Microsoft Surface Pro X
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix front-facing camera with 1080p full HD video
Price comparison
Moyenne de 28 notes (à partir de 53 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Microsoft Surface Pro X
The Surface Pro X comes with an ARM-based processor and an integrated LTE modem, which is why it is an interesting device for those who appreciate portability. However, in everyday use, the combination of an ARM SoC and Windows 10 results in a lot of limitations, and the battery life is also quite poor.
Source: Tablette-tactile.net Archive.org version
Portant haut l'étendard des processeurs ARM, la Surface Pro X écope finalement des mêmes défauts que tous les autres PC privilégiant cette technologie : problèmes de compatibilité, performances limitées et autonomie pas si bonne qu'annoncée. Sachant qu'il faut investir pas loin de 1500€ pour profiter pleinement de l'ensemble tablette + clavier + stylet, on ne peut s’empêcher de ressentir une certaine déception.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/27/2020
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Il y a beaucoup de choses que nous aimons dans la Surface Pro X : son design plus fin, l’écran aux bords fins, le travail d’intégration du stylet, l’autonomie décente et l'excellente expérience que procure le clavier. Mais le prix relativement élevé, surtout si l'on considère le coût des accessoires, les problèmes de compatibilité logicielle et la comparaison des spécifications avec la Surface Pro 7 peu avantageuse la limitent à un petit sous-ensemble de consommateurs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar EN→FR
While we applaud the Surface Pro X for its slick and refined, thin and light design, and comfy typing experience, the Surface Pro X is difficult to recommend for most people. It ends up being an ideal device for a very small group of users, thanks to the lack of a headphone jack and no support for a variety of apps.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/24/2024
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Last year, when Microsoft launched the original Surface Pro X, the idea of a premium Arm-based PC was a fanciful one. There had been a handful of lower-cost models from HP, Asus and others, but they generally failed to impress. The Surface Pro X was a bold move to ditch the usual Intel (or AMD) chips and power a high-gloss, high-price two-in-one with a more smartphone-like processor. In that case it was the Microsoft SQ1, a collaboration between Microsoft and Qualcomm, based on the latter's Snapdragon chips.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/27/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
After a day with this device, we were convinced that this is more of a tablet, that can behave as a laptop, than the other way around. Its ARM processor barely opens 64-bit programs, and the lack of genuine ports makes it less versatile. On the bright side, however, the Surface Pro X features an NVMe SSD drive, and its memory comes in two options – 8GB and 16GB of LPDDRx RAM.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2020
Source: Laptop Media EN→FR Archive.org version
After a day with this device, we were convinced that this is more of a tablet, that can behave as a laptop, than the other way around. Its ARM processor barely opens 64-bit programs, and the lack of genuine ports makes it less versatile. On the bright side, however, the Surface Pro X features an NVMe SSD drive, and its memory comes in two options – 8GB and 16GB of LPDDRx RAM.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2020
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
The Microsoft Surface Pro X is an expensive tablet which seems to do what Apple did with its iPad Pro 2020 – add keyboard with touchpad support. It works flawlessly and delivers on most basic tasks you expect your Windows-based machine to do. But its expensive price tag (around Rs 1 lakh) makes it best suitable for enthusiasts wanting to experience the Windows future on the ARM processor, not the masses.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/20/2020
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X seemed at first like a slightly mad prospect; a Windows device that could only run certain apps felt far too close to the bad old days of Windows RT, and the spectre of compatibility issues looms large. However, this isn’t nearly as much of a problem in reality as we anticipated. Sure, there are some apps which aren’t available at all but, barring a few intermittent stability hiccups, our experience was untroubled by performance woes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Microsoft Surface Pro X has the potential to deliver the best of all worlds. Powerful performance and long battery life in a design that's lighter and sleeker than any Surface before it. Stay tuned for our full rated review and final verdict.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/29/2020
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is a Windows 2-in-1 that's difficult to get your head around. So long as you're comfortable with its limitations, the only real sticking point is the price as you're going to need the keyboard and Surface Slim Pen as well as the tablet itself. But for many people, there's better value and fewer compatibility issues to be found elsewhere.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→FR Archive.org version
But as I said up top, the Surface Pro X’s success isn’t judged by traditional measures. I won’t recommend a $1,700 2-in-1 with limited compatibility to most people I know, but I can get behind a bold vision for a new Surface and an ARM-based future.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/23/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Fudzilla EN→FR Archive.org version
The overall performance of Surface X Pro is impressive, and a giant leap forward for the “always connected PC” and Qualcomm’s PC efforts. While there is more to be done, especially on the software front, Microsoft priced this Surface at the higher end of the spectrum. Once you spend the time with the machine, you can understand why they went for such pricing. The part that I find difficult to understand is why the storage option costs an ARM and leg, pardon the pun. Storage is not that expensive these days, yet Microsoft wants Apple margins for 256GB or, god forbid, 512GB of storage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
With the Surface Pro X, Microsoft has created a forward-thinking device that’s ahead of its time – but this isn't a good thing. While the Microsoft SQ1 ARM processor enables slightly improved battery life and facilitates the slimmer design, the device is hamstrung by consequential performance and compatibility issues. The Surface Pro X may well be what the future looks like for Surface devices and 2-in-1s across the board, but we're some way off right now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/20/2019
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
The question that I hope Microsoft is asking itself is: What compelling reason has it given for customers to buy the Surface Pro X? Always-on connectivity? It’s not a unique argument, and one that Intel itself is gunning for. We haven’t tested Microsoft’s Surface Pro 7, but we’d assume that that’s its best tablet, not the Surface Pro X. With this tablet, we can’t see why Microsoft would use the term “Pro” at all.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/03/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
After years of cookie-cutter upgrades, the Surface Pro X delivers a well-thought-out physical redesign. Again, however—and this is getting tiring by now—app compatibility, performance issues and bugs complicate Microsoft’s effort. Calling it an “Edgebook” isn’t quite right, because the Surface Pro X runs Office and other Microsoft apps well. But it still feels somewhat short of an actual PC.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/03/2019
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X might be my favorite PC that I've reviewed this year. It's actually the fifth Windows on ARM PC that I've reviewed out of the seven that have existed, so I'm used to the ins and outs of them. What I've always loved about them is that they're light and easy to carry, they're always connected to the internet, and they wake instantly.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The Pro X is a well-designed Windows tablet that will thrill Microsoft's Surface superfans, but its cost and app-compatibility caveats throttle its aim to be a go-anywhere, do-anything PC.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
While we applaud the Surface Pro X for its slick and refined, thin and light design, and comfy typing experience, the Surface Pro X is difficult to recommend for most people. It ends up being an ideal device for a very small group of users, thanks to the lack of a headphone jack and no support for a variety of apps.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/21/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
I'll start with the good. The Surface Pro X nails three of the four main tenets of any good laptop: it has a gorgeous display; a premium, portable design; and long battery life. The fourth, performance, is a problem. ARM might be the future of computing but Microsoft jumped the gun with the SQ1, which offers middling performance on top of app-compatibility issues.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Fair enough, but asking people to pay $1,140 (including the keyboard case) for something that might not run all the apps they need is outrageous. Especially since Chromebooks are just as good at handling browser-based applications and generally cost $500 or less. If you're in the sliver of the population that needs access to a small handful of Windows apps, then maybe the Pro X is sufficient. But bear in mind you'll be paying a hefty premium for Windows, an LTE connection and gorgeous hardware.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 73%
Source: The Verge EN→FR Archive.org version
You should never buy a gadget today based on the hope that the software will come tomorrow. That rule applies to the Surface Pro X more than usual because the investment is so large. For the near $1,800 you’d have to spend to get the Pro X model I reviewed, you would be able to buy a Surface Pro 7 kitted out with equivalent RAM, storage, keyboard, stylus, and an Intel Core i7 processor that would be loads faster and also be compatible with all Windows apps.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is an astoundingly impressive looking and feeling Windows tablet – possibly the best yet in that department. Still, while we understand Microsoft's faith in its new ARM processor, we've yet to see an ARM-based Windows device perform to expectations for the price it will cost you. Consider us impressed, though cautiously optimistic.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/22/2019
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, if the performance promised (3 x that of a Surface Pro 6) is actually delivered, then the Surface Pro X could be a pretty impressive evolution of the Surface Pro and renders the Surface Pro 7 a little redundant. If Microsoft needed a 'hero' device to showcase its Surface range then the Surface Pro X is it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/18/2019
Source: The Register EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is undeniably a pleasant bit of kit to use, but having used one side by side with the Surface Pro 7, we're not sure the premium demanded by the slimmer chassis, larger screen and Qualcomm-inspired tech is worthwhile compared to its stablemate, particularly if ever called on for more intensive work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/18/2019
Source: Digital Arts EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is thinner and lighter than the Pro 7, and has a high-end consumer/pro styling that’s distinctly different from the older design’s more corporate feel. It has a slightly larger screen with a thinner bezel (13-inch vs the 7’s 12.3-inch) with a slightly higher resolution (2,880 x 1,920 vs 2,736 x 1,824). Asleep and without the keyboard, you’d probably mistake it for the current 12.9-inch iPad Pro – unless you spot the Surface Pro X’s additional USB-C port.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
Initial impressions are good: the Pro X looks and feels great, and it has a brilliant screen. The updated Slim Pen can be stowed in the keyboard, too. There are worries about the performance of the ARM processor, as well as compatibility with 64-bit apps.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is an incredibly impressive looking and feeling Windows tablet – perhaps the best yet in that department. However, while we understand Microsoft's faith in its new ARM processor, we've yet to see an ARM-based Windows device perform to expectations for the price. Consider us impressed, though cautiously optimistic.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/11/2019
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s a lot to like about the new Surface Pro X over the conventional Surface Pro devices. In fact, its starting price of US$999 is only a little more than the asking price of the Surface Pro 7 that starts from US$749. Having said that, the Surface Pro X is ideal if you’re looking for the most modern Surface device ever, intend to stay away from a power socket for extended hours and appreciate the instant-on, ever-ready traits of the Surface Pro X. The new Signature Keyboard and Slim Pen sound like excellent options to complement the Surface Pro X, but beware those will add to the base cost of the product. For a higher level of computing power, the Surface Pro 7 will be the better choice with more varied configuration options.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/06/2019
Source: Hardware Zone EN→FR Archive.org version
Microsoft’s Surface hardware launch yesterday saw an impressive range of devices launched that caters to a variety of modern work needs – two of which are still in the showcase stage (Surface Neo and Surface Duo) as they are engineering showcases to get developers onboard to take advantage of the new dual-screen devices along with Windows 10X. Since those are still a year away before consumers can purchase one, without a doubt, the most controversial and arguably the sexiest device that you can get your hands on soon is the Surface Pro X.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
If Microsoft can get developers to bring forth more tablet-friendly Windows apps, then the Surface Pro X really would make a decent stand-alone tablet thanks to its slim design, though to get the most out of it you really need to buy the keyboard as well. Overall, if the performance promised (3 x that of a Surface Pro 6) is actually delivered, then the Surface Pro X could be a pretty impressive evolution of the Surface Pro and renders the Surface Pro 7 a little redundant. If Microsoft needed a 'hero' device to showcase its Surface range then the Surface Pro X is it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is unlike any device we've seen from Microsoft before. It's sleek, study, and sports seriously thin bezels. It features the expected built-in stand and a custom SQ1 CPU designed in partnership with Qualcomm. Just be prepared to spend a lot once you add the keyboard and pen.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is a really interesting device, and proof that Microsoft isn't messing around when it comes to expanding its line of first-party hardware. Aside from looking like the kind of aesthetically and mechanically polished 2-in-1 that we've come to expect from Microsoft, it's also one of the first real outings for ARM-based Windows laptops. This means it's got a lot of proving to do, but it also makes it somewhat difficult to predict how it will perform under pressure.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/03/2019
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Surface Pro X is an absolutely impressive looking and feeling Windows tablet – perhaps the best yet in that department. But, while we appreciate Microsoft's faith in its new ARM processor, we've yet to see an ARM-based Windows device perform to expectations for the price. Consider us impressed but cautiously optimistic.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2019
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→FR Archive.org version
Ultimately, the Surface Laptop 3 offers important changes to the Surface Laptop formula, but Microsoft isn’t breaking new ground here. If you have an ageing device and you’re looking to upgrade, the Surface Laptop 3, as well as the Pro 7, is more than capable. However, Laptop 2 and Pro 6 owners likely won’t need to upgrade this year.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2019
Source: Basic Tutorials DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2021
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 80% mobilité: 100% finition: 100%
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 93% équipement: 91% écran: 91% mobilité: 79%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/09/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/20/2019
Source: Tablet Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/22/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/21/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/22/2020
Notes: Note globale: 89%
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 93% mobilité: 75% finition: 95% ergonomie: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Diskidee.nl NL→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/23/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 60%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/28/2020
Source: Android.com.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/13/2019
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 75% équipement: 92% mobilité: 91% finition: 91%
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 55%
Source: Dinside NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2020
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/09/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 685:
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SQ1:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
13.00": Pour une tablette, cette diagonale d’écran est relativement imposante. A contrario, il s’agit d’un écran de petite taille pour les ultraportables. Certains convertibles embarquent aussi des moniteurs de cette dimension.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.048 kg: Les tablettes de grandes dimensions, les petits ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les convertibles de 10 à 11 pouces affichent habituellement ce poids sur la balance.
73.01%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.