Nokia 6
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, angle 84°
Price comparison
Moyenne de 52 notes (à partir de 108 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Nokia 6
Des nouvelles de Finlande. Avec le Nokia 6, Nokia lance dans la course son modèle le plus haut de gamme actuel. Le smartphone Android de 5,5 pouces est mieux équipé que ses collègues d’entrée de gamme, le Nokia 3 et le Nokia 5, et se situe donc dans le moyen de gamme. Nos tests montrent comment il s’en sort.
Source: Les Mobiles Archive.org version
En revanche, côté point négatif, il y a la plate-forme, un peu chiche. Le Snapdragon 430 aurait au moins mérité un quatrième gigaoctet de mémoire pour fluidifier l’ensemble, à cause de l’écran Full HD principalement. Et le second vrai point négatif est son prix. À 260 euros, de nouveaux mobiles plus ambitieux sont arrivés cette année. Chez Huawei / Honor, chez Motorola ou chez Meizu, par exemple. Sur le milieu de gamme, la guerre est féroce. Et malgré ses belles qualités, sans oublier l’affection que nous portons pour la marque, le Nokia 6 est peut-être arrivé un peu tard. Il faudra donc être plus rapide à l’avenir !
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Si vous cherchez le dernier cri technologique, passez votre chemin. Le Nokia 6 est fait pour ceux qui veulent un très beau téléphone qui réponde aux besoins courants sans vider leur portefeuille. Le Moto G5 Plus de Motorola est une très bonne alternative à un prix équivalent. Il est plus véloce que le Nokia 6, mais ce dernier a un design beaucoup plus réussi. Il vous faudra faire un choix entre une navigation plus fluide et un look d’enfer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le Nokia 6 est un smartphone intéressant qui conviendra aux personnes qui cherchent un téléphone correct sans être particulièrement exigeantes. Entendez par là que ce produit ne se démarque pas par une qualité ou par un défaut particulièrement notable. L'idée générale que l'on en garde est qu'il s'agit d'un smartphone bien fonctionnel, qui remplit son objectif, ni plus ni moins.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Le Nokia 6 est solide, joli et accessible. Cependant, HMD Global fait pourtant une erreur qui le pénalise beaucoup : il ne choisit pas les bons composants. Pour 180 euros, vous pouvez trouver chez Lenovo le Moto G5 qui dispose du mode Slow Motion et de la technologie de recharge rapide. Pour 229 euros, vous trouvez un Honor 6X qui propose davantage d'autonomie et surtout de meilleures performances.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
Nokia est de retour avec un smartphone milieu de gamme, probablement pour attirer ses bons vieux fans avec un appareil costaud, joli et plutôt performant, le tout pour un prix abordable. Nous verrons dans notre test complet ce dont l'appareil est véritablement capable et, s'il est aussi bien qu'il semble l'être, le fabricant devrait préparer un haut de gamme pour affronter des concurrents tels qu'Apple, Samsung et Huawei.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/26/2017
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a mixed bag. It’s better than the Nokia 3 and the 5, but it’s let down by those sharp edges and unimpressive battery. It’s not one for power users, who’ll find the battery runs out of puff long before they do. If you’re not a heavy user or don’t mind the odd bit of battery anxiety the Nokia 6 is a good buy: it’s stylish and generally well specified, with a surprisingly good camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is comfortably the most accomplished of the launch trio of new Nokia phones. If you can stretch to the quite reasonable price tag it’s the Nokia phone we’d recommend you go for thanks to its Full HD display, tidy performance and solid camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techniqued EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 6, priced at Rs 14,999 offers excellent build quality with good design and stock Android along with promised upgrades. But where the device fails is the performance and also the low light camera performance. Nokia 6 is a decent device to buy if you are looking for Nokia brand, but otherwise, there are many other worthy alternatives available.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a conflicting device. There’s a lot to like about it, especially its premium design and solid build quality, but it’s only an average performer. It feels underpowered, especially for what many power users would expect. For those, there are better performing smartphones in the market available in the same price segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 78% écran: 81% mobilité: 80% finition: 86%
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a device with a great design, good display, and decent battery life. But while the design of the device is exciting, everything else looks a bit dull. While there are some positives, there is not anything which would make your jaw drop. The phone is priced at Rs. 14,999 in the market and it is actually on a bit of a hot seat right now, because standing against it are the likes of the Moto G5s Plus, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, the Xiaomi Mi A1, and the Lenovo K8 Note, all of which boast better processors, larger batteries and in some cases, better (and even dual) cameras too. Which leaves the Nokia 6 pretty much in no man’s land. Yes, it retains its traditional values of strength and stability but lags in the experience department. Literally.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 70% performances: 65% finition: 90%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, Nokia 6 has a perfect mix of class, quality, fluidity to be one of the best in the mid-range smartphone segment. Even with few misses including notification light, slight lag on multitasking, and above average camera, Nokia 6 will give other Chinese handsets a good competition. If you want more performance at this price range, you can look out for Moto G5s Plus, Xiaomi Mi A1, Lenovo P2 and others.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/16/2017
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 has a decent design and meets industry standards in terms of battery life, but it is slow and has a poor camera, which makes it difficult to recommend. It's not the phone you should buy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: Techaeris EN→FR Archive.org version
Top notch Nokia build quality and a decent performer all the way around for the $179.99USD price tag. Lockscreen ads may bother some users but I found them easy to tune out. These ads also appear in the notification shade as well but are easy to swipe away, just be aware that there is no way to get rid of them. I would recommend this to those looking to spend less than $200USD on a smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 95% finition: 95%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is trademark Nokia. This is a phone which does not have one strong USP, but this is a phone you will be able to trust and depend upon. This is a phone you know will work every time you turn to it and does not cost a bomb. The mid-range segment has a serious new challenger and I won’t be surprised if this phone ends up being a big success. This is the new no-nonsense phone. Nokia 6 reiterates that a good phone just needs to get the basics right and does not need gimmicks to gain attention.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is an extremely solid offering from HMD Global. It is not a game changer nor is it the best smartphone in its price range. It is among the best, but there are phones that more than match it. It suffers from some performance issues, the back is very scratch prone and the rear camera struggles in low-light.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
After a wait of over six months, the Nokia 6 has finally hit the Indian market. It does seem good enough for most everyday jobs. Its brand, design, and build quality are its biggest highlights. Stock Android is also a nice touch, and the confirmed Android O update is great news too. Music lovers will be happy with the high-quality speakers. However, this phone does have drawbacks in terms of its cameras, battery life, and tendency to get hot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a decent attempt from HMD Global in order to revive the Nokia brand. The smartphone offers a pretty good design and stock Android is an added advantage. However, it lacks a bit in the performance segment. Priced at Rs 14,999, the smartphone will face tough competition from Moto G5 Plus and Lenovo P2 which come at a similar price tag but offer better specifications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a durable phone with a big screen, clean Android software and decent battery life, but it isn’t much else. The initial cost might seem cheap, but there are a lot of strange decisions here that result in an unbalanced phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 60%
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
For $230 it’s really hard to recommend against some other very decently priced phones, but for $180 that decision is much tougher. You’re getting a lot of bang for your buck there, but you have to live with tons of Amazon ads in your face, all the time. That’s not my cup of tea, but if you’re on a budget, give the Nokia 6 a serious look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/21/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the decision really has to be made on what you're looking for in a sub-£200 phone. If design is important, then there's quality in the Nokia 6 that few rivals offer at this price point, plus that big display. At the same time, if you have budget concerns, then the Moto G5 is more wallet-friendly, while the Lenovo P2 is a longer-lasting proposition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s hard to criticise Nokia too much for the ‘6’ here – it’s almost the perfect budget smartphone. Tech geeks might sniff at the microUSB charging port, the stereo cheat for the ‘speakers’, the way a second nanoSIM only gets 2G capabilities, the unremarkable camera, but they’d be missing the point. At £200 all in (in the UK), this gets a less demanding user a full 5.5” FHD display, plenty of RAM and storage, and good enough components all round, including that NFC chip and Android Pay.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The China-specific Nokia 6 was our first encounter with HMD's revived Nokia and it left us with mixed feelings. There was enough to like about the 6: the superb build quality and the all-round great display, but then the camera was beyond meh, and the chipset felt a little underpowered.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/15/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
Because we’re often lucky enough to review high end phones at Ausdroid, it can be difficult to review a low to mid-range device “fairly” while focussing on what would be the target market. But when you’ve got a device like the Nokia 6 in your pocket that often makes you forget that you’re not dealing with a top flight device, in fact a sub $400 phone it’s far easier to do.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 75%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is comfortably the most accomplished of the launch trio of new Nokia phones. If you can stretch to the quite reasonable price tag it’s the Nokia phone we’d recommend you go for thanks to its Full HD display, tidy performance and solid camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The sluggish performance of the Nokia 6 is a nuisance, but its low price and good looks go a long way to make up for it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 50% mobilité: 60% finition: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
It might be the new Nokia’s most expensive offering right now, but the 6 is still strictly stuck in the mid-range. Sure, it’s well built, and has a screen that’s punching above its weight, but it just doesn’t really do anything dramatic to stand out from the crowd.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 6 has great features such as great camera lens, 32GB ROM, and 3GB RAM. The device is packed with full top-notch features and we have tested the device and it has not given us any negative point. Fingerprint Sensor also works very fast and quick Moreover its camera results are brilliant.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 80% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Ultimately, you can’t really go wrong between these four phones; they all have their strengths and weaknesses. If you’re an iPhone SE user, there’s no compelling reason to jump ship to a mid-range Android phone, but if you’re an Android fan then rejoice! Nokia’s back! Let’s just hope that their impending flagship irons out the few software wrinkles we’ve seen here. Since the 6’s main flaw will be replaced with the top of the line Snapdragon, we’re not anticipating any hardware missteps based on what we’ve seen from the otherwise well-equipped Nokia 6.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a difficult one to offer a verdict on because we feel quite torn about it. If this were a smartphone launched by any of the other big players in the smartphone industry right now we’d probably say that it’s a decent smartphone with a really good price tag but nothing particularly outstanding in the current market. But because this is Nokia we’re talking about we’re strangely excited about it. We think it’s going to catch the attention of those who loved their Nokia phones years back thanks to their simplicity and reliability, and with such a great price tag we expect it’ll quickly become a popular choice for smartphone buyers. We’re looking forward to spending more time with the Nokia 6 and its siblings, and we’re intrigued to find out what the future holds for Nokia.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: The Verge EN→FR Archive.org version
The last time you could buy a phone with the word Nokia imprinted on it in the US, Barack Obama was a mere two years into his second term as president, the Chicago Cubs still hadn’t managed to break their century-long dry spell in the World Series, and Apple had yet to sell a single smartwatch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
How about yourself? Is a $50 savings worth it for you to pick up the ad-filled version over the standard, non-ads option? Considering all of the goodies in tow, and factoring in its very inexpensive price point, the Nokia 6 seems like it’ll benefit from being an Amazon Exclusive. After all, how many of us have journeyed to Amazon with a specific price limit in mind only to add an extra $50 or so at the last minute?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/20/2017
Source: Zdnet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Phones as good as the Nokia 6 make me question spending three to four times more for flagships from Samsung, LG, HTC, and Apple. If I wasn't in the business of writing about smartphones, I am very curious if I could do everything I desire with a $200 smartphone. For just $180, the Nokia 6 is an excellent option for a backup phone if you just cannot give up paying $700 to $900 for a flagship.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/10/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a difficult one to offer a verdict on because we feel quite torn about it. If this were a smartphone launched by any of the other big players in the smartphone industry right now we’d probably say that it’s a decent smartphone with a really good price tag but nothing particularly outstanding in the current market. But because this is Nokia we’re talking about we’re strangely excited about it. We think it’s going to catch the attention of those who loved their Nokia phones years back thanks to their simplicity and reliability, and with such a great price tag we expect it’ll quickly become a popular choice for smartphone buyers. We’re looking forward to spending more time with the Nokia 6 and its siblings, and we’re intrigued to find out what the future holds for Nokia.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/04/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 blends premium design, solid specs and an affordable price tag into a handset which could well put the brand back on the mobile map.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/28/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a difficult one to offer a verdict on because we feel quite torn about it. If this were a smartphone launched by any of the other big players in the smartphone industry right now we’d probably say that it’s a decent smartphone with a really good price tag but nothing particularly outstanding in the current market. But because this is Nokia we’re talking about we’re strangely excited about it. We think it’s going to catch the attention of those who loved their Nokia phones years back thanks to their simplicity and reliability, and with such a great price tag we expect it’ll quickly become a popular choice for smartphone buyers. We’re looking forward to spending more time with the Nokia 6 and its siblings, and we’re intrigued to find out what the future holds for Nokia.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 isn't a flagship phone and that will disappoint many who wanted Nokia to come out swinging and take the fight to the big Android brands. At the same time, Nokia is following a strategy that it attempted with the Lumia brand: it's going mass market, punching into the cheaper segment with a quality product. It's lower level Sony and Samsung phones that should be worried, because Nokia has the product and the brand to make this a success.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 blends premium design, solid specs and an affordable price tag into a handset which could well put the brand back on the mobile map.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/31/2017
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 blends premium design, solid specs and an affordable price tag into a handset which could well put the brand back on the mobile map.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/12/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
A phone of many contradictions, this Nokia 6 is. You're paying low-midrange money for it, and yet you're getting wonderful build quality well worthy of a $700 flagship (we may have to re-evaluate our notion of flagship price in light of recent Korean releases, but that's a different story). The Nokia 6 is also very sturdy, as Zack from JerryRigEverything can confirm.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/03/2017
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→FR Archive.org version
Of course, we’ll need to properly put it through its paces to make any real judgement, but it’s certainly true that Motorola, Sony and Samsung might have some competition on their hands.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/01/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 is a difficult one to offer a verdict on because we feel quite torn about it. If this were a smartphone launched by any of the other big players in the smartphone industry right now we’d probably say that it’s a decent smartphone with a really good price tag but nothing particularly outstanding in the current market. But because this is Nokia we’re talking about we’re strangely excited about it. We think it’s going to catch the attention of those who loved their Nokia phones years back thanks to their simplicity and reliability, and with such a great price tag we expect it’ll quickly become a popular choice for smartphone buyers. We’re looking forward to spending more time with the Nokia 6 and its siblings, and we’re intrigued to find out what the future holds for Nokia.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
Well probably not, anyway. My first impressions of it are that it's a fairly standard mid-range Android without any real distinguishing features. And these days, that's unlikely to cut any mustard. Still, maybe I'll like it more when I spend a bit longer with it for a full review. Keep an eye on Stuff for more as we get it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 6 isn't a flagship phone and that will disappoint many who wanted Nokia to come out swinging and take the fight to the big Android brands. At the same time, Nokia is following a strategy that it attempted with the Lumia brand: it's going mass market, punching into the cheaper segment with a quality product. It's lower level Sony and Samsung phones that should be worried, because Nokia has the product and the brand to make this a success.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
We have finally gets our hands on with Nokia first ever Android device, Nokia 6. The Nokia 6 packs a tech spec of 5.5-inch FullHD (1080p) IPS LCD, Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 octa-core processor, 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storagemicroSD slot (up to 256 GB), 16MP f/2.0 main camera, PDAF, 1.0µm pixel size, dual tone flash8MP f/2.0 front camera, 1.12µm pixel size, 84° wide angle lens, Front mounted fingerprint sensor, Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos®, 3000 mAh battery, Android 7.0 Nougat. The is still no official release date and pricing details in Malaysia but you will still able to get it at SatuGadget for RM 1899. Check our the video below for more hands on experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/14/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
In all honesty, if you’re a novice at tinkering with smartphones, we’d recommend that you hold off till the official release of the device since you won’t be able to maximize the use of the Nokia 6. The lack of the global ROM that includes Google Play and other Google services is just too much of a hit to really let us recommend the device for now. Plus, it has a pretty steep asking price at Php 18,590 as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/31/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→FR Archive.org version
In the end, did the Nokia 6 live up to our expectations? Well, if not only for the China-specific ROM and expensive gray market price tag, it is a reputable candidate for those looking for a handsome Android device. We are impressed with the design and camera performance of the handset.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2017
Source: Manila Shaker EN→FR Archive.org version
There are still no announcements as to when the Nokia 6 will officially arrive in Philippine shores. The latest carrier will come in the form of Lazada at a hefty Php18,590 price tag compared to the expected 11,990 based on international retail price. But it’s a tad too hefty for its processing capabilities, if you ask us. Perhaps if we can all calm down and wait for an official distributor with more reasonable pricing? We’ll keep you posted.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2017
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
We’d be remiss if we didn’t talk about the pricing of the Nokia 6 here in the Philippines. Hellotronics initially priced it at Php 18,490, in Lazada, much to the chagrin of many people. Well, we have good news: the next shipment that’s scheduled to arrive after Chinese New Year would be priced considerably lower, so if you want to buy it you’ll have to wait. It’s not like you can buy one now anyway – Hellotronics said that all of their stock for the Nokia 6 is now gone, despite the higher pricing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/04/2018
Source: PocketPC DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/04/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/13/2017
Source: Connect - 10/17
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 74% équipement: 65% mobilité: 78% ergonomie: 77%
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 87% prix: 90% performances: 80% équipement: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 100% ergonomie: 80%
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/21/2017
Source: Verivox DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% équipement: 68% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/27/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/24/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2017
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 87% écran: 92% mobilité: 91%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 73% performances: 50% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/09/2017
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/10/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/02/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/27/2017
Source: Android Mag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/20/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: Media Trends ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/15/2017
Source: Sin Celular ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/26/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/22/2017
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2018
Notes: Note globale: 71%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/16/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% équipement: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/21/2017
Source: Everyeye.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 73%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/13/2017
Source: InstaNews IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 60% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 79% écran: 80% mobilité: 79% finition: 82%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 75% équipement: 65% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 70% équipement: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: Android Style HD IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/31/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/27/2017
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/26/2017
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% écran: 88% mobilité: 74%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/11/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/05/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/22/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/09/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/28/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/10/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/07/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/05/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 66%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
430:
SoC ARM entrée/milieu de gamme octo-cœur Cortex-A53 cadencé jusqu’à 1.4 GHz, intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 505. SoC gravé selon un procédé d'une finesse de 14nm. Embarque un contrôleur mémoire DDR3L-1600 et un modem X6 LTE (Cat 4).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
73.58%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.