Nokia 4.2

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Nokia 4.2

60% Test Du Nokia 4.2 : Peut-Il Rivaliser Avec Les Derniers Smartphones Chinois?
Source: Frandroid Archive.org version
Soyons clairs, le Nokia 4.2 n'offre pas un bon rapport qualité/prix. S'il souffre, c'est d'abord à cause de la concurrence très agressive, mais aussi parce qu'indépendamment, ses performances sont très limitées tout comme l'expérience photo. Android One permet une expérience proche de l'OS de Google ce qui plaira à certain·e·s et moins à d'autres puisque cela peut manquer d'éléments de personnalisation. De plus, le suivi des mises à jour semble s'être arrêté au mois de février. Donc l'avantage mis en avant par la marque tombe un peu à l'eau. Enfin, s'il jouit d'une belle autonomie, il faut faire preuve d'une grande patience pour le recharger. Face à un Redmi Note 7, difficile de le défendre.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 07/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 60% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 60%

Critiques dans des langues étrangères

Nokia 4.2 review
Source: Android Guys EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, the Nokia 4.2 is a solid entry to the budget market for HMD Global. The price of $189 pits it squarely against the likes of the Moto E6, Samsung A20, and Huawei Honor 8x. Even with this low-end market becoming crowded, Nokia has a real contender with the Android One powered device. With solid construction, a dedicated Google Assistant button, and that beautiful LED notification light, we see a phone with a quirky attitude that stands out.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/04/2019

45% Nokia 4.2 (2019) review
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→FR Archive.org version
The thing that sticks with me about the Nokia 4.2 is the sense of presentation and pomp. It’s rare to find a phone this cheap that looks this good, let alone one that ticks so many boxes. On paper, it’s a $299 phone that feels like it could maybe be a $599 phone. Unfortunately, that taciturn impression only really last until you spend any real time relying on the device. The Nokia 4.2 is an OK budget phone that looks like the real deal but mostly ends up saddled by the same old trade-offs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2019
Notes: Note globale: 45%

Nokia 4.2 and 2.2: The best phones for under $300
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→FR Archive.org version
Overall, these aren’t the first phones I’d recommend to most people, but if you’re looking for a device that gets the job done at a really low price, these two devices are a great option. I found myself able to do everything with both smartphones that I can with a flagship device like the Pixel 3 or the OnePlus 7 Pro, just a bit slower. That means I was streaming music, browsing social media or the web, watching YouTube and answering emails with ease. The 4.2 handles all of these tasks like a champion, while the 2.2 takes more time to do them. Still, both phones are entirely passable. If you’re a heavy phone user, maybe the 4.2 is more your speed. Once again, if you’re looking for a low-cost handset that can do everything a flagship can, these are likely your best bet. Although, don’t expect to be taking amazing pictures.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/22/2019

60% Nokia 4.2 Review – its it budget or mid-range?
Source: Ausdroid EN→FR Archive.org version
One the one hand, the overall design of the Nokia 4.2 makes it feel and look like a mid to high range device. However, design and looks are one thing. It’s the overall experience that also counts. From a function, user experience, camera and performance, I would say it’s more a budget end and that disappoints me as I feel the Nokia 4.2 could have been so much more. Honesty, based on the price alone and performance, you can easily find better devices that will offer both great design, slightly better or enhanced performance and better camera software if you’re willing to spend the extra $50 to $200. Think of say the Huawei Nova 3e or the OPPO AX5s or AX7. All these devices offer something similar albeit without Android One OS or NFC.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/31/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

60% Nokia 4.2 review: Glowy buttons and Google brilliance for under $200
Source: Android Central EN→FR Archive.org version
Android One makes this one of the more reliable buys you can make under $200 — especially here in the US, where Android One phones are still fairly rare — and Nokia's been consistent with its updates and support over the last two years. If you want an unlocked phone you can rely on without blowing $400 on a Pixel 3a, you could do a lot worse than the Nokia 4.2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/27/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

70% Nokia 4.2 review
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
The 4.2 has shown that Nokia can still produce good hardware, and combined with the slick user interface on Android One it provides an enjoyable user experience. This fully featured modern handset produces consistently solid performance, with above average cameras and impressive battery life. However, it is let down by a low resolution screen, poor implementation of biometrics and some stubborn design choices.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/26/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%

Nokia 4.2 review: A lightweight, good-looking device stuck in a time warp
Source: Business Standard EN→FR Archive.org version
Compare the specifications of sub-12k phones and Nokia 4.2 won’t even make it to the Top 5 in its price segment. It doesn’t have the best screen or the camera, neither does it have the fastest processor or the biggest battery. But somewhere in its mediocrity lies its unique strength.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/25/2019

60% Nokia 4.2 Review
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 4.2 aims to build on the momentum created by some of its well-received siblings such as the Nokia 6.1 Plus (Review) and the Nokia 7 Plus ₹ 25,410 (Review), but fails on multiple grounds. The phone definitely looks and feels good, and many people will appreciate the stock Android experience. The inclusion of the notification LED around the power button is also clever, but that's the end of this phone's advantages.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/24/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 60% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%

60% Nokia 4.2 review: The stock budget phone
Source: Gadgets Now EN→FR Archive.org version
Nokia 4.2 has got a plain yet eye-catching and compact design. The build quality is impressive barring the placement of the Google Assistant and the power buttons. Though some security features like face unlock take an extra one-two seconds to unlock the device and navigating through the apps is a tad slow, we hope that the issues will get fixed with a software update. The UI is bloatware-free and the icons look crisp and punchy. The cameras, when used in bright sunlight and when indoors under artificial light, gave natural and mostly sharp photos. Low-light camera performance is what Nokia 4.2 is weak in.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/16/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

66% Nokia 4.2 Review
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
For those of you on a budget and with moderate expectations, the Nokia 4.2 is your fast track to a clean Android experience with the promise of regular software updates for up to two years from now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/10/2019
Notes: Note globale: 66%

66% Nokia 4.2 Review: A Decent Everyday Performer For Stock Android Lovers
Source: Tech2 EN→FR Archive.org version
For a more hardcore user, I'd suggest you look at Redmi Y3, Realme 3 if you're unwilling to flinch with your budget. But if you are willing to spend 2-3 k more, you do get much more capable budget devices to choose from like the Redmi Note 7 Pro (review) and the Realme 3 Pro (review). The Xiaomi Mi A2 (review) is also a phone you could consider if you're adamant that you want a phone which offers a stock Android One experience. The Mi A2 also offers a far more capable camera performance in comparison.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 66% performances: 65% écran: 65% mobilité: 65% finition: 75%

70% Nokia 4.2 review: A compact phone for a budget price
Source: The Indian Express EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 4.2 is a budget device which is compact and looks premium. For its price range, the phone stands out because of its design, clean UI (stock Android) and smooth performance. People who want a small compact handset and prefer stock Android can consider Nokia 4.2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/08/2019
Notes: Note globale: 70%

75% Nokia 4.2 review: Premium and compact Android One phone on a budget
Source: India Today EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 4.2 is one of the better looking phones that you'll find at around Rs 10,000. The glass design combined with some really attractive colours, especially the Pink Sand option will no doubt find a lot of takers. The fact that you're also getting a device with a waterdrop display and stock Android Pie are some of the bonuses here.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/07/2019
Notes: Note globale: 75%

66% Nokia 4.2 Review
Source: Think Digit EN→FR Archive.org version
For those of you on a budget and with moderate expectations, the Nokia 4.2 is your fast track to a clean Android experience with the promise of regular software updates for up to two years from now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/07/2019
Notes: Note globale: 66%

Nokia 4.2 First Impressions: Compact Design, Pure Android experience on a budget!
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→FR Archive.org version
To conclude, the Nokia 4.2 is surely a premium-looking smartphone and it feels solid when you hold it in your hand. The pure Android is a delight for those who want to experience without spending too much on Pixel phones. The processor seems to be an underdog, while the camera seems to be promising. As for the competition, it will face stiff competition with the likes of Xiaomi Redmi Y3, Realme 3, Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 and Zenfone Max M2.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/07/2019

Hands on: Nokia 4.2 review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
The Nokia 4.2 appears to offer great value for money with a solid feature set and stylish design at an attractive price point.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/24/2019

Nokia 4.2, 3.2, 1 Plus and 210 hands-on review
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
We really like what HMD is doing with the Nokia brand in both the middle and higher range and we applaud the company for its grit and dedication that it takes to be successful in this business. Keep it up, HMD - just be cautious, because rapid growth is a double edged sword.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/24/2019

Nokia 4.2 Trotz Schick nur 2. Wahl
Source: Tech Stage DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/13/2019

81% Nokia 4.2 Lange Akkulaufzeit und viel Glas
Source: Chip.de DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/14/2019
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 87% équipement: 77% écran: 83% mobilité: 92%

60% Nokia 4.2 Review: A Budget Phone, But No Bargain
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/26/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

Recenzja Nokia 4.2. Co ma do zaoferowania poza czystym Androidem?
Source: Antyweb PL→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/30/2019

Обзор плюсов и минусов смартфона Nokia 4.2. Компактный бюджетник с NFC
Source: Mega Obzor RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/28/2019

Обзор Nokia 4.2: компактный смартфон, где есть все, что пожелаете
Source: DGL.ru RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/05/2019

60% Обзор Nokia 4.2. «Чистый» Android с кнопкой Google недорого
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/02/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60% performances: 40% écran: 50% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%

Đánh giá Nokia 4.2: Thiết kế nhỏ gọn, cấu hình ổn, camera kép
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/16/2019

Đánh giá nhanh Nokia 4.2: Chỉ vừa đủ đáp ứng nhu cầu cơ bản người dùng
Source: FPT shop VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2019

Có nên mua Nokia 4.2 không?
Source: Viettelstore VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/08/2019

60% Nokia 4.2
Source: Tek.no NO→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/13/2019
Notes: Note globale: 60%

66% Nokia 4.2 testad - Bastelefon
Source: Mobil.se SV→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/18/2019
Notes: Note globale: 66%

62% Review Nokia 4.2 – Android One si cam atat
Source: Arena IT →FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/22/2019
Notes: Note globale: 62% prix: 40% performances: 50% écran: 60% mobilité: 50% finition: 90%

Commentaire

Qualcomm Adreno 505:

Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

SD 439:

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

5.71": Avec 4,9 pouces, on commence à s’attaquer aux smartphones à grand écran. Cette taille d’écran reste néanmoins très répandue.

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).

64.62%: Une note aussi moyenne est rare. Il y a peu d'ordinateurs portables aussi mauvais.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Ordinateurs portables avec la même carte graphique

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids