Samsung Galaxy A51
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix f/2,2
Price comparison
Moyenne de 79 notes (à partir de 171 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy A51
Le Samsung Galaxy A51 est le successeur de l’un des smartphones les plus réussis de 2019. Bien sûr nos attentes sont élevées – et la concurrence ne se repose jamais. Découvrez dans ce rapport de test si le smartphone Galaxy avec ses cinq capteurs photo au total peut tirer son épingle du jeu.
Source: Nextpit France
Mais si on se réfère à son prix de lancement de 379 euros, je lui préfère nettement un Redmi Note 10 Pro avec son écran Amoled 120 Hz, son module photo principal de 108 MP et sa batterie de 5020 mAh acceptant la charge rapide en 33 W, le tout à 299 euros pour la configuration 6/128 Go. Même si on prend le prix actuel situé autour de 270 euros, je choisirais, là aussi, plutôt un Realme 8 Pro avec un écran Amoled de 60 Hz, un quadruple module photo de 108 MP et sa batterie de 4500 mAh acceptant la charge rapide filaire de 50 W au prix de 279 euros pour la version 8/128 Go.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2021
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le A51 est un smartphone qui, malgré quelques petits défauts, tient décidément la route. L'appareil dispose de tout ce qu'il faut en matière de performances, de design, de prises de vue... Bref, si vous cherchez un appareil à moins de 400 €, il constitue un excellent choix. On aurait cependant aimé que Samsung conserve le prix du A50, voire qu'il le revoie à la baisse, car la concurrence est rude dans cette gamme de prix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Top for Phone Archive.org version
Il propose un beau design, une belle qualité de fabrication, un écran magnifique, des performances honorables, une excellente connectivité, un système d’exploitation agréable à utiliser, un belle qualité photo et une bonne autonomie.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: CNet France Archive.org version
Si Samsung soigne le design et l'écran de son Galaxy A51, la firme sud-coréenne laisse de côté tout le reste. Techniquement en retard et très limité, rien ne peut justifier la hausse de prix de 30 euros. Pas même sa partie photo qui se montre bien trop inégale. Difficile donc pour lui de devenir une référence comme son prédécesseur. Face à une concurrence qui relève constamment le niveau, le Samsung Galaxy A51 fait pâle figure.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Journal du Geek Archive.org version
Le Galaxy A51 n'a que quelques euros de différence avec le A50, mais la différence de performance et l'amélioration apportée par Samsung est bien là ! On a un bon capteur photo avec 4 objectifs, un superbe écran AMOLED avec un design et des finitions vraiment agréables tant pour les mains que pour les yeux. Malgré quelques petits accrocs, comme le capteur d'empreintes, le Galaxy A51 se positionne comme un très bon milieu de gamme.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/11/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
En soi, il n'est qu'une évolution logique de son prédécesseur. Ainsi, si vous le comparez à un modèle de 2019, vous ne verrez pas forcément ses qualités ressortir. Toutefois, si votre smartphone actuel se fait un peu vieux et que vous souhaitez vous procurer un bon smartphone, qui tient bien la route et ne vous décevra pas, le Galaxy A51 est clairement une option à considérer. À condition de lui excuser son lecteur d'empreintes lent, ses petites limites sur les photos de nuit et ses performances pas tout à fait mirobolantes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
En soi, il n'est qu'une évolution logique de son prédécesseur. Ainsi, si vous le comparez à un modèle de 2019, vous ne verrez pas forcément ses qualités ressortir. Toutefois, si votre smartphone actuel se fait un peu vieux et que vous souhaitez vous procurer un bon smartphone, qui tient bien la route et ne vous décevra pas, le Galaxy A51 est clairement une option à considérer. À condition de lui excuser son lecteur d'empreintes lent, ses petites limites sur les photos de nuit et ses performances pas tout à fait mirobolantes.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 70% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Phonandroid Archive.org version
Le A51 est un smartphone qui, malgré quelques petits défauts, tient décidément la route. L'appareil dispose de tout ce qu'il faut en matière de performances, de design, de prises de vue... Bref, si vous cherchez un appareil à moins de 400 €, il constitue un excellent choix. On aurait cependant aimé que Samsung conserve le prix du A50, voire qu'il le revoie à la baisse, car la concurrence est rude dans cette gamme de prix.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/22/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
À l’intérieur, Samsung a opté pour sa puce Exynos 9611. Il s’agit d’une puce à huit cœurs (quatre Cortex-A73 à 4,2.3 GHz et quatre Cortex-A53 à 1,7 GHz) avec un cœur graphique Mali-G72. Il est aussi doté de 4 Go de mémoire vive, de 128 Go d’espace (avec fente pour carte micro SD) et d’une batterie de 4000 mAh. Sur le papier, cela devrait être convenable et l’appareil semblait fluide lorsqu’on l’a utilisé au CES, mais il faudra évidemment attendre sa sortie à la fin janvier pour s’en faire une idée complète.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/13/2020
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Android Authority EN→FR
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/16/2022
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 40% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung also offers the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features as the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/31/2022
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 40% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR
The MSRP of the Samsung Galaxy A51 has dropped to just $349.99, and it can be had for much less. You can easily find the phone for under $300 if you shop around. At that price, it’s hard to ignore the value Samsung is offering with the phone. With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. It’s also offering three years of guaranteed software updates which guarantees support until at least Android 12. However, while the build quality and screen are also great, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel. And for the retail price of $349, the competition is very, very high.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/04/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 40% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→FR
Other parts of the phone are solid. And complaints about low-light camera performance, the opportunism of the patchy ‘quad-camera’ array, and less than flagship level screen brightness apply to most at the price. That the Samsung Galaxy A51 operates more like a phone from the tier below is hard to forget, though.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/12/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals as the Galaxy A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up anymore, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/28/2021
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→FR
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/06/2021
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Ricks Tech
In this video im doing a screen replacement on a Samsung Galaxy A51. i did have a video of this from last year but this has been done with the new camera, for much better focus. Note: i do say A51s, this not that, the A51s is a snapdragon version from india.
Soutien, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/03/2021
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
For the retail price of $399, the competition is very, very high. The iPhone SE has Apple’s newest processor and equally great build quality for the same price, and the Google Pixel 4a has a fantastic Android experience and wonderful camera for $350. And if you’re willing to spend more but not $1,000, Samsung has just released the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, which has many of the same features of the full-fledged Galaxy S20 for $699 before trade-in. If you are looking for something similar with a little more power though, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is out now as well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 62% performances: 40% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 78%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
This phone is not one of our favorites at the price, largely because of its flawed general performance. It feels a little too slow day-to-day at the price, even if it can run most popular 3D games perfectly well.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: 9to5google EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung gets a lot right with the Galaxy A51. The display is excellent, the design is really nice, the camera is passable, and the price is great, too! It really only struggles in the performance department. Admittedly, that’s a huge area of concern and may be a deal-breaker for you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/15/2020
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
And that's before you account for the fact that it's the most affordable point of entry into 5G coming from Samsung. It's not as good value as what Xiaomi can give you, but competing offers from other big names like LG and Motorola come at an even larger premium if they're available at all. As such, the Galaxy A51 5G is shaping up to be an easy recommendation for early 5G adopters that would like to reap the benefits of the faster connectivity without shelling flagship money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an affordable way to get a good-looking Galaxy phone, but it makes Android feel a little too slow for us to wholeheartedly recommend it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/18/2020
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
With the A51, you’re getting a really great screen, decent build quality, some okay cameras, and even a headphone jack. While the build quality and screen are great, however, the sub-par performance of this phone is its Achilles heel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/16/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65% performances: 40% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 75%
Source: Talk Android EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a well-made smartphone with an interesting if unobtrusively pattern on the rear panel with all-day battery life, a fabulous AMOLED display, great customization options, and a dependable camera. Sadly, it’s let down by the sluggish processor and over-shadowed by handsets with similar price-points that have better cameras and more powerful chipsets. It’s a case of a decent phone being let down by an Exynos processor, a scenario that we’ve seen play out on much more expensive Samsung smartphones over the past couple of years.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/12/2020
Source: Pocket Lint EN→FR Archive.org version
A great design and screen are the big sells of this mid-ranger, which performs generally well but can struggle a little when it comes to gaming tasks. Otherwise the clean software experience makes for a generally polished and affordable choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
It's disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most modern phones have it, though it's typical for budget devices to have no waterproofing or simply be "splash resistant." The A51's all-day battery life takes it from morning to night, and it lasted an average of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video tests in airplane mode. I'll update this review with the results of our steaming lab tests over Wi-Fi when they're complete.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Engadget EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung’s Galaxy A51 packs a great screen, a handful of cameras, and a big battery -- what more could you ask from a mid-range smartphone? Well, more consistent performance, for one. Despite using a reasonably powerful chipset, the A51 is often plagued by slow app launches and laggy animations, to the point when it sometimes feels like a device that costs much less. Battery life wasn’t as good as we had hoped for, either. While Samsung got a lot right with the Galaxy A51, it never feels as consistently nice to use as some of truly great devices available in its price range.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2020
Notes: Note globale: 73%
Source: Engadget Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/15/2020
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
At $400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a perfectly good Android phone for many users. It has a big, crisp AMOLED display, long battery life, and sharp cameras. If it had a faster processor, you'd be seeing a higher score here. If you’re not a diehard Android fan and don't mind a smaller display, the iPhone SE is a significantly more powerful phone, and it's guaranteed to receive software updates for years to come. For Android enthusiasts, meanwhile, the Pixel 3a gets you more power and reliable software updates, while the Moto G Power offers longer battery life than the A51 for $150 less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/12/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
How good can a $400 phone really be? When the device in question is the Samsung Galaxy A51, the answer is simple: very good. As the first real representative of the Galaxy A family in the US, the A51 is a convincing effort that proves Samsung can make a good midprice phone that's worth buying. In fact, Samsung's budget phone (£329 in the UK and AU$599 in Australia) even bests the iPhone SE (which starts at $399, £419 and AU$749), in some specific, and significant, ways. When it comes to screen size and clarity, phone features, camera quality and performance, the Galaxy A51 delivers where it counts, with one exception.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2020
Notes: Note globale: 85% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tech Switch EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most fashionable telephones have it, although it is typical for finances gadgets to don’t have any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” The A51’s all-day battery life takes it from morning to nighttime, and it lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video assessments in airplane mode. I’ll replace this evaluation with the outcomes of our steaming lab assessments over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your personal headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nevertheless.Although cellphone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is certainly one of not less than 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable cellphone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2020
Source: The Verge EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 doesn’t look or feel like a cheap phone at all. It is big and well-put-together. Samsung says that the material it’s made out of is called “Glasstic,” which sounds way chintzier than it feels. It feels nearly like glass, but it has just a bit of that hollow feel you can get from plastic.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/08/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech Switch EN→FR Archive.org version
It’s disappointing that the Galaxy A51 lacks water resistance. Most trendy telephones have it, although it is typical for price range units to haven’t any waterproofing or just be “splash resistant.” All-day battery life will take the A51 from morning to nighttime, and the telephone lasted a median of 16 hours, 10 minutes after three looping video exams in airplane mode. I’ll replace this assessment with the outcomes of our steaming lab exams over Wi-Fi once they’re full. Luckily, the A51 additionally features a 15-watt quick charger within the field, however in contrast to the Galaxy S20 telephones, you may want to provide your individual headphones and any USB-C to USB-C cables you might have considered trying. It does include a USB-A to USB-C wire, nonetheless.Although telephone releases have slowed down, the Galaxy A51 is considered one of at the very least 16 telephones popping out in 2020. Samsung has additionally confirmed plans to make one other foldable telephone.Galaxy A51 vs iPhone SE.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/06/2020
Source: Tom's Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 offers a nice design and attractive OLED display, but it’s hamstrung by middling performance, cameras that underperform in low light and relatively short battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mobile Tech Review Archive.org version
Lisa Gade reviews the Samsung Galaxy A51 midrange Android smartphone that sells for $399. It’s available worldwide, and in the US is offered by AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, Comcast and unlocked (compatible with T-Mobile). This is a 4G LTE Android 10 phone with OneUI 2.0 and a 6.5” Super AMOLED FHD+ display. Despite the low price you get a modern and attractive design, quad rear cameras with a 48MP main camera, 32MP selfie camera and a 15 watt fast charger in the box. It has 4GB RAM, 128GB storage and a microSD card slot. And yes, it has a headphone jack! In the US it competes with the Google Pixel 3a XL and the 2020 iPhone SE.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/05/2020
Source: T3 EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 packs a nice big display and a light, ergonomic design as sleek as its flagship siblings. A good budget phone for Samsung fans that want the look of the S20 and Note series.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The A51 proves Samsung can make solid mid-range phones. Its flagship-esque design and solid cameras provide the foundations for an excellent handset, while One UI provides an excellent user experience. However, performance is less than impressive, while the poor in-display fingerprint scanner is a big letdown. Samsung fans can look beyond these shortcomings, but at this price point the A51 is hard to recommend.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 is a phone that’s worth considering, given its decent all-round performance; its camera versatility is impressive, the screen is enjoyable to watch content on, and it looks good too, which doesn’t hurt. But if you take a look around, you’ll find devices with better processors and better cameras for the same price, so you might want to look elsewhere if those are your top priorities.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/17/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 isn't necessarily a bad phone, but it's a phone that I feel does very little to justify the €369 (€399 in Portugal) price tag that it commands. In my (admittedly short) experience with reviewing phones, I've never been so thoroughly disappointed with so many aspects of a phone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/16/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 improves on certain aspects that were required, such as a better camera, improved display and better battery life. Although, at the price of Rs 23,999, it feels slightly overpriced for the kind of feature and performance it offers. But, with improved performance, display, battery, design and camera, the Galaxy A51 provides a good balance between features, price and performance. It’s more than a competent phone for those who are looking at a mid-range device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech ARP EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is one of the best mid-range smartphones you can buy today, and one of the main reason (in addition to its 32 MP selfie camera) is its combination of 48 MP, Ultra Wide and macro cameras.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/04/2020
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 shares the same fundamentals of last year's A50 and A50s. The 48MP camera takes decent shots during the day, you get all-day battery life, a vibrant AMOLED display, 3.5mm jack, and Android 10. But the hardware just doesn't hold up in 2020, and there are much better alternatives available at the same price point.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 looks quite good, especially in blue. It has a premium design. The phone also has a good day camera, but it struggles a bit with night photography. The battery of the phone lasts long and charges reasonably fast.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/26/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Unbox EN→FR Archive.org version
Despite the exterior makeover and added camera features, the Galaxy A51 uses the same set of internals found on the Galaxy A50s: Exynos 9611, 6GB RAM, 128GB internal storage, and a 4000mAh battery with 15w wired charging. While the Exynos 9611 may be a generation old (Samsung’s current mid-range Exynos processor is the 5G-capable Exynos 980), the Galaxy A51 is capable of running today’s popular games smoothly. We tried playing Asphalt 9: Legends with the Galaxy A51 during our short time with it, and the experience was smooth even at high-quality graphics settings.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/24/2020
Source: Fone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 comes in a single 6GB RAM + 128GB storage option, is priced at Rs. 23,999, and is available on Samsung India e-Store, Flipkart, and Amazon.in. The A51 gets few things right like the great display, versatile camera setup, sleek design, and slim form factor. But it does not pack the power, considering Rs. 23,999 price point. One UI 2.0 is certainly clean and minimalistic, but on the Galaxy A51, the noticeable lag is a bit not up to the mark. Samsung’s own Galaxy M31 that costs Rs. 12,999 packs the same SoC. The pricing of the Galaxy A51 could have been competitive and considering this is positioned as a mid-range smartphone, Samsung could have packed in a powerful processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2020
Source: Tech Nave EN→FR Archive.org version
If you’re having trouble figuring out how to take a good photo, you might want to consider turning on Shot Suggestion which can help suggest where to point your camera for the perfect shot. With all that said, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is quite a capable and versatile midrange camera phone that can take surprisingly good pictures in almost any situation from macro to landscape photography.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/21/2020
Source: Tech PP EN→FR Archive.org version
After making it big with the Galaxy A50 and A50s, Samsung has now released the Galaxy A51. The brand has chosen not to tinker too much with the formula that worked with those two phones. But has increased its price. Do the additions to the package justify the increased price tag?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 70% performances: 80% finition: 70%
Source: NLT EN→FR Archive.org version
All in all, I am unable to recommend one smartphone over the other. They both do share some similarities, but the price scales alongside the performance, camera, and overall battery capacity. For example, if you want to play games on your smartphone – then the Galaxy A71 is great. Else, the Galaxy A51 is fine too.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/19/2020
Source: Stuff TV EN→FR Archive.org version
Others may offer stronger performance, battery life and camera results, but the Galaxy A51 is bursting with great features and excels for movies and music.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Gogi.in EN→FR Archive.org version
Pretty impressive device, comes with NFC / Samsung Pay and host of interesting features that are hard to find on other devices (do check the video review for more unique features). Price I feel is good enough considering the Samsung brand value.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/02/2020
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung Galaxy A51 is targeted at users looking for a mid-premium Android option. There’s a lot to like including the Infinity-O display, stylish design as well as good cameras and performance. This is a good buy for those willing to spend up to Rs 24,000. Those looking for alternatives can consider the Redmi K20 Pro, which now starts at Rs 24,999 and offers the better Snapdragon 855 processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/01/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
It has everything it needs for a mid-range phone right now, and yet it doesn’t for one that’s supposed to go strong into the latter stages of 2020. For a phone that the buyer may want to use for at least the next three years, the Galaxy A51 just doesn’t evoke the kind of confidence with its hardware to warrant an outright recommendation.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has launched the Galaxy A51 at a slightly higher price than the Galaxy A50s (Review) when it first debuted. For this extra money, you get a fourth rear camera, a more modern-looking hole-punch display, and more RAM. Currently, Samsung has only launched the 6GB variant in India, priced at Rs. 23,999. The company's website however mentions the existence of an 8GB RAM option, but that doesn't appear to be avialable yet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A51 offers a sensible package of features and performs well in most key areas. It's one of the lightest handsets in the segment while still having a big display and doesn't sacrifice battery life in the process. Typically for a Samsung, the A51's display leaves little to complain about too. A thorough upgrade in the camera department means good daylight photos from all cameras, with particularly great portraits and a 'macro' cam that's hard to beat. The up to date software at launch, complete with added features which used to be reserved for the flagships until only recently, rounds up a compelling list of pros.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Phone Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Yes, it’s a nice-looking phone that offers a beautiful AMOLED display and very good battery life, and we don’t mind the plastic build at all, but the new cameras don’t offer much of an improvement and are far less capable than the cameras on the rival Pixel 3a, or even iPhone 7. Worse yet, the performance is underwhelming and the phone often stutters when presented with a slightly more difficult task.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/31/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A51 comes loaded with a host of interesting features. The Infinity-O display looks good and the new features like useful cards and more seems to be interesting. The camera performance is yet to be tested out. Sadly, the older generation processor might hamper the performance. So, stay tuned with us as we will talk in-depth about the Galaxy A51 in our upcoming review.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/30/2020
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
Compared to predecessors, the Samsung Galaxy A51 brings incremental upgrades in terms of performance, design and imaging. However, its new user interface has surprise elements that improve the user experience a lot, making it a better than peers and predecessors. It is important to note that the Galaxy A51 enjoys this exclusivity until these software-related features are rolled out as part of software upgrade to the Samsung smartphones of previous generations. Once that happens, the Galaxy A51 will lose its charm.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/29/2020
Source: Phone World EN→FR Archive.org version
After reading my review, you must thinking about purchasing this smartphone. Certainly this smartphone deserves a chance. I’m pretty sure that Galaxy A 51 will stun the market in terms of sale. I have used this phone and keenly observed all its features. And i’m really impressed. So my final thought on Galaxy A 51 is that it’s worth buying.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/21/2020
Source: Hitech Century EN→FR Archive.org version
Keeping it juiced is a large 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging via a USB Type-C port. In Malaysia, the Galaxy A71 ships in three colours – Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Black and Prism Crush Blue. The chassis is also done up in glasstic so it has properties akin to the A51, with a light carry weight and a mirrored finish that bears up to casual inspection. No word on price or exact launch dates yet but we’ll keep you posted.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/18/2020
Source: Sam Mobile EN→FR Archive.org version
No device will ever be perfect, and there’s always going to be room for improvement. I would have loved to see a beefier processor, faster charging for the battery, a better loudspeaker, and even a telephoto camera. But these devices have to exist within their own realities and to that extent, the Galaxy A51 is quite possibly one of the best smartphones in its category.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/14/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 might be affordable (It’ll retail for £329 in the UK) but it still packs enough ‘flagship’ features to make it seem like a great buy. As long as you don’t mind a phone that feels very plasticky, that is.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/11/2020
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A51 appears to get the mix right when it comes to features vs price point, and it's a smartphone you should definitely keep an eye on this year as it could be an affordable handset champion.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2020
Source: Nextpit Germany DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/07/2021
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/21/2021
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: WinFuture DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/26/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/19/2021
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/30/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Computerbild DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 92% écran: 90% mobilité: 94%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 92% écran: 92% mobilité: 94%
Source: Techtest.org DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/22/2020
Source: Inside Handy DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Android User DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/24/2020
Source: Cyberbloc DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/13/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/08/2020
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 70% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Curved DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: WinFuture DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/12/2020
Source: A1 Blog DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/10/2020
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/02/2020
Source: Profesional Review ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 75% écran: 85% mobilité: 80% finition: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Newesc ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 80% performances: 70% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Newesc ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82% prix: 80% performances: 70% écran: 95% mobilité: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/18/2020
Notes: Note globale: 84% équipement: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%
Source: Tuexperto ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/09/2020
Source: Xataka ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/06/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 85% finition: 85%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/05/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Hipertextual ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/05/2020
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/19/2020
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/13/2020
Notes: Note globale: 89% équipement: 75% écran: 92% mobilité: 95% finition: 95%
Source: PC Guia PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 70%
Source: Android Geek PT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/24/2020
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 60% équipement: 75% écran: 85% mobilité: 75% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/30/2020
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 68% finition: 70%
Source: Tutto Android IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2020
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 65% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/25/2020
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 64% équipement: 84%
Source: Techzine NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/20/2020
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/29/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Diskidee.nl NL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/27/2019
Source: 90 Sekund PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/14/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74% prix: 60% équipement: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/23/2020
Notes: Note globale: 72% performances: 55% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/18/2020
Source: Teknolojioku TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/18/2020
Source: Chip Online TR TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/21/2020
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: HWP.com.tr TR→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/10/2020
Notes: Note globale: 81%
Source: Helpix RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2020
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: i2Hard RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/14/2020
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/11/2020
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/18/2020
Source: DGL.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/13/2020
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/25/2019
Notes: Note globale: 69% performances: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 83% équipement: 81% mobilité: 84% finition: 86%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/04/2020
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 83% équipement: 81% mobilité: 84% finition: 86%
Source: CNews.cz CZ→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/30/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/11/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/02/2020
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/01/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/09/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/17/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/31/2020
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/13/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/10/2020
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Hands-On, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/08/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/07/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/28/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/20/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/19/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/05/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/20/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/16/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/09/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/09/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/03/2020
Source: Techtimes.vn VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/03/2020
Notes: Note globale: 91% performances: 89% écran: 93% mobilité: 88% finition: 92%
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/01/2020
Source: VNReview VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/31/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/29/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/27/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/25/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/25/2019
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/24/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/24/2019
Source: Tinh Te VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/24/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/21/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/21/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/19/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/18/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/18/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/17/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/16/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/16/2019
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/15/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/14/2019
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/14/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/13/2019
Source: Danviet VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/13/2019
Source: Cell Phones VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/13/2019
Source: Zing VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/12/2019
Source: Jagat Review ID→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/31/2020
Source: Mobil DK DA→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/11/2020
Notes: Note globale: 68% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/07/2020
Notes: Note globale: 74%
Source: Playtech.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/27/2020
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/01/2020
Source: Computerblog.ro →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/10/2020
Commentaire
ARM Mali-G72 MP3:
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Exynos 9611:
SoC du milieu de gamme qui intègre 8 curs processeurs dans deux clusters : quatre curs ARM Cortex-A73 qui montent à 2,3 GHz, et 4 curs ARM Cortex-A53 économes en énergie qui montent à 1,7 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.50": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
74.49%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.