Coolpad Mega 2.5D
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix 83.6-degrees wide-angle lens, f/2.2 Aperture
Price comparison
Moyenne de 2 notes (à partir de 9 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Coolpad Mega 2.5D
Source: Tech Magnifier
EN→FR Archive.org versionIndeed the device look premium and beautiful, the screen is smooth and nice however the back is made up of average quality material. It’s a uni-body design and you need both the hands to use it. Battery life is decent and could last a day or more in average usage. However, in the same price range you can get a better choice from Lenovo, the Vibe K5 Plus or Redmi 3s from Mi.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech PP
EN→FR Archive.org versionCoolpad’s intentions are good to bring a phone with good build and design that doesn’t look cheap, doesn’t compromise on some basic sensors, and available at a very affordable price. And they’ve done it, but not without sacrificing the engines that power the phone. The poor choice of processor and hence its clock speeds cannot be overseen just by throwing in a 3GB of RAM. You’d notice the lack of good touch sensitivity the instant you pick the phone and start using. Gaming and camera too aren’t good in their overall performance though the UI has some good options up its sleeves.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: Techniqued
EN→FR Archive.org versionPriced at Rs 6,999, the Coolpad Mega 2.5D offers quite good value for money with stylish design and looks and latest software. But the real problems for Coolpad Mega 2.5D is the average performance, camera, and not so great battery life. The Redmi 3S which is again priced Rs 6,999 definitely offers better value for money. But if you are looking for a large screen budget offering, Coolpad Mega 2.5D is definitely a good buy.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 70% performances: 65% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 85%
Source: Gogi.in
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Coolpad Mega 2.5D could have been a good handset for Rs. 6,999 had the Redmi 3S not been launched, unfortunately for the price the Redmi 3S is no doubt a much better option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: The Mobile Indian
EN→FR Archive.org versionTo sum up, we would suggest you to consider the Coolpad Mega if you are not looking for a small phone like Xiaomi Redmi 3S which we reviewed recently. The Coolpad Mega won't disappoint you at Rs 6,999.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/31/2016
Source: Fone Arena
EN→FR Archive.org versionCoolpad is also playing with feature sets to make them appealing to specific audiences, the selfie loving millennials being that in the case of the Mega 2.5D. Yes, performance does seem to have taken a back seat for the brand but not to a degree that would impede even casual use. At a price point of Rs. 6,999, the Coolpad Mega 2.5D is certainly worth taking a look at the next time you’re in the market for a new handset.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/26/2016
Source: Mobygyaan
EN→FR Archive.org versionCoolpad Mega 2.5D will be available at a price of ₹6,999 on a first flash sale via Amazon India. What we’ll miss in this phone will be the amazing fingerprint scanner other Coolpad phones offer and a larger battery capacity. The good thing is it comes with a classy look and a newer CoolUI 8.0. Coolpad Mega 2.5D comes with an updated CoolUI 8.0 based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow while other Coolpad phones remain behind in terms of the software.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/25/2016
Source: The Indian Express
EN→FR Archive.org versionSelfie obsession is fine, and Coolpad Mega 2.5 manages to have a slight edge on the front for this price point. But for an overall performance, my bet is still the Redmi 3s because of the battery, which I think is a feature you can’t overlook when choosing a smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/24/2016
Source: Gadget Diary
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe phone has a MediaTek MT6573P processor which is a 1 Ghz quad-core chip and it is coupled with 3GB of RAM. Now, you cannot expect some top level performance with this thing, but as a normal day to day phone, this is a great phone to use. It might not be the most powerful phone in the market but we didn’t face lag while navigating through the interface of while opening or closing the applications.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/15/2016
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T720:
Carte graphique pour SoCs ARM. Peut être modulée en 1 - 8 cœurs (T720 MP8) cadencés à 650 MHz (gravure en 28nm). Support des librairies OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3 et Renderscript.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
MT6735:
SoC ARM quad-core 64 bit intégrant quatre cœurs processeurs Cortex-A53 cadencés jusqu'à 1.5 GHz. Conçu pour des tablettes et des smartphones Android à petits prix.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.50": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
71.5%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.
