Nokia 8.1
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 20 MPix f/2,0
Price comparison
Moyenne de 44 notes (à partir de 94 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Nokia 8.1
HMD Global positionne le Nokia 8.1 comme un appareil du haut du milieu de gamme. Il coûte cependant 400 €, ce qui le met en vue des flagships de l’an dernier. Lisez notre rapport de test pour voir ce que le Nokia 8.1 propose, et comment il se mesure à la concurrence.
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Ce Nokia à la sauce HMD n’est pas loin d’être un excellent téléphone. Toutefois, il souffre du syndrome qui touche la majorité des produits Nokia. Si le design est soigné, tout comme la qualité de fabrication, ses entrailles ne sont pas à l’image de la robe. La puissance se révèle suffisante, mais un peu juste dans un segment de prix (399 euros) très concurrentiel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Ce Nokia à la sauce HMD n’est pas loin d’être un excellent téléphone. Toutefois, il souffre du syndrome qui touche la majorité des produits Nokia. Si le design est soigné, tout comme la qualité de fabrication, ses entrailles ne sont pas à l’image de la robe. La puissance se révèle suffisante, mais un peu juste dans un segment de prix (399 euros) très concurrentiel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8.1 est un smartphone de milieu de gamme élégant qui est plus agréable en main que presque tous les smartphones de ce prix. Le logiciel Android One est un gros plus et les fans d'Android apprécieront d'y trouver Pie. Certes, l'appareil photo arrière n'est pas excellent mais celui situé à l'avant est très bon.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Nokia et HMD Global ont-ils abusé des effets d’annonce ? La réponse est " NON" ! Le Nokia 8.1 est bien la "référence photo" de la marque. Mais il a d’autres atouts lui permettant de figurer parmi les meilleurs de sa catégorie. Ses performances sont à la hauteur des attentes, son interface est fluide et légère, son autonomie est exemplaire et son écran est le meilleur LCD dans ce segment de prix. À 399 euros, difficile (pour ne pas dire impossible) de trouver plus complet que le Nokia 8.1. Même s’il n’est pas parfait (peu d’options de personnalisation, glissant dans sa prise en main) ses petits défauts sont vite pardonnés tant il est séduisant au quotidien. Nous recommandons chaudement ce Nokia 8.1, sans aucune hésitation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8.1 est le digne successeur du Nokia 7 Plus et un joli coup de coeur sur le segment milieu de gamme. L'appareil additionne les bons points comme un bel écran lumineux, un design premium, un logiciel à jour et une très bonne autonomie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 8.1 est le digne successeur du Nokia 7 Plus et un joli coup de coeur sur le segment milieu de gamme. L'appareil additionne les bons points comme un bel écran lumineux, un design premium, un logiciel à jour et une très bonne autonomie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Even if it took over 7 months for HMD Global to officially bring the Nokia 8.1 to the Philippines, their mid-range offering remains to be competitive against its rivals with its PureDisplay screen, Snapdragon 710 processor, and dual Zeiss cameras. While it has shortcomings with its ginormous notch and so-so gaming performance, that does not stop us from considering the Nokia 8.1 as a great follow-up to last year’s Nokia 7 Plus.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/22/2019
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
With our initial time with the phone, the Nokia 8.1 felt snappy and smooth, free of any lags even if we switch through various apps and games in between. We will be doing our usual barrage of tests that includes several games to see if the Nokia 8.1 lives up to expectations. Like all Nokia phones, the Nokia 8.1 comes with a stock, bloatware-free version of Android Pie. Being part of the Android One program, the Nokia 8.1 is guaranteed to receive Android Q and Android R in the future, along with three years of security updates.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2019
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
Although released a little late in the Philippines, the Nokia 8.1 is a competent smartphone that has the guts to go up against other devices in the mid-range section. It has an impressive display, speedy CPU performance unmarred by lags, modest audio quality, Stock Android, and decent camera quality. Despite the fact that it has an outdated bar notch design, poor speaker location, a frustrating user interface, and seemingly artificial-looking selfies, it can be overlooked when you’ve got a solid performer in your hands.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2019
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
If you’re after a mid range device that look like a high end phone without the price tag or after a BYO device, then the Nokia 8.1 could be a potential choice. Otherwise it might be worth looking at other Nokia devices such as the 7.1 or possibly even the Nokia 5.1 Plus for a slightly cheaper model.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
There are some I can recommend the device to; obviously the Nokia fans out there, those who can’t easily access the aforementioned deals on other devices, those who can get a good price or discount, and just those who want a nice phone and may love the design regardless of the competition. However, I really must emphasise that there are perhaps better deals to be had; if I were in the market around the Nokia 8.1’s price range today I would undoubtedly buy a different device – probably a OnePlus flagship – and that’s sad. The Nokia 8.1 is a fantastic phone let down by an overreaching price tag which will sadly hold it back from the greatness it could so easily achieve were it more reasonably priced.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2019
Source: Sydney Morning Herald EN→FR Archive.org version
All that aside, this is an incredibly solid smartphone that delivers one of the best Android experiences you can get. The software is near identical to that on the Nokia 7.1, so those hunting for the least expensive way to get pure Android in a stylish package will likely still look there. But the 8.1 offers a bigger and nicer screen, much better performance and improved cameras for its extra $200, which is an attractive proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/18/2019
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 has a lot going for it, but it's still an odd phone. The design is generally good - apart from its inability to stay on a shelf - and we like the camera experience. But it's a phone that feels too expensive compared to the rest of the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
Another modern HMD handset that offers the usual winning combination of slick design, solid specs and delightfully clean software.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Offering a fantastic screen, a great camera and a lovely design for less than £400 all-in, the Nokia 8.1 is a bit of a bargain. It's only beaten by the Xiaomi Pocofone F1, which offers improved performance at an even cheaper price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Team Android EN→FR Archive.org version
HMD Global, Nokia’s parent brand, has witnessed impressive growth within the highly competitive Android smartphone market since it was founded couple of years back, which is all thanks to its amazing mid-tier and budget offerings. Expanding, HMD Global recently added Nokia 8.1 to its diverse lineup. We got some hands-on time with the new phone at its global launch event in Dubai last month but after thoroughly testing it and using it as a daily driver, here is our in-depth review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/31/2019
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
You may be disappointed that this isn’t a true follow-up to the original Nokia 8, but the Nokia 8.1 is trying to be something different and it succeeds at exactly that. It’s a top of the mid-range phone that we found to do everyday tasks surprisingly well if not particularly majestically.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
At its price, the Nokia 8.1 faces competition from mid-range flagship smartphones like the Asus Zenfone 5Z or the Pocophone F1 with a Snapdragon 845 chipset and better RAM and storage combinations, but the performance delta isn’t much for most users to compromise on the Android One experience that only the former offers – all that packed in a stylish chassis. Most people want a great phone, not just a brilliant specifications sheet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
And if you are a stock Android enthusiast, well, we daresay there will be those who will be tempted by the Xiaomi Mi A2 (review), which has better cameras although the 8.1 comfortably outguns it in terms of design and battery life. In fact, truth be told, we are not too sure if the Nokia 8.1 itself is a massive step forward from the Nokia 7 Plus (review), which remains perhaps the best phone we have seen from Nokia in its new avatar. In fact, the 8.1 falls somewhere between the 8 and the 7 Plus, with some design refinements brought to the table – and its rivals number everyone from the Moto One Power to the Mi A2 to the Poco F1 to the Honor Play to…you get the idea.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Team Android EN→FR Archive.org version
We will be unboxing the new Nokia 8.1 and sharing our initial impressions on the new high-end Android One smartphone from HMD Global which was initially launched back in December. To understand the Nokia 8.1 it is important to first begin with the smartphone it is succeeding or replacing from HMD’s current lineup. In a bid to standardize the naming convention, HMD has decided that the new Nokia 8.1 is actually a successor to the Nokia 7.1 Plus and not the Nokia 8. From this, we can relate that the new smartphone is not the brand’s premiere flagship but a high-end smartphone that sits below the flagship line — which is to be announced soon. We have the device with us and here is our complete unboxing — you can also view our unboxing video on YouTube as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/16/2019
Source: The Times of India EN→FR Archive.org version
At Rs 26,999, Nokia 8.1 does not have a lot of competition. There’s Poco F1 with superior Snapdragon 845 processor but the Xiaomi phone has cut too many corners to keep the prices low. Nokia 8.1 looks good and delivers near excellent performance. If you don’t have a budget for OnePlus 6T and don’t want to settle with a budget phone, Nokia 8.1 is worth investing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 caters to a mid-range buyer and aims to provide a true mid-range smartphone. One that delivers a better camera, better video recording and a brand-new chipset in a package that has been designed to delight. Oh, and did I mention stock Android and faster software updates thanks to the Android One program? The Nokia 8.1 seems to have it all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/17/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 85% finition: 80%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 8.1 is an impressive device by all accounts. The performance is smooth, the camera delivers pleasing photos in most scenarios, while the battery life should keep most users happy. There are very little flaws here, except that HMD Global has only introduced one variant with the base 4GB RAM and 64GB storage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
When we reviewed the Nokia 8.1 Sirocco, we had said that the ..
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/14/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8 is no longer a flagship product and if you can digest that, you will be pleasantly surprised by how good this mid-ranged phone is. It has a good screen and camera, performs quite well and lasts you more than a day on a full charge. And it doesn't break the bank doing so.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone can be seen as an upgrade over the usual low-cost options in terms of its material and construction quality, style, display, and cameras – the latter in the daytime, at least. Some users might also be willing to pay a little more for the Nokia name. There is a lot to like about the Nokia 8.1, but most of the things that give it its appeal can also be found in phones that cost much less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/11/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 takes the elements that made the Nokia 7 Plus great, while offering much-needed upgrades as we head into 2019. The Snapdragon 710 ensures there's no shortage of power, the 3500mAh battery easily delivers over a day's worth of use, and the camera holds its own in this segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 may bother consumers who feel that competition like the Poco F1 offers a flagship-level chipset for much lower. But the SD710 chipset handles real-world performance as smooth as a flagship phone, and you get the added benefit of a better design language as well. The Zeiss optics marginally improves low-light camera performance, but the cameras are largely impressive. To top it off, HMD has priced the Nokia 8.1 at an incredibly competitive price of Rs 26,999.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2018
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 sits pretty between the mid-range smartphone segment and the ‘flagship killers’. It’s a well-rounded smartphone that tries to punch above the specifications sheet thanks to Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 processor that aces the performance bit.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To conclude, the Nokia 8.1 is a pretty interesting device to watch for. The phone features a premium design and display looks sharp. The hardware is up to the mark and the software gives pure stock Android experience. As for the competition is concerned, the phone will face a stiff competition from the likes of Vivo V11 Pro and more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 8.1 is a no-brainer. It does not rely on gimmicks or fads to try and woo you. At its core, this is a phone that focusses on the essentials and delivers a great camera, good performance, excellent battery life and an absolutely clean build of Android with a promise of long-term support. Priced at Rs. 26,999, the phone offers tremendous value for money and is highly recommended if you’re looking for a new smartphone in the sub Rs. 30,000 segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 80% écran: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 72% équipement: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 83% performances: 72% mobilité: 91% finition: 86%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 88% équipement: 71% écran: 94% mobilité: 93%
Source: Connect - 3/19
Critique simple, , De taille moyenne, Date: 02/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% équipement: 76% mobilité: 87% ergonomie: 75%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/05/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/05/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/20/2019
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 70% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/14/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 59% équipement: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/23/2019
Source: Techzine NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/26/2019
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 90% écran: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/21/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/21/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/04/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/11/2019
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 71% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/17/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/17/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/28/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/11/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/27/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/22/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/19/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/07/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/06/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/05/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/31/2018
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/29/2018
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/25/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/23/2018
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/19/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/10/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 73% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Computerblog.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/25/2019
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 616:
Carte graphique intégrée (dans le Snapdragon 710) basée sur l'architecture Adreno 600. Selon Qualcomm, jusqu'à 30 % plus rapide que la génération précédente (Adreno 512 dans le Snapdragon 660). Prend en charge DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 710:
SoC ARM rapide du milieu de gamme, avec 8 cœurs CPU Kryo 260 (deux cœurs puissants 2,2 GHz dans un clusteur, et six cœurs économes en énergie) et un GPU Adreno 616 plutôt lent. Gravé en 10 nm.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.18": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
79.13%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.