Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019-Z0WQ
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 11 notes (à partir de 13 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019-Z0WQ
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s clear from the benchmark results that the people who will clearly benefit from the update to the entry-level 13in MacBook Pro are those in a production environment who rely on apps that take advantage of multiple processing cores. The jump from two to four cores without a jump in price is significant and makes the new laptop an attractive investment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/11/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
Don’t expect it to feel like anything has really changed compared to the 2018 model - the tweaked keyboard, brighter screen, new processors and must-have-it Touch Bar don't make this Mac upgrade worthy for existing users. That said, it's a great entry point if you're looking to invest in a workhorse machine, reinforcing why this iconic laptop has been so successful over the years.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
In fact, in purely Mac terms, this new MacBook Pro now gives you quite the conundrum – should you splash out an extra 200 quid over an equivalent Air? Forget the Touch Bar (the Air has Touch ID), and the weight difference – unless you can genuinely get worked up about 120g, in which case congrats on your new job replacing the scales at Tesco. For that additional outlay, what you’re really getting is a superior display, a longer-lasting battery, and that quad-core i5. For undemanding users, none of that matters much, and the Air is the better buy; for everyone else choosing between Apple’s two most affordable portable Macs, go for the entry-level Pro.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2019
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
This is where we are in the evolution of Apple's laptops. The best MacBook for most people costs $1,299. You can complain about the "Apple Tax," but I'm telling you that this system is a better value than the MacBook Air at $1,099. You get a much faster processor, brighter display and considerably longer battery life for your money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar delivers even faster performance and a slightly better keyboard, but the battery life could be better.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/05/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple has long avoided adding touch capabilities to macOS, instead preferring to let its unique and controversial Touch Bar serve as an alternative touch-input method. The company appears to be doubling down on this strategy by now adding this touch-enabled secondary display to the entry-level MacBook Pro, too. (It was formerly reserved only for higher-end models.)
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/29/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
If you are willing to go the Windows route, the Dell XPS 13 is still our pick for best overall laptop, as it offers a comfier keyboard, an additional USB-C port and microSD card slot, and a slimmer and sleeker design. Plus, it lasts longer on a charge. But if you're set on macOS, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is the one to get.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/19/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
This update makes picking the right MacBook a lot easier. If your needs are fairly modest, get the Air. But if you plan to push your computer, spend the extra $200 on the Pro. It'll get you far better performance and still won't break the bank. The usual MacBook caveats still apply; if you had problems with the keyboard or port selection before, that hasn't changed. But a week ago, it was foolish to recommend that anyone buy the entry-level MacBook Pro. Now it might be the best all-around laptop Apple sells.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/17/2019
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is the Apple laptop I would buy for myself, even with its $1,799 starting price. It gives me all the power I could want, a brilliant display, great audio and an improved keyboard that should prove more reliable over time. I also continue to appreciate such amenities as Touch ID button and "Hey, Siri"
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Mac Welt DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/17/2019
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/26/2019
Source: Input DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 90% finition: 90%
Commentaire
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655:
Carte graphique intégrée (GT3e), qui est utilisée par certains processeur Coffee Lake U (28 W).
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
unknown:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
13.30": Cette diagonale d’écran est surtout utilisée dans les ultraportables, ultrabooks et convertibles. Quoiqu’un peu large, il s’agit de la taille d’écran la plus commune parmi les ultraportables.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un ordinateur plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.37 kg: Les tablettes de très grandes dimensions, les ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les convertibles de 11 à 13 pouces affichent habituellement ce poids sur la balance.
83.27%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.