Motorola Xoom WiFi/UMTS

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Motorola Xoom WiFi/UMTS

The Best Tablet for You
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/29/2011

Ten... high-end Android tablets
Source: Reg Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2011

Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi + Verizon Wireless Tablet PC Review
Source: Legit Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola Xoom with Android 3.2 is an impressive tablet that is supports Adobe Flash 10.3 and has the potential to replace the PC for many people!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/13/2011

67% Motorola Xoom reviewed: the good and the bad
Source: PC Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite these gripes, we like the Motorola Xoom. It’s well made, the hardware is powerful and battery life is good. Before you rush out and buy one, though, we’d urge you to pause and consider a couple of things. First, the price is a little high. In numerous areas – the screen, the apps and the slick performance – this tablet lags behind the iPad 2, yet it costs exactly the same amount. Second, for all that’s good about the Xoom, it isn’t the only Android 3-enabled tablet around. Asus’ 16GB Transformer (see p48), for example, is cheaper, boasts a better screen and is slightly slicker in use. For those reasons, even if you’re desperate to buy an Android tablet, we’d advise you to hold onto your cash for the time being and see what the next few months bring. The Motorola Xoom ups the ante, without a doubt, but it isn’t everything that we’d been wishing for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/25/2011
Notes: Note globale: 67% prix: 67% performances: 67% équipement: 83% ergonomie: 83%

80% Motorola XOOM
Source: ITP EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xoom is a fast and capable Android tablet but a few annoying issues and a high price tag stifle its appeal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/12/2011
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80%

70% Motorola Xoom (Wi-Fi)
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
This leaves a couple other strictly Wi-Fi, Honeycomb tablet options. The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 (3.5 stars) is cheaper no matter which model you get, the 16GB ($399) or the 32GB ($499). It also has a great keyboard-with-trackpad dock accessory that snaps on and folds the tablet into a makeshift netbook, though it costs $149 extra. The Acer Iconia Tab A500 ($449, 3.5 stars) is quite similar to the Xoom in many regards, but its $450 price tag only gets you 16GB—but if that's all you need, it's obviously a better deal. For a deeper dive, read our Motorola Xoom review, which discusses the tablet in greater detail. Everything you need to know about design, performance, the OS, and apps is there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/08/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%

70% Motorola Xoom (Verizon Wireless)
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola Xoom lacked key features out of the gate, but it has slowly addressed the majority of them, aside from the non-working microSD slot. The Xoom is beautiful, with an intuitive and customizable (though slightly redundant and cluttered) user interface, excellent screen quality, and some very useful apps and features, like Talk and the dual cameras with a built-in flash. Whether the Android Market will catch up to Honeycomb, however, remains to be seen. The Xoom lacks the app selection and overall grace that makes the iPad 2 the best tablet currently available. Furthermore, there are other Honeycomb tablets that offer more features, like the 3D-enhanced T-Mobile G-Slate with Google (by LG) ($629, 3.5 stars), or cost less, like the Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 ($449, 3.5 stars). After being first out of the gate, the Motorola Xoom has plenty of competition, and while it is a quality device, it does little to differentiate itself.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/02/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%

70% Motorola Xoom WiFi 32GB Review
Source: T Break EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Xoom is a pretty solid tablet, however, the size and weight are more than what I personally prefer- other people I showed the tablet do didn’t mind that at all. I would recommend that you go play with one at your nearby Axiom store to get a feel of it. Priced at AED 2699, the Motorola Xoom is definitely a decent competitor to the iPad- especially for a geek that likes to tweak their system.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/23/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%

67% Motorola Xoom 32GB WiFi review
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Luckily the Xoom's own cameras capture reasonably good-looking footage. Clips look much crisper and sharper than the iPad's miserable little cameras, which admittedly isn't difficult. Footage captured in low-light conditions is quite grainy and the dual LED flash only helps so much. You'd still get better looking results from a recent HD Flip camera, but it'd good enough in a pinch even if using a tablet as a camera feels very conspicuous.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/12/2011
Notes: Note globale: 67%

85% Motorola Xoom
Source: Reg Hardware EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite the weight, despite the price, despite everything, the Motorola Xoom has the power to move me. It feels so solid and performs so reliably that I increasingly find myself using it in preference to my iPad 2 whenever Apple compatibility is not an issue. The problem is that it’s an intellectual love affair. While I adore my iPad, I admire and respect my Xoom.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/09/2011
Notes: Note globale: 85%

Commentaire

NVIDIA GeForce ULP (Tegra 2):

GPU intégré aux SoC Ultra-bas-voltage Tegra 3 SoC. Selon le modèle il est cadencé entre 300 et 400 MHz.

Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

2 (250): Système intégré SoC (System on a Chip) qui comprend un CPU Corex A9 Dual-Core, une carte graphique GeForce ULP et quelques autres sub-processeurs pour d'autres tâches (Audio, Video).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

10.10": Il est question de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune parmi les tablettes standards ainsi que certains convertibles de petites dimensions.

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).

0.73 kg: Seules les tablettes de grandes dimensions et certains convertibles affichent un tel poids à la pesée.

74.5%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

Ordinateurs portables similaires avec les mêmes spécifications techniques

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique