Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz

80% MacBook review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple has given the MacBook's performance a much-needed boost, and it helps OS X zip along much better. Its critical flaws remain, but the 2016 version is less of a risk than it was last year. We just wish it was a bit cheaper.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Xiaomi MI Notebook Air 12 VS Apple MacBook Review
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
They sell at different price, Xiaomi MI Notebook Air 12 at 3499 yuan, $583, Macbook at 9288 yuan, $1548. Xiaomi MI Notebook Air is triple cheaper than Macbook, although Macbook has better design. But if you are looking for a decent notebook with high performance as Macbook, and similar to Macbook in design, but cheaper than Macbook, Xiaomi MI Notebook Air 12 will still improve your personal status and help you work more conveniently. Don’t forget to use this coupon code: NOTEB125 , Coupon price： 584.99usd, just catch here for Xiaomi mi notebook air 12inch. Right now you can also enjoy coupon code: XAIR13IV for xiaomi mi notebook air 13inch at $887.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/12/2016

80% Review: Apple MacBook (2016)
Source: PC Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
If your needs are relatively light, and you value design and portability over all else, then you’ll love the MacBook.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Faster and longer-lasting than ever, is the 12in MacBook the best portable laptop?
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
There's no escaping the fact that this is a very similar laptop to its 2015 predecessor, which so divided the tech community. But we think the problems have been overblown. The engineering on show is superb, and the performance is completely acceptable for a modern-day computer of this size. The arguments that there should be more ports on the MacBook only exist because people want one, and are frustrated that their current set-up needs will not allow for it. Apple has undoubtedly improved the MacBook for 2016. It is a truly outstanding laptop that will be wrongly categorised as a luxury technological item. There's a difference between something costing a little too much and it being luxurious - just like the MacBook Air, this laptop deserves to fall in price and rise in specs to continue to be what we consider an excellent flagship computer. The world and its ports just need to catch up.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

70% Apple MacBook 2016 Review: The Good, The Bad, The Expensive
Source: Notebookreview.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Apple MacBook 2016 is an excellent piece of hardware with all the compromises and frustrations common with mobile tech. The single USB Type-C port is the hardest to swallow, especially given that USB Type-C accessories are prohibitively expensive. In a few years, USB Type-C accessories will be cheaper and this will be a moot point. But during this transition, we’re annoyed that a $1,299 laptop doesn’t ship with any extras to take the edge off. We can look past the other drawbacks — the lousy camera, shallow keyboard, and non-touch display — but the single port hinders productivity.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%

80% Apple Macbook review (2016, 12-inch)
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
As good as last year’s model was, I felt like a really needed an excuse in order to justify buying one. This year’s model, however, with its better battery life, faster storage and quicker CPU is a laptop that needs no such vindication. If portability is the most important thing to you, there's simply nothing else like it. However, if you need more power, this probably isn't the laptop you're looking for.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/05/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% MacBook (12-inch, 2016) review
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The 2016 MacBook is much the same computer as that of last year in most respects, but it's more powerful and a little longer-lasting. Those in possession of a 2015 MacBook will find little reason to upgrade – unless they have a particular liking for Rose Gold, that is.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 70% équipement: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90% ergonomie: 85% degré de nuisance: 90%

80% Apple MacBook (12-inch, 2016) hands-on review: A question of port
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple finds itself in a simultaneously difficult and enviable position in 2016. Having cast its spell over the laptop, the smartphone and the tablet, it has run out of things to revolutionise, things to invent. It seems that Apple is starting to plateau, in both creative and financial terms, but (perhaps unfairly) it must live up to its own hype every time it releases a product. Such as this amazing MacBook, an update to the original 12-inch MacBook unveiled in 2015.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

70% Apple MacBook
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
Apple did a fairly minimal amount of tweaking with the 2016 MacBook, dropping new Intel Core M processors and a faster SSD into the snazzy, slim, and solid-feeling chassis that debuted in 2015. We're sure the Rose Gold hue will make the system more appealing to some, but the other color options will still be there for those who prefer a more traditional (and professional) look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/03/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%

100% Apple MacBook (2016) review
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s the MacBook Air’s prettier, younger brother. But sometimes we wish it had a bit more of the MacBook Air about it. One USB-C is only really going to cut if you’re one of those stereotype millennials who uses a laptop solely to watch YouTube, obsess over their Instagram likes and waste time browsing inane websites. For the remotely hardcore crowd, this is better as a second, ultraportable PC. And for the bargain-savvy buyer, why not check out Apple’s first-gen MacBook refurbs? Unless you’d lap up that extra hour’s battery life, the older version is just about as good.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 100%

80% Apple MacBook (2016) review: Small and even more perfectly formed
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Should you buy one? If your needs are relatively light, and if you value design and portability over everything else, then you'll love the MacBook. But you'll also find yourself grimacing occasionally when you release you've left the vital dongle you need to connect a monitor and power simultaneously at home. Thankfully, at least with this generation, you'll get closer to all-day battery life from it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% MacBook review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The decision of whether you should buy a new MacBook is a simple one: does it play to your strengths? Perhaps you need the lightest and most portable OS X machine out there today, one with good battery life. Maybe you appreciate an incredible, vibrant display that's equally as good at rendering your crisp documents as it is displaying the same amount of a spreadsheet as a 24-inch monitor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% MacBook 2016 review: Ultraportable laptop satisfies with speed gains
Source: Macworld.co.uk EN→FR Archive.org version
For a lot of people, the MacBook is the ideal laptop. It’s light, small, easy to carry, and offers good performance for productivity software, though it can handle pro apps fine (you’ll just have to wait a little longer for some tasks). The MacBook is meant to serve for the user constantly on the go, and it serves that purpose well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% 12" MacBook
Source: Mobile Tech Review EN→FR Archive.org version
As ever, the 12" MacBook is a surprisingly polarizing little laptop. The first generation sold so well folks had to wait months to buy one, so some people obviously love it (and are willing to spend this much on an ultraportable). Others have lambasted it for lacking ports, having a Core M rather than Core i5 and for costing so darned much.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%

Schlanker Begleiter für Kreative
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/06/2016

100% Apple MacBook 12" (2016) 1,1GHz 256GB Goud - Reviews
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%

75% Apple MacBook: sneller met langere accuduur
Source: Tweakers NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%

不吹不黑|用过MacBook后,论逼格我就只服自己
Source: PC Online.com.cn zh-CN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/20/2016

Commentaire

Intel HD Graphics 515:

La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

6Y30:

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

12.00": Pour une tablette, cette diagonale d’écran est relativement imposante. A contrario, il s’agit d’un écran de petite taille pour les ultraportables. Certains convertibles embarquent aussi des moniteurs de cette dimension.

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un appareil plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).

0.927 kg: Seules les tablettes de grandes dimensions et certains convertibles affichent un tel poids à la pesée.

81.59%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids