Motorola Moto G 4. Gen Plus

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Motorola Moto G 4. Gen Plus

Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus Review: Pretty Nice, Low Price
Source: The Cheat Sheet EN→FR Archive.org version
The sweet spot here seems to be for the base Moto G4 Plus, as it comes with that slightly better camera, fingerprint scanner, and quick charging capability. At $249, it’s only a little more expensive than a OnePlus X and has some better features, and it’s cheaper than the Moto X. Definitely a solid buy for someone trying to dodge the hefty price tag of the latest Samsung or Apple flagship phones while still getting something that looks good and performs admirably.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/22/2016

80% Australian Review: Motorola Moto G4 Plus - Bigger Ain'T Always Better
Source: Cybershack EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G4 Plus isn't quite as easy to recommend as last year's third generation Moto G, but it's nonetheless a fantastic bang-for-buck smartphone. The screen is lovely, the camera is much better than expected, and stock Android is always welcome. On the other hand, the design is uninspired, and you've got quirks like a front-facing fingerprint reader that doesn't also work as a home button. The jump to a 5.5-inch display will win some over, but will be a deal breaker for others.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

70% Motorola Moto G4 Plus Review
Source: Techspot EN→FR Archive.org version
At $250 the Moto G4 Plus also faces stiff competition from previous-gen flagships. The LG G4 costs $280, which is just $30 more and packs much better hardware across the board. Or you could purchase the Google Nexus 5X, which often hovers around $250 as an unbelievably good deal. My advice is to pocket your $50 and purchase the standard Motorola Moto G4 if you’re after an excellent budget handset. If you want to spend a full $250, I’d strongly recommend the Nexus 5X over the Moto G4 Plus, which provides much better value at its ultra-cheap price point.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%

Far from mid-range bliss
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
Because the Moto Z and Moto Z Force are Verizon exclusives for the foreseeable future, the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus are better recommendations if you’re wanting to buy from Lenovo’s Moto brand. These phones carry low price tags and ship with clean software, and you can take them to just about any carrier for seamless use. But the price is truly good for the Moto G4 alone.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2016

82% A spectrum of budget options
Source: Pocketnow EN→FR Archive.org version
These are great little phones. In 2016 Moto doesn’t deliver quite the impact they once did when they were one of the only manufacturers offering a high quality experience at such a low price, but we’re happy to see how competitive this generation has become by offering a spectrum of devices. Instead of just two options divided by storage, consumers have a number of options to select depending on their individual needs. Even at $200 though, you’ll end up with a phone which would have shamed a Galaxy S4, LG Optimus G Pro, or HTC One M7 when those phones were new.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%

Review: The new Moto G/G Plus phones add size, features and cost
Source: Computerworld.com EN→FR Archive.org version
With their comfortable feel, excellent displays, good cameras and day-long battery life, the Moto G phones are fine choices if you want to spend less for your next Android smartphone. Considering its better camera and fingerprint sensor, I'd strongly consider spending the extra $50 for the Moto G Plus, although that does push it from "cheap" to "reasonably priced."
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/21/2016

60% No longer the best budget smartphones available
Source: Greenbot EN→FR Archive.org version
The G4 Plus is a different story. I’ve requested another review unit in an attempt to get down to the bottom of whether the interface glitching and unresponsiveness spans across all models. But until then, I’d warn that you’re gambling if you’re considering bringing home this $250 device—which shoots up to $300+ if you get it with 4GB of RAM.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%

Moto G4 and G4 Plus Review
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Both the Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus are some well-done mid-rangers, marrying performance that should be adequate for casual users with some very attractive pricing. But a lot of companies give us well-executed phones; are the new Moto G4s anything special? Well, that's sadly to say a bit of a “no.” The Moto Gs in general have been experiencing a sort of drift over the years, and while they're still a cheap alternative to Motorola's flagships, they no longer feel like they're doing much that's unique to stand out in the mid-ranger space.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2016

70% Motorola Moto G4 Plus
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
For $300, the Moto G4 Plus is a capable midrange phone, and a good option if you're concerned about cross-carrier compatibility since it supports both CDMA and GSM along with numerous LTE bands. But its sibling the G4 costs $80 less by losing the fingerprint sensor and 2GB of RAM. It offers the same degree of carrier compatibility and almost identical performance, making it the better pick among the two. If you're not likely to be switching carriers, the OnePlus 3 provides a better value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%

50% No longer the best budget smartphones available
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
The G4 Plus is a different story. I’ve requested another review unit in an attempt to get down to the bottom of whether the interface glitching and unresponsiveness spans across all models. But until then, I’d warn that you’re gambling if you’re considering bringing home this $250 device—which shoots up to $300+ if you get it with 4GB of RAM.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 50%

Bigger and (mostly) better
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Motorola's big problem with these new phones is that the last Moto G was simply too good. In pushing for larger screens and other upgrades, it also introduced some compromises. Ultimately though, the good outweighs the bad. The Moto G4 and G4 Plus offer plenty of power and versatility without breaking the bank.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2016

Paying a premium for a flagship is getting harder to justify
Source: Gizmag EN→FR Archive.org version
If we're going to keep playing the for just this much more you can get ... game, then you should also know that you can get a phone that not just feels high-end, but is high-end, for only $399 in the OnePlus 3. It too runs a mostly stock version of Android (though its update schedule isn't likely to be as good as Motorola's), while adding a cutting-edge processor, 6 GB of RAM, nearly as good battery life and (mostly) high-end specs everywhere else. If you're already considering the 64 GB version of the Moto G4 Plus, then the OnePlus is going to be tempting for just an extra Benjamin.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/13/2016

Still king of the affordable market?
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
Back in 2013, the Moto G was a game-changer. As phones were getting bigger and more expensive, the Moto G offered an uncompromising experience at an impulse buy price. And even though it didn’t come equipped with the latest specs, it quickly went on to become Motorola’s most successful phone ever—even surpassing the hallowed Razr, which basically defined the flip phone era.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2016

80% Plus and minus
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
When we first saw the Motorola Moto G4 and G4 Plus, we though the Plus was hands-down the one to choose. Having used both handsets for weeks and days at a time, however, we've taken an about-turn on that initial feeling: the Plus does have plenty of positives, in that it can handle the day-to-day with no troubles and lasts out for a decent period of time per charge, but in the wider context of the smartphone market it has its minuses too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Extra storage, fingerprint scanner and 16Mp camera will tempt some to upgrade
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G4 Plus is a nice phone but it's very similar to the regular model. Since we're disappointed in the camera (with no noticeable difference), it's not worth paying the extra money to get a fingerprint scanner which can't even be used with Android Pay since there's no NFC. The only real reason to opt for the Plus is to gain more storage and the extra RAM which comes with the 64GB model; however, the Micro-SD card slot negates this somewhat.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% finition: 80%

100% Moto G4 Plus review
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Is it much better than the regular Moto G4? Well, if you’re happy to lay down that extra cash, then yes – the camera is more reliable and having a fingerprint scanner is always handy. The fast charger alone costs £30 if you want to buy it separately. You’re getting a fantastic phone either way, but I'd recommend spending the extra if you can, buying the 16GB version and complementing it with a 64GB microSD card to make good use of Android's Adoptable Storage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100% prix: 100% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%

90% Moto G4 Plus Review: In Depth
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
The obvious question is, which is best for you: the Moto G4 or Moto G4 Plus? Well, we’d honestly say that unless you’re constantly snapping hyper kids, there’s no need to splash out extra money on the Plus’ 16-meg camera. That super-smart auto-focus definitely helps with fast-moving subjects, but otherwise the difference in photo quality is negligible.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%

83% One of the best bang for your buck smartphones in 2016
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Moto G was in desperate need for an upgrade though, and the changes Motorola has made to the display and camera make the Moto G4 Plus a very compelling option for those who are looking for a smartphone that falls in the sub-$250 category.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 85% finition: 80%

Moto G4 Plus Review: A No-Nonsense Mid-Ranger
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
On paper, the Moto G4 Plus is easily outgunned by phones from Xiaomi, LeEco, and other Chinese companies. It does not sport a metal unibody design that has become a commonplace even in phones priced below $200 mark. It also lacks the water resistance capabilities found on its predecessor. And not to forget, the Snapdragon 617 chipset inside the Moto G4 Plus has severe overheating issues.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/18/2016

80% Is it worth the extra £60?
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Yes, the camera is better, and yes, you do get a fingerprint reader – oh, and there’s a more powerful mains charger in the box that lets you charge the phone more quickly. But is this all worth £60? I’d say not. That’s not to belittle the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, though. It’s the Moto G4 with slight improvements, so it’s awesome. But compare it directly with its sibling, which is damned near as good and available for so much less, and it’s a considerably less appealing purchase.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% The one true king?
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Ultimately, the Moto G4 Plus doesn't offer quite enough to make it a viable upgrade over the regular G4, and even its super-fast processor just can't quite match its nearest competitor, the OnePlus 2, making it something of an awkward middle child rather than a shining star in the Moto G roster. As a result, you're either better off saving your money and going with the regular Moto G4, or, if you really want a proper cut-price powerhouse, then the OnePlus 2 is your next best bet. Buy the Moto G4 Plus now from Motorola.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: c't - 5/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/01/2017

91% Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 91%

Grosser Effekt für minim mehr Geld
Source: Blick DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/26/2016

84% Die neue Mittelklasse Plus
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 96% performances: 87% équipement: 71% écran: 90% mobilité: 90%

80% Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 4/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

81% Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81%

74% Aufpreis und Abstriche
Source: Verivox DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 74% équipement: 70%

Motorola Moto G4 Plus
Source: Computerbild - Heft 12/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/15/2016

Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: c't - Heft 13/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/15/2016

Das beste Moto aller Zeiten?
Source: Turn On DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/07/2016

Ist das Moto G4 Plus ein Preisknüller?
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2016

100% Motorola Moto G4 Plus
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%

94% Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: SFT - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 94%

82% Moto G4 Plus
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 75% écran: 78% mobilité: 84%

80% Motorola Moto G4 Plus
Source: Android Pit - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

91% Motorola Moto G4 Plus (16 GB)
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 91%

[Review] Moto G4 Plus: um bom smartphone intermediário com preço pouco camarada
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/23/2016

80% Recensione: Moto G4 Plus, re dell'equilibrio
Source: Saggiamente IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Commentaire

Qualcomm Adreno 405:

Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

617 MSM8952:

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).

80.92%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

Ordinateurs portables similaires avec les mêmes spécifications techniques

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique