Motorola Moto G 4. Gen
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 20 notes (à partir de 43 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Motorola Moto G 4. Gen
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Under Lenovo, Motorola is sticking to its formula of offering an essentially stock Android experience. The Moto G4 and G4 Plus both come with Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow pre-installed with a very thin layer on top to add some features.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/22/2018
Source: The Cheat Sheet EN→FR Archive.org version
The sweet spot here seems to be for the base Moto G4 Plus, as it comes with that slightly better camera, fingerprint scanner, and quick charging capability. At $249, it’s only a little more expensive than a OnePlus X and has some better features, and it’s cheaper than the Moto X. Definitely a solid buy for someone trying to dodge the hefty price tag of the latest Samsung or Apple flagship phones while still getting something that looks good and performs admirably.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Alphr EN→FR Archive.org version
As an all-round package, it’s hard to find fault with the Motorola Moto G4. It may be a touch more expensive than last year’s Moto G, but since it’s better in most ways – with superior battery life, a better camera, a brighter, bigger screen and a sleeker, more grown-up design – you won’t find me complaining. There may be some who complain that the Moto G is now too big, and yes, for those with smaller hands and pockets it may be a stretch too far. But let’s not get too hung up about what the Moto G4 isn’t and celebrate what it is: it’s one hell of a smartphone, and delivers more bang per buck than any smartphone to date. If you’re looking to spend less than £200 on your next handset, there’s simply no better choice than the Motorola Moto G4.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Android Headlines EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G4 Play brings to the table all of the specs and features you would expect out of the normal Moto G. In fact, its specs are basically the same as last year’s Moto G (third generation), but with a slightly larger battery (2800mAh in the Moto G4 Play vs 2470mAh in last year’s Moto G). All in all, it’s not a bad phone whatsoever. It’s a pretty good workhorse that will more than last you an entire day. In fact, you could probably get through two days or even more out of the Moto G4 Play. That’s something we can’t say about many other smartphones available today.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/15/2016
Source: Alphr EN→FR Archive.org version
There may be some who complain that the Moto G is now too big, and yes, for those with smaller hands and pockets it may be a stretch too far. But let’s not get too hung up about what the Moto G4 isn’t and celebrate what it is: it’s one hell of a smartphone, and delivers more bang per buck than any smartphone to date. If you’re looking to spend less than £200 on your next handset, there’s simply no better choice than the Motorola Moto G4.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
Because the Moto Z and Moto Z Force are Verizon exclusives for the foreseeable future, the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus are better recommendations if you’re wanting to buy from Lenovo’s Moto brand. These phones carry low price tags and ship with clean software, and you can take them to just about any carrier for seamless use. But the price is truly good for the Moto G4 alone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Pocketnow EN→FR Archive.org version
These are great little phones. In 2016 Moto doesn’t deliver quite the impact they once did when they were one of the only manufacturers offering a high quality experience at such a low price, but we’re happy to see how competitive this generation has become by offering a spectrum of devices. Instead of just two options divided by storage, consumers have a number of options to select depending on their individual needs. Even at $200 though, you’ll end up with a phone which would have shamed a Galaxy S4, LG Optimus G Pro, or HTC One M7 when those phones were new.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% équipement: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→FR Archive.org version
If you want to spend no more than $200 (plus whatever tax is in order) on a smartphone, Moto G4 is still the best smartphone on the market. Motorola's industrial design may have become a bit more bland this time around, but the device is right on the money for cash value. If you need a fingerprint scanner and you want to start getting into better camera features, skip over the Moto G4 Plus and head straight for Moto X.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/26/2016
Source: Computerworld.com EN→FR Archive.org version
With their comfortable feel, excellent displays, good cameras and day-long battery life, the Moto G phones are fine choices if you want to spend less for your next Android smartphone. Considering its better camera and fingerprint sensor, I'd strongly consider spending the extra $50 for the Moto G Plus, although that does push it from "cheap" to "reasonably priced."
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
As an all-round package, it’s hard to find fault with the Motorola Moto G4. It may be a touch more expensive than last year’s Moto G, but since it’s better in most ways – with superior battery life, a better camera, a brighter, bigger screen and a sleeker, more grown-up design – you won’t find me complaining.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
The G4 Plus is a different story. I’ve requested another review unit in an attempt to get down to the bottom of whether the interface glitching and unresponsiveness spans across all models. But until then, I’d warn that you’re gambling if you’re considering bringing home this $250 device—which shoots up to $300+ if you get it with 4GB of RAM.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/18/2016
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Both the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus are some well-done mid-rangers, marrying performance that should be adequate for casual users with some very attractive pricing. But a lot of companies give us well-executed phones; are the new Moto G4s anything special? Well, that's sadly to say a bit of a “no.” The Moto Gs in general have been experiencing a sort of drift over the years, and while they're still a cheap alternative to Motorola's flagships, they no longer feel like they're doing much that's unique to stand out in the mid-ranger space.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The $230 Moto G4 is a relatively affordable midrange phone with a crisp 1080p and solid battery life, but it's key selling point is its broad carrier compatibility. You're unlikely to find any other affordable unlocked phones that support bands for all four major US carriers. However, if you're not interested in switching carriers the $150 Blu Life One X will give you very similar performance for $80 less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
The G4 Plus is a different story. I’ve requested another review unit in an attempt to get down to the bottom of whether the interface glitching and unresponsiveness spans across all models. But until then, I’d warn that you’re gambling if you’re considering bringing home this $250 device—which shoots up to $300+ if you get it with 4GB of RAM.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
As far as performance is concerned, we are more than happy because of the available Snapdragon 617 which is noticeably more powerful than Snapdragon 410 (present in Moto G3 and many other mid-rangers). The camera is 13MP again, and albeit it does not offer a lot of software features, the decent image quality it provides is enough. As for the battery improvements, they are not great. Yes, it is now bigger but has to support more demanding hardware. We appreciate the available stock Android which contributes to the fast operation of Moto G4. In a nutshell, the new Moto G has what it takes to be a leader of the mid-range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/16/2016
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Motorola's big problem with these new phones is that the last Moto G was simply too good. In pushing for larger screens and other upgrades, it also introduced some compromises. Ultimately though, the good outweighs the bad. The Moto G4 and G4 Plus offer plenty of power and versatility without breaking the bank.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Gizmag EN→FR Archive.org version
If we're going to keep playing the for just this much more you can get ... game, then you should also know that you can get a phone that not just feels high-end, but is high-end, for only $399 in the OnePlus 3. It too runs a mostly stock version of Android (though its update schedule isn't likely to be as good as Motorola's), while adding a cutting-edge processor, 6 GB of RAM, nearly as good battery life and (mostly) high-end specs everywhere else. If you're already considering the 64 GB version of the Moto G4 Plus, then the OnePlus is going to be tempting for just an extra Benjamin.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/13/2016
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
Back in 2013, the Moto G was a game-changer. As phones were getting bigger and more expensive, the Moto G offered an uncompromising experience at an impulse buy price. And even though it didn’t come equipped with the latest specs, it quickly went on to become Motorola’s most successful phone ever—even surpassing the hallowed Razr, which basically defined the flip phone era.
video review
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
That a £169 smartphone can achieve so much for so little is absolutely astounding, and it firmly throws down the gauntlet to all other budget smartphone manufacturers. The Vodafone Smart Ultra 7 does, admittedly, come very close, but while it can match the Moto G4 on speed, it simply can't compare when it comes to the quality of the display, camera, or battery life. The Smart Ultra 7 might be a fraction cheaper on prepay, but when the Moto G4 only costs another £35 (which then gives you the freedom to pick your own contract or SIM-only deal rather than being tied in to Vodafone's rates), there's simply no competition. It's a Best Buy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G4 is a decent smartphone, offering one of the best smartphone photography in the budget segment, along with good battery life. Unfortunately, it does not offer the all-round performance balance that the likes of LeEco Le 2, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and Lenovo ZUK Z1 do. It is a good smartphone, only not the best.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 66%
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
There may be some who moan that the Moto G is now too big, and yes, for those with smaller hands and pockets it may be a stretch too far. But let’s not get too hung up about what the Moto G4 isn’t and celebrate what it is: it’s one hell of a smartphone, and delivers more bang per buck than any smartphone to date. If you’re looking to spend less than £200 on your next handset, there’s simply no better choice than the Motorola Moto G4.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G4 is a decent phone in all ways. It's well built, looks decent, and comes with excellent, up-to-date software. However, on its own, it doesn't quite have what it takes to compete against other players in the sub-Rs. 15,000 price bracket, and indeed faces its toughest competition from the Moto G4 Plus itself.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
Finally, as noted, the prices appear very good for what's on offer at £169 for the G4 and £199 for the G4 Plus. Certainly this is a great price for anyone after a phone with more than adequate specs and that won't break the bank.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Another solid, safe and affordable handset from Motorola ensures the Moto G range remains the benchmark at this end of the market, but the gap between it and the competition is narrowing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Lenovo’s first stab at a Moto G device could very well be the best yet. But, by being a much larger device, I fear it could alienate a number of potential customers. Still, if the size isn’t an issue then it’s a fast phone with what appears to be a strong camera and plenty of power. It comfortably outshines its modest £169 price once again.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
We didn’t have all that much time with the G4 before it was swept out of our hands, but on first impressions it looks like a very tempting handset. Especially if you’re not all that tempted by the flagship offerings from Samsung and LG. Lay down your cash for the Moto G4 and you’ll bag yourself a thoroughly capable phone with a tremendous, distinct design for the price. Despite its myriad rivals, Moto still knows how to deliver an affordable phone with knockout panache.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Although the new Moto G4 is more expensive than the third-generation, Motorola is offering a Full HD screen, better processor, more storage and memory. Not everyone will enjoy the jump to 5.5in or the lack of full waterproofing but this is still a decent phone for under £200. Most will benefit from fingerprint scanner and better camera of the Moto G4 Plus for just £30 which also comes with the Turbo Charger in the box. Stay tuned for full reviews soon.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s slightly unusual for a ‘plus’ model of a phone not to have a larger screen, and with the Moto G4 having largely the same specs as the G4 Plus, but an extra £30 for a fingerprint scanner and a better camera doesn't seem bad at all. It's a bit confusing but hopefully we've cleared things up for you so you can decide which Moto G4 is right for you.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The new Moto G and Moto G Plus hangs on to many of the characteristics of the previous Moto G phones, importantly it's still good value for money. However, there's a general creep in price and size that some might not like: this could be a 5-inch device that's cheaper than the £169 starting price offered here.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91%
Source: Futurezone.at DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 13/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 75% écran: 78% mobilité: 84%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 12/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/15/2016
Source: c't - Heft 13/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/15/2016
Source: Notebookinfo DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 85% écran: 95% mobilité: 100% finition: 90% ergonomie: 90% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Android Pit - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 89%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Carte graphique intégrée dans des SoC ARM. En fonction du SoC, la fréquence d'horloge devrait être aux alentours des 500 MHz. Intègre 48 unités de calcul shaders unifiées.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
617 MSM8952:
SoC ARM milieu de gamme octo-core (Cortex-A53, compatible 64-bit) intégrant un circuit graphique Adreno 405. SoC gravé selon un procédé d'une finesse de gravure de 28nm LP.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
84.5%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.