Xiaomi Redmi 4A
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Moyenne de 25 notes (à partir de 49 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Xiaomi Redmi 4A
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Il bénéficie d’un beau design, il est agréable à prendre en main et l’image restituée par l’écran de 5 pouces est de bonne qualité. De plus, dans le cadre d’une utilisation quotidienne raisonnable, on arrive à dépasser les 1,5 jours d’autonomie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/12/2017
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi 4A is ageing, and yet it remains a very good budget phone and a decent all-rounder under £100. Though it lacks more modern aspects such as a fingerprint scanner, metal build and 18:9 display, it's almost impossible to argue at this price. The 4A has since been succeeded by the 5A, but there's really no difference in core specification, making this an even better deal if you can find it at a rock-bottom price. The Global model is recommended, provided you're happy to get along with MIUI 8.5.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/25/2018
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Igeekphone EN→FR Archive.org version
As you can see in the images and in the video presentation, finally the Xiaomi Redmi 4A is a very good mobile for it’s money! For me, coming from the Xiaomi Mi5S plus, at some moments looked a little bit slow, but I guess it will be very unfair to compare the Snapdragon 425 with the Snapdragon 821! So the Xiaomi Redmi 4A is a very good mobile. Also if you think that you can grab it now at the flash sales of Banggood for only 97.99$, that’s less from 100$, this is a really bargain! So go over there while they last, but don’t wait to much, as the available pieces get less and less!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/17/2017
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
So, what can a $100 smartphone do for you? The Xiaomi Redmi 4a is as cheap as they get but, you know it's a thin line between low-cost and plain poor. With an LTE-capable Snapdragon chipset and a pretty decent 5" 720p screen, the Redmi 4a is on the right side of that line. Performance-wise however, it crosses it more than once.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/06/2017
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi 4A is priced at Rs 5,999. At this price point, you are getting a lot of value for your money. The only challenge, rather, an irritant, with Xiaomi phones is their online-only open sale model where phones get sold out in seconds. It is quite annoying that Xiaomi hasn’t yet made the process of buying a smartphone online any easier. That seems to be a major roadblock and could easily put off many potential buyers. Xiaomi should understand that this isn’t 2013 and that the competition has evolved.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi has got a winner here with the Redmi 4A. There is no room for complaints, and its highly compelling price tag makes it hard to ignore this smartphone in the entry-level price segment. The only thing that may affect someone's decision of getting this device would be MIUI, but that alone doesn't seem like a proper reason to ignore an otherwise amazing smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/17/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Tech Magnifier EN→FR Archive.org version
There’s no better choice available in the same price range. Specifications offered by the Redmi 4A are unmatchable and the user experience was also good. If you have a much higher budget, go for a different device, however if 6K is your bar than this is the best choice available in the market right now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
At a price of Rs 5,999, the Xiaomi Redmi 4A is an exceptionally competent smartphone. With specifications such as 13MP rear camera, a 3,120mAh battery and VoLTE support, it offers a lot of features. It'll surely give tough competition to peers such as Xolo Era 2X and Coolpad Mega 2.5D, which are priced in the same bracket.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Techniqued EN→FR Archive.org version
If you are looking for an affordable smartphone, Xiaomi Redmi 4A is definitely one of those entry level Android smartphones to buy. It has good design and build, decent display, a customizable software and decent performance for the price segment and a good camera. Price at Rs 5999, Xiaomi Redmi 4A is definitely worth the money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 85% performances: 70% écran: 75% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
Boasting of an all-metal body, the Redmi 3S -- at Rs 6,999 -- offers all the bells and whistles that someone on a tight budget would want. You're better off buying the Redmi 3S -- provided you can get a hold of it -- because for Rs 1,000 more you're getting a premium body, a better screen, better hardware and a much bigger battery. Also, the Redmi 3S' rear camera comes with PDAF: it's not a deal-breaker but when you're in the budget segment, every rupee counts and a potentially faster camera would mean a great deal for many. As for the Redmi 4A, well, it's not a bad phone. It just doesn't make sense the way the Redmi 1S did once upon a time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
At a price tag of Rs. 5,999, the Xiaomi Redmi 4A is a good deal. It has all the required sensors, including an infrared sensor for remote control. The camera is decent for the price, and the build quality is good even though it has a polycarbonate body. I personally like the polycarbonate body with a smooth matte finish on the Redmi 4A compared to Redmi 3s with a metal body.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi 4A has the potential to stir up (in fact, going by the first sales figures, it has already stirred up) what we call the “ultra-budget” segment in the smartphone market. In fact, we think it can even give tough competition to even devices that come with higher price tags. No, there is nothing that really jumps out of the device, as exceptional but then there are no deal breakers either, and at this price that makes the Redmi 4A a very sweet deal. The perfect solution for those wanting a good smartphone but facing budget blues.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 90% performances: 82% finition: 75%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To sum up, the all-new Redmi 4A has all the ingredients to become another hit at this price point. The smartphone surely raises the bar for the much-need standard at this price segment. The device offers some decent design, good battery life and respectable performance for Rs 5,999. However, if you pay Rs 1000 more than you can get Redmi 3s, which offers metal unibody, better Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 processor and better battery backup.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/24/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The new Redmi 4A definitely raises the bar for smartphones at this price level, and we expect it to be very popular. At Rs. 5,999, the Redmi 4A offers a lot of features, especially VoLTE support. Camera performance is decent, and the polycarbonate body, 3120mAh battery, and software are all satisfactory.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 70%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi 4A is powerful but not for gaming user, Redmi 3S is a much better option. There is a decent price difference among these two handsets. But still Redmi 4A is a very good buy, an awesomely awesome handset for non-gamers and is the best 4G VoLTE supported handset loaded with high end feature with an affordable price tag.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 86%
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi 4A is a decent performer for the entry segment and it makes a good case for itself. However, its camera is disappointing and it has only 16GB of storage. As long as you're fine with these compromises, this is a phone worth buying.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 74%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→FR Archive.org version
The Redmi 4A comes with the new MIUI 8 which is based on Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow. The MIUI 8 features a variety of features including dual apps feature that lets you can take advantage of using WhatsApp with two accounts. Furthermore, it has an Indic support for 13 local languages and has a customized SMS app. There’s more stuff coming soon to the MIUI 8. It will come with a smart SMS feature that converts IRCTC SMS into a full-fledged ticket-like format.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
At ₹5,999 ($92), the Redmi 4A is a great budget smartphone that would sell quite well. It’s not an upgrade to the Redmi 3s which is a better option between the two – although the latter is also ₹1,000 expensive. And that’s why, with its price, it will be an attractive option for many. It’s an affordable package that offers decent smartphone experience without too many compromises.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To wrap it up, the Xiaomi Redmi 4A has a lot to offer and can be considered one of the best option, by looking at its sheer specs sheet. The smartphone comes loaded with some good processor, battery and is surely a good-looking device and we hope it retain this impression in our detailed review as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/20/2017
Source: Htxt Africa EN→FR Archive.org version
It's somewhat surprising that the R1999-priced Redmi 4A punches above its weight, as the camera is decent and its battery life is impressive. While performance won't blow anyone away, overall we must say that this is a fantastic budget handset.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Girl EN→FR Archive.org version
The Xiaomi Redmi 4A is really a super little phone and the best budget smartphone I’ve tested out in months. Xiaomi could definitely cement itself in the lower end market with offerings like these and knock some of the other Chinese manufacturers out of the budget phone market. Colour me impressed.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi Redmi 4a is LTE enabled device with 16GB ROM and 2GB RAM. Cameras are 13MP and 5MP while quad-core 1.4GHz processor is enabled in it. Those users who are looking for a perfect entertainment device with all necessary features must go for Xiaomi Redmi 4a. It has very affordable price range and giving the best features in its price range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 90% performances: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: University Herald EN→FR Archive.org version
Xiaomi offers the Redmi 4a at an extremely cheap price around $72. With such internal specifications, it is no surprise that this device becomes the best-selling phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/14/2016
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/17/2017
Source: Geektopia ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 68% performances: 65% écran: 65% mobilité: 75% finition: 65%
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 90% écran: 65% mobilité: 70% finition: 60%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Ridble IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/16/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/23/2017
Source: Chimera Revo IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/22/2017
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 90% équipement: 70% mobilité: 85% finition: 75%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% prix: 95% équipement: 68% écran: 72% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 86%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/12/2016
Source: Batista70Phone IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 100% écran: 60% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 100%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 90% écran: 60% mobilité: 85% finition: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/20/2018
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/04/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 70% écran: 75% mobilité: 75% finition: 75%
Source: Webriyota.com TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/29/2017
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Yamobi RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/21/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Svet Androida CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/30/2016
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/21/2017
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Carte graphique intégrée dans des SoC ARM. En fonction du SoC, la fréquence d'horloge devrait être aux alentours des 500 MHz. Intègre 48 unités de calcul shaders unifiées.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
425:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
5.00": Il s’agit de la diagonale d’écran la plus commune chez les smartphones.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
77.8%: La note n'est pas convaincante. On doit considérer qu'il n'y a pas beaucoup d'ordinateurs portables qui reçoivent une note en dessous de 60%. Ce portable est en dessous de la moyenne, Nous ne conseillons pas vraiment son achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.