Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 10 notes (à partir de 16 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.2 GHz
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionApple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/11/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe updated MacBook packs more performance and battery life into a wonderfully thin and light design, but Apple didn't address the biggest drawbacks.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tab Times
EN→FR Archive.org versionAs a Mac user of many years, the 12-inch Macbook definitely requires a compromise in the way I work. For example, my 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina Display powers a two screen set up and the Macbook 2016 is incapable of doing that, especially as none of Apple’s official adapters currently offer DisplayPort functionality. Ironically, Google makes a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter that is perfect for this task, but with the limitations of a single port, the Macbook doesn’t stack up to my particular usage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe 12-inch MacBook has divided opinion since day one, having done-away with a full-size USB port for the smaller USB Type-C. A couple of years down the line and this will be a more standard format, but the bigger issue is the MacBook's persistence to offer just one of these ports for both charging and connectivity. If you're a casual or cloud-based user that won't be a big issue though. Just as we said of the first iteration: the 12-inch MacBook is all about portability; it's a laptop so thin, so sleek, so light, that everything else has been pushed by the wayside.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionApple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Slashgear
EN→FR Archive.org versionI'll be sticking with my first-gen MacBook, then, though that's not going to stop me recommending it to those who travel frequently, have mainstream needs for processing, and who are willing to pay a premium for OS X on a notebook that's still a relatively rare sight in the wild. Apple doesn't expect it to be the Mac for every user: that's why it's not the only Mac. Just make sure you're going into it with your eyes wide open.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/02/2016
Source: It Pro
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe 12in Retina MacBook isn’t for everyone. If you value portability and battery life above all and predominately use wireless peripherals as well as cloud apps and storage, then this MacBook will be a great fit. If you use lots of demanding applications, need to connect lots of wired peripherals or just can’t get on with the low-travel keyboard, then one of Apple’s more conventional MacBooks will be a better choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Engadget
EN→FR Archive.org versionApple deserves credit for improving the MacBook's battery life and disk speeds, but other than that, this is, for better and worse, the same machine as last year's model. If you previously shied away from the 12-inch MacBook because of the "one port" thing, this still isn't the laptop for you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet
EN→FR Archive.org versionIn hands-on use, the new MacBook feels almost exactly like the previous version. If you've got the 2015 MacBook, there's no need to upgrade, but if you were holding off to see what the second generation looked like, the potential boost to performance and battery life makes me feel even more confident about using this as primary laptop, especially for frequent travelers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/08/2016
Source: Spiegel Online
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/30/2016
Source: Mobileimho.ru
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/06/2017
Source: 3DNews.ru
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/12/2016
Source: Ferra.ru
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/21/2016
Commentaire
Intel HD Graphics 515:
Carte graphique intégrée (GT2) à certains processeurs Core M de génération Skylake (TDP de 4,5 W). Embarque 24 unités d'exécution
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
6Y54:
Processeur dual-core basé sur l'architecture Skylake pour tablettes et convertibles. Il offre une puce graphique intégrée HD Graphics 515. Le processeur est gravé selon une lithographie d'une finesse de 14 nm.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
12.00": Pour une tablette, cette diagonale d’écran est relativement imposante. A contrario, il s’agit d’un écran de petite taille pour les ultraportables. Certains convertibles embarquent aussi des moniteurs de cette dimension.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
0.92 kg: Seules les tablettes de grandes dimensions et certains convertibles affichent un tel poids à la pesée.
77.9%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.
