Microsoft Lumia 650
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix (f/2.2, angle large)
Price comparison
Moyenne de 18 notes (à partir de 27 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Microsoft Lumia 650
Le milieu de gamme selon Microsoft. Le nouveau Lumia 650 de Microsoft veut convaincre avec des prix compétitifs et, évidemment, le système d'exploitation Windows. Le géant de Redmond cible une clientèle d'affaires. Du fait d'un matériel lent, cependant, il existe certaines limites, notamment l'absence de la fonctionnalité Windows Continuum.
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The 600 series within the Lumia line-up has always been where the best of budget and premium combine to offer something distinctive. From the 620 through to the 640, these have been popular, powerful devices. The Lumia 650 is a different beast. It's the experience of using this phone that sets it apart. The lovely in-hand feel, the dependable camera, the decent battery life, the surprisingly good speakers and the mostly smooth day-to-day operation are all key to what a good smartphone experience should be.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/18/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Microsoft Lumia 650 provides a mostly adequate experience, making it a solid choice for an entry-level Windows 10 handset. It's nicely put together and handles well. The screen and speaker are of good quality and make for enjoyable multimedia. The hardware is competent enough to ensure smooth basic functionality, though it isn't capable of more than that. For an entry-level phone, the Lumia 650 delivered better photo quality than we expected, but then there's the borderline unusable camcorder.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s plenty to like about the Lumia 650. It offers up a great design that makes it look and feel far more expensive than it actually is, and the OLED screen is one of the best I’ve seen on an affordable smartphone. While I’m still not convinced that Windows 10 Mobile is great for general consumers, for business users the Lumia 650 ticks all the right boxes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 40% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
In its second generation since going solo, the Microsoft lineup is keeping up the ambition and drive. It's obviously the flagship that sets the tone but the lower ranks do have a purpose in the greater scheme as well. Especially when you consider that Microsoft intends to have a lot fewer devices in its portfolio this time around.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/30/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
In some ways Microsoft has its upped standards, but only at a surface level. The screen and metal-rimmed design make a great first impression, but the slow performance and water-treading hardware in other areas make it seem less of a smart buy than several Androids around the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Without the draw of Windows 10 Continuum, it feels like the Lumia 650 is perpetually on the back foot. It never really makes the most of its new operating system, and there's very little to distinguish it from its Windows Phone 8-based predecessors apart from its metal frame and beautiful OLED display.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Still, the interface is smooth, apps (people, phone) load quick, scrolling through long lists was a breeze. The camera interface was reasonably snappy too. The browser takes its time to re-render the page as you pan and zoom, though. That's what you get with a low-power chipset and a single gig of RAM.
video review
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/23/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The build quality of the Lumia 650 is decent enough for the money and the screen, despite being 720p, does its job well. There's a heft to the handset that makes it feel strong, like it will last. Limitations to processing power, camera resolution and connectivity really pull the phone down. Yes the price is low at £150, but without Windows 10 Continuum, 4G or 1080p video recording it'll be a no go for some.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/22/2016
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
After first setting eyes on its slim form and understated design, I wanted to like the Microsoft Lumia 650. Its screen is great, the camera isn’t bad and there are plenty of elements of Windows 10 Mobile that I like. But it's completely spoiled by Microsoft's decision to hobble the performance of the phone by shoehorning in a processor so low on power that not even Windows Phone can make it look good.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
This is such a shame, as this would have been a great Windows phone if only it had a decent processor inside it. Battery life was very respectable at 11h 36m in our continuous video playback test with the screen brightness set to 170cd/m2, and its screen and build quality are practically second to none in its price range. However, when it's so crippled by its bad choice of chipset, the Lumia 650 just can't measure up to its infinitely superior predecessor. If you're looking for a cheap Windows handset, the Lumia 640 is still your best choice, as you can now pick one up for £120 SIM-free or £90 on pre-pay. The only silver lining is that this could be the basis for a great mid-range Windows phone just around the corner.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
However, the limited performance and lack of killer features such as Continuum make it difficult to recommend as a business device, especially as the competition from the Android market is very strong. For less money you can grab a Moto G, Wileyfox Swift or Vodafone Prime Ultra, which offer excellent features and dependable performance. And if you’re dead set on Windows, you can still pick up last year’s brilliant Lumia 640 LTE for under £100.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76% mobilité: 67%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 64% prix: 82% performances: 68% équipement: 48% écran: 94% mobilité: 53%
Source: SFT - Heft 8/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PocketPC DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/26/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/25/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Expert Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/20/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 75% écran: 75% mobilité: 75%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 08/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: c't - Heft 09/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/15/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 77%
Source: c't - Heft 08/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: A1 Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2016
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 63%
Source: Teltarif DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% équipement: 90% finition: 93% ergonomie: 84%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 304:
Carte graphique entrée de gamme intégrée dans les SoC Snapdragon 210, prenant en charge les instructions OpenGL ES 3.0. Unités de calcul unifiées
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
212 APQ8009:
SoC ARM d'entrée de gamme intégrant quatre cœurs processeurs Cortex-A7 cadencés jusqu'à 1.3 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
69.02%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.