Apple MacBook Pro 15 Zoll Santa Rosa
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 19 notes (à partir de 26 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Apple MacBook Pro 15 Zoll Santa Rosa
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch (Penryn), at $3,149 (direct), isn't the first laptop to undergo an Intel brain transplant in the form of a next-generation Penryn processor , but it's among the most sizzling we've seen so far. At the heart of this MacBook Pro, the 2.6-GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 CPU and 4GB RAM played a pivotal role in tearing up performance tests, including a compelling 15 percent increase in battery life. Although it didn't go through any major design changes, the MacBook Pro 15-inch delivers more battery life, better performance scores, and is still the best-looking mainstream laptop in the market.
4.5 von 5, Leistung exzellent, Mobilität sehr gut, Display gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/26/2008
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 95% écran: 80% mobilité: 90%
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Apple MacBook Pro is a decent contender against other notebooks in the 15.4" segment with quality display and powerful internals. Having the upper hand against other computers being able to legally run both OSX and Vista does give it some strength, but I am not sure that will outweigh the disadvantage of leg griddle capabilities.
Leistung gut, Emissionen mangelhaft, Mobilität schlecht
Critique d'utilisateur, , Courte, Date: 02/26/2008
Notes: performances: 80% mobilité: 40% degré de nuisance: 50%
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
When today's laptops start to appear in museums in a few decades' time, Apple's range is guaranteed a place, with the MacBook Pro a case in point. We first saw the MacBook Pro over a year ago (web ID: 84908), and the exterior has changed little since Apple first adopted Intel's architecture. But Apple has been busy with the internals, with plenty of worthwhile changes that make the MacBook better value. First is the screen, with LED backlighting. This, at least in theory, means better battery life, although there's no noticeable difference to panel quality. Whites are clean and colours vibrant. And, befitting a machine that will find its way into the hands of professional photographers, the panel is mercifully free of a reflective gloss finish, although you can specify one for no extra charge if you wish. There's more good news in store with the 120GB of hard disk capacity, which will be a practical size for business users, although those working with significant amounts of media might want to upgrade to 200GB for £94 exc VAT.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4 von 6, Mobilität gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/20/2007
Notes: Note globale: 67% mobilité: 80%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple MacBook Pro fanatics know the drill. Every six months or so, their eyes gleam in anticipation of earth-shattering upgrades. With Intel's launch of its Santa Rosa platform, the foregone conclusion was that the MacBook Pros would get the added speed from a component transplant. But what about other desired features? Would the MacBook Pro have built-in Wireless WAN? A Blu-ray drive? An LED display? Well, one out of three isn't bad. The Apple MacBook Pro 15-inch (LED) embeds a new display technology called LED backlighting, not to mention an array of processing parts that range from a new Intel Core 2 Duo processor to a new graphics core from nVidia. You won't notice much of a visual difference with the LED screen, but the performance enhancements may be enough to make MacBook Pro owners out of some who had been undecided.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4.5 von 5, Leistung hervorragend, Mobilität gut, Emissionen schlecht
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/17/2007
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 95% mobilité: 80% degré de nuisance: 40%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple gives its high-end notebook a speed and graphics boost and a stunning LED display. You can't tell by looking at the sexy, familiar aluminum design that the MacBook Pro has undergone several significant improvements that elevate it from a very good machine to one that's arguably the best in its class. Aimed at mobile professionals who want power and performance in an easy-to-carry design, the MacBook Pro features a blazing-fast Intel Core 2 Duo processor, powerful Nvidia graphics, outstanding battery life, and one of the best software suites around. Starting at a reasonable $1,999, the MacBook Pro is definitely a dream machine for creative types seeking a notebook for work and play. At just 5.4 pounds and an inch thick, the MacBook Pro has a bright and colorful 15.4-inch display, making it the thinnest and lightest mainstream notebook on the market--again. Everyday productivity and video watching is a joy.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4.5 von 5, Leistung gut, Display gut, Mobilität gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/09/2007
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
While the core element of the MacBook Pro hasn't changed, Apple has moved to upgrade and improve certain elements of the laptop. So should you upgrade now, does the new features give it a 9/10? We get working to find out. Choosing when to upgrade your computer is always a hard one. Chances are you'll buy one and then new features come out and that's what most likely happened here. Following hot on the heals of new specs for Apple's MacBook Pro range being announced earlier in the year, the laptop has had yet more upgrades, although not to the design of the model. As before the MacBook Pro retains its lightweight aluminium chassis, there is a 1.3MP iSight webcam above the screen and it weights in around the 2.5kg mark. New however to this mix, is the introduction of a faster processor; still Intel Dual Core, although now Santa Rosa and with speeds up to 2.4GHz.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
8 von 10, Mobilität gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/30/2007
Notes: Note globale: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Mobile Macs EN→FR Archive.org version
Ich kann so richtig eigentlich nur den Vergleich zu meinem alten PowerBook ziehen. Und der ist … nun ja … schon ziemlich umwerfend. Da wäre natürlich die Prozessorleistung. Das ein 2.5 Jahre alter Rechner nicht mit einem aktuellen Modell mithalten kann ist sicherlich nicht sonderlich verwunderlich. Aber diese Intel-Kisten sind wirklich noch mal einen ganzen Zacken schneller und die meiste Software gibt es mittlerweile nativ für Intel Macs. DVD-Encoding mit Handbracke z.B. lief auf meinem Powerbook mit ca. 8 Bildern pro Sekunde ab. Mit dem MacBook sind es über 50. Autsch. Natürlich sind nicht alle Programme so deutlich schneller, aber der allgemeine Leistungszuwachs ist beeindruckend. Der Rechner fährt deutlich schneller hoch, Camino mit seinen vielen offenen Tabs startet viel schneller. Darüber hinaus arbeitet es sich einfach flüssiger. Jedes Programm ist merklich flotter, z.B. Mail.
umfangreicher Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar
sehr gut, Leistung gut
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/26/2007
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
But that’s ignoring the point of the Apple MacBook Pro, the best laptop we think Apple has ever made. Usually, when reviewing a product, we come across a design flaw or issue that gives us pause. Not so this time. That doesn’t mean that this Apple MacBook Pro is perfect. The ability to show off high-def video would have been nice, and a Blu-ray drive (indeed, any improvement on the eight-speed SuperDrive) would have made an excellent inclusion. But the Apple MacBook Pro is fast, looks good, and battery life is substantial. Oh, and did we mention the screen?
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
(von 5): 4.5, Preis/Leistung 4, Ausstattung 4.5, Verarbeitung 5, Leistung gut, Mobilität gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/02/2007
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 100%
Source: Digital Trends EN→FR Archive.org version
The new 2.4GHz MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo is a fantastic laptop for almost every conceivable use; it's even powerful enough to act as a desktop replacement. The internal component upgrades over the previous MacBook Pro are groundbreaking, especially the new LED-lit screen and perpendicular SATA hard drive. This is the 3rd major revision of the MacBook Pro and Apple has clearly worked out all the kinks attendant to 1st rev products. In fact, everywhere you look, the 2.4GHz MacBook Pro is flat-out better, faster, more efficient and more advanced than any other Apple laptop ever produced - and perhaps more so than any other PC/Windows laptop on the market today. And though Apple clearly increased the 2.4GHz MacBook Pro's specifications, they didn't raise the price one penny.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
8.5 von 10, Preis/Leistung schlecht, Leistung gut, Display sehr gut, Mobilität gut, Emissionen gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/02/2007
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 40% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% degré de nuisance: 80%
Source: vnunet.com EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple has been hyping the iPhone like crazy for the past few months. Meanwhile, without much hype at all, its range of Macbook laptops has been quietly flying off the shelves and helping the company rack up record profits. Pros: Attractive design; good performance and features; Cons: Expensive, but still comparable to PC laptops; Overall: It may not be Apple’s most high-profile product, but the Macbook Pro is a top-of-the-range laptop
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
(von 5): 4, Preis/Leistung 4, Ausstattung 4, Ergonomie 4, Leistung gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/25/2007
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The good: Updated CPUs and graphics without an updated price; LED-backlit display for better battery life; 802.11n support. The bad: Minimal configuration options; only 90 days of toll-free technical support; still no media card reader. The bottom line: Apple's 15-inch MacBook Pro gets a solid under-the-hood upgrade for better performance and longer battery life, allowing the MacBook Pro to put enough distance between itself and the lower-end MacBook to justify its higher price.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
(von 10): 8.2, Preis/Leistung gerechtfertigt, Leistung gut, Mobilität gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/21/2007
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 70% performances: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: TBreak EN→FR Archive.org version
With the latest update from Apple that was released a couple of weeks back, the Macbook Pro is now on its third revision now. I owned the original Core Duo based MBP but never felt the need to upgrade to the second revision which was mainly a CPU upgrade to Intel's Core 2. This latest update certainly offers a lot more more reasons to upgrade. Before I begin, this is not a full blooded review of the MBP. Instead, its more of a quick take- comparing the new features to the older revisions. The first thing that strikes you off about the new MacBook Pro is the incredibly bright screen. The LED lighting certainly causes the whites to appear much whiter, however, at the brightest settings, you can see that the lighting is slightly uneven. On a totally white background, my particular unit was bleeding from the top and bottom. Lowering the brightness- which you certainly will to avoid theHDR/squinting effect, makes the uneven lighting disappear.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
Display gut
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/18/2007
Notes: écran: 80%
Source: Ars Technica EN→FR Archive.org version
If you focus merely on the clock speed, the difference between the Rev. B and Rev. C machines is truly miniscule. After all, we're talking about a 70MHz speed bump. However, the performance gains with the Rev. C MacBook Pro belie the modest megahertz burp, due in no small part to its 800MHz front-side bus. Subjectively, using the two laptops feels about the same. They're both snappy and leave nothing to be desired when it comes to both everyday and special-case usage. Bootup times on the Santa Rosa MacBook Pro are a bit faster, as mentioned before. To me, the biggest difference is the high-resolution screen. If your eyes can take it—and I'm approaching the age where I have to hold things farther away from my eyes to read them—the extra $100 for the 1920x1200 display is money well-spent.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
Leistung zufriedenstellend, Display gut, Verarbeitung gut, Mobilität gut, Emissionen mangelhaft
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/12/2007
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80% degré de nuisance: 50%
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→FR Archive.org version
This is an excellent upgrade to the MacBook Pro, I'm extremely satisfied with it so far. I'm new to Mac computers, new to OS X, but I am one happy switcher. The MBP would be an excellent choice for anyone looking to purchase a performance laptop, or even desktop replacement. Combine that performance with Apple's sexy design, and the MBP is a great purchase.
umfangreicher Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar
Display ausgezeichnet, Leistung sehr gut, Preis/Leistung gerechtfertigt, Mobilität mangelhaft
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/07/2007
Notes: prix: 70% performances: 90% écran: 95% mobilité: 50%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/16/2008
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 70% performances: 80% équipement: 50% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 100% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Musician's Life - 2/08 DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/01/2008
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 90% écran: 90% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2007
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 93% écran: 95% mobilité: 83% finition: 98% ergonomie: 86% degré de nuisance: 65%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 11-12/07
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/10/2007
Notes: prix: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/10/2007
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 100% équipement: 88% écran: 10% mobilité: 59% ergonomie: 71%
Source: c't DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 08/05/2007
Notes: performances: 90% équipement: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Mac Up DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/20/2007
Notes: Note globale: 67% performances: 90% écran: 80%
Source: Mac Life DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/20/2007
Notes: Note globale: 83% degré de nuisance: 40%
Source: ZDNet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/19/2007
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 90% équipement: 90% mobilité: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/08/2007
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 97% écran: 96% mobilité: 83% finition: 98% ergonomie: 89% degré de nuisance: 76%
Source: Mac Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/14/2007
Notes: Note globale: 95% prix: 80% performances: 80%
Source: Beat DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/20/2007
performances: 80%
Commentaire
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT: La NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT est le successeur direct X 10 de la GeForce Go 7600 GT pour ordinateurs portables, Selon la VRAM et la cadence du processeur, sa performance est entre la carte graphique 7600 GT et la 7900 GS.
Docn les jeux récents comme Company of Heroes, Supreme Commander ou F.E.A.R tournerons de façon fluide avec les détails à fond et une résolution de 1024 ou similaire. Les joueurs qui veulent des taux de rafraichissements élevés devraient attendre la série 8800 de chez NVidia.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Core 2 Duo:
C'est le successeur du Core Duo avec des pipelines 5-20% plus rapides sans consommation supplémentaire. Comme une addition à la conception du core duo là existe un quatrième décodeur, une SSE-unité amplifiée et une unité logique arithmétique additionnelle (ALU). Le core 2 duo pour ordinateurs portables est identique aux processeurs de core 2 duo d'ordinateur de bureau mais les portables fonctionnent avec des tensions inférieures et une vitesse de Frontside. L'exécution des portables également synchronisés est 20-25% inférieure à des ordinateur de bureau en raison de fréquence d’horloge inférieure de Frontside et plus lents de disques durs.
T7700:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
15.40": 15-16 pouces Soit la diagonale d’écran la plus commune dans le monde des ordinateurs portables. Il s’agit de la taille d’écran offrant actuellement la plus grande variété de choix sur le marché.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
2.5 kg: Ce poids est le plus répandu parmi les ordinateurs portables standards de 14-16 pouces.
84.95%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.