Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 Gamme
Processeur: Intel Core i7 6700HQ, Intel Core i7 6820HQ, Intel Core i7 6920HQCarte graphique: AMD Radeon Pro 450, AMD Radeon Pro 455, AMD Radeon Pro 460
Écran: 15.40 pouces
Poids: 1.807kg, 1.83kg
Prix: 2699, 4039 euros
Moyenne de 69 notes (à partir de 123 critiques)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)Processeur: Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Carte graphique: AMD Radeon Pro 450
Écran: 15.40 pouces, 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixels
Poids: 1.807kg
Prix: 2699 euros
Liens: Apple Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Critiques
Test en direct // Mieux d'une Touch ? Apple a considérablement aminci son MacBook Pro 15 et a réduit le poids de ce dernier à environ 1,8 kg pour une épaisseur de seulement 16 millimètres. Professionnel, cet ordinateur portable avait réussi a gagner le cœur de la clientèle du feu MacBook Pro 17 dans le passé. Est-ce dorénavant une alternative pour les utilisateurs de l'ancienne version du MBP 13 ?
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple is expected to unveil an updated MacBook Pro line-up in June, so if you can wait, you should as you'll likely get better specs for the same money, or get the 2016 model on a slight discount.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple is expected to unveil an updated MacBook Pro line-up in June, so if you can wait, you should as you'll likely get better specs for the same money, or get the 2016 model on a slight discount.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80% performances: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Digital Versus EN→FR Archive.org version
The Touch Bar is very much the poor cousin of a proper touchscreen, the lack of ports is very much style over substance – and let’s not forget that it's both late and about to be superseded. We expected more from you, Apple.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Digital Versus EN→FR Archive.org version
The Touch Bar is very much the poor cousin of a proper touchscreen, the lack of ports is very much style over substance – and let’s not forget that it's both late and about to be superseded. We expected more from you, Apple.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Business News Daily EN→FR Archive.org version
The Touch Bar isn't perfect – it can seem gimmicky and even be downright confusing at times. Still, I think it has plenty of potential, especially once you get past the initial learning curve. It won't revolutionize your workflow, but it could save you from hunting through menus while you work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Business News Daily EN→FR Archive.org version
The Touch Bar isn't perfect – it can seem gimmicky and even be downright confusing at times. Still, I think it has plenty of potential, especially once you get past the initial learning curve. It won't revolutionize your workflow, but it could save you from hunting through menus while you work.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
With a slim bezel around its 15-inch screen and a thinner, lighter body, the top-end MacBook Pro packs a real visual punch. But if you miss the traditional HDMI and USB ports, consider the older 2015 model that Apple still sells.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
With a slim bezel around its 15-inch screen and a thinner, lighter body, the top-end MacBook Pro packs a real visual punch. But if you miss the traditional HDMI and USB ports, consider the older 2015 model that Apple still sells.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a fast machine, of course, but maybe not quite fast enough for some tastes; it's worth reflecting on that maximum spec of 16GB of RAM, which may hold this machine back from a role in genuine pro settings. We're somewhat hopeful for a March update to add the option of more RAM and Kaby Lake processors.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a fast machine, of course, but maybe not quite fast enough for some tastes; it's worth reflecting on that maximum spec of 16GB of RAM, which may hold this machine back from a role in genuine pro settings. We're somewhat hopeful for a March update to add the option of more RAM and Kaby Lake processors.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is it worth it? Yes, if you can get a discount (decent discounts aren’t hard to find, though you have to be vigilant and have some patience). I believe Apple still makes the best laptops on the planet and the MBP 15 Touch Bar is the pinnacle of Apple’s MacBook line.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is it worth it? Yes, if you can get a discount (decent discounts aren’t hard to find, though you have to be vigilant and have some patience). I believe Apple still makes the best laptops on the planet and the MBP 15 Touch Bar is the pinnacle of Apple’s MacBook line.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2017
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
With its solid feel, bold screen, clean lines, giant touch pad, and svelte frame, Apple's new MacBook Pro 15-inch is a very good light laptop, with solid (though sometimes unpredictable) battery life that eclipses most of the big-screen competition. If you've been waiting for a thin-and-light premium powerhouse, it's well worth considering. You can certainly buy more powerful workstation-grade Windows laptops with more memory, but their design and portability won't match up well to the MacBook Pro, and their unplugged longevity will almost certainly be shorter.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
With its solid feel, bold screen, clean lines, giant touch pad, and svelte frame, Apple's new MacBook Pro 15-inch is a very good light laptop, with solid (though sometimes unpredictable) battery life that eclipses most of the big-screen competition. If you've been waiting for a thin-and-light premium powerhouse, it's well worth considering. You can certainly buy more powerful workstation-grade Windows laptops with more memory, but their design and portability won't match up well to the MacBook Pro, and their unplugged longevity will almost certainly be shorter.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s thin, light and very fast, but also so expensive that it’s in danger of pricing out even the professionals.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s thin, light and very fast, but also so expensive that it’s in danger of pricing out even the professionals.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no denying that the 15in MacBook Pro is a flawed device. Its battery life is much weaker than expected, its choice of connections means you need to buy adapters, and its headline-grabbing new Touch Bar just isn’t that useful right now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no denying that the 15in MacBook Pro is a flawed device. Its battery life is much weaker than expected, its choice of connections means you need to buy adapters, and its headline-grabbing new Touch Bar just isn’t that useful right now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
Mostly though, the MacBook Pro is a supreme notebooks that you won’t mind spending good money on because they’ll be companions for years. Want to know the only thing we really don’t like? The Apple logo on the lid no longer lights up. That’s a sadness. But USB-C and the Touch Bar? That’s welcome progress.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
Mostly though, the MacBook Pro is a supreme notebooks that you won’t mind spending good money on because they’ll be companions for years. Want to know the only thing we really don’t like? The Apple logo on the lid no longer lights up. That’s a sadness. But USB-C and the Touch Bar? That’s welcome progress.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
You can rely on its big and gorgeous screen more than any other MacBook in history. The ability to hook up three 4K monitors or two 5K panels feels like a bonus more than anything – and even if you did that, you would still want to use the MacBook's screen for its incredible luminosity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
You can rely on its big and gorgeous screen more than any other MacBook in history. The ability to hook up three 4K monitors or two 5K panels feels like a bonus more than anything – and even if you did that, you would still want to use the MacBook's screen for its incredible luminosity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, if you're still nursing a 2011 MacBook/MacBook Pro, or are moving up from a 12 or 13 inch Mac, there's certainly stuff to enjoy here: dedicated graphics, faster performance with double the CPU cores, a roomier display and a relatively portable package. If you're upgrading from a previous generation 13" MacBook Pro, the 15" MacBook Pro will be heavenly in all but footprint and weight (though miraculously, it's only a half pound heavier than the last gen 13" Pro). The display is brighter and more colorful than ever, and the design and looks are beyond reproach. As ever, OS X is stable and intuitive and Apple's support on the phone and at the Genius Bar is better than most Windows PC makers' support.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→FR Archive.org version
That said, if you're still nursing a 2011 MacBook/MacBook Pro, or are moving up from a 12 or 13 inch Mac, there's certainly stuff to enjoy here: dedicated graphics, faster performance with double the CPU cores, a roomier display and a relatively portable package. If you're upgrading from a previous generation 13" MacBook Pro, the 15" MacBook Pro will be heavenly in all but footprint and weight (though miraculously, it's only a half pound heavier than the last gen 13" Pro). The display is brighter and more colorful than ever, and the design and looks are beyond reproach. As ever, OS X is stable and intuitive and Apple's support on the phone and at the Genius Bar is better than most Windows PC makers' support.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
That’s not to say Apple’s new MacBook Pro isn’t good, because it is. You just have to be prepared for Apple’s future of computing, which is very much in its infancy. Even if you don’t jump on the new Pro, you should start preparing now, because a dongle-filled future is coming whether you like it or not.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→FR Archive.org version
That’s not to say Apple’s new MacBook Pro isn’t good, because it is. You just have to be prepared for Apple’s future of computing, which is very much in its infancy. Even if you don’t jump on the new Pro, you should start preparing now, because a dongle-filled future is coming whether you like it or not.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/23/2016
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
My biggest point of contention with this year's line-up has been that I thought Apple skimped on storage and RAM while boosting the entry price for the MacBook Pros with Touch Bar. I felt Apple was nickel and diming its customers, especially considering the company's average profit margins (over 38% last quarter).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Computerworld.com EN→FR Archive.org version
My biggest point of contention with this year's line-up has been that I thought Apple skimped on storage and RAM while boosting the entry price for the MacBook Pros with Touch Bar. I felt Apple was nickel and diming its customers, especially considering the company's average profit margins (over 38% last quarter).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
My biggest point of contention with this year's line-up has been that I thought Apple skimped on storage and RAM while boosting the entry price for the MacBook Pros with Touch Bar. I felt Apple was nickel and diming its customers, especially considering the company's average profit margins (over 38% last quarter).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Computerworld.com EN→FR Archive.org version
My biggest point of contention with this year's line-up has been that I thought Apple skimped on storage and RAM while boosting the entry price for the MacBook Pros with Touch Bar. I felt Apple was nickel and diming its customers, especially considering the company's average profit margins (over 38% last quarter).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Gizmodo EN→FR Archive.org version
O destaque real do novo MacBook Pro é a Touch Bar. Ela é um pouco útil, mas possui tão pouco suporte em apps de terceiros que, pelo menos por enquanto, não é razão suficiente para comprar um laptop novo, particularmente se você já está satisfeito com o desempenho de sua máquina atual.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro has lots of things going for it. We love the keyboard, the trackpad, the screen, the performance, and the inclusion of the Touch ID sensor.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gizmodo EN→FR Archive.org version
O destaque real do novo MacBook Pro é a Touch Bar. Ela é um pouco útil, mas possui tão pouco suporte em apps de terceiros que, pelo menos por enquanto, não é razão suficiente para comprar um laptop novo, particularmente se você já está satisfeito com o desempenho de sua máquina atual.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro has lots of things going for it. We love the keyboard, the trackpad, the screen, the performance, and the inclusion of the Touch ID sensor.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
While the $2,130 Dell XPS 15 Touch has better legacy connectivity with USB 3.0 and HDMI, and a higher-resolution 4K screen with a slightly wider color gamut, that won't do you any good when you run out of juice 5 hours earlier in a long workday. The fact that you have to buy new adapters for external displays or drives may give you pause, but the industry is catching up, and finally, Thunderbolt no longer means "Mac-only." You'll be ahead of the game with the 15-inch MacBook Pro, which replaces the Dell XPS 15 Touch as our latest Editors' Choice for high-end desktop-replacement laptops.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
While the $2,130 Dell XPS 15 Touch has better legacy connectivity with USB 3.0 and HDMI, and a higher-resolution 4K screen with a slightly wider color gamut, that won't do you any good when you run out of juice 5 hours earlier in a long workday. The fact that you have to buy new adapters for external displays or drives may give you pause, but the industry is catching up, and finally, Thunderbolt no longer means "Mac-only." You'll be ahead of the game with the 15-inch MacBook Pro, which replaces the Dell XPS 15 Touch as our latest Editors' Choice for high-end desktop-replacement laptops.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Six Colours EN→FR Archive.org version
So who says there’s nothing new under the sun? Here’s a new dimension added to the Mac, with a debt owed to iOS, but undeniably its own approach. It never forgets it’s a companion to the keyboard and trackpad, but adds more flexibility than a static keyboard ever could. I’m looking forward to seeing how it evolves—and I have to admit, I kind of want one to place above the top row of my own external Mac keyboard now. I never felt that way about function keys.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: The Verge EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro with Touch Bar is the first major laptop that tries to replicate that dream — not with individually reprogrammable keys, but with a thin touchscreen strip that can do even more. It adds touchscreen buttons and ever-changing digital controls to the familiar set of physical keys, and it has the potential to remake the keyboard in a way we've never seen before.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is the Touch Bar worth a gamble? It’s an expensive gamble to make, and I think that anyone except the utterly faithful should wait six months to see how the ecosystem react.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Windows PCs have undergone huge transformations over the past several years: they’ve gained touchscreens, the ability to bend and twist, and many can pull double duty as tablets. Apple’s MacBooks haven’t changed nearly as dramatically — using an Apple laptop built in 2015 is largely the same as using one from 2010.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro with Touch Bar offers a slew of neat touch controls, a beautifully slim design and the most blazing performance you can find on a Mac.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Six Colours EN→FR Archive.org version
So who says there’s nothing new under the sun? Here’s a new dimension added to the Mac, with a debt owed to iOS, but undeniably its own approach. It never forgets it’s a companion to the keyboard and trackpad, but adds more flexibility than a static keyboard ever could. I’m looking forward to seeing how it evolves—and I have to admit, I kind of want one to place above the top row of my own external Mac keyboard now. I never felt that way about function keys.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: The Verge EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro with Touch Bar is the first major laptop that tries to replicate that dream — not with individually reprogrammable keys, but with a thin touchscreen strip that can do even more. It adds touchscreen buttons and ever-changing digital controls to the familiar set of physical keys, and it has the potential to remake the keyboard in a way we've never seen before.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Is the Touch Bar worth a gamble? It’s an expensive gamble to make, and I think that anyone except the utterly faithful should wait six months to see how the ecosystem react.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Forbes EN→FR Archive.org version
Windows PCs have undergone huge transformations over the past several years: they’ve gained touchscreens, the ability to bend and twist, and many can pull double duty as tablets. Apple’s MacBooks haven’t changed nearly as dramatically — using an Apple laptop built in 2015 is largely the same as using one from 2010.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The MacBook Pro with Touch Bar offers a slew of neat touch controls, a beautifully slim design and the most blazing performance you can find on a Mac.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple's MacBook Pro has long been the go-to laptop for the media creation set. But with this week's upgrade, the laptop gets more powerful internals, a new chassis, MacBook-like butterfly switches for the keyboard, and USB-C/Thunderbolt 3, in addition to the unique Touch Bar above the keyboard. The Apple faithful will likely be eager to upgrade, though they might need to budget a few extra bucks for adapters.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Opt for the 15-inch MacBook Pro, meanwhile, and that starts at $2,399. That comes with a 2.6GHz quad-core Core i7, 16GB of memory, a 256GB SSD, and AMD’s 2GB Radeon Pro 450 graphics. Throw the contents of your wallet at the configurator, and you can end up with a 2.9GHz quad-core Core i7, 16GB of memory, 2TB of SSD, and a 4GB Radeon Pro 460. You’ll also be $4,299 poorer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The beautiful Retina screen is unchanged from previous generations, and with the new Mac lineup, every notebook Apple sells is now Retina. In our full review we’ll dive more deeply into the performance of the updated processors and GPU, as well as Apple’s promised 10 hour battery life. But from what I’ve seen so far, the updated MacBook Pro is going to be worth the wait.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple's MacBook Pro has long been the go-to laptop for the media creation set. But with this week's upgrade, the laptop gets more powerful internals, a new chassis, MacBook-like butterfly switches for the keyboard, and USB-C/Thunderbolt 3, in addition to the unique Touch Bar above the keyboard. The Apple faithful will likely be eager to upgrade, though they might need to budget a few extra bucks for adapters.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Gear Open EN→FR Archive.org version
Opt for the 15-inch MacBook Pro, meanwhile, and that starts at $2,399. That comes with a 2.6GHz quad-core Core i7, 16GB of memory, a 256GB SSD, and AMD’s 2GB Radeon Pro 450 graphics. Throw the contents of your wallet at the configurator, and you can end up with a 2.9GHz quad-core Core i7, 16GB of memory, 2TB of SSD, and a 4GB Radeon Pro 460. You’ll also be $4,299 poorer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The beautiful Retina screen is unchanged from previous generations, and with the new Mac lineup, every notebook Apple sells is now Retina. In our full review we’ll dive more deeply into the performance of the updated processors and GPU, as well as Apple’s promised 10 hour battery life. But from what I’ve seen so far, the updated MacBook Pro is going to be worth the wait.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
It seems like this MacBook hasn't really moved on, but tiny tweaks ensure it's still a great machine. After all, the mid-2015 model can't be considered ot innovative by Apple's standards, but the largest of Apple's notebooks is still a stunning Mac and a total powerhouse in general.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
It seems like this MacBook hasn't really moved on, but tiny tweaks ensure it's still a great machine. After all, the mid-2015 model can't be considered ot innovative by Apple's standards, but the largest of Apple's notebooks is still a stunning Mac and a total powerhouse in general.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - 4/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 93% écran: 91% mobilité: 99%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - 4/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 93% écran: 91% mobilité: 99%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 96% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 100% degré de nuisance: 95%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 96% performances: 90% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 100% degré de nuisance: 95%
Source: Technik Surfer DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 40% performances: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Technik Surfer DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 40% performances: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 90% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Computerbase DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: c't - 01/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: c't - 01/2017
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: RP-Online DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Der Standard DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: RP-Online DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Der Standard DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/31/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 100% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Netzwelt DE→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 100% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Descargar.mobi ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 55% écran: 95% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 55% écran: 95% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Saggiamente IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: Saggiamente IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/11/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/21/2016
Source: Smart World IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 50% équipement: 90% écran: 95% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Smart World IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% prix: 50% équipement: 90% écran: 95% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Smart World IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 95% mobilité: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Smart World IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 95% mobilité: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/05/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Consumentenbond NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Consumentenbond NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techzine NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 85%
Source: Techzine NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 85%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2017
Source: Benchmark.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Benchmark.pl PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: Log.com.tr TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 95%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 95%
Source: Ixbt RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/14/2017
Source: Ixbt RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/14/2017
Source: Ixbt RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2017
Source: Ixbt RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/18/2017
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/22/2016
Source: Zoom RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/22/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: Product Test RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: PC Online.com.cn zh-CN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: PC Online.com.cn zh-CN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/13/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)Processeur: Intel Core i7 6820HQ
Carte graphique: AMD Radeon Pro 455 2048 Mo
Écran: 15.40 pouces, 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixels
Poids: 1.83kg
Liens: Apple Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Critiques
The perfect balance? We also review the mainstream configuration of the new MacBook Pro 15. The test model is faster than the entry-level spec thanks to the Core i7-6820HQ and the AMD Radeon Pro 455, but is it worth the additional price?
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/18/2017
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460)Processeur: Intel Core i7 6920HQ
Carte graphique: AMD Radeon Pro 460 4096 Mo
Écran: 15.40 pouces, 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixels
Poids: 1.83kg
Prix: 4039 euros
Liens: Apple Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Critiques
Top specification. We have already reviewed the entry-level of the new Apple MacBook Pro 15. Our test sample today is the high-end SKU, and the graphics card AMD Radeon Pro 460 is particularly interesting.
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Laptop.bg BU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/31/2017
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Ordinateur portable: Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450)Processeur: Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Carte graphique: AMD Radeon Pro 450
Écran: 15.40 pouces, , 2880 x 1800 pixels
Poids: 1.807kg
Prix: 2699 euros
Liens: Apple Page d'accueil
Price comparison
Critiques
Samsung a présenté son SSD T5, le dernier modèle d’une série de SSD hautes performances. Tout comme ses prédécesseurs, le T5 offre des taux de transfert de données vraiment élevés, et un package de haute qualité, mais il manque d’innovation.
Commentaire
Apple:
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
AMD Radeon Pro 450:
AMD Radeon Pro 455:
AMD Radeon Pro 460:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Core i7:
6700HQ:
Processeur quad-core basé sur l'architecture Skylake pour ordinateur portable. Il offre une puce graphique intégrée HD Graphics 530. Le processeur est gravé selon une lithographie d'une finesse de 14 nm.
6820HQ:
Processeur quad-core basé sur l'architecture Skylake pour ordinateur portable. Il offre une puce graphique intégrée HD Graphics 530. Le processeur est gravé selon une lithographie d'une finesse de 14 nm.
6920HQ:
Processeur quad-core basé sur l'architecture Skylake pour ordinateur portable. Il offre une puce graphique intégrée HD Graphics 530. Le processeur est gravé selon une lithographie d'une finesse de 14 nm.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.807 kg:
Les ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les ordinateurs portables de 12 à 16 pouces les plus légers affichent communément ce poids sur la balance.
1.83 kg:
82.3%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.