Aorus X3 Plus
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 5 notes (à partir de 7 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Aorus X3 Plus
Source: Hexus EN→FR Archive.org version
Having arrived on the scene with the eye-catching X7 back in January 2014, the Gigabyte subsidiary has been quick to follow up with the smaller X3 and the soon-to-be-released X5. Keeping up with the latest developments in PC graphics, Aorus has refreshed its 13.9in laptop with a GeForce GTX 970M GPU that delivers the best mobile gaming experience we've seen on a system of this size.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/12/2015
Source: Digital Versus EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite an impressive spec sheet, the X3 Plus is a little disappointing: it needs a much better a cooling system, and it produces far too much noise. On top of that, although its general characteristics are pretty decent, the screen's impressive native resolution just isn't usable. Seems like they got a bit carried away...
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/16/2015
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 100% équipement: 60% mobilité: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Aorus X3 Plus works well as a portable games station, providing fast framerates with modern games at high details settings. Its high-resolution screen is less obviously useful for its gaming role as fewer games may benefit from its high 262 ppi pixel density, and the Windows platform does not support absurdly high resolution displays well. When it does work you're rewarded with a pin-sharp image but remember that for gaming there's arguably little need to exceed 2560 or even 1920 screen pixel widths. Overall there's definite room for improvement by its maker but the X3 Plus should prove popular with Windows gamers looking to combine performance and portability.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/07/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 90% équipement: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Aorus X3 Plus is a technically brilliant laptop with a great screen and superb performance. It's one of the most desirable laptops we've seen in 2014. If you don't have the money to spend on the X3 Plus, you should look at the £899 Chillblast Defiant 2 Mini (Reviews, Shopper 320). It has good mid-range gaming performance and a relatively attractive chassis, and is much cheaper.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/25/2014
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Ultrabook Review EN→FR Archive.org version
As far as the laptop goes, it’s certainly going back because of the Wifi issue and the gap in the lid. I will be hard pressed to replace it with another though unless I find something I really love about it. The keyboard flex and the lid flex(which causes the screen flicker) are reasons enough for me to stay away. This is a really expensive machine to have to treat it so delicately. On the positive side, the laptop is extremely lightweight and powerful – something no other laptop except the Razer Blade can claim. The Aorus X3+ is about $550 cheaper than the Razer blade with 512GB of storage, so maybe average build quality is something that could be tolerated in order to save some money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/14/2014
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
Small gaming laptops have been improving, and Gigabyte has made a step forward with the X3: it’s slimmer and lighter than anything else we’ve seen while including power levels that’ll match many larger notebooks. It doesn’t just impress with its benchmark scores. Its battery life is reasonable, and the screen has impressive quality – even if we’re not keen on its high resolution, which doesn’t work well when gaming or working. The keyboard is middling, but it’s no worse than many other laptops.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/10/2014
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: Hexus EN→FR Archive.org version
Having set the stage with the powerful X7 back in January this year, Aorus has now taken the opportunity to deliver a smaller alternative designed with portability in mind. Priced at £1,549, the 13.9in X3 Plus has been worth the wait and for the most part exceeds our expectations of a modern-day gaming laptop.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/20/2014
Commentaire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M:
Carte graphique haut de gamme de la famille GeForce GTX 800M.
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
4860HQ: Processeur quad-core de génération Haswell, cadencé à 2,4 GHz pouvant être surcadencé à 3,6 GHz avec le Turbo Boost. Le processeur offre une carte graphique intégrée Iris Pro Graphics 5200 et un contrôleur mémoire double canal DDR3.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
14.00": Cette diagonale d’écran est surtout utilisée dans les ultraportables, ultrabooks et convertibles. Quoiqu’un peu large, il s’agit de la taille d’écran la plus commune parmi les ultraportables.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un ordinateur plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
1.9 kg: Les ultraportables, les ultrabooks et les ordinateurs portables de 12 à 16 pouces les plus légers affichent communément ce poids sur la balance.
78%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.