Honor 5C
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Moyenne de 27 notes (à partir de 52 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Honor 5C
C'est un "honor". Un superbe écran, un appareil photo très correct et le tout dans un boitier en métal pour 200 euros. Le Honor 5C fait aux premiers abords bonne impression. Et vous allez voir que cela continue tout au long de notre test.
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Soyons clairs, si l’on fait abstraction de son DAS (Débit d’Absorption Spécifique) bien trop élevé à mon goût, ce Honor 5C est sans doute l’un des meilleurs, ni ce n’est LE meilleur des smartphones entrée de gamme du moment (octobre 2016).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70%
Source: Clubic Archive.org version
Honor, et à travers la marque, Huawei, se place une fois de plus dans le haut du panier de l'offre actuelle, au palier de prix considéré (200 euros). Le 5C est un smartphone plaisant, qui repose sur un gabarit 5,2 pouces équilibré et profite d'une finition honnête, en partie métallique.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le Honor 5C est un très bon smartphone au niveau du rapport qualité prix. Il est polyvalent dans tout les domaines même si ce n’est pas le meilleur (mais on ne peut pas tout avoir) et il convient parfaitement à une utilisation quotidienne (mail, musique, internet) grâce à sa batterie qui permet de durer une journée. Même en jouant à des jeux il ne chauffe pas trop et laisse une bonne fluidité. Au final, pour les petits budgets et pour ceux qui cherchent un smartphone sans se prendre la tête avec la partie technique, ce Honor 5C est l’un des meilleurs à ce niveau-là.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→FR Archive.org version
As with all modern phones it has front and back cameras the front often called a Selfie camera is a respectable 8MP while the rear camera is mounted 1.5cm down from the top of the back and has an LED flash by its side. The camera resolution is 13MP and takes good images but not up to the superb standard of the Huawei P9 but then the unit costs only 1/3 of the price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
If you're looking for a phone with a bit of high-end flavour on a super-tight budget, the Honor 5C is an excellent choice. As long as you don't mind the Honor software approach, there's nothing major to complain about here. The main consideration is whether you might prefer the Moto G4, which costs £20 more but has a bigger screen, and a very pure take on Android.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: KL Gadget Guy EN→FR Archive.org version
For RM799, the Honor 5C is a perfectly decent mid-range smartphone that does almost everything you need out of it. However, the problem the Honor 5C has is that its just not that interesting as a whole. There are no particularly standout features about the phone that makes the Honor 5C a must buy, and in a market that is highly saturated, the Honor 5C could potentially be lost in the shuffle.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 80% performances: 70% équipement: 60% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C’s performance is more than adequate especially when compared against similarly priced handsets. Loading apps and scrolling through images and websites was fine although I would have preferred more of a reluctance of the screen to gather finger smears.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 100%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→FR Archive.org version
I was a bit worried taking a punt on this device. I normally recommend a Moto G for people in this segment and had the G4 been smaller, I would’ve bought that for my mother without any hesitation. But this phone really surprised me. Frankly this is the best budget phone on the market now. Sure, as a phone-nerd it doesnt have the features and power that I want for all the things I do with my phone. But for a lot of people, it really is all the phone they’d ever need. Everyday tasks are done easily with good performance, a good screen, good battery life, decent camera and a surprisingly enjoyable software experience.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% mobilité: 93% finition: 87%
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
Nevertheless, the Honor 5C is a decent entry-level phone with a few standout features — solid, multi-day battery life, a touch of class with that metal back panel, expandable storage and easy dual-SIM connectivity. And if you're looking for an affordable Android phone which covers all the major bases, it's definitely worth a look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/08/2016
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C excels when it comes to speed, but fails to excel in any other regard. Even its camera, which is arguably the phone's only other strong suit, is rather hit and miss depending on lighting conditions. The biggest issue here, though, is the quality of the competition. When you consider that the Moto G4 costs just £20 more yet comes with a better screen, longer-lasting battery and vastly superior build quality, the Honor 5C simply can't compete.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a good smartphone that gets a lot right, but unfortunately, does not really have anything that sets it apart in competition. It offers good performance, camera, ergonomics, battery life, and is an overall pleasant device. The lack of frills make it a very simple, easy to use and convenient device, and is worthy of being considered at Rs. 10,999.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Techtree.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite quite a lot being written about the 13MP and 8MP cameras on the 5C, I found them a bit wanting. They do both shoot video at 1080p, and there's anF2.0 aperture and 78° wide-angle 5-element (5P) macro lens, but I found photos ready to pixelate under many conditions. Image reproduction was good, but the fuzziness and noise set the camera at standard average budget for me. The camera app, on the other hand, is rather nice and easy to use.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C offers a blend of good design, appealing UI and a capable hardware. It is definitely a good update over its predecessor, the Honor 4C, and feels as good as the Honor 5X. There are minor software issues but nothing that a quick update can’t fix. Having said that, the smartphone doesn’t offer anything unique or a differentiating factor that would set it apart from the competition. It’s a plain Jane phone which will struggle to survive in the market. The only reason one might just go for the Honor 5C is for its smaller display, as there are some consumers who don’t want to go beyond the 5.0-5.2 inch screen size.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% équipement: 70% écran: 65% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Recombu EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C presents itself as an unassuming, middling Android handset, but you’ll quickly realise that it’s full of surprises. Great performance, battery life and cameras elevated the 5C above our expectations and at £149 it undercuts other top affordable offerings like the new Moto G4 giving it a serious edge.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Androidbeat EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5c is Huawei’s second entrant into the rapidly growing sub-15k smartphone segment in India. The handset does a lot of things right that the Honor 5x got wrong – especially with respect to software and performance. However, I cannot help but feel that Honor/Huawei should have also launched a 32GB/3GB RAM variant of the 5c at a slightly higher price as it would have then better sufficed the needs of customers who want a phone with dual-SIM capabilities. The sub-par GPU and multitasking performance also immediately rule out the phone for any power user.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Tech Critter EN→FR Archive.org version
Apart from the SoC efficiency, the battery life is also affected by the smart app & battery management under EMUI and they're not so smart if you left it in default. The OS would automatically choose which app is more critical and set it as "protected" app which allows it to run after the screen is turned off.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/23/2016
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is a mid-tier phone through and through. If we cast our minds back to 2013 we could almost say the same of the iPhone 5C. It was placed just below the more powerful 5S, and both served as updates to the ageing iPhone 5. Ultimately, either would make a great second, standby handset. The choice might be easier to make if you're tied to one ecosystem, but if we have one concern it would be the age of the iPhone 5C.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/22/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C improves ever so slightly on its predecessor, thanks to a more capable SoC and small improvements to the camera. The design and build have also been bettered, and Android Marshmallow adds a few features and tweaks to the software. There isn't much to complain about here, especially at this price. Unfortunately, the 5C still lacks any wow factor. Nothing in the phone stands out, and this is in all ways an average phone that does what it does capably, but not exceptionally well. The pricing is competitive, but a lower price would have suited this phone much more. Buyers are likely to prefer other products in the same price range, such as the Redmi Note 3 or Lenovo Zuk Z1.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C is undeniably excellent value for money as a piece of hardware. It has internal specs that match, if not beat, the Moto G4's. But its use of Huawei’s Emotion skin will be a sticking point for many buyers. I can’t help but feel Honor should follow Motorola’s example and load its handsets with an unskinned version of Android.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
The Honor 5C looks set to be a cracking deal for £150, falling in between the £116 Vodafone Ultra 6 and £170 Moto G4. With a metal build, G4-matching specs, and a price that won’t destroy your wallet, Honor could have a real winner on its hands here. Stay tuned for our full review, to see if we’ll be crowning it our new budget smartphone champion.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
For the low asking price of £149, you really do get quite a lot of phone for your money in the Honor 5C. That's the aim of Honor - giving good value for money without making too many compromises. The only real omission on the spec sheet is the lack of a fingerprint scanner. With most devices offering this technology, both in the top and mid ranges, it would have been more appealing if that had been offered.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: Computer Magazin - 01/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 93%
Source: Area DVD DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/17/2016
Source: eTest DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/09/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 08/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Android Pit DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/20/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 15/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: Verivox DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60%
Source: Honor News Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/09/2016
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: PC Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 92% performances: 93% équipement: 94% écran: 91% mobilité: 98%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% équipement: 100% mobilité: 70% finition: 100%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2016
Source: Turn On DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2016
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 79% écran: 83% mobilité: 79%
Source: n-tv DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/21/2016
Source: Golem DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/20/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/13/2016
Source: Android Pit - Heft 7/2016
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: InstaNews IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/02/2016
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/05/2016
Notes: prix: 90% équipement: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Tecno Cino IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 85% écran: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
Carte graphique intégrée pour smartphones et tablettes. Dotée de deux clusters et prenant en charge les instructions OpenGL ES 3.2.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Kirin 650:
SoC ARM octo-core intégrant huit cœurs processeurs Cortex-A53. Quatre cœurs cadencés jusqu'à 1.7 GHz (dans une optique d'économie d'énergie) et les quatre autres jusqu'à 2 GHz (mode performance). Le SoC intègre par ailleurs une carte graphique ARM Mali-T830 MP2 et un modem LTE.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.20": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
79.93%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.