Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 14 notes (à partir de 20 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t
Up to the challenge? The IdeaPad S10-3t Convertible from Lenovo is a combination of netbook and tablet which could be described stylishly as a "netvertible”. The older Intel Atom N450 single core processor and a flood of tablet novelties didn’t make things easy for our tester.
Source: Futurelooks
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t leaves a lot to be desired and I don’t think this kind of form factor is going to be relevant moving forward. The performance just isn’t up to snuff and I’d be more inclined to buy a 15-inch notebook with a “real” processor than a netbook like this given the price point. On the tablet front, again, you’re better off with a real tablet with a more tablet-appropriate operating system.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/03/2010
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Inside HW
EN→FR Archive.org versionYou may end up with the impression that we’ve had many remarks to this small Lenovo Ideapad. That may be true, but Ideapad S10-3t proved to be one of those devices that you like despite its flaws. Once you learn to appreciate its advantages, such as display rotation, as well as finger-controlling your computer’s screen, you’ll be quick to realise why.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2010
Notes: performances: 60% degré de nuisance: 50%
Source: PC World
EN→FR Archive.org versionThis half-netbook, half-tablet would have probably been better if it had just stuck with one genre or the other.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/04/2010
Notes: performances: 64% équipement: 78%
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionLenovo's IdeaPad S10-3T is the a netbook with a swivelling touchscreen. Although this is certainly a different design and works as expected, the heavy chassis – due to the large battery -is a major letdown.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/30/2010
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Liliputing
EN→FR Archive.org versionIf the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t were simply a netbook, it would be a decent offering. It offers middle-of -the-road performance, a decent keyboard, and a compact, light weight case. I’d be happier with a larger touchpad and a more powerful battery, but I’d also be happier with world peace and a million bucks in my pocket. We can’t always have everything.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/29/2010
Notes: performances: 70% mobilité: 70%
Source: Hot Hardware
EN→FR Archive.org versionWe were very excited about the ThinkPad X100e we evaluated a couple of weeks back, but we're somewhat underwhelmed with the IdeaPad S10-3t. We expected this machine to be so much more, particularly considering its price, which is far higher than most other netbooks and/ or entry-level tablets. Using the touch screen on this netbook doesn't have enough utility. We're not really sure it's worth the extra investment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2010
Notes: performances: 40% écran: 50% mobilité: 60% degré de nuisance: 40%
Source: Techtree.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Lenovo Ideapad S10-3t sells for Rs. 30,740. That's a few thousand rupees more than a competitive Eee PC T91. The Ideapad S10-3t comparatively offers a lot more than the T91 -- a slightly larger screen, a traditional 250GB hard drive (as opposed to the paltry 32GB SSD storage), a newer-generation Atom processor and a better battery life. But not providing a stylus means Lenovo wants people to use the touchscreen mainly for media. That's where the argument begins, what are you really looking for? If you want to use a media consumption device, then an iPad will offer a UI experience like no other. If you are looking for a PC, then a regular netbook, which is much cheaper than this one, would suffice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/20/2010
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionOverall, the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t seems more of a proof of concept than anything else. As a tablet, it’s not fun to use and it will have a negative impact on your productivity. Things could be better if Windows 7 Home Premium was installed, but the hardware also needs some tweaking. A screen with edge-to-edge glass would make scrolling a lot more comfortable and responsive; a trimmed-down hinge design would probably allow for a deeper palm rest and larger touchpad; and a webcam at the centre of the screen would make it possible to use the netbook for video conferencing. It’s clear that netbooks with touchscreens aren’t prime-time material yet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Good Gear Guide
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t is a tablet-convertible netbook with a touchscreen. However, a poor software implementation, slow CPU and a unfriendly design make it a frustrating product to use. An on-screen keyboard is not supplied, the screen gestures place a lot of strain on the CPU and aren't always recognised, and the design of screen itself is not good enough for touch input. On the plus side, it has a great keyboard and long battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 30%
Source: Slashgear
EN→FR Archive.org versionIt’s unfortunate, but the fact that the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t promises so much – multitouch, usability both while desk-bound and while mobile – makes it all the more disappointing when it falls short. The occasional periods of sluggishness that all netbooks encounter are somehow exponentially more frustrating when you’re trying to interact via the touchscreen, and the choice of either battery life or holding-comfort is a disappointing one to have to make.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/23/2010
Notes: ergonomie: 40%
Source: PC Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionNetbooks come in many variations, but few have had success as convertible tablets. Part of the problem is cost, since a rotating hinge and touch display are drive up the cost. Demand for tablets hasn't exactly been surging either, well, aside from the Apple iPad. If you can past the single-piece touchpad and lackluster speeds, the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t is one of the few netbooks that have a rotating touch display.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/22/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe S10-3t does some things right. It's fairly light for a convertible, offers accurate touch input, and it has a comfortable keyboard. And, provided you get the 8-cell battery, you’ll see 7 hours of unplugged computing time. However, this machines’ sluggish performance and weak wireless range hold it back. If you want a netbook with touch capability, the S10-3t is worth considering, but this netvertible didn't quite live up to our expectations.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Computer Shopper
EN→FR Archive.org versionFor those turned off by the Apple iPad’s lack of certain features (no keyboard or Flash support, for instance), it’s nice to know that other tablet options are available. One of them, the Lenovo IdeaPad S10-3t convertible tablet, delivers a bunch of ports and features that the iPad won't have. Good-looking and sturdy, this netbook/tablet combo improves on previous tablet designs, but its performance lags behind that of the competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/20/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 38% écran: 85% mobilité: 95% finition: 83% ergonomie: 66% degré de nuisance: 91%
Source: c't - 8/10
Comparaison, , Longue, Date: 04/01/2010
Notes: performances: 35% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 80% degré de nuisance: 70%
Source: Jambitz
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/24/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC World Italia
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/16/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Benchmark.pl
PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/22/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 20% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80% degré de nuisance: 60%
Source: Retera
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/29/2010
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 16% écran: 40% mobilité: 48% degré de nuisance: 51%
Source: Itsvet
HR→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/06/2011
Commentaire
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150: Carte graphique intégrée pour les Intel Atom N4xx CPUs. A peine plus rapide que les GMA 950 et donc pas non plus pour les jeux ou la HD.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Atom:
Le processeur Intel Atom est un microprocesseur 64-bits pour ordinateurs portables petits et bon marché, les MIDs ou UMPC. La spécialité de la nouvelle architecture est dans le mode d'exécution "in order" (au lieu de l'habituel et plus rapide mode d'exécution "out of order"). Par conséquent, le coût du transistor de la série Atom est beaucoup plus faible, et donc moins cher à produire.
N450: Le Intel Atom pour Netbooks avec un contrôleur mémoire intégré et une GMA 3150 comme GPU. Les performances du système sont très proches des Atom N280 / GMA 950.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
10.10": Il est question de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune parmi les tablettes standards ainsi que certains convertibles de petites dimensions.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.55 kg: Les tablettes de très grandes dimensions, les ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les convertibles de 11 à 13 pouces affichent habituellement ce poids sur la balance.
Lenovo: Lenovo ("Le" de la légende anglaise, novo (latin) pour nouveau) a été fondée en 1984 en tant que société chinoise de commerce d'ordinateurs. En 2004, la société était le plus grand fabricant d'ordinateurs portables en Chine et, après l'acquisition de la division PC d'IBM en 2005, le quatrième au monde. En plus des ordinateurs de bureau et des ordinateurs portables, la société fabrique des moniteurs, des projecteurs, des serveurs, etc., et se spécialise dans le développement, la fabrication et la commercialisation d'électronique grand public, d'ordinateurs personnels, de logiciels, de solutions d'entreprise et de services connexes.
En 2016, l'entreprise s'est classée au premier rang mondial des ventes d'ordinateurs. Il le détenait encore en 2023 avec environ 23% de part de marché mondiale. Les gammes de produits importantes sont Thinkpad, Legion et Ideapad.
En 2011, elle a acquis une participation majoritaire dans Medion AG, un fabricant européen de matériel informatique. En 2014, Motorola Mobility a été racheté, ce qui a donné un coup de pouce à Lenovo sur le marché des smartphones.
63.93%: Une note aussi moyenne est rare. Il y a peu d'ordinateurs portables aussi mauvais.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.
