27/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/25/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 65% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 65% finition: 70% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/26/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Tech Different IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 65% ergonomie: 65%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/03/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/30/2018
Source: Geek 4 You IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: InstaNews IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/10/2017
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/03/2017
Source: Techstation.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2017
Source: Panorama IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/27/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2017
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 80% équipement: 90% écran: 83% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% écran: 83% mobilité: 70% finition: 79%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/09/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/19/2018
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/20/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/29/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/26/2017
Source: All About Phones NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87% performances: 95% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% équipement: 75%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 79% performances: 90% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Tekno Seyir TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/12/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Teknokulis TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: Log.com.tr TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81%
Source: Mobileimho.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/09/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/21/2017
Source: CZC CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/25/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/16/2017
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: TechZ VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/03/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: Tinh Te VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Dinside NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/03/2017
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 55%
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/01/2018
Notes: Note globale: 82% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/09/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android Portal SK→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/22/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 95% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/14/2017
Source: Puhelinvertailu →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 540:
Carte graphique intégrée dans le SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Architecture légèrement optimisée par rapport à l'Adreno 530, mais avec une fréquence d'horloge plus élevée grâce au nouveau procédé 10 nm. Une des cartes graphiques pour smartphones Android la plus rapide début 2017.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 835:
SoC haut de gamme pour smartphones, lancé début 2017, et fabriqué par Samsung en 10 nm LPE FinFET. Intègre 4 cœurs Kryo 280 cadencés à 2,45 GHz (max.) pour les performances, et 4 cœurs Kryo 280 cadencés à 1,9 GHz (max.) économes. Est également équipé d'un modem LTE X16, du Wifi ac et d'un contrôleur mémoire LPDDR4x 32 bits double canal.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.30": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
79.48%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.