Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M

 Helio A22 MT6762M

Le Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M est un SoC ARM du bas du milieu de gamme pour les smartphones (principalement Android) lancé en 2018. Il intègre quatre cœurs ARM Cortex-A53 cadencés à 2 GHz, ainsi qu'une puce graphique PowerVR GE6320 montant à 650 MHz. Le contrôleur mémoire intégré prend en charge la RAM LPDDR4x-3200 (maximum 6 Go). Un module LTE cat. 7 en réception (300 Mbit/s) et cat. 13 en envoi (150 Mbit/s) et Wifi 802.11 a/b/g/n est intégré.

Nom de codeCortex-A53
Gamme Mediatek Helio 20

Gamme: Mediatek Helio 20 Cortex-A53

Mediatek Helio P252.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A251.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67572.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT67622 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67612 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Fréquence2000 MHz
Nombres de cœurs/threads simultanés supportés4 / 4
Lithographie (procédé de fabrication)16 nm
FonctionnalitésPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200
Carte graphiquePowerVR GE8320
64 BitPrend en charge les instructions 64 Bit
ArchitectureARM
Date de présentation02/01/2018
Lien redirigeant vers une page externe du produitwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14128     moyenne: 14475     médian: 14475 (12%)     maximum: 14822 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 763     moyenne: 851     médian: 851 (8%)     maximum: 939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 807     moyenne: 875     médian: 875 (10%)     maximum: 943 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
538 points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
825 points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10740     moyenne: 10817     médian: 10817 (13%)     maximum: 10894 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4332     moyenne: 4355     médian: 4355 (4%)     maximum: 4378 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 30     moyenne: 32     médian: 32 (6%)     maximum: 34 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
51633 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
5659 Points (17%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
18552 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
7993 Points (2%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
29549 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
61753 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15291 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4118 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
34075 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
79125 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
66909 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6194     moyenne: 6607     médian: 6606.5 (33%)     maximum: 7019 Points
- Amplitude des valeurs obtenues dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
red legend - Valeur moyenne obtenue dans le benchmark avec cette carte graphique
* Plus les chiffres sont petits, plus les performances sont élevées

v1.28
log 20. 00:34:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:30:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.008s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 10951 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#15 got single benchmarks 10951 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.393s ... 0.415s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.415s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.415s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparaison des processeurs pour ordinateur portable
Comparaison de tout les processeurs mobiles

 

» Processeurs mobiles - liste des benchmarks
Liste des benchmarks de l'intégralité des processeurs pour portables

 

Les autres processeurs de la gamme Mediatek Helio 20

» MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X
   10x 2.6 GHz
» Mediatek Helio X25 MTK6797T
   10x 2.5 GHz
» Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797
   10x 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P25
   8x 2.6 GHz
» Mediatek Helio A25
   8x 1.8 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T
   8x 2.3 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
   4x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
   4x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
   4x 1.8 GHz

Processeurs similaires

+ Samsung Exynos 5410 Octa
   8x 1.6 GHz
+ Intel Atom Z3480
   2x 2.13 GHz
+ Intel Atom x3-C3440
   4x 1.2 GHz - 1.4 GHz
+ Samsung Exynos 5260 Hexa
   6x 1.7 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
   4x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
   4x 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
   4x 2 GHz
- Mediatek MT8766B
   4x 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
   4x 1.8 GHz
- Mediatek MT8135
   4x 1.7 GHz
- Rockchip RK3566
   4x - 2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-04-10)