Motorola One Vision
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 25 MPix f/2,0, 0,9µm
Price comparison
Moyenne de 51 notes (à partir de 78 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Motorola One Vision
Le Motorola One Vision suit les pas du Moto One de l’an dernier, et vise à fixer de nouveaux standards avec un écran mis à jour et un appareil photo amélioré. Ce qui était bon le reste – au moins selon les indications du fabricant, qui reprend la référence "Android One". Le résultat est-il bon ?
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Le Motorola One Vision est un smartphone qui fait correctement tout ce qu’on lui demande. De plus, sa qualité de fabrication est très bonne mais son boîtier fait intégralement appel au polycarbonate. Le problème de ce smartphone sino-américain, c’est qu’il ne se démarque pas assez de la concurrence, si ce n’est par son écran au format 21:9. Bref, on est sur un bon appareil qui rentre dans la norme, sans plus!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/03/2019
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Le Motorola One Vision est un produit polyvalent, efficace qui se positionne très bien dans sa gamme de prix. De plus, son format atypique est un atout pratique et charme qui n’est pas à négliger. Toutefois, son énorme poinçon, un affichage à la colorimétrie perfectible, le peu de fonctions de personnalisation et des performances photo très moyennes en faible luminosité entachent le tableau. La concurrence est cruelle et le rapport qualité/prix ne penche pas en faveur de ce Motorola.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: 01Net Archive.org version
Vendu 319 euros, le Motorola One Vision est un smartphone qui mérite toute votre attention. C'est une alternative intéressante aux appareils que nous qualifierions de « plus populaires ». Par son grand écran 21:9 insolite, sa caméra frontale logée dans un poinçon et son appareil photo de 48 Mpix, il est un condensé des dernières tendances… à prix très abordable. Quoi qu’il en soit, le smartphone ne nous a jamais déçus, se montrant à la hauteur en toutes circonstances. On vous le recommande chaudement malgré son autonomie perfectible.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 70% mobilité: 70%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Le One Vision présente l’avantage d’opter pour un format intéressant et de bénéficier du programme Android One. Mais l'originalité ne fait pas tout non plus. La grosse bulle vient gâcher le pari du 21:9 et on déplore le manque de personnalisation dans les paramètres d'affichage. Côté photo il ne s'en sort pas si mal de jour, mais les clichés de nuit et le mode portrait n'apportent pas tellement de satisfaction. L'autonomie fond comme neige au soleil pour peu que vous consommiez pas mal de contenus multimédias.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 60% finition: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr Archive.org version
L'appareil plaira à ceux qui se soucient des mises à jour Android, à ceux qui recherchent un rapport intéressant prix/appareil photo, à ceux qui veulent avoir une expérience multimédia intéressante avec l'écran 21:9, ou même à ceux qui aiment un design élégant. Cependant, la concurrence chinoise est dure pour Motorola, il nous faudra voir dans notre test complet s'il arrive à tenir la route face aux téléphones de Xiaomi, Honor et autres du genre car à 319 euros (sortie prévue le 2 juin) la concurrence est rude pour Motorola.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This well-priced and specified phone shows that a mid-range device can deliver the goods without costing the earth. We'd have even greater things to say about it if the screen aspect ratio wasn't as elongated and the punch-hole wasn't as huge. Oh, and now that there are droves of Moto One phone options - Hyper, Action, Zoom, Macro - the water has become somewhat muddied.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→FR Archive.org version
If anyone looking for a low-cost phone asked for guidance, I'd recommend taking a look at the One Vision. While the Motorola One Vision isn't the best mid-range on the market, it's worth considering. The Motorola One Vision costs $455 CAD outright at Koodo.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/06/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→FR Archive.org version
This latest phone has some nice little extra features, it also is Android 9 and has a pure Android operating system so no skin added this is called Android One but this means with no extra skin to slow it down it is really fast.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/30/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 100% finition: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision doesn’t redefine what a handset this cheap gets you in the way that the Pixel 3a does but it still manages to give it a shiny new coat of paint. It’s rare to find a $499 handset that looks and feels this good and, if nothing else, the Motorola One Vision articulates a much clearer idea of what a more expensive Motorola phone could look like. It might be more concerned with style than substance but it’s been a while since you could honestly say that about a Motorola phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision redeems Motorola's Android One-powered series and delivers a fun, ambitious budget phone that's far from perfect, but full of surprises.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 55% écran: 83% mobilité: 47%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about this smartphone such as overall smooth performance, acceptable camera quality, Android One operating system and more. However, the most touted feature of the phone which is its 21:9 relatively taller aspect ratio is something which is only useful if the more contents are made available by providers. As of now, the screen just shows big black letterboxing at both top and bottom which compromises on the overall viewing experience. However, at the price of Rs 19,999, Motorola One Vision caters most of the users' requirements for day-to-day usage. Those who are Motorola users and look forward to upgrading from their previous Moto device can buy this phone. For the rest, there are several other smartphones from brands like Xiaomi, Samsung, Honor that offers much better value for money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/24/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision attempts to solve the pain-point of good imaging and a good display and in that, while the One Vision's display takes time to get used to, it's actually quite helpful in both ergonomics and visual experience.The One Vision's camera however is largely inconsistent especially while shooting under tricky conditions, but it does have one of the sharpest night modes. As for the performance, it's nothing extraordinary but does allow games to run smoothly. Read the full review to find out more.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Motorola has proven itself to make excellent phones at affordable prices and the One Vision appears to be no exception. This is a gorgeous device with some specs and features you wouldn't expect for under £300 including a decent screen and a 48Mp camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision stands out from the crowd as the phone is an Android One device, which is rare in this price segment. Nokia is the other brand that is still making Android One phones but is not as value-for-money as this one. While the phone may look taller, it is quite easy to handle but yes, it may not be for everyone. It does offer good performance, a capable camera, clean and smooth software, and almost good battery life. In short, if you don’t mind the taller 21:9 aspect ratio and a pretty big punch-hole in the top-left corner, you should go for it as the phone offers an overall good experience and is also priced good at Rs. 19,999 in India. It can be purchased exclusively through Flipkart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/12/2019
Source: The Techy EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision is definitely a good looking smartphone and gives very smooth user-experience, thanks to the Android One software experience. With a 3500 mAh battery, you can expect a day of usage without having to reach for the charger, that said, it comes with fast charging. The camera department could have been a lot better. Moto could have helped with 6 GB of RAM and better software for the camera; hoping that they fix it soon with required updates. If you are looking for a no-frills smartphone with good user experience, you would not be disappointed.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 73% performances: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 90%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The tall display and egregiously large punch-hole may be off putting at first glance, but the well-supported software, surprisingly smooth performance, highly competent cameras, and sub-£300 price tag make the Motorola One Vision a great option in the hotly-contested affordable phone battleground. That’s all for our Motorola One Vision review. Let us know your thoughts on Motorola’s mid-ranger in the comments.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 55% écran: 83% mobilité: 47%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
As reviewers, there are so many things that we have to keep in mind before delivering a verdict on a smartphone. Most of the time, phones earn recommendation due to the value and features they offer for the price, excluding the flagship ones that lead the way for budget phones. If I had to judge the One Vision solely based on features, it may not fare well with many phones that are priced cheaper than this. The battery life is just average and the cameras, despite packing some intelligent technology, don't perform as expected -- may be an update could fix this. Even the display, which is the One Vision’s highlight, isn’t great -- the LCD panel performs average and the oddly big hole-punch cutout for the camera does more harm than the old trusty notch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
With HMD Global’s Android One-toting Nokia entourage currently lost in a haze of decimals and pluses, the Motorola One Vision stands out as one of the most accomplished and, in spite of its ambitious Vision-ary pitch, straight-talking Android One propositions currently on the market. It also redeems the Motorola One line after the lackluster first attempt threatened to damage Motorola’s standing as a leading mid-range phone maker. The tall display and egregiously large punch-hole may be off putting at first glance, but the well-supported software, surprisingly smooth performance, highly competent cameras, and sub-£300 price tag make the Motorola One Vision a great option in the hotly-contested affordable phone battleground. That’s all for our Motorola One Vision review. Let us know your thoughts on Motorola’s mid-ranger in the comments.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 55% écran: 90% mobilité: 49%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Thanks to Motorola One Vision’s tall body and punch-hole screen, the phone stands out in the crowd. It offers smooth performance, a good screen, a powerful speaker and a camera with OIS. Motorola One Vision offers nice low-light photography that is great for a mid-range smartphone. However, Motorola One Vision has a below-average battery life, the build is too thick, and the big punch-hole is an eye-sore. But all in all, Motorola One Vision is not a bad deal. While there are other alternatives available at this price range, the phone is worthy enough to make it to the list of phones to buy under Rs 20,000.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision has its flaws, but it delivers a most comprehensive experience in its segment. The phone’s tall aspect ratio screen is a delight to watch videos that are optimised for a wide viewing experience. Its camera might not match the versatility and quality of its competitors with triple-camera modules, but its night mode is one of the best in the midrange segment. The phone’s overall performance is smooth and the stock Android Pie operating system is swift and sleek to use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/27/2019
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision stands out with its appealing design and 21:9 display with a hole punch, a combination that is not found on any other phone in the Indian market right now. Stock Android is a big plus for users who want a clean software experience without any bloatware.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/26/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This well-priced and specified phone shows that a mid-range device can deliver the goods in performance and features terms without costing the earth. We'd have even greater things to say about it if the screen aspect ratio wasn't as elongated and the punch-hole wasn't as huge, but this Moto takes the fight to Sony and beats the Xperia 10 hands down.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
If you’re after a mid-range Android phone with near untouched Google software, you could do a lot worse than the Motorola One Vision. The phone gets all the basics right and thanks to that Android One user experience it’s blissfully bloatware free. It’s also guaranteed to get updates to newer versions of Android, which is rare on phones around this price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Motorola redoubled its efforts after the disappointing Motorola One, and came up with the much improved - if quirky - Motorola One Vision. It’s an improvement in virtually every department, and a worthy budget phone contender with a beautifully pure OS.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/24/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Motorola has proven itself to make excellent phones at affordable prices and the One Vision appears to be no exception. This is a gorgeous device with some specs and features you wouldn't expect for under £300 including a decent screen and a 48Mp camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision at first looks like a repackaged Moto G7, but it may be more than that with its 21:9 aspect ratio display and powerful-looking rear camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision doesn't have the wow factor of its arch-rivals, but from what we've seen it gets nearly all the basics right and could be one of 2019's best mid-range smartphones as a result.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Motorola One Vision has what it takes to be a good mid-ranger and thanks to the cinematic screen and its punch-hole selfie shooter - the Vision can stand out in a crowd. Digging deeper, we found also the optical image stabilization helps the Vision to deliver one of the best low-light photos in this class, too. Unfortunately, the battery life is below average, while punch-hole's size is both an eyesore and on occasion an obstacle to the cinematic immersion. With those two the purchasing decision becomes much harder and very depended on how keen you are on stock Android. If you are into that then the camera alone can easily make you pick the One Vision over the HMD alternatives. If it's not a big deal to you then all boils down to which competitor is the cheapest in your market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
All things considered, for a price of around $300, this phone still offers excellent value for the money. It is fast, has tons of storage, the new tall and narrow format is easy to get used to, it’s comfortable for one-handed use, and its Night Vision photos turn out surprisingly great. And if those are your priorities, the Moto One Vision delivers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
This isn't just another mid-range phone with no personality, it's a well-priced and specced handset with unique appeal; nowhere else will you get a 21:9 aspect ratio paired with a hole-punch front-facing camera. It outsmarts its Sony Xperia 10 competition, too, although whether you'll see any genuine point in the elongated display is up for debate.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Tech.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Connect - 8/19
Critique simple, , De taille moyenne, Date: 07/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75% équipement: 70% mobilité: 86% ergonomie: 68%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 91% performances: 3% mobilité: 81% finition: 91%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 91% équipement: 87% écran: 92% mobilité: 94%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/17/2019
Source: MobiFlip DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: RP-Online DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/06/2019
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/02/2019
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 98% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/25/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/16/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Arturogoga ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/04/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 82% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 75% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/28/2019
Source: Movil Zona ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/10/2019
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% mobilité: 65% finition: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 73% équipement: 85%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 75% écran: 65% mobilité: 85% finition: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 75% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 85% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 79% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/28/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/16/2019
Source: Galaktyczny PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/26/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/15/2019
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/10/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/01/2019
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/20/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/16/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2019
Notes: Note globale: 95%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/09/2019
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 79% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/16/2019
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/04/2019
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Computerblog.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2019
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2019
Commentaire
ARM Mali-G72 MP3:
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Exynos 9609:
SoC du milieu de gamme qui intègre 8 cœurs processeurs dans deux clusters : quatre cœurs ARM Cortex-A73 qui montent à 2,2 GHz, et 4 cœurs ARM Cortex-A53 économes en énergie qui montent à 1,2 GHz. Le 9609 possède une fréquence de 100 MHz inférieure à celle de l'Exynos 9610 plus ancien, sur les deux clusters.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.30": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
77.78%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.