Nokia 5.3
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0
Price comparison
Moyenne de 24 notes (à partir de 47 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Nokia 5.3
Le Nokia 5.3 possède quatre capteurs photo, un grand écran, et une grosse autonomie, pour un prix relativement modeste. Mais la concurrence est rude à ce niveau de prix.
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
With a decent camera configuration and a fairly attractive chassis (in spite of its bland colour), the Nokia 5.3 represents a surprising package, especially considering its £130 price tag. Of course, compromises are to be expected when you compare it to mid-tier devices, especially in terms of battery life, hardware and in the display quality. Admittedly, these do add up to the detriment of the overall user experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/22/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 is a good phone if you prefer ease of use to everything else. Otherwise, there is no parameter on which the phone outshines its peers. Its screen looks pixelated, the cameras are mediocre and the performance is good only if you stick to basic functions. The phone has some cleverly implemented features, such as the notification light in the power button and a multi-purpose capacitive fingerprint sensor on the back, but they do not lift the user experience much.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/08/2020
Source: G Style Magazine EN→FR Archive.org version
As an entry-level to mid-tier device, the Nokia 5.3 is actually very good and better than some of the other low-end phones I’ve tested in the past. This thing is fairly snappy for what it has. Not only that, this is a pure Android experience right here with no unnecessary junk installed. Android One also means you’ll be seeing consistent updates as well as the opportunity to update to Android 11.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/06/2020
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 is overall a wholesome package as a device for a starting price of Rs 13,999. The handset may not be a specs powerhouse, however, all in all it is a good performer with almost all parameters when seen individually. Also, courtesy its clean UI, the smartphone even stands apart in the crowd.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 5.3 is a smartphone that you should totally avoid if you are looking for a value for money smartphone right now. The HD+ display is just terrible and In addition to this, it is offering you specifications that are more than one year old. Smartphones like Poco M2, Realme 7, Redmi Note 9 Pro are much better options in this price range and they offer you way better specs than the Nokia 5.3.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/17/2020
Source: Htxt Africa EN→FR Archive.org version
At R4 999 the Nokia 5.3 is an ably equipped smartphone. Unlike previous Nokia devices though, it cannot deliver the same value for money we once expected from this manufacturer, especially as cheaper and more feature-rich devices begin to enter the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/09/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The design and the daylight camera output is what the Nokia 5.3 gets right, and the battery lasts a day. The software too is a good differentiator, provided you can bear with sluggish performance. Where it falters is in gaming, low-light photography and overall performance. All things said and done, you can give this one a skip.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/08/2020
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 64% performances: 40% finition: 54%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Starting at Rs 13,999, Nokia 5.3 is unlikely to impress those looking for some specific features. Its camera is mediocre, the display is large but lacks sharpness, and it ships with a 10W charger (Hello, it’s 2020). That said, Nokia 5.3 isn’t a disappointing phone. The build quality is excellent, the phone’s performance snappy, and the promise of regular software updates is a perk. The problem is there are better phones out there in the market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 is aimed at the sub-Rs. 15,000 price segment, with the main attraction being stock Android and the promise of software updates. This device should stay up to date longer than the competition, so it will suit the needs of people who don't wish to change their phone very often. However, it isn't the strongest performer right now, and will fall further behind as other companies launch newer models.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 is a lackluster option from HMD Global. The design is uninspired and the spec-sheet uncompetitive. The quad-camera setup doesn't inspire much confidence either. The only thing going for the phone is the stock-Android build and a promise of two years of updates, but that might not be enough anymore.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2020
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 features a solid display, all-day battery life, and excellent performance for $200. For $230, we also like the Moto G Power, which offers even longer battery life and slightly faster performance. On the flip side, the Nokia 5.3 has NFC and is guaranteed to get timely OS and security updates for two years, so it really comes down to which features matter most to you, and both phones earn our Editors' Choice. Shutterbugs, meanwhile, might want to stretch their budget and reach for the $349 Google Pixel 4a.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia smartphones have a different audience that still confides in the brand. They have never been about specifications and all about the Android experience. It is reasonable that your phone should be able to handle everything that you want from it, irrespective of that chatter around numbers and specifications. Nokia 5.3 is not any different from previous-generation smartphones but is somewhat better.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Priced at Rs. 13,999 for the base variant and Rs. 15,499 if you want more RAM, the Nokia 5.3 goes up against the Redmi Note 9 Pro (Review), the Realme 6i (Review), and the newly launched Motorola G9. I will be subjecting the Nokia 5.3 to our benchmarks and in-depth testing very soon, so stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for the full review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
If you don't have a huge budget to spend on a phone, the Nokia 5.3 will tick most of the boxes for you. It delivers a clean software experience that'll always be up to date, and a big screen. However, it's a bit slow to respond at times - but that's the play-off for the lower asking price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 5.3 is by no means a perfect phone. The poor speakers and low-resolution screen don't make it the best choice for watching Netflix or YouTube, and there are a few gimmicky features that don’t always work very well, especially when it comes to the camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/30/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: 9to5google Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/10/2020
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
As long as you have reasonable expectations for its price point, the Nokia 5.3 does not disappoint. It's one of the better value smartphones, with its bright screen and capable rear quad camera setup. In many ways, the Nokia 5.3 defies expectations for what a budget device can be, proving once again that if you look around, there's always a gem to be found in the sea of ever so expensive smartphones out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/24/2020
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/22/2020
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2020
Source: A1 Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/10/2020
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/08/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/10/2020
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2021
Notes: Note globale: 78% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Canaltech PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2020
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/04/2021
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/13/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/01/2020
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/30/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 70% équipement: 75% écran: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 70% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 84% équipement: 61% mobilité: 85% finition: 85%
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/15/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/09/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/08/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: TechZ VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/08/2020
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/11/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/17/2020
Notes: Note globale: 59% écran: 40% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Computerblog.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/08/2020
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 90% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 80%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 610:
Carte graphique intégrée (dans le Snapdragon 665) basée sur l'architecture Adreno 600. Les performances de cette puce graphique se situent entre celles de l'Adreno 510 et des 512/612, et la situent de ce fait dans le bas du milieu de gamme. Compatible DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 665:
SoC ARM puissant du milieu de gamme, avec 8 curs Kryo 260 (quatre curs Cortex-A73 rapides 2 GHz dans un cluster, et quatre curs économes en énergie Cortex-A53 de 1,8 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.55": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
71.15%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.