Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 10 notes (à partir de 18 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2014-06 MD711LL/B
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
L'Apple MacBook Air 11 pouces reste en deçà de l'autonomie de la version 13 pouces. Avec la taille d'écran et la présence d'un lecteur de carte mémoire SD, il s'agit des seuls point distinctif ! Son prix de 899 euros peut tenter les acheteurs potentiels à la recherché d'une machine sous OS X. Le MacBook Air 11 pouces (2014) reste l'ordinateur le plus abordable pour entrer dans l'univers Mac. De par sa taille, son poids et son autonomie il s'agit aussi d'une machine mobile par excellence.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/06/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
After trying to wrangle cross-platform battery testing and seeing how many variables can go into the tests, I've decided that the best we can say is battery life on X platform is better for Y task. So, I can say quite comfortably that playing 1080p MKV files using VLC, the XPS 13 gives you better battery life.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/09/2015
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
In 2013, when Apple reduced the price of the MacBook Pro with Retina display range, we stopped recommending the 13-inch MacBook Air on the basis that there was only £150 difference in price. As Apple has continued to drop prices we are still looking at just a £150 difference between the two ranges at the entry level. It's great to see Apple reducing prices across its MacBook ranges, but the lower prices of the MacBook Pro Retina range do have the effect of making the MacBook Air look less attractive in comparison. However, we still love the MacBook Air, which is lighter and thinner, although a fraction bigger than the MacBook Pro with Retina display. If it's the MacBook Air that you have your heart set on, you can't go wrong with it, but if you have a little more in your budget, then consider the MacBook Pro with Retina display because it's a really good deal in comparison.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2014
Source: V3.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
Featuring a better display, upgradable storage and an advanced Surface Pen digital stylus, the Surface Pro 3 is the winner of this vs review. However, having matched the Surface Pro 3 in performance and battery life, and featuring a more user-friendly laptop design, the MacBook Air definitely gave Microsoft's latest hybrid a run for its money and still is a significantly better choice for users more familiar with Apple's platform.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/13/2014
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
Even Apple's cheapest laptop is head and shoulders above most of its competitors, and in terms of build, battery life and usability the MacBook Air 11 is an all-round winner. It's also that most unusual of items: an Apple product which represents good value for money. That screen is really starting to show its age, though, so fingers crossed that Apple brings out an Air with Retina Display soon.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/28/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 80%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
The 2014 MacBook Air, like the largely similar 2013 version, is all about battery life and portability. This 11-inch laptop, nearly the size of an iPad, now lasts almost as long as one, too. It could tip the balance in favor of the 11 for some. For others, though, an iPad plus keyboard might have replaced this already.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/27/2014
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% mobilité: 90%
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, we take our hats off to Microsoft for its Surface Pro 3. It really does have specs that rival the MacBook Air and portability that brings it closer to competing tablets. But when it actually comes to using the Surface Pro 3 as a laptop, it's not the most comfortable of activities. We find the MacBook Air wonderful to work on for long periods of time, and with that lengthy battery life it's more suitable for full-day use.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/30/2014
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
The 2014 11-inch MacBook Air aptly demonstrates the truth of the age-old aphorism, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Last year's $999 model delivered spectacular battery life, solid performance, and a truly outstanding keyboard and touch pad—all packaged in a sleek aluminum chassis—for a price comparable to most Windows-based ultrabooks.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/27/2014
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a niche device, suitable for Apple users that need both portability and power. While it’s tempting to compare it to other Ultrabooks, it actually has a lot in common with the Surface Pro 2, which has very similar specs and is built for a very specific type of Windows user. For the platform agnostic looking for thin, light, and powerful, the MacBook Air is certainly worth considering. Its “acceptable” display and other drawbacks make it tough to outright recommend over any and all competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/21/2014
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
With its lower price the 2014 11in MacBook Air is a great purchase. If you want the lightest laptop available there is no need to sacrifice power - the 11in MacBook Air is just as good as the 13in model. Unfortunately in some areas this year's model isn't quite as good as last year's model - the flash storage seems to be slower than it was in 2013. If you can get a discounted 11in 2013 MacBook Air from the Apple refurb store, it is still be worth considering as an alternative to the 2014 Mac Air model.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/15/2014
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Gizmag EN→FR Archive.org version
If you already own the mid-2013 MacBook Air, then there's really no reason to consider this new model. The speed differences are far too subtle for you to even consider upgrading. And if you can find last year's model on the cheap, then I'd also recommend going that route. Save the money, and enjoy your shiny new 99 percent as good as this year's model MacBook Air.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/15/2014
Source: Chip Test & Kauf - Heft 2/2015
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2015
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/09/2014
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 75% performances: 59% équipement: 33% écran: 64% mobilité: 97% ergonomie: 98%
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/29/2014
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 71% performances: 80% équipement: 56% écran: 68% mobilité: 99% ergonomie: 85%
Source: Mac Easy - Heft 04/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2014
Notes: Note globale: 98%
Source: Mac & i - Heft 04/2014
Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2014
Source: Hispazone ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/16/2014
Source: Notebook-Center.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/17/2014
Commentaire
Intel HD Graphics 5000:
GPU intégré aux processeurs ULV (GT3) avec 40 EUs (pas de eDRAM) que l'on trouve sur certains processeurs Haswell.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
4260U:
L'Intel Core i5-4260U est un processeur Haswell ULV (Ultra Basse Tension) dual-core cadencé à 1,4 GHz dont le mode Turbo Boost surcadence le processeur jusqu'à 2,7 GHz. Il offre une puce graphique intégrée HD Graphics 5000 et un contrôleur mémoire double canal DDR3.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
11.60": Pour une tablette, cette diagonale d’écran est relativement imposante. A contrario, il s’agit d’un écran de petite taille pour les ultraportables. Certains convertibles embarquent aussi des moniteurs de cette dimension.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.1 kg: Les tablettes de grandes dimensions, les petits ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les convertibles de 10 à 11 pouces affichent habituellement ce poids sur la balance.
84.5%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.